Published at : 31 Jul 2026
Volume : IJtech
Vol 17, No 4 (2026)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v17i4.8711
| Arrie Tjahyo Setiawan | Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia |
| Rinaldy Dalimi | Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia |
| Iwa Garniwa | Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia |
Palm oil industry growth brings along its waste management obligations, at a very large scale. Its solid biomass residue, or waste, has a significant potential for energy resources. This study seeks to improve the knowledge of the dynamic behavior of a complex system from the perspective of a coupled waste and energy system. Based on a system dynamics (SD) modelling methodology framework with a multi-paradigm basis, it intends to employ a full-cycle, iterative approach and closed feedback-loop model structure, clarifying its difference from other studies that tend to have a linear behavior of an open-loop structure. The simulated model couples both the producer and consumer sub-models for introducing a non-linear system behavior using total crude palm oil (CPO) production data input and production ratio of different types of biomass residue materials, to enable an accelerated utilization rate of biomass residue derivative products. The results indicate three cases of growth rate (without and with coupling of sub-models, and with a multiplier coefficient to represent external intervention). This dynamic behavior arises by allowing the current practice of palm kernel shell (PKS) use as biomass fuel to be balanced with alternative biomass fuel such as empty fruit bunch (EFB), accelerating the utilization rate up to 100% of biomass residue (or being zero-waste) by simulated-month 125. This study serves as a valuable reference through the lens of a constructivist paradigm, by elaborating the applications of a full-cycle SD framework on a waste-to-energy system model, based on system thinking (ST), for getting insights into a complex system behavior.
Biomass-residue; Complex-system; Palm-oil; System-dynamics; Zero-waste
| Filename | Description |
|---|---|
| R1-EECE-8711-20260701044538.pdf | this diagram was inside the manuscript draft file (version-01) = FIGURE-9 now it is removed from manuscript file (version-02), and being submitted as a supplementary file .pdf (with the same infographics picture). |
| R1-EECE-8711-20260701072859.pdf | program listing Vensim biomass residue utilization rate PDF (convert from .mdl filetype) |
Abbasi, I. A., Ashari, H., & Yusuf, I. (2023).
System dynamics modelling: Integrating empty fruit bunch biomass
logistics to reduce GHG emissions. Resources, 12 (4), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12040053
Anjard, R. P.
(1995). Management and planning tools. Training for Quality, 3 (2), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684879510087512
Arifin, Z., Amrul,
A., & Irsyad, M. (2021). Simulasi co-combustion batubara dan biomassa
tandan kosong kelapa sawit tertorefaksi (torrefied biomass). Turbo: Jurnal
Program Studi Teknik Mesin, 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.24127/trb.v10i1.1468
Arnold, R. D.,
& Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach.
Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050
Arrumaisho, U. S.,
& Sunitiyoso, Y. (2019). A system dynamics model for biodiesel industry in
Indonesia. The Asian Journal of Technology Management (AJTM), 12 (2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.12695/ajtm.2019.12.2.6
Astria, N., Dachyar, M., & Nurcahyo, R.
(2021). System dynamics modelling approach for palm oil supply chain
under various policy interventions: A case study in Indonesia’s private
company. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial
Engineering and Operations Management, 1760–1771. https://doi.org/10.46254/AN11.20210335
BPS. (2024).
Statistik kelapa sawit Indonesia 2023 (tech. rep.). Badan Pusat Statistik.
Brassard, M.
(1989). The memory jogger plus+: Featuring the seven management and planning
tools. Goal/QPC.
Brett, N. (2024).
Bridging local constraints and global priorities: The shaping of Swedish biogas
markets (Vol. 881). Linköping University Electronic Press. https://doi.org/10.3384/9789180756501
De Wijse-van Heeswijk, M., Rouwette, E. A., &
Meijerink, S. V. (2025). The learning effects of first, second, and
third order interventions in a rule-based and open simulation game.
Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 53
(4), 821–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09715-w
Haas, W., Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., Lauk,
C., & Mayer, A. (2020). Spaceship earth’s odyssey to a circular
economy—a century long perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 163, 105076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105076
Henseling, C., Behrendt, S., & Zwiers, J.
(2021). Zirkuläre innovationen im bereich textilien in Berlin. Zuletzt
abgerufen am, 21.
Jones, J. L.
(1978). Overview of solid waste and residue generation, disposition, and
conversion technologies. ACS Symposium Series, 76. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1978-0076.ch001
Jonsdottir, A. T.,
Johannsdottir, L., & Davidsdottir, B. (2025). A systems approach to
circular economy transition: Creating causal loop diagrams for the Icelandic
building industry. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 17, 100276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100276
Kemp-Benedict, E.,
Kartha, S., & Fencl, A. (2012). Biomass in a low-carbon economy: Resource
scarcity, climate change, and business in a finite world (tech. rep.).
Stockholm Environment Institute. http://www.sei-international.org/publications?pid=2078
Kovacic, Z., Strand, R., & Völker, T. (2019). The
circular economy in Europe: Critical perspectives on policies and imaginaries.
Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429061028
Mathies, K.
(2025). Microplastics are not microplastics are not microplastics: Making
microplastics in the EU regulatory environment [MA Master Thesis]. University
of Vienna. https://utheses.univie.ac.at/detail/75223
Meadows, D.
(1999). Leverage points, places to intervene in a system (tech. rep.). The
Sustainability Institute. Hartland.
Merzic, A.,
Turkovic, N., Ikanovic, N., Lapandic, E., Kazagic, A., & Music, M. (2022).
Towards just transition of coal regions—cultivation of short rotation copies
and dedicated energy crops for biomass co-firing vs photo voltaic power plants.
Energy Conversion and Management: X, 15, 100267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100267
Mustangin, M.,
& Harnowo, S. (2020). Electric and boiler energy audits palm oil factory
capacity 60 ton/hour. Jurnal Agro Fabrica, 2 (1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.47199/jaf.v2i1.139
Muzayanah, F. N., Cahyadi, E. R., & Munandar,
J. M. (2018). Dynamic modelling system of Indonesia’s crude palm oil
sustainable supply chain management. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Agribisnis, 15 (1),
260899. https://doi.org/10.17358/jma.15.1.33
Nemet, G. F.
(2009). Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for
non-incremental technical change. Research Policy, 38 (5), 700–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.004
Newes, E., Bush,
B., Inman, D., Lin, Y., Mai, T., Martinez, A., Mulcahy, D., Short, W.,
Simpkins, T., Uriarte, C., & Peck, C. (2012). Biomass resource allocation
among competing end uses (tech. rep. No. NREL/TP-6A20-54217). National
Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Golden, CO.
Pruyt, E. (2006).
What is system dynamics? a paradigmatic inquiry. Proceedings of the 2006
Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 29.
Saeyang, R., &
Nissapa, A. (2021). Trade competitiveness in the global market: An analysis of
four palm oil products from Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand.
Samsu, M. A.
(2022). Process optimization of biomass combustion of an industrial boiler in a
palm oil mill (Project Report). Pusat Pengajian Kejuruteraan Kimia, Universiti
Sains Malaysia.
Schwaninger, M.
(2019). System dynamics in the evolution of the systems approach. In R. Meyers
(Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_537-5
Schwaninger, M.,
& Grösser, S. (2016). System dynamics modeling: Validation for quality
assurance. In Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science (pp. 1–20).
Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_540-3
Schwaninger, M.,
& Ríos, J. P. (2008). System dynamics and cybernetics: A synergetic pair.
System Dynamics Review, 24 (2), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.400
Silalahi, F. T.
R., Simatupang, T. M., & Siallagan, M. P. (2020). A system dynamics
approach to biodiesel fund management in Indonesia. AIMS Energy, 8 (6),
1173–1198. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2020.6.1173
Sterman, J. D.
(2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modelling for a complex world.
Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Sulaiman, A. A.,
et al. (2024). Sawit Indonesia dalam dinamika pasar dunia. Pertanian Press.
Syamsiro, M., Nasution, R. M. A., Surono, U. B.,
Pambudi, N. A., & Kismurtono, M. (2019). Dry and wet torrefaction of
empty fruit bunch to produce clean solid fuel for cooking application. Journal
of Physics: Conference Series, 1175 (1), 012272. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012272
Wijaya, H.,
Arkeman, Y., & Hambali, E. (2017). Formulation of Indonesian palm oil
biodiesel policy for energy security by using system dynamics model.
Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 19.
Yeng, F. F.,
Zainuddin, Z. M., & Pheng, H. S. (2024). Optimizing palm oil biomass supply
chain logistics through multi-objective location-routing model. Malaysian
Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 20 (2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v20n2.3085
Zahraee, S. M.,
Golroudbary, S. R., Shiwakoti, N., Kraslawski, A., & Stasinopoulos, P.
(2019). An investigation of the environmental sustainability of palm biomass
supply chains via dynamic simulation modeling: A case of Malaysia. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 237, 117740.
Zamri, M. F.,
Milano, J., Shamsuddin, A. H., Roslan, M. E., Salleh, S. F., Rahman, A. A.,
Bahru, R., Fattah, I. M., & Mahlia, T. I. (2022). An overview of palm oil
biomass for power generation sector decarbonization in Malaysia: Progress,
challenges, and prospects. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and
Environment, 11 (4), e437. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.437