Published at : 30 Oct 2019
Volume : IJtech
Vol 10, No 5 (2019)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i5.518
Dedi Suwandi | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Indramayu, Jl.Lohbener Lama No.8 Lohbener, Indramayu, West Java 45252, Indonesia |
Rofan Aziz | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Indramayu, Jl.Lohbener Lama No.8 Lohbener, Indramayu, West Java 45252, Indonesia |
Agus Sifa | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Indramayu, Jl.Lohbener Lama No.8 Lohbener, Indramayu, West Java 45252, Indonesia |
Emin Haris | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Indramayu, Jl.Lohbener Lama No.8 Lohbener, Indramayu, West Java 45252, Indonesia |
Jos Istiyanto | Department Mechanical of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
Yudan Whulanza | Department Mechanical of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
This paper offers an
alternative method of making PCB routing using a negative dry film photoresist
and a maskless photolithography method. The objective of this research is
determining the correct parameters for the process of making PCB design easier,
cheaper and safer. Electronic circuit design was created on a laptop or PC
using Autodesk EAGLE software with a combination of result is black and blue light
color. PCB routing design was inserted into a PowerPoint slide to display on a
commercial Digital Light Processing (DLP) projector. No modifications were made
to projector, which was mounted directly on a stand with a downward facing
position. The projector lamp replaced an ultraviolet or X-ray source during the
exposure process, exposing PCB coated in negative dry film photoresist. After
the exposure process, the PCB was inserted into developer solution, causing the
blue light irradiated part to remain while the blackened sections dissolved.
The PCB was then added to an etching solution to scrape the copper unprotected
by the photoresist. The PCB was finally soaked in a remover solution to remove
the photoresist. Once complete, the process generated a laptop-designed PCB
routing. Electrical lines can be created using this method with a size of 100
µm and a lane edge deviation of 5 µm. The goal of research to make PCB routing
cheaper, easier and safer was achieved. Evidenced by the installation of
electronic components and then tested, the results are all components function
well.
Dry film photoresist; Lithography; Maskless; Maskless lithography; PCB
The manufacture of PCB routing can be performed
manually. That is, drawing electrical paths directly on a PCB using a permanent
marker, and then placing the board into an etchant solution. The advantages of
such methods are its ease and inexpensive nature, but it cannot be used to
create identical profiles in large quantities, and the resulting lines are
significantly rough. In the transfer method (mold removal), PCB paper is
printed with a laser printer then ironed onto a PCB, transferring the electric
line profile to the board before being inserted into enchanting solution. The transfer
method can make identical paths and more complicated profile shapes than the
manual process. However, its disadvantages include broken lines that must be
connected with permanent marker and PCB line size that remains significantly
rough.
PCB laser printer technology can erode a PCB with a laser beam (Triano & Collins, 2013; Alwaidh et al., 2014), which allows complicated and smooth profiles to be generated. Yet, such work takes a long time, requires expensive machines and tools, and is inherently dangerous due to laser beam utilization. A PCB milling method mechanically scrapes the PCB (Seo et al., 2011; B?aez et al., 2012) to create complicated profiles with matching repetitive quality. The disadvantage of the milling method is that the pattern is rough, takes a long time, is expensive, the tool breaks easily.
The most widely used, and still developing, method is
lithography, which is distinguished by its use of light sources. Specifically,
ultraviolet (UV) lithography (Bertsch et al., 1999; Hirai et al., 2006) uses UV
rays to produce micro profiles and X-ray lithography (Romanato et al., 2004; Nazmov,
2015; Zhao et al., 2017) uses X-ray beams capable of producing nanoscale
profiles. Although lithography can provide high-quality products quickly, it is
significantly expensive and dangerous. Of the several existing methods, each
with its own challenges in PCB routing creation, there is not yet a method
capable of producing complicated paths with small and smooth profiles at a low
cost while maintaining easy and safe manufacture.
Some method improvements have been made by replacing
UV light and X-rays with visible projector light and maskless lithography
method (Rajan et al., 2013). The exposure process described by Rajan et al.
(2013) was sourced from a DLP projector. However, the projector required
modification and an added stereo microscope, making it less than
straightforward and preventing this method from being applied to copper or a
PCB.
Modifying maskless lithography with Digital Mirror
Device (DMD), the use of mercury lamp light has been performed successfully
(Zhong et al., 2014). The modifications produced maskless real-time results
with no alignment errors as well as time and cost savings. Despite this, the
method is not simple and rendering it not yet inapplicable to copper or PCB.
The maskless photolithography method was then modified
further by using an unmodified commercial DLP projector (Suwandi et al., 2014),
and was successfully applied to copper by using bacteria Acidithiobacillus
ferrooxidans NBRC 14262 as a scraper (a form of biomachining). This process
produced a path profile with the smallest size of 180 ?m and 26 ?m deviations.
The weakness of the method was that the erosion process took a long time (2-3 day). A DLP
projector was also used in a seedless-electroplating process with maskless
lithography replacing the Lithographie,
Galvanoformung, Abformung (LIGA) process (Whulanza et al., 2015), and this
process successfully deposited nickel onto a silicon wafer.
This paper will attempt to improve the visible
light maskless photolithography method by replacing a negative tone photoresist
with a negative dry film photoresist. This replacement will eliminate some
processes, such as pre-baking and spin coating, making the process more
straightforward. Then, the copper etching process before using bacteria was
replaced with liquid etching so that it was faster.
A maskless photolithography process was performed successfully using an
infocus in114a dlp projector and applying dry film photoresists within
established parameters of exposure time: four minutes, developing time: three
minutes, etching time: two minutes, and removing time: one minute. Some
products maskless photolithography process that successfully made such a
flip-flop lamp, mini power supply, and alarm. The smallest pcb routing width
produced is 100 µm ± 5 µm.
This
research was supported by Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan
Tinggi Republik Indonesia.
Alwaidh, A., Sharp, M.,
French, P., 2014. Laser Processing of Rigid and Flexible PCBs. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Volume 58, pp. 109–113
B?aez, A.M., Leon, G.M.,
Dom´?nguez, E.G., Gallardo, C.S., 2012. Processing Gerber Files for
Manufacturing Printed Circuit Boards. Procedia
Engineering, Volume 35, pp. 240–244
Bertsch, A., Lorenz, H.,
Renaud, P., 1999. 3D Microfabrication by Combining Micro Stereo Lithography and
Thick Resist UV Lithography. Sensors and
Actuators A: Physical, Volume 73(1-2), pp. 14–23
DuPont, 1997. Riston 200
Data Sheet and Processing Information, Rev. 1.2 DuPont Photopolymer &
Electronic Material, DuPont Electronic Technologies, USA: Research Triangle
Park
Hirai, Y., Inamoto, Y.,
Sugano, K., Tsuchiya, T., Tabata, O., 2006. Moving Mask UV Lithography for
Three-dimensional Structuring. Journal of
Micromechanics and Microengineering, Volume 17(2), pp. 199–206
InFocus, 2014. IN112a,
IN114a, IN114STa, IN116a, IN112aT, IN114aT User’s Guide. InFocus
Corporation, 13190 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 200, Portland, Oregon, USA
Nazmov, V., Reznikova, E.,
Mohr, J., Schulz, J., Voigt, A., 2015. Development and Characterization of
Ultra-high Aspect Ratio Microstructures Made by Ultra-Deep X-ray Lithography. Journal of Materials Processing Technology,
Volume 225, pp. 170–177
Rajan, D.K., Raunio, J.P.,
Karjalainen, M.T., Ryynänen, T., Lekkala, J., 2013. Novel Method for Intensity
Correction using a Simple Maskless Lithography Device. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Volume 194, pp. 40–46
Romanato, F., Tormen, M.,
Businaro, L., Vaccari, L., Stomeo, T., Passaseo, A., Di Fabrizio, E., 2004.
X-ray Lithography for 3D Microfluidic Applications. Microelectronic Engineering, Volume 73-74, pp. 870–875
Seo, T.S., Song, B.U., Seo,
K.H., Chol, J.H., Yoon, G.S., 2011. A Study of Optimization of Machining
Conditions in Micro End-milling by using Response Surface Design. International Journal of Technology,
Volume 2(3), pp. 248–256
Suwandi, D., Istiyanto, J., Whulanza,
Y., 2014. Visible Light Maskless Photolithography for Biomachining Application.
Applied Mechanics and Materials,
Volume 493, pp. 552–557
Triano, A., Collins, S., 2013.
Development of a PCB Printer using an Ultraviolet Laser Diode. IEEE Long Island
Systems. In: Applications and Technology
Conference (LISAT), pp. 1–6
Whulanza, Y., Sitanggang, T.,
Istiyanto, J., Supriadi, S., 2015. Seedless-electroplating Process Development
for Microfeatures Realization. International
Journal of Technology,
Volume 6(6), pp. 1050–1056
Zhao, J., Wu, Y., Xue, C.,
Yang, S., Wang, L., Zhu, F., Zhu, Z., Liu, B., Wang, Y., Tai, R., 2017.
Fabrication of High Aspect Ratio Nanoscale Periodic Structures by the Soft
X-ray Interference Lithography. Microelectronic
Engineering, Volume 170,
pp. 49–53
Zhong, K., Gao, Y., Li, F.,
Lou, N., Zhang, W., 2014. Fabrication of Continuous Relief Micro-Optic Elements
using Real-time Maskless Lithography Technique on DMD. Optics & Laser Technology, Volume 56, pp. 367–371