Published at : 07 Jul 2014
Volume : IJtech
Vol 5, No 2 (2014)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v5i2.410
Prasenjit Chatterjee | Department of Mechanical Engineering, MCKV Institute of Engineering, Liluah, Howrah- 711 204, India |
Suprakash Mondal | Department of Production Engineering, Mallabhum Institute of Technology, Bishnupur, Bankura- 722 122, India |
Shankar Chakraborty | Department of Production Engineering, Jadavpur University, KOLKATA- 700 032, India |
Selection of an automated inspection device for an explicit industrial application is one of the most challenging problems in the current manufacturing environment. It has become more and more complicated due to increasing complexity, advanced features and facilities that are endlessly being integrated into the devices by different manufacturers. Selection of inspection devices plays a significant role in a manufacturing system for cost effectiveness and improved productivity. This paper focuses on the application of a very popular Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) tool, i.e. ELimination and Et Choice Translating REality (ELECTRE) for solving an automated inspection device selection problem in a discrete manufacturing environment. Using a sample case study from the published literature, this paper attempts to show how different variants of the ELECTRE method, namely ELECTRE II, IS, III, IV and TRI can be suitably applied in choosing the most efficient alternative that accounts for both the decision maker’s intervention and other technical elements. Using different ELECTRE methods, a list of all the possible choices from the best to the worst suitable devices is obtained while taking into account different selection attributes. The ranking performance of these methods is also compared with that of the past researchers.
Automated inspection device selection, Comparative analysis, ELECTRE II, IS, III, IV, TRI, MCDM
Chatterjee, P., Mondal, S., Chakraborty, S., 2014. A Comparative Study of Preference
Dominance-based Approaches for Selection of Industrial Robots. Advances in Production
Engineering & Management, Volume 9, pp. 5?20
Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V.M., Chakraborty, S., 2009. Selection of Materials using Compromise
Ranking and Outranking methods. Materials and Design, Volume 30, pp. 4043?4053
Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V.M., Chakraborty, S., 2010a. Selection of Industrial Robots using
Compromise Ranking and Outranking Methods. Robotics and Computer Integrated
Manufacturing, Volume 26, pp. 483?489
Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V.M., Chakraborty, S., 2010b. Selection of Facility Layouts using
ELECTRE II Method. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, Volume
, pp. 41?53
Chatterjee, P., Chakraborty, S., 2014. Flexible Manufacturing System Selection using
Preference Ranking Methods: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Industrial
Engineering Computations, Volume 5, pp. 1?25
Chatterjee, P., Mukherjee, P., Chakraborty, S., 2011. Supplier Selection using Compromise
Ranking and Outranking Methods. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, Volume
, pp. 61?73
Chen, S.M., 1997. A New Method for Tool Steel Materials under Fuzzy Environment. Fuzzy
Sets System, Volume 92, pp. 265?274
Cho, K.T., 2003. Multi Criteria Decision Methods: An Attempt to Evaluate and Unify.
Mathematics and Computer Modeling, Volume 37, pp. 1099?1119
Clivillé, V., Berrah, L., Mauris, G., 2006. Deploying the ELECTRE III and MACBETH
Multicriteria Ranking Methods for SMEs Tactical Performance Improvements. Journal of
Modelling in Management, Volume 8, pp. 348?370
Figueira, J.R., Greco, S., Roy, B., Slowinski, R., 2013. An Overview of ELECTRE Methods
and their Recent Extensions. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Volume 20, pp.
?85
Golomski, W.A., 1990. Justification Methods for Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems.
In: accounting aspects of automated inspection systems, Elsevier, Amsterdam
Hunjak, T., 1997. Mathematical Foundations of the Methods for Multi-criteria Decision
Making. Mathematical Communications, Volume 2, pp. 161?169
Liu, P., Zhang, X., 2010. Research on the Supplier Selection of a Supply Chain based on
Entropy Weight and Improved ELECTRE-III Method. International Journal of Production
Research, Volume 49, pp. 637?646
Lourenco, R.P., Costa, J.P., 2004. Using ELECTRE TRI Outranking Method to Sort MOMILP
Nondominated Solutions. European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 153, pp.
?289
Milani, A.S., Shanian, A., El-Lahham, C., 2006. Using Different ELECTRE Methods in
Strategic Planning in the Presence of Human Behavioral Resistance. Journal of Applied
Mathematics and Decision Sciences, Volume 206, pp. 1?19
Mousseau, V., Slowinski R., 1998. Inferring an ELECTRE TRI Model from Assignment
Examples. Journal of Global Optimization, Volume 12, pp. 157?174
Mousseau, V., Slowinski R., Zielniewicz P., 2000. A User-oriented Implementation of the
ELECTRE-TRI Method Integrating Preference Elicitation Support. Computers &
Operations Research, Volume 27, pp. 757?777
Pandey, P.C., Kengpol, A., 1995. Selection of an Automated Inspection System using Multiattribute
Decision Analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 39,
pp. 289?298
A Comprehensive Solution to Automated Inspection Device
Selection Problems using ELECTRE Methods
Papadopoulos, A., Karagiannidis, A., 2008. Application of the Multi-criteria Analysis Method
Electre III for the Optimisation of Decentralised Energy Systems. Omega, Volume 36, pp.
?776
Rao, R.V., 2007. Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment using Graph Theory and
Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods. Springer-Verlag, London
Roy, B., 1991. The Outranking Approach and the Foundations of ELECTRE Methods. Theory
and Decision, Volume 31, pp. 49?73
Shanian, A., Savadogo, O., 2009. A Methodological Concept for Material Selection of Highly
Sensitive Components based on Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Expert Systems with
Applications, Volume 36, pp. 1362?1370