The Extended Integrated Model of Kansei Engineering, Kano, and TRIZ Incorporating Cultural Differences into Services

The fulfilment of customers’ emotional needs (Kansei in Japanese) tends to be highly expected, especially in growing industries such as the service industry. Recent research shows that emotion is just as important as cognition in service-related encounters. Thus, service providers should not overlook the significant roles of both emotional and cognitive aspects in achieving service excellence for customers. In modeling how to capture and translate customers’ emotional needs into services, Kansei Engineering (KE) is used. This study aims to integrate Kansei Engineering with the Kano model and the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ). The Kano model is used to identify the relationship between service attribute performance and customer satisfaction, whereas TRIZ is utilized subsequently to generate designs for improvement with the lowest contradiction between the proposed service design solutions. Due to relatively unexplored cultural differences in Kansei research, cultural factors are also considered and incorporated into the integrated model. It is hoped that further insight into the emotional needs of customers from different cultural backgrounds will be better understood, so that the improvement strategies will be suitable. In addition, to illustrate the applicability of the integrated model, an empirical study in a medium-sized restaurant that takes into account both Indonesian and non-Indonesian customers will be discussed.

Cultural differences, Customer service, Kano, Kansei Engineering, TRIZ

Altshuller, G.S., In: Shulyak, L., Rodman, S. (Eds.), 1997. 40 principles: TRIZ keys to Technical Innovation. Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA

Chai, K.H., Jun, Z., Tan, K.C., 2005. A TRIZ-based Method for New Service Design. Journal of Service Research, Volume 8(1), pp. 48–66

Hartono, M., Raharjo, H., 2014. Exploring the Mediating Role of Affective and Cognitive Satisfaction on the Effect of Service Quality on Loyalty. In: the Proceedings of the 17th QMOD Conference on Quality and Service Sciences ICQSS 2014, Prague, September 3-5, Czech Republic

Hartono, M., Sari, Y., Oeij, A.S., 2014. The Scheme of the Kano Model, SERVQUAL, Kansei Engineering, and TRIZ to Increase Service Quality. In: the Proceedings of Industrial Engineering National Conference by Petra Christian University 2014, Surabaya, November 7-8, Indonesia

Hartono, M., Tan, K.C., 2011. How the Kano Model Contributes to Kansei Engineering in Services. Ergonomics, Volume 54(11), pp. 987–1004

Hartono, M., Tan, K.C., Peacock, J.B., 2013. Applying Kansei Engineering, the Kano Model and QFD to Services. International Journal of Services, Economics and Management, Volume 5(3), pp. 256–274

Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., 1984. Attractive Quality and Must-be Quality. The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, Volume 14(2), pp. 39–44

Kelly, D., Storey, C., 2000. New Service Development: Initiation Strategies. International Journal of Service Industry Management, Volume 11(1), pp. 45–62

Mattila, A.S., 1999. The Role of Culture in the Service Evaluation Process. Journal of Service Research, Volume 1(3), pp. 250–261

Nagamachi, M., 1995. Kansei Engineering: A New Ergonomic Consumer-oriented Technology for Product Development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Volume 15(1), pp. 3–11

Nagamachi, M., Lokman, A.M., 2011. Innovations of Kansei Engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA

Parasuraman, A., Berry, L.L., Zeithaml, V.A., 1988. SERVQUAL: A Multiple-item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, Volume 64(1), pp. 12–40

Tan, K.C., Pawitra, A.T., 2001. Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano’s Model into QFD for Service Excellence Development. Managing Service Quality, Volume 11(6), pp. 418–430

Weiermair, K., 2000. Tourist’s Perceptions Towards and Satisfaction with Service Quality in the Cross-cultural Service Encounter: Implications for Hospitality and Tourism Management. Managing Service Quality, Volume 10(6), pp. 397–409