Published at : 17 May 2024
Volume : IJtech
Vol 15, No 3 (2024)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v15i3.6442
Muhammad Zulkarnain | Faculty of Mechanical Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia |
Irianto Harny | Department General Education, Faculty of Resilience, Rabdan Academy, 22401 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates |
Mohamad Irfan Insdrawaty | Faculty of Mechanical Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia |
Mohamad Izmul Farees Azman | Faculty of Mechanical Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia |
Muhamad Izwan Aiman Azmi | Faculty of Mechanical Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia |
Eny Kusrini | 1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI, Depok 16424, Indonesia, 2. Research Group of Green Product and Fine Chemical Engineering, Laborato |
Transportation tracks of
railways and highways are the highest noise pollution contribution to the
inhabitant urban due to the sources near residential areas. Many researchers
proved that the composite material could help reduce the noise by 30%. This study
focuses on designing local nature fiber composite for developing a good sound
absorption material by providing experimental methods. Three natural fibers of coconut,
palm oil, and sugarcane are used to make a composite by varying filler content
for sound absorption and transmission loss observation. The results found that
sugar cane bagasse is suitable for average performance in varied filler content
for both sound absorption and transmission loss. The overall results showed a
successful improvement in both sound absorption coefficient and transmission
loss with the addition of fiber content
Absorption coefficient; Environmental noise; Noise barrier; Natural fiber; Transmission loss
The capital cities with modern facilities generate numerous sources of noise pollution in their surroundings, including vehicles, high-speed railways, industries, and construction activities. These factors directly impact the urban inhabitants. The drawback effects of environmental noise are shown in the form of mental health, high stress, or high sound pressure environments that propose hearing damage permanently. Many researchers have shown that this pollution impacts the quality of life by receiving regularly and continuing as an annoying source (Yu et al., 2023; Guha et al., 2023; Ciach et al., 2019). Comprehensive scientific studies have presented methods to counter or reduce the adverse effects of noise pollution. In transportation, efforts to reduce noise pollution were popular by introducing composite material based on the railway structure (Gu et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022). The noise from railway vibration is absorbed by structure-borne concrete composite bridges and composite floors. In this research, the composite is a paramount part of reducing the noise to 30% as reported.
In urban management, it has been reported that rice
husk nanoparticle composites effectively mitigate the reverberation effect
around building facades caused by noise. The composite generated tends to have
a high absorption material that is denoted by increasing the sound absorption
coefficient of materials (Rendón et al., 2023; Sharma et al. 2023; Raj et al., 2020; Hassan et al., 2020; Echeverria et al. 2019; Samodra, 2018).
They observed that the relation between the particle size of the filler and
sound absorption coefficient levels was affected. The natural source to
generate composite becomes one alternative to reduce pollution, a significant
study has been made by utilization of bamboo biochar as a filler in natural
rubber composite for vibration and noise control (Mago et al.,
2022; Khair et al. 2015). However, there
are several materials the most widely used to absorb vibrations and noise pollution in some
engineering applications such as rubber (Corredor -Bedoya, Zoppi, and
Serpa, 2017), wool (Ilangovan et al., 2022), and silica (Yusoff et al.,
2023) to optimize a
material design. Natural fibers are well-known in engineering applications due
to their present advantages, such as no harmful emissions and, at the same
time, being able to compete with the mechanical performance capabilities of synthetic
materials. Additionally, certain natural fibers are local commodities,
representing renewable resources throughout every season (Operato et al.,
2023).
The study of the absorption material is
required, and the relation between material and sound absorption coefficient
and overall performance is to be well understood through the properly designed
material. The optimization of design will promote the prevention of noise from
the source and provide well on transmission loss of sound. Many studies have
proposed different optimization strategies to control the noise system for
material design. First, through the experiments, the material design is
characterized by measurement testing and analyzed for the sound transmission
characteristics of the composite (Zhang et al., 2022; Zheng et al., 2022). Secondly, numerical studies, such as finite element analysis, are
employed to optimize and validate the transmission loss and vibration through
composite materials (Lim, Yaw, and Chen, 2022; Araújo and Madeira, 2020; Soltani et al., 2020). These studies have indicated that optimized design can play a crucial
role in mitigating the spread of noise contaminants and enhancing acoustical
contributions.
Generally, natural fibers are difficult to harvest directly to be a
composite due to natural fibers having a lot of impurities naturally (Yudha et al., 2023; Indrasti et al.,
2020;
Hariprasada et al., 2020). A special investigation is required to
determine the feasibility of natural fiber treatment (Dasore et al., 2022). The previous researcher
reported that varied levels of alkalinity were observed in composite strength
through morphological improvement (Suwan
et al., 2021). On the other hand, fiber size process
conditions affect composite performance on mechanical, thermal, or sound
absorption coefficient itself. The previous researcher reported that thermal
stability is more efficient by adding composites reinforced with nano clay (Choudhary et al.,
2023), and chrome shave
(CS) and coffee silver skin (CSS) fiber composite showed slightly higher sound
absorption performance of 1 mm compared to 3 mm of size (Abdi, 2021).
Realizing the
importance of using local nature fibre regarding optimization material design
on mitigating noise contaminants, this study focuses on designing local nature
fiber composite for developing a good sound absorption material by providing
experimental methods. Characteristics of natural fibers such as coconut, palm
oil, and sugarcane on sound absorption coefficient and transmission loss are
proposed in this investigation. The optimization of material design is
characterized by varying filler content with the polyester matrix. This
composite material is targeted as a noise barrier for high-noise transportation
tracts close to residential areas, such as near railway traffic noise (Zheng
et al., 2022; Abdulkareem et al.,
2021) and highways (Shokouhian et al., 2021).
2.1. Materials
Matrix composite is polyester resin and is a
viscous liquid resin made from glycol and unsaturated dibasic acid condensate,
and the hardener is the butanox m-50 with a ratio of 100:4. Another chemical is
the solution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for cotton yarns or fabrics.
Three natural fibers, namely coconut, palm oil,
and sugarcane, are employed to create a composite. The ratio of composite with
varied filler content detail is given in Table 1.
Table 1 Ratio of composite detail with varied filler content
Polyester Weight
(g) |
Hardener Weight
(g) |
Fibre Weight (g) |
Total Weight (g) |
Fibers Percentage (%wt.) |
336.00 |
14.00 |
0.00 |
350 |
0 |
329.28 |
13.72 |
7.00 |
350 |
2 |
322.56 |
13.44 |
14.00 |
350 |
4 |
315.84 |
13.16 |
21.00 |
350 |
6 |
309.12 |
12.88 |
28.00 |
350 |
8 |
302.40 |
12.60 |
35.00 |
350 |
10 |
295.68 |
12.32 |
42.00 |
350 |
12 |
2.2. Natural Fibres
Collection
The
natural fiber of coconut, palm oil, and sugarcane were collected from local
sources by varying methods. The coconut fibers were made from the coconut skin
received from local farmers in Malaysia, and they were then shredded to get the
coconut fiber before any treatment was conducted. The coconut fiber was then
cleaned with distilled water and dried for one day in direct sunlight.
Moreover, the oil palm fiber was made from oil palm fruits and collected from
the palm oil industry in Malaysia after the milking process. Meanwhile, the
leftover components, which are typically referred to as bagasse, were generated
as by-products after the sugar canes were compressed. Due to the bagasse
containing a lignocellulose substance made up of 45–55 percent cellulose and
25–30 percent hemicellulose, the natural sugarcane fiber was submerged in water
for 24 hours to remove those impurities. To prevent the sugarcane from
remaining in moisture conditions, the sugarcane residue was exposed to the sun
to evaporate the water.
2.3. Mercerization Processing
To
enhance flexibility and remove impurities from the natural fiber, it underwent
treatment with a 2% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution, commonly referred to as
an alkaline treatment. The natural fibers were submerged for a predetermined
period of time at a predetermined temperature in a NaOH solution, as shown in
Figure 1A. Subsequently, the fibers were thoroughly
rinsed to remove the solution, using distilled water. In addition, the coconut
fiber was soaked for 1 to 2 hours in distilled water to neutralize it and
render it non-alkaline. Followed by an evaporation stage where the fibers were
dried in the oven at 100oC for six hours as shown in Figure 1B.
Figure 1 Natural
fiber treatment; 1A) NaOH immersing and 1B) dried process
2.4. Composite Preparation
The process of removing impurities
involved a grinding and sifting process in the preparation of the material. In
the sieving process, the fibers were filtered to remove unwanted materials such
as cotton on sugar cane fiber and palm oil shell fragments from the fiber, as
shown in Figure 2. The preparation of the composite material
ratios followed the guidelines outlined in Table 1. The mold used in the
process was crafted from a steel plate with a thickness of 5 mm. The
ease-release compound was required to be applied to the mold before pouring the
polyester inside. The composite was made by implementing the lay-up technique,
where the polyester was mixed with the hardener before being applied to the
mold together with the fibers. The composite curing was at ambient temperature
for 4 hours, followed by cutting the sample using a hole saw 38 mm in diameter
for each sample, as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 2 Impurities removal processing
Figure 3 Composite samples were analyzed in the impedance tube
2.5. Impedance Tube Testing
The impedance tube with
ACUPRO Version 4.5 was used to measure the acoustical properties of materials
and systems under ISO 10534–1 (ISO, 2002) and ASTM E2611 for transmission loss
measurement. The ACUPRO tube with supports and leveling screws was made of
stainless steel with an internal diameter of 38 mm. The operating range
frequency level ranged from 50 Hz to 5000 Hz with 4 microphones. The impedance
tube was measured for both sound absorption coefficient and transmission loss
of those frequency ranges.
3.1. Noise Absorption Coefficient
The
plotting graph was described as a single peak to measure the sound absorption
coefficient of each sample. Figure 4 presents the level of the sound absorption
coefficient against the frequency of coconut fiber. The observation of the
sound absorption coefficient was conducted by varying the filler content within
the range of 0% wt. to 8% wt. Likewise, the frequency absorption has shown in
diversity ranges. Based on the results, the 6%wt. of filler content showed a
slightly higher sound absorption coefficient compared to others reaching 0.985,
while 0.832 was the lowest reached by the polyester. It means that the sound
absorption coefficient was close to 1 and has an improvement of around 16.62%
compared to polyester. Other observations found that the frequency absorption
values occur at 2268 Hz presented that early compared to other composite filler
content. This frequency was valid and good results were expected for the
frequency ranges between 45 45.6 £ f £ 4559 Hz and 64.8 £ f £ 6480 Hz for coconut
and sugar cane, respectively (Da-Silva et
al., 2019). While the sound absorption factor for each
palm oil sample is illustrated in Figure 5. The single peak predicted that the
highest peak occurred in 8% by Weight. of filling content observed that all
peaks resulted below 3300 Hz. By comparing the initial sound absorption
coefficient of polyester, it has improved by 20.12% from the polyester shown
much better than coconut fiber. Another observation has been done on sugar cane
fiber composite. The sugar cane fiber also reported showing good agreement with
adding filler content which is the highest single peak shown by 10% wt. of
filler content as shown in Figure 6. It reported that a wide range of
frequencies at a single peak occurs from 3000 Hz to 3900 Hz.
Figure 4 The sound Absorption coefficient against the frequency of Coconut Fiber
Figure 5 The sound
Absorption coefficient against the frequency of Palm Oil Fiber
Figure 6 The sound Absorption
coefficient against the frequency of sugar cane fiber
All
results present the phenomenon of the sound absorption coefficient being linear
to fiber content. These measurements were the average absorption graphs
mentioned in Figure 7. The potential of coconut composite to sound absorption
was successful and obviously shown good based on the results. In the
observation of filler content, the sound absorption coefficient of oil palm
fiber exhibited a slight linear increase, as depicted by the average plotting
on the graph, albeit on a small scale. Furthermore, the sugar cane results also
presented performance improvement in sound absorption by linearly adding sugar
cane fiber. This improvement was able to achieve a sound absorption percentage
increase average of 18.54% compared to pure polymer.
The
comparison of the sound absorption coefficient for all natural fibers is shown
in Figure 8. The high performance was shown by palm oil fiber at 20.12% from
pure polyester. It is obvious that natural fiber has the potential to absorb
sound to control the noise system. This phenomenon was also reported by
previous researchers, and natural fiber was successfully used as an alternative
material for noise control (Saini et
al., 2020; Kesharwani et al.
2020; Sasikumar et
al., 2020; Da-Silva et al., 2019).
3.2. Transmission Loss Measurement
On the ACUPRO impedance tube, ASTM E2611
stated two load methods for transmission loss measurements, first by using
Anechoic Load A for independent termination of the tube and second by using
Rigid Load B. This investigation was represented by Rigid Load B to describe
transmission loss conditions for each natural fiber composite. The ability of
the material to absorb the sound can be observed by plotting the graph between
sound (dB) and filler contact (%wt.). Figure 9 shows the transmission loss that
occurs in the all-natural fiber composites obtained by predictions by DB. The
coconut can be seen obviously that the sound (dB) successfully counters by the
composite denoted by linear line by increasing the filler content (%wt.). It
can be verified that the values of the transmission loss increase by adding
filler content. With the comparison of the results from palm oil fiber, it is
easy to observe that the optimization of the palm oil fiber composites some
meet unsuccessful. The results found that only 2%wt. of filler content showed
higher absorbance of the sound (dB) then became constantly lower. It might have
been caused by inhomogeneous fiber distribution and agglomeration during
composite fabrication. A good agreement between transmission loss and filler content
was shown by sugar cane fiber that filler content succeeds in countering the
sound by adding the fiber. According to the results, coconut fiber was the best
combination of the transmission loss composite material, giving the most
effective sound absorption, as shown in Figure 10. All composites were
collected at similar frequencies of transmission loss peaks of around 5000 Hz.
It was confirmed by the results of previous research that found the
transmission loss of coconut was higher due to good fiber distribution or well
morphology and allowed to absorb more sound (Bhingare and
Prakash, 2021; Da-Silva et al., 2019).
Figure 8 The sound Absorption coefficient of The natural fiber
Figure 9 Transmission loss against filler content of natural fiber
Figure 10 Transmission loss against natural fiber
The main target of this
experimental study was to generate composite material based on natural fiber
that presented good performance in noise control for noise barrier
applications. Based on
the observed results, several predictions have been formulated. The first
suggests that the sound absorption coefficient obtained from oil palm exhibited
superior performance. On the other hand, for overall average performance, sugar
cane dominated, likely due to its promotion of low density and low stiffness.
The second prediction indicates that the transmission loss of coconut fiber
material surpassed that of other fibers, attributed to morphology-related
factors. The sugar cane performance showed stable results on average compared
to others which fluctuated. The third found that lay-up techniques of composite
showed that it is very difficult to achieve the desired results due to the
natural fiber presenting low density, which causes a lack of homogeneity of
composite. However, the overall results showed an improvement in both sound
absorption coefficient and transmission loss with the addition of fiber
content. The last recommendation is to explore hybrid fiber content in noise
control studies, aiming to address morphology issues by filling the void among
fibers.
On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author expresses
profound appreciation to Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM) for the
facilitative support provided by the laboratory, technicians, and all equipment
during the completion of the research.
Abdi, D.D., Monazzam, M., Taban, E., Putra, A., Golbabaei, F., Khadem,
M., 2021. Sound Absorption Performance of Natural Fiber Composite from Chrome
Shave and Coffee Silver Skin. Applied Acoustics, Volume 182, p. 108264
Abdulkareem, M., Havukainen, J., Nuortila-Jokinen,
J., Horttanainen, M., 2021. Life Cycle
Assessment of A Low-Height Noise Barrier For Railway Traffic Noise. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume
323, p. 129169
Araújo, A.L., Madeira, J.F.A., 2020. Multiobjective Optimization
Solutions for Noise Reduction in Composite Sandwich Panels Using Active
Control. Composite Structures, Volume
247, p. 112440
Bhingare, N.H., Prakash, S., 2021. An Experimental And Theoretical
Investigation Of Coconut Coir Material For Sound Absorption Characteristics. In:
Mater Today: Proceeding, Volume
43, pp. 1545–1551
Choudhary, S., Haloi, J., Sain, M.K., Saraswat, P.,
Kumar, V., 2023. Systematic Literature Review
on Thermal and Acoustic Characteristics of Natural Fibre Polymer Composites for
Automobile Applications. In:
Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 2023
Ciach, M., Fara?, H., Fröhlich, A., Fedyn, I.,
2022. Contrasting Effects of Light and Noise
Pollution Interact with Natural Vegetation Remnants: Human-Related Indicators
Of The Habitat Suitability For Ungulates In The Urban Landscape. Ecological Indicators, Volume 142, p.
109261
Corredor-Bedoya, A.C., Zoppi, R.A., Serpa A.L.,
2017. Composites of Scrap Tire Rubber Particles and Adhesive Mortar E Noise
Insulation Potential. Cement and Concrete
Composites. Volume 82, pp. 46–66
Da-Silva, C.C.B., Terashima, F.J.H., Barbieri, N., De-Lima, K.F., 2019. Sound
Absorption Coefficient Assessment of Sisal, Coconut Husk and Sugar Cane Fibers
For Low Frequencies Based on Three Different Methods. Applied Acoustics, Volume 156, pp. 92–100
Dasore, A., Rajak, U., Balijepalli, R., Verma,
T.N., Ramakrishna, K., 2022. An Overview of
Refinements, Processing Methods and Properties of Natural Fiber Composites. In:
Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 49, pp. 296–300
Echeverria, CA, Pahlevani F, Handoko W, Jiang C, Doolan C, Sahajwalla
V., 2019. Engineered Hybrid Fibre Reinforced Composites For Sound Absorption
Building Applications. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Volume
143, pp. 1–14
Gu, Y.W., Nie, X., Yan, A.G., Zeng, J.H., Liu, Y.F., Jiang, Y.X., 2022.
Experimental And Numerical Study on Vibration and Structure-Borne Noise of
High-Speed Railway Composite Bridge. Applied
Acoustics, Volume 192, p. 108757
Guha, A.K., Gokhale, S., 2023. Urban Workers' Cardiovascular Health Due
to Exposure to Traffic-Originated PM2.5 and Noise Pollution in Different
Microenvironments. Science of the Total Environment,
Volume 859, p. 160268
Hariprasad, K., Ravichandran, K., Jayaseelan,
V., Muthuramalingam, T., 2020. Acoustic and
Mechanical Zcharacterization of Polypropylene Composites Reinforced by Natural
Fibres for Automotive Applications, Journal
of Materials Research and Technology, Volume 9(6), pp. 14029–14035
Hassan, T., Jamshaid, H., Mishra, R., Khan, M.Q., Petru M., Novak, J.,
2020. Acoustic, Mechanical And Thermal Properties Of Green Composites
Reinforced With Natural Fibers Waste. Polymers
(Basel), Volume 12(3), p. 654
Ilangovan, M., Navada, A.P., Guna, V.,
Touchaleaume, F., Saulnier, B., Grohens, Y., Reddy, N., 2022. Hybrid Biocomposites with High Thermal And Noise
Insulation From Discarded Wool, Poultry Feathers, and Their Blends. Construction and Building Materials,
Volume 345, p. 128324
Indrasti, N.S., Ismayana, A., Maddu, A., Utomo, S.S., 2020. Synthesis of
Nano-silica from Boiler Ash in the Sugar Cane Industry using the Precipitation
Method. International Journal of
Technology, Volume 11(2), pp. 422–435
Kesharwani, A., Bedi, R., Bagha, A.K., Bahl, S., 2020. Experimental
Study To Measure The Sound Transmission Loss Of Natural Fibers At Tonal
Excitations. In: Materials
Today: Proceedings, Volume 28, pp. 1554-1559.
Khair, F., Putra, A., Nor, M., Selamat, M., 2015. Enhancement On
Acoustical Performance Of Feed ‘Imperata Cylindrica. In: Proceeding Mech
Eng Res Day, Volume 192(3), pp. 601–608.
Lim, C.W., Yaw, Z., Chen, Z., 2022. Periodic and Aperiodic 3-D Composite
Metastructures with Ultrawide Bandgap for Vibration and Noise Control. Composite Structures, Volume 287, p.
115324
Mago, J., Negi, A., Pant, K.K., Fatima, S., 2022. Development of Natural
Rubber-Bamboo Biochar Composites for Vibration and Noise Control Applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume
373, p. 133760
Operato, L., Vitiello, L., Aprea, P.,
Ambrogi, V., de Luna, M.S., Filippone, G., 2023. Life Cycle Assessment of Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Green Composites Filled
With Pine Needles or Kenaf Fibers. Journal
of Cleaner Production, Volume 387, p. 135901
Ouakarrouch M., Bousshine S., Bybi A., Laaroussi N., Garoum M., 2022. Applied Acoustics, Volume 199, p.109007.
Raj, M., Fatima, S., Tandon, N., 2020. A Study Of Areca Nut Leaf Sheath Fibers As A Green
Sound-Absorbing Material. Applied Acoustics, Volume 169, p. 107490
Rendón, J., Giraldo, C.H., Monyake, K.C., Alagha, L., Colorado, H.A., 2023.
Experimental Investigation on Composites Incorporating Rice Husk Nanoparticles
for Environmental Noise Management. Journal
of Environmental Management, Volume 325, p. 116477
Saini, M.K., Bagha, A.K., Kumar, S., 2020. Experimental Study to Measure The Transmission Loss Of
Double Panel Natural Fibers. In:
Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume
26, pp. 482–48
Samodra, F.X.T.B., 2018. Optimization of Architectural Electroacoustics Design for the Interior
Mezzanines of Vertical Buildings. International
Journal of Technology, Volume 9(2), pp. 246–256
Sasikumar, K.S.K., Saravanan, N., Sambathkumar, M.,
Guekndran, R., 2020. Acoustic
Characterization Of Farm Residues For Sound Absorption Applications. Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 33,
pp. 2917–2922
Sharma, S., Sudhakara, P., Singh, J., Singh, S., Singh, G., 2023.
Emerging Progressive Developments In The Fibrous Composites For Acoustic
Applications. Journal of Manufacturing
Processes, Volume 102, pp. 443–477
Shokouhian, M., Owolabi, O., Efe, S., Ikiriko,
S., Tsegaye, T., 2021. Development of A
Highway Geometry Based Noise Abatement Model. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Volume 10,
p. 100382
Soltani, P., Taban, E., Faridan, M,, Samaei, S.E.,
Amininasab, S., 2020. Experimental and Computational Investigation of Sound
Absorption Performance of Sustainable Porous Material: Yucca Gloriosa Fiber. Applied
Acoustics, Volume 157, p. 106999
Suwan, T., Maichin, P., Fan, M., Jitsangiam, P., Tangchirapat, W.,
Chindaprasirt, P., 2021. Influence of Alkalinity on Self-Treatment Process of
Natural Fiber and Properties of Its Geopolymeric Composites. Construction and Building Materials, Volume
316, p. 125817
Yu, Y., Su, J., Jerrett, M., Paul, K.C., Lee, E., Shih, I.F., Haan, M.,
Ritz, B., 2023. Air Pollution and Traffic Noise Interact to Affect Cognitive
Health in Older Mexican Americans. Environment
International, Volume 173, p. 107810
Yudha, S.S., Banon, C., Falahudin, A., Reagen, M.A., Kaus, N.H.M.,
Salaeh, S., 2023. Fabrication of Silver-Silica Composite using the
Carbo-thermal Degradation of Oil Palm Leaves for the Reduction of
p-nitrophenol. International Journal of
Technology, Volume 14(2), pp. 290–299
Yusoff, N.M., Lee, H.K., Ng, E.K., Rosli, N.S., Abdullah, C.A.C.,
Alresheedi, M.T., Mahdi, M.A., 2023. Titania-Coated Silica Nanocomposite For
L-Band Noise-Like Pulse Fiber Laser. Journal
of Luminescence, Volume 258, p. 119779
Zhang, J., Yao, D., Peng, W., Wang, R., Li, J., Guo, S., 2022. Optimal
Design of Lightweight Acoustic Metamaterials for Low-Frequency Noise and
Vibration Control of High-Speed Train Composite Floor. Applied Acoustics, Volume 199, p. 109041
Zheng, J., Li, X., Zhang, X., Bi, R., Qiu, X., 2022. Structure-Borne Noise of
Fully Enclosed Sound Barriers Composed of Engineered Cementitious Composites on
High-Speed Railway Bridges. Applied
Acoustics, Volume 192, p. 108705