Published at : 05 Feb 2024
Volume : IJtech
Vol 15, No 2 (2024)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v15i2.6698
Nurhayati | 1. Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia, 2. Research Center for Marine and Land Bioindustry, National Research |
Hari Eko Irianto | Research Center for Marine and Land Bioindustry, National Research and Innovation Agency, Lombok 83352, Indonesia |
Rini Riastuti | Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia |
Azizah Intan Pangesty | 1. Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia, 2. Research Center for Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, |
Adam F. Nugraha | 1. Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia, 2. Center for Sustainability and Waste Management, Universitas Indones |
Mitsugu Todo | Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Kasuga-koen 6-1, Kasuga-shi, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan |
Aidah Jumahat | 1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Malaysia, 2. Institute for Infrastructure Engineering Sustainable and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam |
Mochamad Chalid | 1. Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia, 2. Center for Sustainability and Waste Management, Universitas Indones |
This study aimed to report the extraction of micro-fibrillated cellulose
(MFC) from rice husk (RH) through a series of processes including alkalization,
bleaching, chemical hydrolysis, and mechanical treatment. The chemical
structure, morphology, and crystallinity were assessed using Fourier Transform
Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), and X-ray
diffraction (XRD). The results showed that alkalization was more effective in
removing unwanted substances such as silica, hemicellulose, and lignin compared
to bleaching. Chemical or mechanical treatment was more targeted towards
removing the amorphous phase while fibrillating MFC. Further mechanical
treatment significantly enhanced the crystallinity index (CI) of MFC, reaching
87.47%, while chemical treatment remained at 78.54%. The mechanical treatment
led to a larger void size due to rigorous fibrillation, resulting in increased
water retention during extraction compared to chemically treated MFC with a
negatively charged surface. Crystal extraction through mechanical treatment
disrupted the hydrogen bond, transforming cellulose crystal from triclinic to monoclinic The comprehensive evaluation of MFC extracted from RH showed
its potential for biomedical application.
Acid hydrolysis; Mechanical treatment; Micro-fibrillated cellulose; Rice husk
Exploration
of bio-based materials is a process for addressing global challenges such as
the lack of petroleum, climate change, and unmanageable waste. Cellulose, a
member of the polysaccharide family, is the most prevalent organic component
generated from biomass. This material has diverse applications in industries,
including textiles (Felgueiras et al., 2021), food (Suryanti
et al., 2023;
The use of environmentally
friendly and sustainable biomedical materials has become increasingly important
in healthcare studies and development. Rice husk (RH) waste, the outer covering
of rice grains resulting from the milling process, constitutes a natural fiber
comprising cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and other compounds such as wax,
pectin, and silica (Johar, Ahmad, and Dufresne, 2012).
Studies showed that RH contained cellulose (25-35%), lignin (26-31%),
hemicellulose (18-21%), and silica (15-17%) (Rezanezhad,
Nazarnezhad, and Asadpour, 2013).
An extensive study
has been conducted on the isolation of cellulose from biomass/natural fibers
(Ng et al. 2015). This process aimed to remove lignin, hemicellulose, and other
non-cellulose compounds that naturally encapsulate cellulose. Alkalization and
bleaching are the most commonly used chemical treatments. These treatments not
only remove non-cellulose components but also defibrillate cellulose fibers
into micro-sized (Yuanita et al., 2015).
Menawhile, mechanical treatment through grinding is a straightforward,
energy-efficient process that requires simple equipment. Uetani and Yano (2011) explored the isolation of
nano-fibrillated cellulose using a modified blender. In the mechanical grinding
method, shear forces from the blades break hydrogen bonds, reducing cellulose
cell wall size to the nanoscale (Abdul-Khalil et
al., 2014). Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effect of
chemical and mechanical treatments on the characteristics of micro/nano-fibrillated
cellulose as a biomedical material. The resulting material from processed RH
holds potential applications in various medical fields, including surgical
paper, wound coverings, bone patch devices, and drug delivery systems.
2.1. Materials
RH (Oryza sativa L.) was obtained from a
local rice field in Wonogiri, Central Java, Indonesia. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH,
99.9%), Sodium chlorite (NaClO2, 25%), and acetic acid (CH3COOH,
99%) were procured from Merck, while sulfuric acid (H2SO4,
96.1%) was obtained from Mallinckrodt AR.
2.2. Treatment Preparation
In this study, virgin
RH was subjected to sequential treatments by alkalization, bleaching, and
hydrolysis or mechanical methods, to obtain the treated RH as RH_Al, RH_Al-Bl,
and RH_Al-Bl-Ch or RH_Al-Bl-Mc, respectively. The following section provides
the details for each process.
2.2.1. Pre-treatment
MFC extraction from RH comprised 2 primary
steps, namely pretreatment (washing, crushing, alkalization) and MFC isolation
using either mechanical or chemical methods. Pre-treatment began with washing
RH fibers in flowing water to remove visible debris, followed by soaking RH and
drying it at room temperature for 24 hours. The soaked fibers were then crushed
through a 40-mesh sieve and alkalinized in a 5 w/w% NaOH solution at a 1:25 w/v
ratio for 2 hours while stirring at approximately 80°C. After draining and
rinsing with distilled water, alkalized RH fibers were bleached for 2 hours at
70°C using 1.7% NaClO2 in a buffer of 100 ml of 0.2 M acetic acid
and 0.291 g NaOH. According to Iwamoto, Nakagaito,
and Yano (2007), this bleaching process was repeated 5 times until the
sample was cloudy white. Finally, the obtained product was rinsed with
distilled water to remove residual lignin, hemicellulose, and chlorine ions.
Observations were conducted at each step, including RH, fibers after alkaline
treatment (RH_Al), as well as fibers after alkaline and bleaching treatments
(RH_Al-Bl).
2.2.2. MFC Isolation
Following the removal of lignin, hemicellulose, and
other impurities, the pre-treatment was followed by isolating MFC through acid
hydrolysis (RH_Al-Bl-Ch) and mechanical milling, (RH_Al-Bl-Mc). In this study,
MFC results from both methods were compared to identify the most effective.
Acid hydrolysis treatment was performed by adding 60% v/v sulfuric acid to the
pre-treated RH fibers in distilled water (1/25 of w/v) and mixing at 45°C
(Syafri et al. 2011). After 45 minutes, the hydrolysis was terminated by adding
cold distilled water (about 15°C). For the mechanical milling treatment, water
(98/2 of w/w) was added to the pre-treated RH fibers in a blender, and the
blade was rotated between 11,000 - 12,000 rpm at room temperature for 20
minutes (Johar, Ahmad, and Dufresne, 2012).
2.2.3. Characterizations
RH at each treatment stage was evaluated by using a Field
Emission Scanning Electron Microscopes (FE-SEM) Quanta 650 EDAX EDS Analyzer at
varying magnifications of 100 and 500 times. Crystallinity percentage was
determined through hydrogen bonding analysis, using FTIR spectroscopy (Perkin
Elmer 90325) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) with a Philips XRD. FTIR was also
adopted to investigate the chemical structure, while XRD data was analyzed to
assess polymorphism and the allomorph of the extracted MFC. The crystallinity
ratio (CrR) and hydrogen bond energy (EH) for specific OH stretching bands in
cellulose fibers were calculated by comparing absorbance peaks at 1372 cm-1
(A1372) and 2900 cm-1 (A2900) (Nelson
and O’Connor 1964). Gaussian deconvolution peak separation methods were
applied to XRD data to obtain the crystallinity index (CI) of cellulose fibers,
calculated using the Segal Equation (Park et al., 2010).
3.1. Physical Appearance
This study adopted alkalization, bleaching, hydrolysis, and mechanical treatment methods to extract MFC and separate it from unwanted impurities. These methods yielded distinct physical changes, particularly in color and texture.
Figure 1 Physical appearance of isolated husk rice
fibers for (a) RH, (b) RH_Al, and (c) RH_Al-Bl
Figure 1 shows the
significant morphological changes observed during MFC isolation process. A
noticeable color shift was discovered in each phase, showing a reduction in
impurities such as lignin, hemicellulose, and silica, hemicellulose, and
silica. RH_Al sample maintained a dark color compared to RH, suggesting the
presence of lingering lignin. In contrast, RH_Al-Bl sample was white, showing
the effective removal of lignin during the bleaching steps.
3.2. Morphology Evolution
Figure
2a–e shows the SEM images at 100 and 500
Figure 2 SEM
images with 100x (left) and 500x (right) magnification of each sample; (a) RH,
(b) RH_Al (c) RH_Al-Bl (d) RH_Al-Bl-Ch, (e) RH_Al-Bl-Mc
Figures 2d (chemical) and 2e (mechanical) showed that surface patterns,
namely RH_Al-Bl-Ch had spiky surfaces, while RH_Al-Bl-Mc was smoother
3.3. Chemical Structure Analysis
The chemical structure of
the samples was observed through FTIR spectra (Figure 3a). The peak at
approximately 1555 cm-1, attributed to lignin according to Wyman et al. (2004), diminished as expected
in RH_Al sample compared to RH, and it became broader and disappeared in
samples RH_Al-Bl.
A similar pattern was
observed for the slight bump around 800 cm-1, showing silica in RH
samples, which was removed in RH_Al, RH_Al-Bl, and RH_Al-Bl-Ch or RH_Al-Bl-Mc.
The valley of 1260 cm-1 in FTIR signal, represented another
impurity, such as hemicellulose, coexisting with the prominent cellulose peak
at 1300 cm-1. This valley weakened and split from RH_Al to further
treated samples, signifying the effective removal of silica during the initial
alkalization.
Figure 3 a) FTIR spectra absorbance; b) Absorbance ratio of
hemicellulose, lignin, silica.
Figure
3b compiles the impurity content in the RH sample, using absorbance ratios to
provide a detailed assessment of impurities. The ratios at 800 cm-1, 1260 cm-1, and 1555 cm-1 represent silica, hemicellulose, and lignin,
respectively, with the as-received RH sample serving as the reference. Figure
3b shows a significant reduction in all impurities, at least 45%, starting from
alkalization treatment. Alkalization substantially reduced silica content, with
the entire elimination being performed through bleaching. Hemicellulose and
lignin ratios also decreased after alkalization and further decreased due to
mechanical or chemical treatment.
Chemical or mechanical treatments were applied to
further reduce impurities and extract MFC. The primary objective is to remove
the amorphous region and unbundle micro and nanofibrils of cellulose network
using different strategies. Chemical treatment uses sulfuric acid, following
the same principle as alkalization, to isolate and fibrillate cellulose by
hydrolyzing the glucoside bonds in lignin and hemicellulose chains (Jamalpoor and Hosseini 2015).
3.4. Crystallinity
Behavior
3.4.1. Hidrogen bond energy (EH) and bond distance (R)
In discussing sample crystallization behavior, FTIR
absorption peaks in the 1700-850 cm-1 range aid in assessing cellulose polymorphism. A shift in C-C and C-O
vibration peaks showed the conversion of cellulose allomorph from type I to II.
According to Carrillo et al. (2004), when
cellulose type I is more dominant than type II, the absorption at 1420 and 1155
cm-1 would change to
approximately 1430 and 1162 cm-1, respectively. Therefore, the absorption at approximately 1430 and 1162 cm-1 in all sample spectra
showed the presence of cellulose I.
Absorption at 893 cm-1 for cellulose type I changed to approximately 897 cm-1. The 895-905 cm-1 range was in line with higher wavenumbers
indicating cellulose type I, consistent with Yue
(2011), and attributed to glucose residue rotation around the glycosidic
bond (Jamalpoor and Hosseini 2015).
Furthermore, all fibers had an absorption peak at 1315 cm-1, confirming the minor presence of cellulose
type II. FTIR analysis reinforces cellulose I dominance in both untreated and
treated RH samples.
EH and R analysis offered another method to distinguish cellulose
types. Cellulose type I had 3 hydrogen bonding arrangements, namely
intramolecular hydrogen bonds O(6)H···O(2) and O(3)H···O(5), as well as
intermolecular hydrogen bond O(6)H···O’(3) with FTIR absorption peaks around
3455-3410 cm-1, 3375-3340 cm-1, and 3310-3230 cm-1, respectively.
Meanwhile, cellulose type II had 4 hydrogen bond arrangement, similar to type
I, with the addition of an intermolecular hydrogen bond: O(2)H···O’(2) or
O(6)H···O’(3) (Poletto et al., 2011). Table 1 provides EH and R values for each sample. Compared to EH value of
the as-received RH, all treated samples had lower hydrogen bond energy,
consistent with Poletto et al., (2011).
Table 1 Values of EH and R for each
sample
Intramolecular O(2)H···O(6) |
Intramolecular O(3)H···O(5) |
Intermolecular O(2)H···O'(2) | ||||
Sample Name |
3460-3405 c |
3375-3340 c |
3310-3230 c | |||
EH (kJ/mol) |
R (Å) |
EH (kJ/mol) |
R (Å) |
EH (kJ/mol) |
R (Å) | |
RH |
17.692 |
2.796 |
24.452 |
2.775 |
28.839 |
2.761 |
RH_Al |
18.483 |
2.793 |
23.229 |
2.778 |
30.134 |
2.757 |
RH_Al-Bl |
15.750 |
2.802 |
23.158 |
2.779 |
30.565 |
2.755 |
RH_Al-Bl-Ch |
15.750 |
2.802 |
23.229 |
2.778 |
26.394 |
2.768 |
RH_Al-Bl-Mc |
11.651 |
2.815 |
20.856 |
2.786 |
28.911 |
2.761 |
The relative
hydrogen bond distances examined in this study range from 2.755 to 2.815 Å.
According to Tasker et al., the hydrogen bond distance of Cellulose I was 2.75
Å. Consequently, the proximity of the distance to this value showed the
refinement of cellulose in the sample (O’Sullivan
1997). Additionally, as stated by Poletto et
al., (2011), higher crystallinity
leads to denser cellulose packing and shorter distances, resulting in increased
hydrogen energy between cellulose molecules.
Nelson and O’Connor (1964)
proposed the ratio between FTIR absorbance bands at 1372 and 2900 cm-1 as CrR, which is
proportional to the crystallinity degree of cellulose. CrR values for RH,
RH_Al, RH_Al-Bl, RH_Al-Bl-Ch, and RH_Al-Bl-Mc were 0.79, 1.73, 2.17, 3.03, and
5.67, respectively. The values gradually increase along with the treatment
process, with RH_Al-Bl-Mc having the highest. This suggested that mechanical
treatment was more powerful compared to chemical treatment in removing the
amorphous region.
3.4.2. Crystallinity Index (CI)
XRD was used
to complement the other characterization and further evaluate the crystallinity
behavior of cellulose. Figure 8
shows XRD diffraction of untreated and treated RH. From
XRD diffraction data, several peaks were identified, where peak one at =14.5°
is (100) and (10), peak two at =17.0° is (010) and (110), peak
three at =22.5° is or (002) and (012), as well as peak four at =34.0° is and (004) (Hult et al., 2003; Wada and Okano, 2001). XRD peaks were
processed by Gaussian deconvolution separation to further determine the
crystallinity index, the d-spacing, crystallite size, and Z-values.
In this study, Z-values function
developed by Wada
and Okano (2001) was used to determine cellulose crystal structure, identifying it
as either triclinic or monoclinic allomorph. The most intense
crystalline peak was discovered at 22.62° on the (002) lattice plane for all
the samples. Lionetto et al. and Harahap et al. investigations also identified
the same peak within different scanning angles () (Harahap et al., 2023; Lionetto et al.,
2012).
Figure 4 a) XRD
spectra; b) CI for each samplex
Figure 4a shows a decreasing
amorphous trench between peak (002) and peak (010) during each treatment phase,
moving towards the baseline, while CI is reversely increasing. Quantitatively,
Figure
4b showed a continuous rise in CI in the treatment process, with mechanical
treatment showing superiority compared to the chemical counterpart. CI of MFC
shows a tightly packed structure, hypothetically improving thermal stability
and mechanical properties, making it desirable for composite applications (Poletto et al.,
2011).
Table 2 Crystallite size (L) from each sample
Sample Name |
L (110) (nm) |
L (nm) |
L (002) (nm) |
L (004) (nm) |
L (100) (nm) |
L (010) (nm) |
L (110) (nm) |
L ( (nm) |
RH |
6.91 |
2.33 |
1.79 |
7.99 |
|
|
|
|
RH_Al |
5.73 |
2.27 |
1.51 |
8.83 |
|
|
|
|
RH_Al-Bl |
5.65 |
2.21 |
6.74 |
10.13 |
|
|
|
|
RH_Al-Bl-Ch |
6.36 |
1.01 |
7.52 |
5.28 |
|
|
|
|
RH_Al-Bl-Mc |
|
|
|
|
6.97 |
0.67 |
5.77 |
3.03 |
The crystallite size of the samples decreases during the treatment process, as shown in Table 2. When cellulose fiber was more distanced, smaller crystal sizes were observed, often associated with a change in crystal structure. The desirable triclinic structure of crystal in RH for MFC isolation is prone to hydrogen bonding breakdown. However, when the triclinic structure loses integrity, it will rearrange to create a monoclinic structure of This suggested that the final mechanical treatment entirely transformed cellulose crystal from The transformation was also shown in Table 2, where the crystallographic family was diverted from triclinic structure to monoclinic structure
3.5. Biomedical
Potential
This study presents the potential
of MFC extracted from RH as a
biomedical material for innovative applications (Varshney et al., 2022). The successful
removal of unwanted substances such as silica, hemicellulose, and lignin
through alkalization and bleaching treatments showed the suitability for
medical applications where purity and biocompatibility were crucial (Islam et al.,
2018).
The pristine MFC structure achieved through these processes presents a clean
surface, minimizing adverse reactions when interacting with biological systems (Sunasee, Hemraz,
and Ckless, 2016). Finally, the impurity-free nature of MFC positions it as a
promising candidate for wound healing and tissue engineering, where seamless
integration with the natural processes of the body is essential.
The substantial increase in CI of
MFC due to rigorous mechanical treatment is essential with potential biomedical
implications. This heightened CI signifies a more ordered and aligned cellulose
structure, enhancing mechanical strength and stability, particularly beneficial
for regenerative medicine scaffolds (Mauck and Burdick, 2015). The unique voids observed in
mechanically treated MFC, showing increased water retention, offered
opportunities for controlled drug delivery systems. These interconnected voids
serve as therapeutic agent reservoirs. This controlled release mechanism holds
promise for precise and sustained pharmaceutical delivery to enhance patient
outcomes (Sun
et al., 2019). Further mechanical processes elevate CI of MFC to 87.47%. This
improved mechanical strength and stability, crucial for biomedical applications
(Seddiqi
et al., 2021). Mechanically treated negatively charged surfaces aid
interactions with positively charged cells and medical materials, supporting
its usage in wound healing and as a medical adhesive. Additionally, mechanical
treatment shifts cellulose crystal structure from triclinic to monoclinic , while reducing MFC crystallite size, potentially affecting mechanical
properties and reactivity.
In
conclusion, this study delved into the evolution of MFC crystallinity through a
multi-stage extraction process, comprising alkalization, bleaching, and either
chemical or mechanical treatment. Alkalization proved effective in removing
silica and hemicellulose from RH while bleaching primarily eliminated the bulky
lignin structure. These procedures not only heightened MFC purity, assessed
both visually and chemically using FTIR, but also improved crystallinity,
scrutinized through XRD. Successful efforts were made to eliminate the
amorphous phase through both chemical and mechanical treatments, substantiated
by SEM images showcasing fibrillation. This fibrillation was accompanied by a decrease
in EH, an increase in R, and a slight reduction in crystallite size and width.
Smaller MFC widths resulting from mechanical treatment led to higher surface
energy, rendering the surface more water-attractive. Furthermore, cellulose
crystals in MFC, extracted using both methods, predominantly had cellulose ,
transitioning to specifically pronounced after mechanical treatment due to
hydrogen bond rearrangement. These discoveries firmly established MFC as a
highly promising biomedical material with versatile potential across various
medical applications.
This research was
funded by Universitas Indonesia with grant number
NKB-678/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2021. The authors are grateful to Aldhi Saputro for
the laboratory activity.
Abdul-Khalil, H.P.S., Davoudpour, Y., Islam,
M.N., Mustapha, A., Sudesh, K., Dungani, R., Jawaid, M., 2014. Production and Modification
of Nanofibrillated Cellulose Using Various Mechanical Processes: A Review. Carbohydrate
Polymers, Volume 99, pp. 649–665
Carrillo, F., Colom, X., Suñol, J.J., Saurina, J.,
2004. Structural FTIR analysis and thermal characterization of lyocell and
viscose-type fibers. European Polymer Journal, Volume 40(9), pp. 2229–2234
Chen, Z., Xu, Y., Shivkumar, S., 2018. Microstructure
and Tensile Properties of Various Varieties of Rice Husk. Journal of the
Science of Food and Agriculture, Volume 98(3), pp. 1061–1070
Choi, K., Nam, J.D., Kwon, S.H., Choi, H.J.,
Islam, M.S., Kao, N., 2019. Microfibrillated Cellulose Suspension and its Electrorheology.
Polymers, Volume 11(12), p. 2119
Felgueiras, C., Azoia, N.G., Gonçalves, C., Gama,
M., Dourado, F., 2021. Trends on the Cellulose-Based Textiles: Raw Materials
and Technologies. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Volume 9, p. 608826
Galera-Manzano, L.M., Ruz
Cruz, M.Á., Moo Tun, N.M., Valadez González, A., Mina Hernandez, J.H., 2021.
Effect of Cellulose and Cellulose Nanocrystal Contents on the Biodegradation,
Under Composting Conditions, of Hierarchical Pla Biocomposites. Polymers,
Volume 13(11), p. 1855
Harahap, M., Daulay, N., Zebua, D., Gea, S.,
2023. Nanofiber Cellulose/Lignin from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches and the
Potential for Carbon Fiber Precursor Prepared by Wet-spinning. International
Journal of Technology, Volume 14(1), pp. 152–161
Hu, L., Zhong, Y., Wu, S., Wei, P., Huang, J.,
Xu, D., Zhang, L., Ye, Q., Cai, J., 2021. Biocompatible and Biodegradable Super-toughness
Regenerated Cellulose via Water Molecule-assisted Molding. Chemical
Engineering Journal, Volume 417, p. 129229
Hult, E.L., Iversen, T., Sugiyama, J., 2003.
Characterization of the Supermolecular Structure of Cellulose in Wood Pulp Fibers.
Cellulose, Volume 10(2), pp. 103–110
Islam, M.S., Kao, N., Bhattacharya, S.N., Gupta,
R., Choi, H.J., 2018. Potential Aspect of Rice Husk Biomass in Australia for Nanocrystalline
Cellulose Production. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, Volume
26(3), pp. 465–476
Iwamoto, S., Nakagaito, A.N., Yano, H., 2007.
Nano-fibrillation of Pulp Fibers for the Processing of Transparent Nanocomposites.
Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing, Volume 89(2), pp.
461–466
Jamalpoor, A., Hosseini, M., 2015. Biaxial Buckling
Analysis of Double-orthotropic Microplate-systems Including in-plane Magnetic Field
Based on strain gradient theory. Composites Part B: Engineering, Volume 75,
pp. 53–64
Johar, N., Ahmad, I., Dufresne, A., 2012.
Extraction, preparation, and characterization of cellulose fibers and
nanocrystals from rice husk. Industrial Crops and Products, Volume 37(1),
pp. 93–99
Lionetto, F., Del-Sole, R., Cannoletta, D.,
Vasapollo, G., Maffezzoli, A., 2012. Monitoring wood degradation during
weathering by cellulose crystallinity. Materials, Volume 5(10), pp. 1910–1922
Ludueña, L., Fasce, D., Alvarez, V.A., Stefani,
P.M., 2011. Nanocellulose from Rice Husk Following Alkaline Treatment to Remove
Silica. BioResources, Volume 6(2)
Mauck, R.L., Burdick, J.A., 2015. From Repair to
Regeneration: Biomaterials to Reprogram the Meniscus Wound Microenvironment. Annals
of Biomedical Engineering, Volume 43(3), pp. 529–542
Mu, R., Hong, X., Ni, Y.,
Li, Y., Pang, J., Wang, Q., Xiao, J., Zheng, Y., 2019. Recent Trends and
Applications of Cellulose Nanocrystals in Food Industry. Trends in Food
Science and Technology, Volume 93, pp. 136–144
Nelson, M.L., O’Connor, R.T., 1964. Relation of Certain
Infrared Bands to Cellulose Crystallinity and Crystal Lattice Type. Part II. A New
Infrared Ratio for Estimation of Crystallinity in Celluloses I and II. Journal
of Applied Polymer Science, Volume 8(3) , pp. 1325–1341
O’Sullivan, A.C., 1997. Cellulose: The Structure Slowly
Unravels. Cellulose, Volume 4(3), pp. 173–207
Pandey, A. 2021. Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications
of Cellulose Nanofibers: a Review. Environmental Chemistry Letters,
Volume 19(3), pp. 2043–2055
Park, B.D., Gon Wi, S., Ho Lee, K., Singh, A.P.,
Yoon, T.H., Soo-Kim, Y., 2003. Characterization of Anatomical Features and Silica
Distribution in Rice Husk using Microscopic and Micro-analytical Techniques. Biomass
and Bioenergy, Volume 25(3), pp. 319–327
Park, S., Baker, J.O., Himmel, M.E., Parilla,
P.A., Johnson, D.K., 2010. Cellulose Crystallinity Index: Measurement Techniques
and Their Impact on Interpreting Cellulase Performance. Biotechnology for
Biofuels, Volume 3, pp. 1–10
Poletto, M., Pistor, V., Zeni, M., Zattera, A.J.,
2011. Crystalline Properties and Decomposition Kinetics of Cellulose Fibers in Wood
Pulp Obtained by Two Pulping Processes. Polymer Degradation and Stability,
Volume 96(4), pp. 679–685
Rajinipriya, M., Nagalakshmaiah, M., Robert, M., Elkoun,
S., 2018. Importance of Agricultural and Industrial Waste in the Field of
Nanocellulose and Recent Industrial Developments of Wood Based Nanocellulose: A
Review. American Chemical Society (ACS) Sustainable Chemistry and
Engineering, Volume 6(3), pp. 2807–2828
Rezanezhad, S., Nazarnezhad, N., Asadpour, G.,
2013. Isolation of Nanocellulose from Rice Waste via Ultrasonication. Lignocellulose,
Volume 2(1), pp. 282–291
Rochardjo, H.S.B., Fatkhurrohman,
AK., Yudhanto, F., 2021. Fabrication of Nanofiltration Membrane Based on
Polyvinyl Alcohol Nanofibers Reinforced with Cellulose Nanocrystal using
Electrospinning Techniques. International Journal of Technology, Volume 12(2),
pp. 329–338
Seddiqi, H., Oliaei, E., Honarkar, H., Jin, J.,
Geonzon, L.C., Bacabac, R.G., Klein-Nulend, J., 2021. Cellulose and its Derivatives:
Towards Biomedical Applications. Cellulose, Volume 28(4), pp. 1893–1931
Sun, B., Zhang, M., Shen, J., He, Z., Fatehi, P.,
Ni, Y., 2019. Applications of Cellulose-based Materials in Sustained Drug
Delivery Systems. Current Medicinal Chemistry, Volume 26(14), pp.
2485–2501
Sunasee, R., Hemraz, U.D., Ckless, K., 2016.
Cellulose Nanocrystals: a Versatile Nano Platform for Emerging Biomedical Applications.
Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, Volume 13(9), pp. 1243–1256
Suryanti, V., Kusumaningsih, T., Safriyani, D., Cahyani,
I.S., 2023. Synthesis and Characterization of Cellulose Ethers from Screw Pine
(Pandanus tectorius) Leaves Cellulose as Food Additives. International
Journal of Technology, Volume 14(3), pp. 659–668
Uetani, K., Yano, H., 2011. Nanofibrillation of Wood
Pulp Using a High-speed Blender. Biomacromolecules, Volume 12(2), pp.
348–353
Väisänen, S., Pönni, R.,
Hämäläinen, A., Vuorinen, T., 2018. Quantification of Accessible Hydroxyl
Groups in Cellulosic Pulps by Dynamic Vapor Sorption with Deuterium Exchange. Cellulose,
Volume 25(12), pp. 6923–6934
Varshney, S., Mulpuru, V., Mishra, N., Gupta,
M.K., 2022. Microwave-irradiated Novel Isolation of Nanocellulose from Waste Rice
Husk via Modified Chemo-mechanical Route: Characterization, in-silico Prediction,
and its Antibacterial Activity. Materials Technology, Volume 37(13), pp.
2608–2622
Wada, M., Okano, T., 2001. Localization of and Phases in Algal Cellulose Revealed by Acid Treatments. Cellulose,
Volume 8(3), pp. 183–188
Wyman, C., Decker, S., Himmel, M., Brady, J.,
Skopec, C., Viikari, L., 2004. Hydrolysis of Cellulose and Hemicellulose. Polysaccharides:
Structural Diversity and Functional Versatility, Volume 1, pp. 1023–1062
Yuanita, E., Pratama, J.N., Mustafa, J.H., Chalid,
M., 2015. Multistage Preparation for Microfibrillated Celluloses Based on
Arenga Pinnata “ijuk” fiber. Procedia Chemistry, Volume 16, pp. 608–615
Yue, Y., 2011. A Comparative Study of Cellulose I
and II Fibers and Nanocrystals. Louisiana State University and Agricultural
and Mechanical College