Published at : 24 Dec 2024
Volume : IJtech
Vol 15, No 6 (2024)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v15i6.7116
Meyliana Wulandari | Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences, State Islamic University (UIN) Syarif Hidyatullah Jakarta, Jl. Ir H. Juanda No. 95, Ciputat, Banten 15412, Indonesia |
Zahratussaadah Zahratussaadah | Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, State Islamic University (UIN) Syarif Hidyatullah Jakarta, Jl. Ir H. Juanda No. 95, Ciputat, Banten 15412, Indonesia |
Andreas Andreas | Research Centre for Chemistry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Kawasan Puspiptek, Building 452, Serpong, Banten 15314, Indonesia |
Roza Adriany | Research Centre for Chemistry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Kawasan Puspiptek, Building 452, Serpong, Banten 15314, Indonesia |
Nofrizal Nofrizal | Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources – Lemigas, Jl. Ciledug Raya Kavling. 109, Jakarta 12230, Indonesia |
Mardiana Saaid | School of Chemical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Penang, Malaysia |
Javier Urraca | Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain |
Black
tea is known to contain condensed tannins including catechin (C), epicatechin
(EC), and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), as well as caffeine (CAF). Some
consumers of specific diets avoid consuming tannins or CAF. Therefore, this
study aimed to explore the fast and simple development of a method for
separating and quantifying tannins and CAF in black tea using microwave-assisted
extraction (MAE) followed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
analysis. MAE, a type of solid-phase extraction recently developed, was used
with a modified microwave that simultaneously accommodates up to 24 samples.
The effects of various MAE parameters, including microwave irradiation power,
temperature, and solvent, were studied, with concentrations measured in mg/kg.
The results showed that optimal extraction conditions were achieved at a
microwave irradiation power of 1500 W, a temperature of 80°C, and methanol as
the extraction solvent. The extracted samples were analyzed using a C18-M-SE
reverse phase column (150 × 4.6 mm) with a mobile phase consisting of
acetonitrile, methanol, and H3PO4 (1:49:50), and NaH2PO4 (20 mM) at pH 2.5. The
three tannin compounds and CAF were separated in less than 10 min. The method
demonstrated excellent repeatability (RSD ? 2%, n = 3), accuracy (96.7-102.5%),
and was successfully applied to determine tannin content in commercial black
tea samples.
Black tea; Caffeine; Catechin; Epicatechin; Epigallocatechin gallate
Black
tea is among the most favorite teas (Zhang,
Qi, and Mine, 2019) and has many health benefits,
including antioxidants, anti-inflammatory, anti-obesity, and anti-cancer effects
as well as preventing high blood pressure (Durgawale,
Durgawale, and Khanwelkar 2016). The benefits are due to the components,
such as tannins, flavonoids, phenolic acids, caffeine (CAF), amino acids, and
other compounds (Shaukat
et al., 2023). The most crucial component is
tannins (Naveed
et al., 2018). Tannins are phenol derivatives
soluble in water
C has been studied
for pharmacological properties, including antihypertensive, anti-oxidative,
anti-carcinogenic, and preventing dental caries (Rana et al., 2016). EGCG is reportedly capable of suppressing brain
dysfunction (Pervin et al., 2019), and also the component with the highest
antioxidant and free-radical-scavenging properties. It has 25 times more
antioxidant activity than vitamin E and 100 times more than vitamin C, hence,
EGCG can be an anti-cancer agent (Chen et al., 2020). EC (flavan-3-ols) is a potential
antioxidant with significant biological, pharmacological, and medicinal
properties (Shay et al., 2015). CAF is the most significant component of tea, hence,
when measuring tannin concentration, CAF is always detected (Zhang et al., 2020). Appropriate consumption drives away
drowsiness, relieves fatigue, and stimulates the nerves (Iswanto et al., 2023). High intake of CAF also has many side
effects that can damage human health because of stimulatory effects but it is
an essential factor in the quality of tea (Saraiva et al., 2023).
Aside from the
benefits, tannins also have adverse effects. People with iron deficiency should
not consume excessive amounts of tannins because it potentially inhibits the reduction of iron from food (Delimont, Haub, and Lindshield, 2017). CAF is a stimulant that causes sleep
disorders, anxiety, and increased heart rate (O’callaghan, Muurlink, and Reid, 2018). The daily standard for CAF consumption has been
set by The Scientific Committee on Food of the European Commission at 150 mg L-1
(Turck et al., 2022). Therefore,
this study significantly contributes to the beverage industry by providing a
method to separate and determine the concentrations of tannins and CAF
in tea. The developed method also offers an alternative to existing methods. Tea producers can better tailor products to
consumer preferences by separating CAF and tannins.
Tannins and CAF separation methods
from the matrix are required for sample analysis. Naturally, the sample
contains other interfering compounds that can interfere with the measurements. The
analyte concentration is also usually on a micro or nano-scale, hence, a fast
and simple separation method is needed before the sample is injected into
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The separation methods include Soxhlet
(Ruiz-Aquino et al., 2023), liquid-liquid (Chaugule et al., 2019), and solid-phase extraction (Martins et al., 2020). A standard method for tannins and CAF separation is
liquid-liquid extraction. This method requires large volumes of solvent and a
long extraction time to produce large volumes of organic solvent for disposal (Wangkarn et al., 2021; Das et al., 2020) which is not in
accordance with the principles of green chemistry. Molecular imprinting
technology has been reported to separate CAF. However, this method does not determine
the concentration of tannins and CAF in tea (Mehamod et al., 2015). In this context, supercritical carbon
dioxide fluid extraction (SFE) has also been applied (Serdar Demir, and Sökmen, 2019) but this method uses
chlorinated solvents, which harm the environment. Microwave-assisted extraction
(MAE) is a type of solid-phase extraction that has recently been developed due
to the cheapness, specificity, fastness, accuracy, preciseness, and robustness
of various molecules (Aparamarta et al., 2019). MAE using non-chlorinated solvents such
as methanol and acetonitrile is a suitable method for extracting tannins from
biomass in a short time and with excellent recovery (Ciuperca et al., 2023; Brantsen et al., 2021; Silva et al., 2021). Following capillary electrophoresis, the method has been used to
determine C and EC from green tea, producing extraction recoveries of more than
100% (Li et al., 2010).
Several analytical
methods have been used to determine tannins and CAF concentration. The
simplest method has been reported using an ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis)
spectrophotometer (Loum, Byamukama, and Wanyama, 2020). Advanced methods, such as liquid
chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass
spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), are used to analyze tannins. These methods provide
more reliable quantitative and qualitative data with improved analytical
accuracy and precision but are expensive. HPLC (Rahim,
Nofrizal, and Saad, 2014) is the primary method used to determine tea tannins
and CAF. Fast analytical
methods have been developed in the past few years. A simple tannins and CAF determination method
is adapted from the initial screening chromatogram, then the mobile phase
composition is varied, changing the flow rate, temperature, and other
measurement conditions. Due to the demand for fast and accurate separations
from chromatography, optimizing separation conditions is still an art.
Different separation methods and equipment produce various separations.
This study presents the relationship between initial screening chromatograms and rapid separation of tannins (C, EC, EGCG) with optimized CAF (Figure 1) using MAE method on black tea samples to produce optimal separation rates. The microwave has been modified to accommodate the simultaneous extraction of up to 24 samples. The modification made was increasing the number of cells. A previous study used 6 sample cells for extraction (Rahim, Nofrizal, and Saad, 2014), while 24 cells were used in this study to make extraction more efficient (see Figure 2).
Figure 1 Molecular structure of C, EC, EGCG, and CAF
Therefore, the developed method can
separate tannins and caffein compounds faster. Several extraction parameters,
such as temperature, microwave irradiation power, and solvent composition, have
been optimized to obtain separation conditions for tannins and caffein
compounds at mg g-1 levels. A previous study used microwave
irradiation power in the 300-600 W range and high temperatures. The result
showed that Malaysian green tea tannins and CAF extraction have good separation
(Rahim,
Nofrizal, and Saad, 2014), but the DBS
Hypersil gold C-18 monolithic column used is expensive. Therefore, in this
study, the extraction of tannins and CAF from Indonesian black tea was reported
using a C18-M-SE reverse phase column (150 × 4.6 mm) that can be found in
standard laboratories due to the lower price. MAE temperatures (60-90 oC) and
irradiation power (1200-1800 W) were optimized for highly efficient extraction.
The optimized procedure was validated through recovery and comparison with
previous results to determine tannins in black tea samples.
2.1. Chemical and Reagents
Figure 2 24 Microwave assisted extraction cells side view (A) and top view (B).
This cell is placed in a microwave to extract tannins and CAF from black tea
2.2. Apparatus
Black tea sample extraction was
conducted using a microwave (Mars 6, CEM Corporation, USA), as shown in Figure
2. Chromatographic analysis was carried out with an HPLC (Agilent 1260 Infinity
Quaternary LC) equipped with diode array detector (DAD). A C18 reverse phase
VDSpher PUR 100 C-18-M-SE (150 × 4.6 mm for length vs inner diameter) with particle
size of 3 µm and pore size of 100 Å. The column was purchased from Germany and
used as the analytical column.
2.3. Preparation of Sample and Sample Extraction Method
Black tea samples were ground
with mortar and pestle then passed through a 20-mesh sieve (The Cary Company,
USA). After grinding, 100 g of sample was dried in an oven at 40°C for 24
hours. A 2 g sub-sample was prepared and placed in the extraction vessel. For
extraction using the spike method, standard solutions of C,
EC, EGCG, and CAF in methanol (1 mg L-1) were added to the
sample. The recovery data was obtained from spiked
samples by adding 1 mL of a 25 mg L-1 tannin standard solution and
caffein mixture into a 25 mL volumetric flask.
MAE extraction stages include lean
(temperature increase), holding (temperature maintenance), and cooling. The
extraction time selected referred to previously reported studies (Ahmad
et al., 2023). The parameters to be studied
include microwave irradiation power (1200, 1500, and 1800 W), the extraction
temperature (60°C, 70°C, 80°C, and 90°C), and the extraction solvent (acetone,
methanol, water, and ethanol). The extract was diluted with extraction solvent
to 30 mL and then the solvent was evaporated at 90°C. The dried extract was
added with 1 mL of methanol and ready to be injected into HPLC.
2.4. The Analysis of high-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC)-diode
array detector (DAD)
The mobile phase composition used was acetonitrile/methanol/0.05 % H3PO4 1/49/50 (v/v/v) and 20 mM NaH2PO4 with pH 2.5 at a flow rate of 0.8 mL min-1 and injection volume of 8 µL. NaH2PO4 was weighed as 3.1202 grams, then dissolved in aqua millipore and adjusted to pH 2.5 using H3PO4 85%. The choice of mobile phase was based on the validated C separation method using a C18 HPLC reverse phase VDSpher PUR 100-C-18-E (150 x 4.6 mm for length vs inner diameter) with a particle size of 3.5 µm (Andreas et al., 2019). The column was maintained at ambient temperature and DAD was set at a wavelength of 210 nm. All the measurements were carried out in triplicate. Reverse phase chromatography is a separation method where the stationary phase is a nonpolar compound (C18) and the mobile/solvent phase is a polar compound.
Figure 3 shows HPLC
instrumentation where a peristaltic pump sets the solvent (mobile phase) flow
rate in mL/min. The analyte was injected, solvents produced tannins and CAF, then
the separation occurred in the column (stationary phase). The injector used is
the autosampler.
Figure 3 HPLC instrumentation with autosampler
3.1. HPLC Method Optimization
Separation of C, EC, EGCG, and CAF was carried out using a C18 column. Good separation resolution was obtained using a mobile phase composition of acetonitrile/methanol/0.05% H3PO4 1/49/50 (v/v/v) and 20 mM NaH2PO4 with pH 2.5, flow rate of 0.8 mL min-1 and a total analysis time of 10 min (Table 1). The average retention time (min ± SD., n = 10) under the condition was 6.000 ± 0.3 (C), 7.912 ± 0.3 (EGCG), 8.901 ± 0.3 (CAF), and 9.991 min ± 0.3 (EC) (Supplementary file). Previous studies have reported separating C, EGCG, and EC using a VDSpher Pur 100 C18-E column with the same mobile phase but the retention times obtained were longer. C, EGCG, and EC had retention times of 12.09, 12.98, and 13.75 min, respectively (Andreas et al., 2019). The difference in retention time from the previous study is because the larger the particle column size, the slower the separation. The column particle size of the previous study was 3.5 compared to 3.0 used in this experiment. Compared to this study, all the compounds can be determined in less than 10 min using an isocratic mode of the mobile phase, decreasing the analysis time per sample. Four compounds were separated with a resolution above 1.5, indicating that all the compounds are well-separated. Table 1 shows the retention time of black tea sample, with CAF having the highest peak height. This indicates that the concentration of CAF in black tea is the greatest.
Table 1 Retention time of
tannins and CAF in standard and sample solution
Retention time |
Compound | |
Standard solution |
Sample solution | |
6.0 |
5.9 |
catechin (C) |
7.9 |
8.2 |
epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) |
8.9 |
9.0 |
caffeine (CAF) |
9.9 |
9.8 |
epicatechin (EC) |
3.2.
Optimization of MAE for C, EGCG, CAF, and EC Extraction in Black Tea Method
3.1.1. MAE
Irradiation Power
Microwaves produced
electromagnetic waves that interacted with water molecules, polar solvents, and
other polar substances in the sample, causing rapid heating. Therefore, thermal
energy increased, as well as the process of dissolving tannins and CAF.
Extraction without the use of microwave irradiation takes a longer time.
Optimization of irradiation power is needed to obtain optimum conditions while
also avoiding tannins and CAF degradation. Figure 4 shows a series of samples
to study the effect of microwave irradiation on the % extraction recovery.
There was no significant color change when the power was increased from 1200,
1500, and 1800 W. However, the % recovery was optimum at 1500 W, and the
calculation was carried out using the results of HPLC measurements.
Figure 4 Black tea samples after
extraction with MAE using variations in irradiation power of 1200, 1500, and
1800 W
Figure 5 Extraction recoveries of C, EGCG, CAF, and EC
from black tea sample spiked at 1 mgL-1 using MAE and HPLC analysis
(n = 3) with various microwave irradiation power
MAE method in this study has
several advantages, including short extraction time, where it can
simultaneously extract samples in large quantities. Furthermore, the solvent
used in MAE is only a small amount (30 to 50 mL) compared to other extraction
methods. Previous study proved that extraction using MAE method produced the
highest tannins concentration, compared to maceration, reflux, and
ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) methods with concentrations of 0.41% each,
0.45%, 0.65% respectively (Zhang
Lin, and Ye, 2018). Therefore, MAE has advantages over other
extraction methods.
3.1.2. Extraction
temperature
C, EGCG, CAF, and EC extraction
using MAE were strongly influenced by temperature. Generally, temperature
affects the ability of the solvent to absorb microwave power. The temperatures
optimized in this study were 60°C, 70°C, 80°C, and 90°C. The extraction
temperature used was only up to 90°C because, according to a previous study (de
Hoyos-Martínez et al., 2019), higher temperatures cause lower tannins due
to stability. Moreover, selectivity was reduced in extraction, co-extracting
other substances in the sample.
Based on Figure 6, C, EGCG, CAF,
and EC recovery % increased from 60°C to 80°C, ranging from 76-97%. The highest
recovery % was at 80°C and decreased tannins levels at 90°C. Generally, high
temperatures can increase tannins and CAF concentration. An increase in
intermolecular interactions in the solvent causes a rise in the solubility,
leading to enhanced final recovery. Higher temperatures also affect pressure,
which causes bond rupture and increases the components to be extracted (Chaves
et al., 2020).
Figure 6 Extraction recoveries of C, EGCG, CAF, and EC
from black tea sample spiked at 1 mgL-1 using MAE and HPLC analysis
(n = 3) at different temperatures (60-90°C)
The optimum temperature for tannins at 80°C and degradation at
90°C is consistent with previous study. The results showed that the highest
tannins were at an optimum temperature of 80°C and decreased at 90°C (Handayani
et al., 2019).
3.1.3. Extraction
Solvent
Methanol, ethanol, water, and acetone were applied for MAE extraction solvent. These solvents were selected according to the solubility of C, EGCG, CAF, and EC in the sample without co-extracting other matrix components. Moreover, the polar solvents were selected due to the ability to easily absorb microwave energy. Polar solvents have molecules with permanent dipole moments that can interact with microwaves efficiently. The solvent molecules interact with the electric field of microwaves. This polarity causes the molecular dipoles to vibrate rapidly, producing heat when exposed to microwave radiation. Solvents with high dielectric constants, such as methanol (: 23.9) and ethanol (: 24.3), can absorb microwave energy more efficiently than non-polar ones. Although less polar than methanol and ethanol, acetone has a sufficient dielectric constant (: 21.1) to absorb microwave heat.
Figure 7 Extraction
recoveries of C, EGCG, CAF, and EC from black tea sample spiked at 1 mgL-1
using MAE and HPLC analysis (n = 3) with various solvent extraction.
The extraction recoveries of C,
EGCG, CAF, and EC from black tea samples spiked at 1 mgL-1 using MAE
and HPLC analysis (n = 3) with various extraction solvents are shown in Figure
7. Excellent recoveries were obtained for C, EGCG, and CAF in methanol, ranging
from 97% to 100%. The extraction recoveries were slightly reduced when ethanol
and water were used as solvents. Acetone as an extraction solvent showed a high
reduction in recovery. Tannins are considered polyphenolic compounds with polarity
properties due to the presence of many hydroxyl groups (-OH), which increase
solubility. Methanol has very high polarity compared to ethanol and acetone, hence,
it forms stronger hydrogen interactions with the hydroxyl groups of tannins.
Methanol smaller molecular size
than ethanol and acetone allows faster diffusion into the material matrix
during extraction, leading to the selection as the optimum solvent. Water can
also dissolve tannins due to the polarity but precipitates in large aggregates,
making it less effective for pure extraction. Methanol is more effective in
dissolving tannins than ethanol, acetone, and water due to the high polarity,
ability to form strong hydrogen bonds with hydroxyl groups, small molecular
size, and better interaction with functional groups. Although other solvents,
such as water and ethanol, can be used, methanol provides more efficient
extraction results due to the more suitable physicochemical properties.
A previous study (Bhebhe et al., 2016) stated that in black tea, water was found as
the most optimal solvent with the highest total phenol concentration, and the
lowest was achieved with acetone. Another study (Anand
et al., 2015) proved that extraction using methanol
for green tea samples produced the highest total phenol concentration while the
lowest was recorded with ethanol.
3.1.4. Performance of the Analytical Method
HPLC method developed has been
validated for the linearity, limit of detection (LOD),
limit of quantification (LOQ), precision, and accuracy. A linear calibration
curve was obtained by plotting the peak area vs standard concentration, ranging
from 0.5-20 mg L-1. The coefficient of determination for C, EGCG,
CAF, and EC ranged from 0.9926 to 0.9999. In conclusion, all the analytes showed
good linearity.
LOD and LOQ were calculated based
on a signal-to-noise ratio of 3:1 and 10:1 (Shrivastava
and Gupta, 2011). The calculations were based on
measurements of blank samples spiked with 1 mg L-1 of each standard
(Table 2). LOD for the four compounds ranged from 0.1-0.2 mg L-1
range, while LOQ was between 0.35-0.59 mg L-1. A previous study also
found the range of LOD and LOQ at the mg L-1 level (Rahim,
Nofrizal, and Saad, 2014). Data observations for the repeatability and reproducibility of the
peak areas were obtained by injecting each standard mixture (1, 5, and 10 mg L-1)
on the same day (intra-day) and for three consecutive days (inter-day). The
repeatability was obtained from relative standard deviation (RSD) value for n =
3. RSD value < 2.5% was found for all experiments, as shown in Table 2.
Table 2 Limit of detection, limit of
quantification, and precision using MAE and HPLC
Analyte |
Linear range (mgL-1) |
R2 |
LOD (mgL-1) |
LOQ (mgL-1) |
Intra-day (%RSD), n = 3 |
Inter-day (%RSD), n = 3 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Fortified concentration level
(mg L-1) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
5 |
10 |
1 |
5 |
10 | ||
C |
0.5-20 |
0.996 |
0.12 |
0.41 |
1.12 |
1.35 |
1.24 |
1.40 |
1.30 |
1.82 | ||
EGCG |
0.5-20 |
0.993 |
0.11 |
0.35 |
1.29 |
2.28 |
1.86 |
1.90 |
1.43 |
2.46 | ||
CAF |
0.5-20 |
0.998 |
0.20 |
0.59 |
1.48 |
1.35 |
1.61 |
1.10 |
1.15 |
2.35 | ||
EC |
0.5-20 |
0.996 |
0.17 |
0.59 |
2.06 |
1.41 |
1.74 |
1.85 |
2.05 |
1.70 | ||
The optimized MAE and HPLC methods were applied to determine
tannins and CAF in one commercial black tea sample. C, EGCG, CAF, and EC
concentrations were determined using the external standard calibration curve
method, and analysis was carried out in triplicate. Based on the calculated
data, the concentrations obtained were 61.91, 393.1, 582.9, and 159.8 mg kg-1,
respectively (Table 3).
C concentration in black tea
sample was the lowest. This is due to maximum oxidation and changes in C, which
turns into the aflavin and the arubigin during fermentation (Abudureheman
et al., 2022). The highest concentration in
black tea sample was CAF. Generally, CAF concentration depends on the origin of
the tea and the processing process (Deka
et al., 2021). A comparative extraction study
with previous investigations is shown in Table 4. This study showed a better
efficiency in terms of recoveries and consumed time per sample, than other previous
studies.
Table 3 The concentration of C, EGCG,
CAF, EC in black tea sample
|
Fortified concentration (mg kg-1) |
Found concentration (mg kg-1) |
C |
61 |
62 ± 1.0 |
EGCG |
391 |
393 ± 2.3 |
CAF |
578 |
583 ± 3.0 |
EC |
161 |
160 ± 2.2 |
Table 4 Previous extraction method for
the analysis of tannins in tea
Extraction Method |
Sample |
Retention time (min) |
Extraction time (min) |
Extraction solvent |
Literature |
Maceration |
Green tea leaves |
C: 13.78; EC: 16.49; EGCG:
17.68 |
60 |
100 mL of 70 % ethanol |
(Maslov et al., 2021) |
Liquid-liquid extraction |
Turkish green tea |
C: 13; EC: 16.5; EGCG: 19 |
40 |
Citric acid water extraction |
(Demir, Serdar, and Sökmen, 2016) |
Supercritical carbon dioxide
fluid extraction |
Green tea |
CAF: 11.18; C: 16.44; EC:
20.60; EGCG: 22.03 |
4 |
ethanol: water mixture |
(Ruiz-Aquino et al., 2023) |
Solid phase extraction using N-
vinylpirolidon-divinylbenzen copolymer |
Wine and apple cider |
C: 15.9; EC: 19.4 |
20 |
10 mL of 70 % aqueous ethanol containing 1 % formic acid for
o |
(Tomaz and Maslov, 2016) |
Microwave assisted-extraction |
Black tea |
C: 5.991; EGCG: 8.201; CAF:
9.000; EC: 9.880 |
15 |
30 mL of methanol |
this study |
Conventional liquid-liquid
extraction including maceration, and separating funnel takes longer because
heat transfer occurs by conduction. Polar molecules absorb microwaves, leading
to vibration and generation of internal heat in the sample. The temperature in
the microwave can also be adjusted, in contrast to liquid-liquid extraction,
which depends on room temperature while maceration uses slow conventional
heating. In MAE, temperature can be precisely controlled during analyte
extraction, allowing users to achieve optimal temperatures in a shorter time.
In
conclusion, the determination of C, EGCG, CAF, and EC in black tea samples
using MAE and HPLC offers several advantages over other HPLC methods with
shorter retention times. Compared to other methods reported in the literature,
this process renders extraction times in 15 min with a fast separation
chromatography in 10 min. MAE extraction procedure significantly reduced the
sample preparation. It also showed excellent characteristics in terms of
precision and accuracy. The combination of MAE and HPLC in this study can be
used as an alternative method for determining tannins and CAF content. Based on
the result, measuring actual black tea samples showed that CAF concentration
was the highest while C was the lowest.
The authors are grateful for the chemicals and equipment support from the Chemical Research Center, Nanotechnology and Materials Research Organization, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
R2-CE-7116-20241012072741.docx | --- |
Abudureheman, B., Yu,
X., Fang, D., Zhang, H., 2022. Enzymatic Oxidation of Tea Catechins and its
Mechanism. Molecules, Volume 27(3), p. 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030942.
Ahmad, I., Narsa, A.C.,
Ramadhani, M.R., Zamruddin, N.M., Iswahyudi, I., Hajrah, H., Indriyanti, N.,
Arifuddin, M., Siska, S., Supandi, S., Ambarwati, N.S.S., 2023. Optimization of
Microwave-Assisted Extraction on Polyphenol Metabolite from Eleutherine Bulbosa
(Mill.) Urb. Bulbs Using Response Surface Methodology. Journal of Advanced
Pharmaceutical Technology & Research, Volume 14(2), pp. 113–118. https://doi.org/10.4103/japtr.japtr_613_22.
Amarowicz, R., Janiak,
M., 2018. Hydrolysable Tannins. Encyclopedia
of Food Chemistry, Volume 2019, pp. 337–343.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.21771-X.
Anand, J., Upadhyaya,
B., Rawat, P., Rai, N., 2015. Biochemical Characterization and Pharmacognostic
Evaluation of Purified Catechins in Green Tea (Camellia sinensis) Cultivars of
India. 3 Biotech, Volume 5(3), pp. 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-014-0230-0.
Andreas, A., Muzdalifah,
D., Udin, L.Z., Kurniawan, H.H., Zuas, O., Handayani, S., Filaila, E., 2019.
Validated Method for Direct Determination of Cathechins by High Performance
Liquid Chromatography. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, Volume 2094, p. 020008.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5097477.
Aparamarta, H.W.,
Gunawan, S., Azhar, B., Aditya, H.T., Widjaja, A., Ju, Y.H., 2019. Comparative
Study of Batchwise Solvent Extraction and the Microwave Assisted Extraction
Method for the Purification of Triglyceride for Biodiesel Feedstock from Crude
Calophyllum Inophyllum Oil (CCIO). International Journal of Technology, Volume
10(3), pp. 551–560. https://dx.doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i3.2920.
Bhebhe, M., Füller,
T.N., Chipurura, B., Muchuweti, M., 2016. Effect of Solvent Type on Total
Phenolic Content and Free Radical Scavenging Activity of Black Tea and Herbal
Infusions. Food Analytical Methods, Volume 9(4), pp. 1060–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0270-z.
Brantsen,
J.F., Herrman, D.A., Ravisankar, S., Awika, J.M., 2021. Effect
of Tannins on Microwave-Assisted Extractability and Color Properties of Sorghum
3-Deoxyanthocyanins. Food Research International, Volume 148, p. 110612.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110612.
Chaugule, A., Patil, H.,
Pagariya, S., Ingle, P., 2019. Extraction of Caffeine. International Journal
of Advanced Research in Chemical Science, Volume 6(9), pp. 11–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2349-0403.0609002.
Chaves, J.O., de Souza,
M.C., da Silva, L.C., Lachos-Perez, D., Torres-Mayanga, P.C., Machado, A.P. da
F., Forster-Carneiro, T., Vázquez-Espinosa, M., González-de-Peredo, A.V.,
Barbero, G.F., Rostagno, M.A., 2020. Extraction of Flavonoids from Natural Sources
Using Modern Techniques. Frontiers in Chemistry, Volume 8, p. 507887. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.507887.
Chen, B.H., Hsieh, C.H.,
Tsai, S.Y., Wang, C.Y., Wang, C.C., 2020. Anticancer Effects of
Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Nanoemulsion on Lung Cancer Cells Through the
Activation of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathway. Scientific
Reports, Volume 10(1), p. 5163. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62136-2.
Ciuperca, O.T., Ionescu,
E., Secula, M.S., Volf, I., 2023. Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Condensed
Tannins from Branches of Prunus spinosa L.: Response Surface Modeling and
Optimization. Processes, Volume 11(7), pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11072024.
Das, A.K., Islam, M.N.,
Faruk, M.O., Ashaduzzaman, M., Dungani, R., 2020. Review on Tannins: Extraction
Processes, Applications and Possibilities. South African Journal of Botany, Volume
135, pp. 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2020.08.008.
de Hoyos-Martínez, P.L.,
Merle, J., Labidi, J., Charrier–El Bouhtoury, F., 2019. Tannins Extraction: A
Key Point for Their Valorization and Cleaner Production. Journal of Cleaner
Production, Volume 206, pp. 1138–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.243.
Deka,
H., Sarmah, P.P., Devi, A., Tamuly, P., Karak, T., 2021. Changes
in Major Catechins, Caffeine, and Antioxidant Activity During CTC Processing of
Black Tea from North East India. RSC Advances, Volume 11(19), pp.
11457–11467. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra09529j.
Delimont, N.M., Haub,
M.D., Lindshield, B.L., 2017. The Impact of Tannin Consumption on Iron
Bioavailability and Status: A Narrative Review. Current Developments in
Nutrition, Volume 1(2), pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3945/cdn.116.000042.
Demir, E., Serdar, G.,
Sökmen, M., 2016. Comparison of Some Extraction Methods for Isolation of
Catechins and Caffeine from Turkish Green Tea. International Journal of
Secondary Metabolite, Volume 2(2), pp. 16–25. https://doi.org/10.21448/ijsm.240702.
Durgawale, T.P.,
Durgawale, P.P., Khanwelkar, C.C., 2016. Quantitative Estimation of Tannins by
HPLC. Der Pharmacia Lettre, Volume 8(3), pp. 123–126. (http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html).
Handayani, P.A.,
Chafidz, A., Ramadani, N.S., Kartika, D., 2019. Microwave Assisted Extraction
(MAE) Process of Tannin from Mangrove Propagules Waste as Natural Dye for
Coloring Batik Tulis. Key Engineering Materials, Volume 805, pp. 128–133.
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.805.128.
Ismail-Suhaimy, N.W.,
Gani, S.S.A., Zaidan, U.H., Halmi, M.I.E., Bawon, P., 2021. Optimizing
Conditions for Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Polyphenolic Content and
Antioxidant Activity of Barleria lupulina Lindl. Plants, Volume 10(4),
pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040682.
Iswanto, T., Shovitri,
M., Altway, A., Widjaja, T., Lisdiyanti, P., Putra, A.P., 2021. Assessment of
Caffeine-degrading Ability on Bacterial Strains Klebsiella sp. Isolated from
Feces of Asian Palm Civet (Luwak). International Journal of Technology, Volume
14(1), pp. 100-108. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v14i1.4982.
Li, Z., Huang, D., Tang,
Z., Deng, C., 2010. Microwave-Assisted Extraction Followed by CE for
Determination of Catechin and Epicatechin in Green Tea. Journal of
Separation Science, Volume 33(8), pp. 1079–1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200900647.
Loum, J., Byamukama, R.,
Wanyama, P.A.G., 2020. UV–Vis Spectrometry for Quantitative Study of Tannin and
Flavonoid Rich Dyes from Plant Sources. Chemistry Africa, Volume 3(2),
pp. 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-020-00135-6.
Martins, R.O., Gomes,
I.C., Mendonça Telles, A.D., Kato, L., Souza, P.S., Chaves, A.R., 2020.
Molecularly Imprinted Polymer as Solid Phase Extraction Phase for Condensed
Tannin Determination from Brazilian Natural Sources. Journal of
Chromatography A, Volume 1620, pp. 460977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2020.460977.
Maslov,
O.Y., Komisarenko, M.A., Kolisnyk, Y.S., Kostina, T.A., 2021. Determination
of Catechins in Green Tea Leaves by HPLC Compared to Spectrophotometry. Journal
of Organic and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Volume 19(3(75)), pp. 28–33. https://doi.org/10.24959/ophcj.21.238177.
Mehamod, F.S., KuBulat,
K., Yusof, N.F., Othman, N.A., 2015. The Development of Molecular Imprinting
Technology for Caffeine Extraction. International Journal of Technology,
Volume 6(4), pp. 546–554. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v6i4.1701.
Mohan,
P.R., Mohan, R., Savithramma, N., 2019. Estimation
of Total Phenol and Tannin Content Present in The Leaf, Bark and Fruits of an
Endemic Semi-Evergreen Tree Species Terminalia pallida Brandis. The Pharma
Innovation Journal, Volume 8(5), pp. 518–522
Naveed, M., BiBi, J.,
Kamboh, A.A., Suheryani, I., Kakar, I., Fazlani, S.A., FangFang, X., Kalhoro,
S.A., Yunjuan, L., Kakar, M.U., Abd El-Hack, M.E., Noreldin, A.E., Zhixiang,
S., LiXia, C., XiaoHui, Z., 2018. Pharmacological Values and Therapeutic
Properties of Black Tea (Camellia Sinensis): A Comprehensive Overview. Biomedicine
and Pharmacotherapy, Volume 100, pp. 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.02.048.
O’callaghan, F.,
Muurlink, O., Reid, N., 2018. Effects of Caffeine on Sleep Quality and Daytime
Functioning. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, Volume 11, pp. 263–271
Pervin, M., Unno,
K., Takagaki, A., Isemura, M., Nakamura, Y., 2019. Function
of Green Tea Catechins in the Brain: Epigallocatechin Gallate and Its
Metabolites. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Volume 20(15),
pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153630.
Plaza, M., Batista,
Â.G., Cazarin, C.B.B., Sandahl, M., Turner, C., Östman, E., Maróstica Júnior, M.R., 2016.
Characterization of Antioxidant Polyphenols from Myrciaria Jaboticaba Peel and
Their Effects on Glucose Metabolism and Antioxidant Status: A Pilot Clinical
Study. Food Chemistry, Volume 211, pp. 185–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.142.
Rahim, A.A., Nofrizal,
S., Saad, B., 2014. Rapid Tea Catechins and Caffeine Determination by HPLC
using Microwave-Assisted Extraction and Silica Monolithic Column. Food
Chemistry, Volume 147, pp. 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.131.
Rana, A., Sharma, E.,
Rawat, K., Sharma, R., Verma, S., Padwad, Y., Gulati, A., 2016. Screening and
Purification of Catechins from Underutilized Tea Plant Parts and Their
Bioactivity Studies. Journal of Food Science and Technology, Volume
53(11), pp. 4023–4032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2406-6.
Ruiz-Aquino, F.,
Feria-Reyes, R., Rutiaga-Quiñones, J.G., Robledo-Taboada, L.H., Gabriel-Parra,
R., 2023. Characterization of tannin extracts derived from the bark of four
tree species by HPLC and FTIR. Forest Science and Technology, Volume
19(1), pp. 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2023.2166593.
Saraiva, S.M., Jacinto,
T.A., Gonçalves, A.C., Gaspar, D., Silva, L.R., 2023. Overview of Caffeine
Effects on Human Health and Emerging Delivery Strategies. Pharmaceuticals,
Volume 16(8), p. 1067. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16081067.
Serdar, G., Demir, E.,
Sökmen, M., 2019. Sequential Green Extraction of Caffeine and Catechins from
Green Tea. International Journal of Secondary Metabolite, Volume 6(3),
pp. 283–291. https://doi.org/10.21448/ijsm.629151.
Shaukat, H., Ali, A.,
Zhang, Y., Ahmad, A., Riaz, S., Khan, A., Mehany, T., Qin, H., 2023. Tea
Polyphenols: Extraction Techniques and its Potency as A Nutraceutical. Frontiers
in Sustainable Food Systems, Volume 7, p. 1175893. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1175893.
Shay, J., Elbaz, H.A.,
Lee, I., Zielske, S.P., Malek, M.H., Hüttemann, M., 2015. Molecular Mechanisms
and Therapeutic Effects Of (-)-Epicatechin and Other Polyphenols in Cancer,
Inflammation, Diabetes, and Neurodegeneration. Oxidative Medicine and
Cellular Longevity, Volume 2015, p. 181260. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/181260.
Shrivastava, A., Gupta,
V., 2011. Methods for the Determination of Limit of Detection and Limit of
Quantitation of the Analytical Methods. Chronicles of Young Scientists,
Volume 2(1), p. 21. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5186.79345.
Silva, C.C.A.R., Gomes,
C.L., Danda, L.J.A., Roberto, A.E.M., De Carvalho, A.M.R., Ximenes, E.C.P.A.,
Da Silva, R.M.F., Angelos, M.A., Rolim, L.A., Rolim Neto, P.J., 2021. Optimized
Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Polyphenols and Tannins from Syzygium Cumini
(L.) Skeels Leaves Through an Experimental Design Coupled to a Desirability
Approach. Anais Da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, Volume 93(2), pp.
1–13. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120190632.
Soldado, D., Bessa,
R.J.B., Jerónimo, E., 2021. Condensed Tannins as Antioxidants in
Ruminants—Effective-Ness and Action Mechanisms to Improve Animal Antioxidant
Status and Oxidative Stability of Products. Animals, Volume 11(11), p.
3243. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113243.
Tomaz, I., Maslov, L.,
2016. Simultaneous Determination of Phenolic Compounds in Different Matrices
Using Phenyl-Hexyl Stationary Phase. Food Analytical Methods, Volume
9(2), pp. 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0206-7.
Turck, D., Bohn, T.,
Castenmiller, J., De Henauw, S., Hirsch-Ernst, K. I., Maciuk, A., Mangelsdorf,
I., McArdle, H. J., Naska, A., Pelaez, C., Pentieva, K., Siani, A., Thies, F.,
Tsabouri, S., Vinceti, M., Cubbada, F., Frenzel, T., Heinonen, M., Marchelli,
R., Neuhäuser-Berthold, M., Poulsen, M., Maradona, P., Schlatter, J., van
Loveren, H., Ververis, E., Knutsen, H.K., 2022. Safety of Dried Coffee Husk
(Cascara) from Coffea Arabica L. As A Novel Food Pursuant to Regulation (EU)
2015/2283. EFSA Journal, Volume 20(2), p. e07085. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7085.
Wangkarn, S., Grudpan,
K., Khanongnuch, Pattananandecha, T., Saenjum, C., 2021. Development of HPLC
Method for Catechins and Related. Mdpi, Volume 6052(26), pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26196052.
Zhang,
H., Qi, R., Mine, Y., 2019. The Impact of Oolong and
Black Tea Polyphenols on Human Health. Food Bioscience, Volume 29, pp.
55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2019.03.009.
Zhang, L., Cao, Q.Q.,
Granato, D., Xu, Y.Q., Ho, C.T., 2020. Association Between Chemistry and Taste
of Tea: A Review. Trends in Food Science and Technology, Volume 101, pp.
139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.05.015.
Zhang, Q.W., Lin, L.G.,
Ye, W.C., 2018. Techniques for Extraction and Isolation of Natural Products: A
Comprehensive Review. Chinese Medicine (United Kingdom), Volume 13(1),
pp. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-018-0177-x.