Published at : 21 Apr 2020
Volume : IJtech
Vol 11, No 2 (2020)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v11i2.905
Husin Ibrahim | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Medan, 20155, Medan, Indonesia. |
Arridina Susan Silitonga | - Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Medan, 20155, Medan, Indonesia. - Department of Mechanical Engineering, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia |
Rahmawaty | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Medan, 20155, Medan, Indonesia. |
Surya Dharma | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Syiah Kuala University, 23111 Banda Aceh, Indonesia |
Abdi Hanra Sebayang | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Medan, 20155, Medan, Indonesia. |
Khairil | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Syiah Kuala University, 23111 Banda Aceh, Indonesia |
Sumartono | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Medan, 20155, Medan, Indonesia. |
Joko Sutrisno | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Medan, 20155, Medan, Indonesia. |
Abdul Razak | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Medan, 20155, Medan, Indonesia |
The ultrasound method is used
to improve mass transfer between incompressible reactants which increases their
chemical reaction and reduces reaction time as well as energy consumption. In
this research, transesterification process variables of rice bran oil were
optimized using response surface methodology (RSM). Three process parameters
were investigated, namely methanol to oil molar ratio, catalyst concentration,
and time. The optimum conditions of the transesterification process based on
RSM were: (1) methanol to oil molar ratio: 1:6; (2) catalyst concentration:
0.5% wt.; and (3) time: 48 min, with methyl ester yield of 94.12 %. The optimum
rice bran methyl ester yield predicted by RSM was validated by replicating
three independent parameters with showed average rice bran methyl ester yield
of 93.98%. The properties of the rice bran biodiesel properties were measured
and the values met the requirements of the ASTM D6751 and EN 14214 standards.
Biodiesel; Response surface methodology; Rice bran; Ultrasound
Rapid depletion of fossil fuels coupled with increasing
awareness of environmental issues, concerns over rising greenhouse gas
emissions and escalating petroleum prices have prompted scientists and researchers
to explore renewable and environmental friendly alternative energy sources (Salaheldeen et al., 2015; Said et al., 2018).
Biodiesel is a type of renewable fuel, biodegradable, non-toxic and a potential
alternative for fossil fuel (Tse et al., 2015;
Leong, et., 2016). Rice (Oryza sativa Linn) bran is a thin layer
between the rice and its husk which is removed to polish the rice. It consists
of pericarp, tegmen (endosperm covering layer), aleurone and sub -aleurone. (Ju and Vali, 2005) and makes up 8% of the
harvested rice. The oil content of rice bran is about 16-32% based on its
weight (Anwar et al., 2005). The oil composition of jatropha and rubber
seed are higher accounting for 55% and 45% of their respective total weight (Ramadhas et al., 2005).
Ultrasound is an energy that absorbs mass and heat transfer
which is an alternative reaction system that can increase the synthesis of
biodiesel process (Maghami et al., 2015). In
recent years, researches have applied ultrasound probes, ultrasound baths or
horns sonochemical reactors in biodiesel synthesis (Koutsouki
et al., 2016). Compared with the conventional method, the
ultrasound-assisted methods have the advantages of shorter reaction time, less
catalyst time, higher methyl ester yields, and less energy in biodiesel
production. (Prakash Maran and Priya, 2015).
Response surface methodology (RSM) is an effective statistical technique used
to establish the relationship between a set of experimental parameters and
results. The RSM defines the effect of the independent variables, and also
generates mathematical models. Therefore, many researchers have studied
biodiesel production using RSM in order to produce high methyl ester and
improve the quality of biodiesel (Dharma et al.,
2016; Sebayang et al., 2017; Milano et al., 2018).
The present study is aimed at optimising the transesterification of rice bran oil using an ultrasound technique. The properties of the rice bran methyl ester were investigated using EN 14214 and ASTM D6751 standards. Results showed producing biodiesel using ultrasound can save cost, time and energy.
In this study, ultrasound-assisted biodiesel production from
crude rice bran oil was evaluated through RSM modelling. The optimisation
process was conducted based on three main parameters: methanol to oil ratio,
reaction time and catalyse concentration. The optimal parameters are methanol
to oil ratio 6:1, reaction time: 48 min and catalyst used: 0.51 wt.%. The
methyl ester yield predicted under these process conditions is 94.12%. The
limitation of this experiment was the capacity the equipment. Therefore, using
a more powerful ultrasound can be explored in future studies to find out if
that increases yields. Results showed the RSM model is reliable in predicting
the values of dependent variables on the conversion of rice bran methyl ester
using ultrasound.
The authors express their gratitude to Direktorat Jenderal Penguatan Riset dan
Pengembangan Kementerian Riset dan Teknologi, Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
Republik Indonesia (Grant No. 032/SP2H/LT/DRPM, No. 147/SP2H/LT/DRPM/2019) and
Politeknik Negeri Medan, Medan, Indonesia.
Anwar, F., Anwer, T., Mahmood, Z., 2005. Methodical Characterization
of Rice (Oryza sativa) Bran Oil from
Pakistan. Grasas Aceites, Volume 56,
pp. 125–134
Balat, M., Balat, H., 2008. A Critical Review of
Bio-diesel as a Vehicular Fuel. Energy Conversion and Management, Volume
49, pp. 2727–2741
Dharma, S.,
Masjuki, H.H., Ong, H.C., Sebayang, A.H., Silitonga, A.S., Kusumo, F., Mahlia,
T.M.I., 2016. Optimization of Biodiesel Production Process for Mixed Jatropha Curcas–Ceiba Pentandra Biodiesel using Response Surface Methodology. Energy Conversion and Management,
Volume 115, pp. 178–190
Dwivedi, G., Sharma, M.P., 2015. Application of Box–Behnken Design in Optimization
of Biodiesel Yield from Pongamia Oil and its Stability Analysis. Fuel, Volume 145 , pp.256–262
Ejikeme, P., I. Anyaogu, C. Ejikeme, N. Nwafor, C.
Egbuonu, K. Ukogu, and J. Ibemesi. 2010. Catalysis in biodiesel production by
transesterification processes-An insight.
Journal Chemical, Volume 7, pp.1120–1132
Ju, Y.-H., Vali, S.R., 2005. Rice Brand Oil as a Potential
Resource for Biodiesel: A Review. Journal
of Science and Industrial Research, Volume 64, pp. 866–882
Koutsouki, A.A., Tegou, E., Badeka, A., Kontakos, S.,
Pomonis, P.J., Kontominas, M.G., 2016. In Situ and Conventional
Transesterification of Rapeseeds for Biodiesel Production: The Effect of Direct
Sonication. Industrial Crops and Products,
Volume 84, pp. 399–407
Leong, S.K.,
Lam, S.S., Ani, F.N., Ng, J.H., Chong, C.T., 2016. Production of Pyrolyzed Oil
from Crude Glycerol using a Microwave Heating Technique. International Journal of Technology, Volume 7(2), pp. 323–331
Leung, D.Y.C., Wu, X., Leung, M.K.H., 2010. A Review
on Biodiesel Production using Catalyzed Transesterification. Applied Energy, Volume 87(4), pp. 1083–1095
Maghami, M., Sadrameli, S.M., Ghobadian, B., 2015. Production of Biodiesel
from Fishmeal Plant Waste Oil using Ultrasonic and Conventional Methods. Applied Thermal Engineering, Volume 75,
pp. 575–579
Milano, J.,
Ong, H.C., Masjuki, H.H., Silitonga, A.S., Chen, W.H., Kusumo, F., Dharma, S.,
Sebayang, A.H., 2018. Optimization of Biodiesel Production by Microwave Irradiation-assisted
Transesterification for Waste Cooking Oil-Calophyllum
Inophyllum Oil via Response Surface Methodology. Energy Conversion and Management, Volume 158, pp. 400–415
Moser, B.R., 2009. Biodiesel Production,
Properties, and Feedstocks. In Vitro
Cellular Develop Biology Plant, Volume 45, pp. 229–266
Pandit, P.R., Fulekar, M.H., 2017. Egg Shell Waste as
Heterogeneous Nanocatalyst for Biodiesel Production: Optimized by Response
Surface Methodology. Journal Enviromental
Management, Volume 198, pp. 319–329
Prakash Maran, J., Priya, B., 2015. Modeling of Ultrasound
Assisted Intensification of Biodiesel Production from Neem (Azadirachta Indica) Oil using Response
Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network. Fuel, Volume 143, pp. 262–267
Pereira, E., dos Santos, L.M., Einloft, S., Seferin, M.,
Dulius, J., 2015. Biodiesel Production from High FFA Degummed Rice Bran Oil by
a Two-step Process using Ethanol/Methanol and a Green Catalyst. Waste and Biomass Valorization, Volume
6, pp. 343–351
Ramadhas, A.S., Jayaraj, S., Muraleedharan, C., 2005.
Biodiesel Production from High FFA Rubber Seed Oil. Fuel, Volume 84(4), pp. 335–340
Said, N.H.,
Ani, F.N., Said, F.M.F, 2018. Emission and Performance Characteristics of Waste
Cooking Oil Biodiesel Blends in a Single Direct Injection Diesel Engine. International Journal of Technology.
Volume 9(2), pp. 238–245
Salaheldeen, M., Aroua, M.K., Mariod, A.A., Cheng, S.F., Abdelrahman,
M.A., Atabani, A.E., 2015. Physicochemical Characterization and Thermal
Behavior of Biodiesel and Biodiesel–diesel Blends Derived from Crude Moringa Peregrina Seed Oil. Energy Conversion and Management, Volume
92, pp. 535–542
Salamatinia, B., Mootabadi, H., Bhatia, S., Abdullah, A.Z.,
2010. Optimization of Ultrasonic-assisted Heterogeneous Biodiesel Production from
Palm Oil: A Response Surface Methodology Approach. Fuel Processing Technology, Volume 91(5), pp. 441–448
Satyanarayana, M., Muraleedharan, C. 2011. A comparative
study of vegetable oil methyl esters (biodiesels).Energy , Volume 36, pp.2129–2137
Sebayang,
A.H., Masjuki, H.H., Ong, H.C., Dharma, S., Silitonga, A.S., Mahlia, T.M.I.,
Aditya, H.B., 2017.
Optimization of Reducing Sugar Production from Manihot glaziovii Starch using Response Surface Methodology. Energies, Volume 10, pp.1–13
Tse, H., Leung, C.W., Cheung, C.S., 2015. Investigation on the Combustion
Characteristics and Particulate Emissions from a Diesel Engine Fueled with Diesel-Biodiesel-Ethanol
Blends. Energy, Volume 83, pp. 343–350