Published at : 31 Oct 2017
Volume : IJtech
Vol 8, No 5 (2017)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v8i5.872
Febrianti, F., 2017. Bioethanol Production from Tofu Waste by Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation (SSF) using Microbial Consortium. International Journal of Technology. Volume 8(5), pp. 898-908
Fitria Febrianti | Major Program of Biotechnology, Graduate School, Bogor Agricultural University, Darmaga Campus, Bogor 16680, Indonesia |
Khaswar Syamsu | Department of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Bogor Agricultural University, Darmaga Campus, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia |
Mulyorini Rahayuningsih | Department of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Bogor Agricultural University, Darmaga Campus, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia |
Tofu
waste can be used as a raw material for bioethanol production due to
its high carbohydrate content in the form of starch. A microbial
consortium, consisting of Aspergillus
niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The study’s first objective wasto capture the amount of sugar produced from starch hydrolysis using
single cultures of Aspergillus niger.The study’s second objective wasto determine the amount of
ethanol produced by the SSF technique. Aspergillus niger was used to produce an amylase enzyme that hydrolyzes starch into
simple sugar.Then, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used to produce bioethanol from the sugar produced earlier.The synthesis of bioethanol consists of two main
stages, hydrolysis and fermentation. In previous studies, the hydrolysis and
fermentation processes were performed separatelyusing a separated hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF)technique. This studyprocesses via a simultaneous saccharification and
fermentation (SSF) technique which produced higher substrate
efficiency, cell yield, and product yield compared to the SHF process.The characterization process showed that tofu
waste flour was mainly composed of carbohydrates, which comprised 52.82±0.01% (dw) and had a starch content of 35.1±0.2%
(dw). Sugar from the starch of the tofu waste was produced by
batch system cultivation for 84 hours using Aspergillus
niger. The highest sugar production (14.48 g/L) was achieved during the 48th hour. Then, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used to convert the produced sugar into bioethanol. The
production of bioethanol by SSF using a microbial consortium for 72
hours was 7.69 g/L of
bioethanol, with a yield of bioethanol per substrate use (Yp/s) of 0.23 g ethanol/g substrate and a substrate conversion efficiency of 88%.
Aspergillus niger; Bioethanol; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation; Tofu waste
Indonesia has one of the highest rates of energy consumption in
the world. Based on data from the Directorate General of New Renewable Energy
and Energy Conservation in the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (2014),
Indonesia’s fuel consumption increased from 297.8 million barrels of fuel in
2005 to 394.052 million barrels of fuel in 2014. In contrast to this increased
consumption, Indonesia’s fuel production has significantly declined in recent
years. While Indonesia produced 268.5 million barrels of fuel in 2005, fuel production
decreased by more than 50% to 122.9 million barrels in 2014.
Because ofthis shortage, fuel must be imported from
overseas.Bioethanol is an alternative
renewable
energy resource.It can be produced from biomass
that is categorized into sugar, starch, and lignocellulose-based material
(Kelly et al., 2009). Tofu waste is a potential bioethanol
feedstock since 59.95% of its contents are
carbohydrates (Yustina& Abadi, 2012)
and starch (Sudaryati et al., 2013). Tofu waste is abundantly available in Indonesia and has low economic value. Currently, tofu waste’s
utility is limited to feed material.
Starch-based material
requires a hydrolyzing agent to convert the starch into simple glucose. Based on Zambare (2010), Aspergillus niger mold has significant
potential to produce amylase and glucoamylase enzymes that can hydrolyze starch into sugar.The amylase family has two
major classes: (1) dextrin, fructose, glucose, lactose, and maltose; and (2) starch enzymesconsisting of amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) and
glucoamylase (EC 3.2.1.3). Amylase can hydrolyze starch into maltose and glucose,while glucoamylase (GA) can produce single glucose units.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae can potentially be used as a fermentation
agent to convert glucose into
ethanol.Based on Hossain et al. (2017), utilization of agricultural
waste using Saccharomyces cerevisiaewith SSF technique can increase
bioethanol production.
SSF can provide the following advantages:
(1) increase the speed of the hydrolysis process by sugar conversion; (2) reduce the enzyme requirement; (3)
increase product yield; and (4) reduce
the need for sterilization (Zhang et al., 2011).SSF technique using both Aspergillus
nigerand Saccharomyces
cerevisiae can
produce ethanol simultaneously from the accumulation of sugar that was produced from the starch-based material.
The synthesis of bioethanol from starch
consists of two main stages, hydrolysis and fermentation. In previous studies, the hydrolysis and fermentation processes were
performed separatelyusing a separated hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF)technique. According to Ali et al. (2011), an SSF technique using a microbial
consortium is more effective than SHF (Separated Hydrolysis and
Fermentation) technique. SSF can produce a higher ethanol yield which ismore productive than
SHF (Dahnum et al., 2015).
Based on the study by Arnata and Dewi (2013), using a microbial
consortium such as Trichoderma spp., Aspergillus spp., or Saccharomycescerevisiae in a medium of cassava starch
at the beginning of the cultivation process can increase the ethanol content by
11% (w/v) and increase efficiency by 40% (w/v) compared to a monoculture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Currently, producing bioethanol as biofuel is not competitive compared to conventional fuel due to its higher production cost. There are at least two strategies to reduce the
cost of production: (1) usingcheap and abundant substrates; and (2) improvingprocess technology to increase yield and productivity.A microbial consortium,
consisting of Aspergillus nigerand Saccharomyces cerevisiae,was used instead of commercial enzymes to minimize
production costs. In this study, the synthesis of enzyme derived from microorganisms without
the addition of synthetic enzyme.
This study were to find (1) the pattern of
Aspergillus niger growth; (2)
determine the highest sugar production time during cultivation; and (3) analyze
tofu waste as a potential medium of bioethanol production using an SSF
technique and a microbial consortium.
2.1. Preparation
of Tofu Waste
Flour as Media
One kilogram of wet tofu
waste was squeezed
to obtain a starch
suspension and dried at 80oCfor 9 hours in an oven. Then the
tofu waste
was milled using a food
processor, and a flour of waste tofu was then tested in dry weight form. The tofu waste flour was characterizedthroughproximate
analysis (AOAC, 1995) ofthe starch,
amylose, and amylopectin using the Anthrone method (Sattler and
Zerban, 1948).
2.2. Preparation
Cultures of the Microbial Consortium
The isolated
cultures
utilizedin this study (Saccharomyces
cerevisiae(IPBCC.Y.
05.544)andAspergillus niger(IPB.93.265.CCBS420.64)) were obtained from the Institut Pertanian Bogor Culture Collection (IPBCC) at
Bogor Agriculture University. Isolates of Aspergillus niger were refreshed on a Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium (Bratachem,
Indonesia). The
culture was incubated at 25oC, for 5–7 days before inoculation.Isolates
of Saccharomyces cerevisiae were
refreshedon a PDA medium and incubated for 3 days. Isolates were grown on 50 ml
of Yeast Malt Broth (YMB)propagation medium
(Bratachem, Indonesia) consisting of 5 g/l yeast extract,
5 g/l malt, 10 g/l glucose, and 5 g/l peptone in a 200 ml Erlenmeyer flask.
Incubation was performed in a 125 rpm shaker at room temperature (±30oC) for 24 hours before inoculation.
2.3. Cultivation of Aspergillus niger
Cultivation
of Aspergillus niger was carried out
to determine the microbial growth curve. Biomass yield, residual starch, total sugar, and total plate count (TPC) from the cultivation process were used to identify the pattern
of growth and the required time for highest sugar production. Tofu waste flour
witha concentration of 10% (w/v) was dissolved in 1.2 liters of distilled water
and then 10% (v/v) inoculum was added to the substrate. The cultivation process
was carried out at room temperature by using 150 rpm agitation and 1 vvm
aeration. A sample was taken every 12 hours for 84 hours.
3.1. Characterization of Tofu Waste Flour
Drying was carried out to reduce the wet tofu waste’s high water content. Reducing
thesize of the tofu waste increases the surface area of
the material, facilitating enzyme hydrolysis performance. In this study,1 kg of wet tofu waste produced 200–300 g of tofu waste flour. Tofu waste flour containsnutrients needed by
microbes such as protein, fat, and glucose. The characteristics of tofu waste flour in proximate analysisare shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Proximate analysis of tofu waste flour
Component |
Composition (%) LiteratureResultd |
|
Water |
5.74a |
9.50 ±0.10 |
Ash (dw) |
9.02a |
8.16±0.20 |
Fat (dw) |
14.49a |
11.30 ±0.05 |
Protein (dw) |
10.04a |
17.02±0.02 |
Carbohydrate (dw) |
59.95a |
54.04±0.03 |
Starch |
11.49b |
39.23±0.20 |
Fiber |
19.47c |
12.38±0.10 |
Amylose |
No literature |
28.09±0.07 |
Amylopectin |
No literature |
73.00±0.10 |
These data have been processed. The mean ± standard deviation (n
= 2); dw: dry weight
aYustina& Abadi (2012), bSudaryati et al. (2013),cJenie
et al. (2004), dAnalysis Result.
Tofu waste is a perishable product due to its high water
content. Environmental pollution will occur if the tofu waste is disposed of carelessly or without being processed. Tofu waste
should be dried to
reduce the water content, crushed, and sifted into aflour so it has more
surface area and
therebyinteract better with water and facilitate enzyme
hydrolysis.
Tofu waste contains 39.23% of starch, a much
higher proportion than the 11.49% of starch in soybean waste reported by (Sudaryati et al., 2013). This difference may be attributable to the duration
of soybean harvesting. Starch content decreasesasharvest time
increases. The plant
enzymes able to hydrolyze starch into
simple sugar also change over
time (Winarno, 1997).
The
amylose and amylopectin levels in the tofu waste flour in this study were 28.09±0.07% and
73.00±0.1%, respectively. The proportion of amylose and
amylopectin from different sources vary depending on variety and growth location (Winarno, 1997). Protein was detected in about 17.02±0.02% (dw) of the tofu waste starch. Protein, one of the elements composing the cell membrane, is expected to be the main source
of nitrogen for microorganism growth(Moore 1982). Nitrogen is an essential
macronutrient for the growth and formationof enzymes (Reed & Rehm, 1983). Protease enzymesare produced by Aspergillus niger
(Parathaman et al., 2009).
3.2. Cultivation of Aspergillus niger
Figure 3 shows the growth of Aspergillus niger based on dry weightbiomass.The early phase of Aspergillus nigerstarted at the 0 hourwhen the new
culture was
inoculated into the cultivation media.Aspergillus niger entered into the adaptation phase soon after inoculation.
The microbial growth was low due to the new media environment during the adaptation phase. The lag phase followed the
adaptation phase. The exponential phase occurredbetweenthe 24th and 48th hours. During this exponential phase,
the microbes grew at their maximum growth rate.
Figure 3 Growth pattern of Aspergillus niger during cultivation
Figure
4 Cultivation
results by
the batch system of tofu waste using Aspergillus
niger
During
hours 0–12 (the adaptation phase), sugar production inAspergillus nigerincreased slowly. During this adaptation phase, the ?-amylase enzyme formed as a catalyst for starch hydrolysis
(Ezugwu et al., 2015). Sugar production increasedrapidly along with the growth
of Aspergillus niger from the 12th hour until the 48th hour.
The amylase and
glucoamylase enzymes
wereproduced by Aspergillus nigerand cut off the polymer
chains of starch into
simplemonomer units. Starch concentration decreased along with mold growth as sugar production
increased.Aspergillus nigergrowth
reached the end of the exponential phase
at the 48th hour. The maximum concentration
of sugar achieved was 14.42 g/L.Aspergillus nigeralso consumes fats (Falony et al., 2006) and protein (Srinubabu et al., 2007).If
polysaccharide content in the cultivation media is low, residual starch is
reduced drastically.
During the cultivation process, the level of residual starch decreasesdue to the Aspergillus niger’s metabolic activity,which produces hydrolysis enzymes such as amylase (Bedan et al., 2014),glucoamylase (Parbat &Barkha, 2011), and
invertase (Veanna et al., 2011). Starchof tofu
waste, therefore, can be used as a carbon source
for the growth of Aspergillus nigerto
producesugar. In addition,Aspergillus nigercan
also produce cellulase enzymes (Jayant et al., 2011). Hence, the fiber in tofu waste can also be used by Aspergillus niger to produce sugar.
3.3. Simultaneous Saccharification and
Fermentation (SSF)
Bioethanol was produced from
tofu waste starch via an SSF technique that used a microbial consortium consisting of Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Aspergillus nigerfunctioned as a saccharification agent to convert starch into sugar; this sugar is subsequently converted through
fermentation into bioethanol by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae. According to Nadir
et al. (2009), using starch and an SSF technique with a mixture of bacteria is more effective at producing bioethanol than replacing the microbes or
adding enzyme at each stage of the process. Bioethanol production from abundant raw materials can
be obtained throughout the cultivation
time, with lower costsand shorter processing times that increase productivity.
Figure 5 Growth of microbial consortium biomass during SSF
The cultivation process was carried out with full
aeration of 185e vvm (Jagani et al., 2010). Aeration is
needed for a group
of molds and yeasts to produce cells. Oxygen in aerobic cultivation is the main
factor affecting a microorganism’s survival. The aeration process cannot be separated from the agitation
process. The air flow from the compressor entered the medium to support aeration and agitation.
The exponential phase of
microbial consortium occurredbetween the 24th and 48th hours. This mold phase is important because cell activity increases
significantly.Enzymes
can be harvested at the beginning of the exponential phase (Bedan et al., 2014). The results
prove that enzyme accumulation occurred in this phase.
Figure 6 Cultivation resultsby SSF using a microbial consortium
The maximum bioethanol concentration, which was obtained during the 72nd hour,
was 7.69 g/L. Saccharomyces
cerevisiaecell numbers increased significantly until the 24th hour. Saccharomyces cerevisiaeconverted
sugar into bioethanol by fermentation in addition to respiration. Sugar concentration from starch hydrolysis increased until the 12th
hour, after which it began to decline, while
yeast growth began to increase. These changes indicate that the sugar substrate had been consumed by the mold and yeast for cell production and by the yeast for bioethanol formation.
The ethanol concentration increased from 2.81 g/L at the 12th hour to 6.82 g/L at the 24th hour.
Starch hydrolysis
activity was high because mold also needs sugar as a carbon and energy source for growth. Energy needs decreased since mold experiences sporulationat
the end of fermentation. However, microbes are able to survive by consuming the remains of substrated and dead microbes because mold cell walls contain
cellulose and chitin (Sharp, 2013), while yeast contains protein and manan (Huang, 2008). According to Moore (1982), the hyphae of mold can absorb simple molecules such as sugars, while the more complex forms of polymers such as cellulose, starch, and protein will be processed outside the cells using their extracellular
enzymes.
The
TPC results show the growth of molds and yeasts in the microbial consortium,
which proves that both microbes can grow when tofu waste starch is used as a cultivation media. The
cell doubling time of the mold was every 2–6 hours, while the yeast doubled every 20–120 minutes(Laskin, 1977). The maximum
growth of molds was 5.4 log cell, which occurred at the 48th hour, while the maximum growth of
the yeast was 6.90 log cell, which occurredat the 60th
hour.
A
microbial consortium consisting ofAspergillus
niger andSaccharomyces cerevisiaewas used for bioethanol production.Saccharomyces
cerevisiaecannot produce hydrolase enzymes that canbreak
down starch into glucose (Zhang et al., 2006). Hence, Aspergillus niger is required to produce amylolytic enzymes (Itelima et al., 2013). The amylase and glucoamylase enzymesin Aspergillus nigercan be used to hydrolyze starch. Saccharomyces
cerevisiaeis required to
convert the
resulting sugar into ethanol.
|
This study’s results clearly show thattofu waste is a viablemedium for bioethanol
production.Tofu waste has a
high carbohydrate content of 54.04±0.01% (dw), with 39.23±0.2% (dw) in the form of starch.Aspergillus
nigerachieved a peak sugar
productionsof 14.42 g/L during the 48th hour of cultivation.
The processes of bioethanol
production from starch was previously carried out in three steps: hydrolysis,
saccharification, and fermentation.But in SSF technique, the steps were only
one, so the time required for cultivation is shorter, hence increase productivity.
Beside that, the SSF technique can reduce the number of enzymes neededand reduce the need for sterilization.
The SSF technique has proven to be superior in productivity and process time
reduction compared to the SHF technique. The implementation of SSF technique
usingAspergillusniger as the saccharification
agent
and Saccharomyces cerevisiae as the fermentation
agent simultaneously
produced 7.69
g/Lethanol.
Ali, N., Mazharuddin, K., Majid, M., 2011. Ethanol Fuel Production through Microbial Extracellular Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Fermentation from Renewable Agrobased Cellulosic Waste.International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, Volume 2(2), pp. 321-331
Arnata, I.W.,
Dewi, A., 2013. Bioprocess
Engineering of Bioethanol Production from Cassava with Yeastand Saccharomyces cerevi siae Culture Technique.Agrointek, Volume 7(1), pp. 21-28
Association of
Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 1995.Official Methods of Analysis
of the Association of Official of Analytic Chemist, Washington, USA
Bedan, D.S., Aziz, G,M., Ali, A., 2014. Optimum Conditions for ?-amylase Production by Aspergillus niger Mutant Isolate using Solid State Fermentation.Current Research in Microbiology
Biotechnology, Volume 2(4), pp. 450-456
Dahnum, D.,
Sri,O.T.,Eka,T.,Muhammad, N., Haznan, A., 2015.Comparison of SHF and SSF Processes using Enzyme and Dry Yeast for Optimization of Bioethanol Production from Empty Fruit Bunch.Energy Procedia Elsevier, Volume 68, pp. 107-115
Directorate
General of New Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Ministry of Energy and
Mineral Resources, 2014.Indonesia’s Fuel Production and Consumption
Ezugwu, A.L., Eze, S.O.O, Chilaka, F.C., 2015. A Study of the Optimal Conditions for Glucoamylases Obtained from Aspergillus niger using Amylopectin from Cassava Starch as Carbon Source.African Journal of Biotechnology,Volume 14(3), pp. 2693-2702
Falony, G., Lose L., Martinez, H.,2006.Production of A. NigerLipase.Food Technology and Biotechnology,Volume 44(2),pp. 235–240
Farida, I., Khaswar, S., Mulyorini, R., 2015. Direct Bioethanol Production from Breadfruit Starch (Artocaspuscommunis
Forst) by Engineered Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation (ESSF) using Microbes Consortium.International Journal of
Renewable Energy Development, Volume 4(1), pp. 25-31
Huang, G.L., 2008. Extraction of Two Active
Polysaccharidesfrom the Yeast Cell WallZ.Naturforsch,Volume63c, pp.919-921
Hossain,
N., Zaini,
J.H.,
Mahlia,T.M.I,
2017. A Review of Bioethanol
Production from Plant-based
Waste Biomass
by Yeast Fermentation.International
Journal of Technology, Volume 8(1), pp. 5-18
Itelima, J., Ogbonna, A., Pandukur, S.,
2013.Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Corn Cobs to Bio-ethanol byCo-culture of Aspergillus Niger and Saccharomyces Cerevisiae.International Journal of Environmental
Science and Development, Volume 4(2), pp. 239-242
Jagani, H., Karteek, H.,
Sagar, S., Gang, P., Vasanth, R., Raghu, C.H., Venkata, J.R., 2010. An Overview of Fermenter and the Design Considerations to Enhance its Productivity.Pharmacologyonline, Volume 1, pp 261-301
Jayant, M., Rashmi, J., Shailendra, M., Deepesh,
Y.,2011.Production
of Cellulase by Different Co-culture of Aspergillus niger and Penicillium chrysogenumfrom Waste Paper, Cotton Waste and Baggase.Journal of Yeast and Fungal Study, Volume 2(2), pp. 24-27
Jenie, B.S.L., Ridawati., Winiati P.R.,2004. Angkak Production by Monascus Purpureus in Tapioca Liquid Waste Medium, Tapioca Pulp and Tofu Waste.Buletin Teknologi dan Industri Pangan, Volume 5(3),pp. 60-64
Kelly, R., Lubbert, D., Hans, L., 2009. Starch andGlucan Acting Enzymes,
Modulating their Properties by Directed Evolution.Elsevier Journal of Biotechnology, Volume 140(3-4), pp. 184–193
Laskin, A., 1977. Biosystem Poised for Growth. Paper presented at a meeting of the
Commercial Development Association, held at Homestead, Virginia, USA
Mangunwidjaja, D., Suryani, A., 1994. Bioprocess
Engineering. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta, Indonesia
Moore, L.E.,1982.Fundamentals of the Fungi, Englewood Cliff, New Jersey, Prentice Hall
Nadir, N., Mel, M., Mia, K.,
2009.Comparison of Sweet Sorghum and Cassava for Ethanol Production by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Journal of Applied Science, Volume 9,
pp. 3068-3073
Parathaman, R., Alagusundaram, K., Indhumathi, J.,2009.Production of Protease
from Rice Mill Wastes by Aspergillus
nigerin Solid State Fermentation.World Journal of Agricultural Sciences,Volume
5(3), pp. 308-312
Parbat, R., Barkha, S.,2011.Production of Glucoamylase by Aspergillus
oryzaeunder Solid StateFermentation using Agro IndustrialProducts.International Journal of Microbiological Study, Volume 2(3), pp. 204-207
Pramashinta, A., Abdullah,2014.Kinetics of Pineapple Skin Waste
Fermentation and Ethanol Productivity.Methane, Volume 10(31), pp. 12-17
Reed,G., Rhem, H.J.,1983.Biotechnology Volume III.Industrial Microbiology, Westport, Connecticut, AVI
Publishing Company
Sattler, L. Zerban, F.W., 1948. The Dreywood Anthrone Reaction as Affected by Carbohydrate
Structure. Science,pp. 108-207
Sharp, R.,2013.A Review of the Applications of Chitin
and its Derivatives in Agriculture to Modify Plant-microbial Interactions and
Improve Crop Yields.Agronomy Journal,
Volume 3, pp. 757-793
Srinubabu, G., Lokeswari,
N., Jayaraju, K.,2007.Screening of Nutritional Parameters for the Production of Protease from Aspergillus oryzae.E-Journal of Chemistry, Volume 4(2),pp. 208-215
Sudaryati., Mulyani, T., Setiawan, E.B.,2013.Study of the Substitution Tofu
Waste and the Use of Sodium Bicarbonate in Tortilla Making.Food Technology Program, FTI UPN Veteran, Indonesia
Veanna, F., Aguilar, C.N., Rodríguez,R., 2011. Kinetic Studies of Invertase Production by Xerophilic Aspergillus and PenicilliumStrains under Submerged Culture.Micología Aplicada International, Volume 23(2), pp. 37-45
Winarno, FG., 1997.Food and
Nutrition Chemicals. PT. Jakarta, Indonesia, Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Yustina, I., Abadi, F.R.,2012.The Potential of Flour from the Pulp of
Soybean Processing Industry as Foodstuff.National Symposiumof Food and Energy. Agriculture Faculty of Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia
Zambare, V.,2010.Solid
State Fermentation of Aspergillus oryzae for Glucoamylase Production on Agro
Residues.International Journal of Life
Science, Volume 4, pp. 16-25
Zhang, Y.P.H., Schell, D., McMillan, J.D.,2006. Methodological Analysis for
Determination
ofEnzymaticDigestibilityofCellulosicMaterials.Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Volume 6(1), pp. 188-194
Zhang. L., Hai, Z., Mingzhe, G., Yanlin, J., Xiaofeng, G., Qian, C., Jiafa, G.,
Zhongyan, W., 2011. Application of Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation
(SSF) from Viscosity Reducing of Raw Sweet Potato for Bioethanol Production at Laboratory, Pilot and Industrial Scales.Bioresource
Technology, Volume 102(6), pp. 4573–4579