• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 17, No 5 (2026)

An MXene–Titania Nanofiltration Membrane with Thermocatalytic Activity for Water Pollution Removal

An MXene–Titania Nanofiltration Membrane with Thermocatalytic Activity for Water Pollution Removal

Title: An MXene–Titania Nanofiltration Membrane with Thermocatalytic Activity for Water Pollution Removal
Samer Al-Ajooli , Mohammed Abdulsalam Kassim, Khazaal Hameed Khazaal, Omar A. Alwash , Rafid N. Al-Mashhadi

Corresponding email:


Cite this article as:
Al-Ajooli, S., Kassim, M. A., Khazaal, K. H., Alwash, O. A., & Al-Mashhadi, R. N. (2026). An MXene–titania nanofiltration membrane with thermocatalytic activity for water pollution removal. International Journal of Technology, 17 (5), 1765–1779


24
Downloads
Samer Al-Ajooli Department of Petroleum Engineering, College of Engineering, Al-Naji University, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Al-Yarmouk, Baghdad 10015, Iraq
Mohammed Abdulsalam Kassim Scientific Research Commission, Baghdad 10070, Iraq
Khazaal Hameed Khazaal Scientific Research Commission, Baghdad 10070, Iraq
Omar A. Alwash Scientific Research Commission, Baghdad 10070, Iraq
Rafid N. Al-Mashhadi Scientific Research Commission, Baghdad 10070, Iraq
Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract
An MXene–Titania Nanofiltration Membrane with Thermocatalytic Activity for Water Pollution Removal

Herein, we designed a multifunctional thermocatalytic nanofiltration membrane, which consists of a MXene–TiO2 nanocomposite incorporated within a humic acid-like crosslinked graphene oxide (GO–HAL) matrix on the surface of polyethersulfone support. The membrane combined molecular separation, dark thermocatalytic degradation, and fouling mitigation without external irradiation and added oxidants. Model feeds were Bisphenol A (BPA) and effluent from a municipal wastewater-treatment-plant. The MTG-98.6 composition accomplished nearly 52% BPA removal in 120 min at 50 °C, and an apparent pseudo-first-order rate constant of (6.2 ± 0.3) × 10-3 min-1 on a mass basis was higher than that of the unsupported MXene–TiO2. It yielded a membrane with a water permeance of 1.3 L m-2 h-1 bar-1. Feed BPA after 18 h of crossflow filtration decreased from 10.19 ± 0.03 mg L-1 to 4.1 mg L-1, whereas the permeate BPA concentration remained stable (0.33 ± 0.09 mg L-1) and rejection decreased only from approximately 97% to 94%. The permeate TOC from wastewater tests was also lower than for the GO–HAL reference. XPS confirmed retention of the catalytic phase after filtration, demonstrating chemical stability under the applied conditions and operational repeatability. Acute ecotoxicity tests indicated low toxicity to Aliivibrio fischeri and Raphidocelis subcapitata, whereas Daphnia magna survival depended on nanocomposite concentration and temperature. These results support MXene–TiO2/GO–HAL membranes for simultaneous nanofiltration and thermocatalytic removal of emerging organic contaminants using low-grade heat.

Antifouling; Bisphenol a removal; MXene–TiO2 nanocomposite; Nanofiltration; Self-cleaning membrane

References

Beretta, G., Puddu, M., Saponaro, S., & Sezenna, E. (2026). Biosurfactants and bioemulsifiers for soil remediation as a green solution from waste. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 25 (1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-025-09761-3

Boffa, V. (2020). Inorganic materials for upcoming water purification membranes. In Current trends and future developments on bio-membranes: Membrane technology for water and wastewater treatment (pp. 117–140). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816823-3.00005-8

Cacace, D., Fatta-Kassinos, D., Manaia, C. M., Cytryn, E., Kreuzinger, N., Rizzo, L., Karaolia, P., Schwartz, T., Alexander, J., Merlin, C., Garelick, H., Schmitt, H., de Vries, D., Schwermer, C. U., Meric, S., Ozkal, C. B., Pons, M.-N., Kneis, D., & Berendonk, T. U. (2019). Antibiotic resistance genes in treated wastewater and in receiving water bodies: A pan-European survey of urban settings. Water Research, 162, 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.039

Cesano, F., Boffa, V., Coelho, F. E. B., & Magnacca, G. (2021). Graphene and graphene oxide for enhancing photocatalytic properties of materials. In Materials science in photocatalysis (pp. 385–396). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821859-4.00015-5

Chen, D., Cheng, Y., Zhou, N., Chen, P., Wang, Y., Li, K., Huo, S., Cheng, P., Peng, P., Zhang, R., Wang, L., Liu, H., Liu, Y., & Ruan, R. (2020). Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants using TiO2-based photocatalysts: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 121725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121725

Chen, H., Ku, J., & Wang, L. (2019). Thermal catalysis under dark ambient conditions in environmental remediation: Fundamental principles, development and challenges. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 40, 1117–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63366-8

Chen, H., Motuzas, J., Martens, W., & Diniz da Costa, J. C. (2018). Degradation of azo dye Orange II under dark ambient conditions by calcium strontium copper perovskite. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 221, 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.056

Du, Y.-C., Huang, L.-J., Wang, Y.-X., Yang, K., Zhang, Z.-J., Wang, Y., Kipper, M. J., Belfiore, L. A., & Tang, J.-G. (2020). Preparation of graphene oxide/silica hybrid composite membranes and performance studies in water treatment. Journal of Materials Science, 55, 11188–11202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04774-5

Fu, X., Yang, R., Zhou, G., Chen, X., Liu, Y., Chi, J., Li, X., Fang, H., Li, H., & Li, W. (2022). New progress in photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A as representative endocrine disrupting chemicals. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 35, 100629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100629

Gao, X., Tan, W., Zhao, Y., Wu, J., Sun, Q., Qi, H., Xie, X., & Wei, Z. (2019). Diversity in the mechanisms of humin formation during composting with different materials. Environmental Science & Technology, 53 (7), 3653–3662. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06401

Garg, A., Singhania, T., Singh, A., Sharma, S., Rani, S., Neogy, A., Yadav, S. R., Sangal, V. K., & Garg, N. (2019). Photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A using N, Co codoped TiO2 catalyst under solar light. Scientific Reports, 9, 765. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38358-w

Gopinath, K. P., Madhav, N. V., & Krishnan, A. (2020). Present applications of titanium dioxide for the photocatalytic removal of pollutants from water: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 270, 110906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110906

Han, Z., Xiao, X., Qu, H., Hu, M., Au, C., Nashalian, A., Xiao, X., Wang, Y., Yang, L., Jia, F., Wang, T., Ye, Z., Servati, P., Huang, L., Zhu, Z., Tang, J., & Chen, J. (2022). Ultrafast and selective nanofiltration enabled by graphene oxide membranes with unzipped carbon nanotube networks. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 14 (1), 1850–1860. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c17201

Hunge, Y. M., Yadav, A. A., Khan, S., Takagi, K., Suzuki, N., Teshima, K., Terashima, C., & Fujishima, A. (2021). Photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A using titanium dioxide@nanodiamond composites under UV light illumination. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 582, 1058–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.08.102

Janowska, K., Boffa, V., Jørgensen, M. K., Quist-Jensen, C. A., Hubac, F., Deganello, F., Coelho, F. E. B., & Magnacca, G. (2020). Thermocatalytic membrane distillation for clean water production. npj Clean Water, 3, 34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-020-00082-2

Janowska, K. J., Ma, X., Boffa, V., Jørgensen, M., & Candelario, V. (2021). Combined nanofiltration and thermocatalysis for simultaneous degradation of micropollutants, fouling mitigation and water purification. Membranes, 11, 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080639

Karaolia, P., Michael-Kordatou, I., Hapeshi, E., Drosou, C., Bertakis, Y., Christofilos, D., Armatas, G. S., Sygellou, L., Schwartz, T., Xekoukoulotakis, N. P., & Fatta-Kassinos, D. (2018). Removal of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes by graphene-based TiO2 composite photocatalysts under solar radiation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 224, 810–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.020

Koe, W. S., Lee, J. W., Chong, W. C., Pang, Y. L., & Sim, L. C. (2020). Photocatalytic degradation: Photocatalysts, mechanisms and development of photocatalytic membranes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 2522–2556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07193-5

Li, X., Xu, Y., Goh, K., Chong, T. H., & Wang, R. (2020). Layer-by-layer assembly based low-pressure biocatalytic nanofiltration membranes for micropollutant removal. Journal of Membrane Science, 615, 118514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118514

Liu, R., Zhao, M., Zheng, X., Wang, Q., Huang, X., Shen, Y., & Chen, B. (2021). Reduced graphene oxide/TiO2(B) immobilized on nylon membrane with enhanced photocatalytic performance. Science of the Total Environment, 799, 149370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149370

Liu, X., Zhou, Y., Zhang, J., Luo, L., Yang, Y., Huang, H., Peng, H., Tang, L., & Mu, Y. (2018). Insight into electro-Fenton and photo-Fenton processes for wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 347, 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.142

Ma, X., Ali, A., & Boffa, V. (2020). Desalination of groundwater from a well in the Puglia region (Italy) using Al2o3-doped silica and polymeric nanofiltration membranes. Nanomaterials, 10, 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091738

Mahmood, T., Momin, S., Ali, R., Naeem, A., & Khan, A. (2022). Technologies for removal of emerging contaminants from wastewater. In Wastewater treatment. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.104466

Miklos, D. B., Remy, C., Jekel, M., Linden, K. G., Drewes, J. E., & Hübner, U. (2018). Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment: A critical review. Water Research, 139, 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.042

Papagiannaki, D., Medana, C., Binetti, R., Calza, P., & Roslev, P. (2020). Effect of UV-A, UV-B and UVC irradiation of glyphosate on photolysis and mitigation of aquatic toxicity. Scientific Reports, 10, 20247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76241-9

Park, J., & Lee, W. (2022). Correlation between the oxidation degree and thickness of graphene oxides. Carbon, 189, 579–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.12.101

Patel, M., Kumar, R., Kishor, K., Mlsna, T., Pittman Jr., C. U., & Mohan, D. (2019). Pharmaceuticals of emerging concern in aquatic systems: Chemistry, occurrence, effects, and removal methods. Chemical Reviews, 119, 3510–3573. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00299

Paul, P. C., Shah, A., Singh, L. R., Mahato, M., & Mahato, D. K. (2023). Mn-doped SrTiO3 and SrTiO3–Fe2o3 composite perovskites: Photocatalytic dye degradation and energy storage application. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 34 (16), 1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-023-10703-4

Qu, H., Xiao, X., Han, Z., Hu, M., Shen, S., Yang, L., Jia, F., Wang, T., Ye, Z., Sun, W., Wang, Y., Huang, L., Zhu, Z., Servati, P., Tang, J., & Chen, J. (2022). Graphene oxide nanofiltration membrane based on three-dimensional size-controllable metal–organic frameworks for water treatment. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 5 (4), 5196–5207. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c00234

Rafique, M., Hajra, S., Irshad, M., Usman, M., Imran, M., Assiri, M. A., & Ashraf, W. M. (2023). Hydrogen production using TiO2-based photocatalysts: A comprehensive review. ACS Omega, 8 (29), 25640–25648. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00963

Reid, A. J., Carlson, A. K., Creed, I. F., Eliason, E. J., Gell, P. A., Johnson, P. T. J., Kidd, K. A., MacCormack, T. J., Olden, J. D., Ormerod, S. J., Smol, J. P., Taylor, W. W., Tockner, K., Vermaire, J. C., Dudgeon, D., & Cooke, S. J. (2019). Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biological Reviews, 94, 849–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12480

Rueda-Marquez, J. J., Levchuk, I., Ibañez, P. F., & Sillanpää, M. (2020). Application of photocatalysis for toxicity reduction of real wastewaters: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120694

Serra, A., Philippe, L., Perreault, F., & Garcia-Segura, S. (2021). Photocatalytic treatment of natural waters: Reality or hype? The case of cyanotoxins remediation. Water Research, 188, 116543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116543

Suhaimin, N. S., Hanifah, M. F. R., Azhar, M., Jaafar, J., Aziz, M., Ismail, A. F., Othman, M. H. D., Rahman, M. A., Aziz, F., Yusof, N., & Mohamud, R. (2022). The evolution of oxygen-functional groups of graphene oxide as a function of oxidation degree. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 278, 125629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125629

Tang, Y., Zhong, Y., Li, H., Huang, Y., Guo, X., Yang, F., & Wu, Y. (2020). Contaminants of emerging concern in aquatic environment: Occurrence, monitoring, fate, and risk assessment. Water Environment Research, 92, 1811–1817. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1438

Tran, M. L., Fu, C. C., Chiang, L. Y., Hsieh, C. T., Liu, S. H., & Juang, R. S. (2020). Immobilization of TiO2 and TiO2–GO hybrids on polymeric membranes for pollutant removal: Photocatalytic activity analysis. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8, 104422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104422

Tummino, M. L., Laurenti, E., Deganello, F., Prevot, A. B., & Magnacca, G. (2017). Catalytic activity of doped SrFeO3 for water pollutants removal: Effect of light and temperature. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 207, 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.007

Wang, J., Qin, L., Lin, J., Zhu, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., & Bruggen, B. V. d. (2017). Enzymatic construction of antibacterial ultrathin membranes for dye removal. Chemical Engineering Journal, 323, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.089

Wu, M., He, X., Jing, B., Wang, T., Wang, C., Qin, Y., Ao, Z., Wang, S., & An, T. (2020). Novel carbon and defects co-modified g-C3N4 for highly efficient photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A under visible light. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 384, 121323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121323

Yang, K., Huang, L.-J., Wang, Y.-X., Du, Y.-C., Zhang, Z.-J., Wang, Y., Kipper, M. J., Belfiore, L. A., & Tang, J.-G. (2020). Graphene oxide nanofiltration membranes containing silver nanoparticles: Tuning separation efficiency via nanoparticle size. Nanomaterials, 10, 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030454

Zhang, H., Luo, J., Woodley, J. M., & Wan, Y. (2021a). Confining enzyme motion in nanofiltration membranes for efficient removal of micropollutants. Chemical Engineering Journal, 421, 127870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127870

Zhang, M. H., Dong, H., Zhao, L., Wang, D. X., & Meng, D. (2019). Review on Fenton process for organic wastewater treatment based on optimization perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 670, 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.180

Zhang, Z., Xiao, X., Zhou, Y., Huang, L., Wang, Y., Rong, Q., Han, Z., Qu, H., Zhu, Z., Xu, S., Tang, J., & Chen, J. (2021b). Bioinspired graphene oxide membranes with pH-responsive nanochannels for high-performance nanofiltration. ACS Nano, 15 (8), 13178–13187. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c02719