• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 17, No 4 (2026)

Socio-Economic Sustainability through Technology Application: Evaluating Trust and System Usability in Digital Banking Adoption

Socio-Economic Sustainability through Technology Application: Evaluating Trust and System Usability in Digital Banking Adoption

Title: Socio-Economic Sustainability through Technology Application: Evaluating Trust and System Usability in Digital Banking Adoption
Vardan Aleksanyan, Hovhannes Asatryan, Karlen Khachatryan

Corresponding email:


Cite this article as:
Aleksanyan, V., Asatryan, H., & Khachatryan, K. (2026). Socio-economic sustainability through technology application: Evaluating trust and system usability in digital banking adoption. International Journal of Technology, 17 (4), 1506–1519


4
Downloads
Vardan Aleksanyan Faculty of Economics and Management, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, 0025, Armenia
Hovhannes Asatryan 1. Department of Macroeconomic Problems and Finance, The Institute of Economics after M. Kotanyan, Yerevan, 0015, Armenia 2. Department of Research and Development, Armenian State University of Econ
Karlen Khachatryan Faculty of Economics and Management, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, 0025, Armenia
Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract
Socio-Economic Sustainability through Technology Application: Evaluating Trust and System Usability in Digital Banking Adoption

This study examines the socio-economic sustainability outcomes of digital banking adoption in Armenia through a two-layer conceptual model in which technology-acceptance constructs serve as antecedents and four perceived sustainability outcomes (financial inclusion, economic benefit, business enablement, and inclusive participation) serve as analytical endpoints. Drawing on survey data from 410 respondents and a supplementary sustainability-perception measurement block, the model was estimated using PLS-SEM with bootstrapping (5,000 resamples). The results identify institutional trust as the dominant predictor of digital banking adoption (= 0.36, t = 4.89, p < 0.001), while classical TAM constructs—perceived usefulness (= 0.11, p = 0.195), perceived ease of use ( = 0.07, p = 0.328), and perceived risk ( =-0.04, p = 0.448)—do not retain explanatory power once trust is included. Behavioural intention strongly predicts actual usage ( = 0.67, t = 10.32, p < 0.001), with the antecedent layer explaining 52% of the variance in intention and 61% in usage. Actual usage significantly and positively predicts all four sustainability outcomes (p < 0.001), with the strongest effect on perceived inclusive participation ( = 0.41) and financial inclusion ( = 0.34), and weaker effects on economic benefit ( = 0.25) and business enablement ( = 0.19). Bootstrapped indirect effects analysis confirms that the trust-adoption-sustainability chain is empirically coherent: trust propagates to all four sustainability outcomes through the adoption mechanism (indirect effects ranging from 0.046 to 0.099, 95% bias-corrected CIs excluding zero), with the strongest propagation to inclusion-oriented outcomes. These findings reposition technology-acceptance research within a socio-economic sustainability framework and provide empirical evidence that institutional trust, rather than usability attitudes, is the binding constraint on the inclusive and sustainable transformation of financial systems in transitional economies.

Digital banking adoption; Financial inclusion; Institutional trust; Socio-economic sustainability; Transitional economy

References

Adian, I., Doumbia, D., Gregory, N., Ragoussis, A., Reddy, A., & Timmis, J. (2020). Small and medium enterprises in the pandemic: Impact, responses, and the role of development finance (Policy Research Working Paper). World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/729451600968236270/pdf/Small-and-Medium-Enterprises-in-the-Pandemic-Impact-Responses-and-the-Role-of-Development-Finance.pdf

Aleksanyan, V., Asatryan, H., Minta, S., & Khachatryan, K. (2026). Uncovering the determinants of the transition to digital agriculture: A survey-based tobit analysis. Economia Agro-Alimentare / Food Economy - Open Access, 28 (1). https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2026oa20705

Almaiah, M., Al-Otaibi, S., Shishakly, R., Hassan, L., Lutfi, A., Alrawad, M., Qatawneh, M., & Alghanam, O. (2023). Investigating the role of perceived risk, perceived security and perceived trust on smart m-banking application using sem. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139908

Alnemer, H. (2022). Determinants of digital banking adoption in the kingdom of saudi arabia: A technology acceptance model approach. Digital Business. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100037

Aron, J. (2018). Mobile money and the economy: A review of the evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, 33 (2), 135–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lky001

Asatryan, H., Erkoyan, A., Muradyan, M., Berberyan, V., Nalbandyan, H., Harutyunyan, A., & Poghosyan, S. (2025). Spillover effects of the russian-ukrainian conflict on the armenian economy: A multiple period approach. Cogent Social Sciences, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2591459

Central Bank of Armenia. (2022). Annual report 2022 (tech. rep.). Central Bank of Armenia. https://www.cba.am/file_manager/Annual-reports/Annual%20Report%202022%20eng.pdf

Cheng, T. C. E., Lam, D. Y. C., & Yeung, A. C. L. (2006). Adoption of internet banking: An empirical study in hong kong. Decision Support Systems, 42 (3), 1558–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.01.002

Demirg¨u¸c-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S., & Hess, J. (2018). The global findex database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1259-0

Demirg¨u¸c-Kunt, A., & Singer, D. (2017). Financial inclusion and inclusive growth: A review of recent empirical evidence (tech. rep.). World Bank.

European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (2021). Armenia diagnostic paper: Enhancing financial inclusion (tech. rep.). EBRD.

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and tam in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27 (1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519

Gu, H., Zhang, T., Lu, C., & Song, X. (2020). Assessing trust and risk perceptions in the sharing economy: An empirical study. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12678

Hair, J. F., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of pls-sem in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117 (3), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-04-2016-0130

Hakobyan, A., & Margaryan, Z. (2025). Impact of the russian-ukrainian armed conflict on the financial performance of armenia’s banking sector. Banks and Bank Systems, 20 (1). https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.20(1).2025.27

Hambardzumyan, A. (2023). Embracing finance 4.0: The opportunity for armenian banks to transform and thrive. Messenger of Armenian State University of Economics. https://doi.org/10.52174/1829-0280_2023.1-19

Harutyunyan, G., Manucharyan, M., Muradyan, M., & Asatryan, H. (2024). Digital literacy of the armenian society: Assessment and determinants. Cogent Social Sciences, 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2398652

Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd). Guilford Press.

Haykyants, A., & Ghukasyan, S. (2022). The factor of consumer rights protection as a criterion for social system development. WISDOM, 22 (2). https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v22i2.807

Hurani, J., & Abdel-Haq, M. K. (2025). Factors influencing fintech adoption among bank customers in palestine: An extended technology acceptance model approach. International Journal of Financial Studies, 13 (1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13010011

Japaridze, D., Kupets, O., Melnyk, T., Lariushin, T., Kasimov, E., & Hovhanisyan, A. (2011). Development in eastern europe and the south caucasus. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264113039-en

Klapper, L., El-Zoghbi, M., & Hess, J. (2017). Achieving the sustainable development goals: The role of financial inclusion (tech. rep.). CGAP / World Bank.

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in pls-sem: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11 (4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101

Kumar, A., Dhingra, S., Batra, V., & Purohit, H. (2020). A framework of mobile banking adoption in india. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6 (2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6020040

Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2002). Why do people use information technology? a critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40 (3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4

Majidli, F. (2020). International comparative and competitive advantage of post-soviet countries in tourism. Research in World Economy, 11 (5), 369. https://doi.org/10.5430/rwe.v11n5p369

Minasyan, D. (2024). Banking stability modelling for armenia: Decision tree approach. ALTERNATIVE. https://doi.org/10.55528/18292828-2024.2-116

Nushikyan, I. (2024). The innovative transformation in the ra banking system. Economics, Finance and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.59503/29538009-2024.2.14-121

Paquin, J. (2022). Institutions and the informal economy: Tax morale of small businesses in armenia and georgia. In A. Polese (Ed.), Informality, labour mobility and precariousness (pp. 113–138). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82499-0_6

Patel, K. J., & Patel, H. J. (2017). Adoption of internet banking services in gujarat: An extension of tam with perceived security and social influence. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36 (1), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-08-2016-0104

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Poghosyan, S., Manucharyan, M., Martirosyan, G., Azatyan, L., & Asatryan, H. (2024). Leslie matrix matching approach in labor market studies. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2426364

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

Raza, A., & Tursoy, T. (2024). Technology acceptance model and fintech: An evidence from italian banking industry. Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas, 20 (1). https://doi.org/10.21919/remef.v20i1.993

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Springer ebooks (pp. 1–47). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2

Tharimala, S., Reddy, G., & Sowmyasree, V. (2024). Impact of financial literacy on behavioural intentions towards digital banking using tam: A study in presence of personality traits. 2024 First International Conference for Women in Computing (InCoWoCo), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/InCoWoCo64194.2024.10863365

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46 (2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11972

World Bank. (2023). Financial inclusion data: Armenia (tech. rep.). World Bank. https://globalfindex.worldbank.org