Published at : 29 May 2026
Volume : IJtech
Vol 17, No 3 (2026)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v17i3.8651
| Yudan Whulanza | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
| Eny Kusrini | 1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI, Depok 16424, Indonesia. 2. Green Product and Fine Chemical Engineering Research Group, Laboratory of Chemical Product Engi |
| Muhamad Sahlan | Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
| Sutrasno Kartohardjono | Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
A shift is underway in how materials, medicines, fuels, and food are
produced. Industrial systems centered on extraction, transformation, and
combustion have supported modern development, while also being associated with
environmental impacts such as emissions and waste. An alternative approach,
often described as engineered biology, emphasizes cultivation, fermentation,
and synthesis and is viewed as a potential direction, though its impacts remain
under evaluation.
Synthetic biology, which applies engineering principles to the
design and construction of living systems, is increasingly being developed
beyond academic laboratories. It is becoming an
industrial platform (Cameron
et al 2014; Mao et al 2021). The global
synthetic biology market was valued at approximately USD 19.75 billion in 2025
and is projected to reach USD 56.48 billion by 2031, at a compound annual
growth rate of 19.14% (Mordor Intelligence, 2026; Zhang et al 2025).
This trajectory reflects the convergence of several enabling forces: dramatic
reductions in the cost of DNA synthesis and sequencing, the proliferation of
CRISPR-based genome editing, the rise of AI-guided protein and metabolic
pathway design, and the maturation of automated biofoundry infrastructure that
can compress the design-build-test-learn cycle from years to weeks.
The Architecture of Engineered Biology
At its core, synthetic biology treats the genetic code of an
organism as programmable software and the organism itself as a production
platform. Similar to how an electrical engineer selects
components and designs circuits to achieve a specific function, a synthetic
biologist combines genetic elements such as promoters, coding sequences, and
regulatory components within a chosen host to produce a desired output, such as
a molecule, material, or signal (Jinek et al 2012).
The CRISPR-Cas9 system and its derivatives have made
precision genome editing tractable at scale (Doudna&Charpentier 2014). Beyond gene editing, synthetic
biology also draws on metabolic engineering, which involves redirecting an
organism’s metabolic pathways to increase production of a target compound (Nadhif et al 2017). It also uses cell free
systems that operate cellular machinery outside living cells, allowing greater
control and fewer constraints from cellular processes (Whulanza
et al 2014, Rahyussalim et al 2017).
AI-guided protein design tools, including AlphaFold and related
approaches, have reduced tasks that previously required years of
crystallographic research to hours of computation, contributing to a shift
toward more data-driven methods in synthetic biology (Jumper
et al 2021, Method 2021). The integration of machine learning into
metabolic pathway optimization, gene circuit design, and strain engineering is
contributing to a shift toward a more computational approach in synthetic
biology. This development shows similarities to the materials informatics
approach discussed in a previous IJTech editorial (January
2024).
Central to this transformation is the biofoundry, a highly automated
facility in which the design, build, test, and learn cycle is carried out at
high throughput. Equipped with robotic
liquid-handling systems, automated DNA assembly platforms, and integrated
computational pipelines, a biofoundry can execute hundreds of design iterations
in parallel (Holowko et al
2021). Governments
that view biomanufacturing as part of strategic infrastructure, including the
United Kingdom, Singapore, Denmark, and the United States, have made
significant investments in national biofoundry capacity (Hillson et al 2019). In
the Asia-Pacific region, the Bioinnovation APAC 2026 forum convened in
Singapore in March 2026, gathering over 250 participants to accelerate
industrial biomanufacturing collaboration, signalling that Southeast Asia is
positioning itself as an active participant rather than a passive recipient in
this buildout (Biospectrum
Asia 2026).
Industrial Applications and Regional Opportunity
The applications of synthetic biology to industrial
production are diverse and, in many cases, near-term. Precision fermentation is
enabling the production of proteins, specialty chemicals, flavors, and
functional ingredients that were previously extracted at high ecological cost
or synthesized using toxic reagents (Ro et al 2006, Paddon et al 2013). Engineered
organisms are being developed to produce next-generation biofuels, such as
hydrogen and fatty acid–derived compounds, as alternatives to earlier biofuels
linked to competition with food production for land and water.
In Southeast Asia, Indonesia and Malaysia produce oil palm biomass
at a large scale, which is widely regarded as a waste management challenge and
may also serve as a potential carbon feedstock for domestic biomanufacturing. As
noted in the our editorial on March 2024, oil palm biomass has already
demonstrated potential as a precursor for graphene-family advanced materials;
synthetic biology offers a complementary route to valorize the same resource
through microbial conversion into biodegradable polymers, platform chemicals,
and bio-based coatings (Ijtech march 2024, Kusrini
et al 2020).
In South America, Brazil offers perhaps the world's most mature
proof of concept for biology-based industrial transformation. Its flex-fuel
vehicle fleet, in which bioethanol derived from sugarcane fuels over 80% of
light vehicles, reflects the long-term deployment of fermentation engineering
at national scale (Bonini et al., 2025). The
next frontier includes second-generation cellulosic ethanol, which uses
sugarcane bagasse and other residues instead of sugar, along with expanding
biorefineries toward higher-value biochemicals, bioplastics, and
biosurfactants.
In Africa, Nigeria presents a comparable case due to its position as
the world’s largest producer of cassava. The crop generates an estimated 40
million tonnes of processing waste annually across Sub-Saharan Africa, over
half of which is currently landfilled or incinerated (Hierro-Iglesias
et al., 2022). Engineered microorganisms that convert cassava starch and
lignocellulosic residues into polyhydroxyalkanoates, which are biodegradable
plastics with properties comparable to petroleum-derived polypropylene, may
provide a way to utilize this waste stream as a higher-value product.
Challenges and the Engineering Research Agenda
The transition from laboratory demonstration to industrial
deployment is not straightforward. A key challenge is
the gap between laboratory and commercial scale, where factors such as
metabolic burden, contamination control, process consistency, and genetic
stability become limiting (Asin-Garcia &
Martins dos Santos, 2025). These challenges can be framed as engineering problems, shaping a
research agenda in which chemical engineers, process engineers, and bioprocess
specialists have important roles to play (Tellechea-Luzardo
2022). The
development of digital twins for bioprocess systems, which integrate
computational biology models with real-time sensor data and process control,
reflects a convergence of themes previously explored in our editorials on
digital twins (Ijtech March 2024) and AI in
engineering (Ijtech November 2025).
Regulatory frameworks for engineered organisms vary
considerably across jurisdictions, and biosafety assessment processes differ in
scope between countries (OECD
2025). The ethical dimensions of synthetic biology include ecological
risks associated with the release of engineered organisms, the dual use
potential of genome editing tools, and the distribution of benefits (Lee et al 2025).. These issues warrant careful consideration by the engineering
community.