Published at : 30 Sep 2026
Volume : IJtech
Vol 17, No 5 (2026)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v17i5.8457
| Andante Hadi Pandyaswargo | Environmental Research Institute, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan |
| Meilinda Fitriani Nur Maghfiroh | 1. Industrial Engineering Department, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta 55584, Indonesia 2. Department of Operations Management and Business Statistics, College of Economics and Political Scien |
| Indriyani Rachman | Graduate School of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, 1-1 Hibikino, Wakamatsu-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka 808-0135, Japan |
| Hiroshi Onoda | Graduate School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Waseda University, 513 Waseda-tsurumaki-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0041, Japan |
Digital technologies are increasingly proposed to improve waste management, yet their uptake depends not only on technical feasibility but also on how people perceive their usefulness under existing service conditions. This study uses a quota-based online survey of 1,000 adults across 33 province-level fielding strata to examine the perceived helpfulness of automated waste-sorting technology in Indonesia, with the Papua region grouped into one fielding category. The main outcome variable captures respondents’ ordered ratings of whether automated sorting would help them, ranging from very unnecessary to very helpful. The analysis combines descriptive statistics, Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA), chi-square tests, Cramer’s V, and Pearson residual analysis to explore how perceived helpfulness is associated with sociodemographic characteristics, self-reported waste practices, and everyday service conditions. Overall, 69.7% and 20.2% of respondents rated automated sorting as very helpful and helpful, respectively, while 7.7% and 2.4% rated it as neutral and unhelpful, respectively. Perceived helpfulness was generally higher among younger respondents, those who were already engaged in waste sorting, and those who reported more reliable pickup services. Exploratory MCA results suggested recurring patterns linking favorable perceptions with active sorting behavior and more reliable service contexts, whereas less favorable perceptions were more common where pickup reliability was uncertain or weak. These findings suggest that public receptivity to automated waste sorting in Indonesia is associated not only with attitudes toward technology but also with the quality of routine waste services. The results should be interpreted as exploratory evidence from an online quota-based sample rather than as a nationally representative estimate of technology acceptance.
Automated waste sorting; Indonesia; Perceived helpfulness; Pickup-service reliability; Waste-sorting behavior
Abdi, H., & Valentin, D. (2007).
Multiple correspondence analysis. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of
measurement and statistics. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952644.n299
Amoah, J. O., Britwum, A. O., Essaw, D.
W., & Mensah, J. (2023). Solid waste management and gender dynamics:
Evidence from rural Ghana. Research in Globalization, 6, 100111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2023.100111
Asteria, D., & Herdiansyah, H.
(2022). The role of women in managing waste banks and supporting waste
management in local communities. Community Development Journal, 57(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsaa025
Barr, S., Gilg, A. W., & Ford, N. J.
(2001). A conceptual framework for understanding and analysing attitudes
towards household-waste management. Environment and Planning A, 33(11),
2025–2048. https://doi.org/10.1068/a33225
Bastos, D., Fernández-Caballero, A.,
Pereira, A., & Rocha, N. P. (2022). Smart city applications to promote
citizen participation in city management and governance: A systematic review.
Informatics, 9(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9040089
Botetzagias, I., Dima, A.-F., & Malesios,
C. (2015). Extending the theory of planned behavior in the context of
recycling: The role of moral norms and of demographic predictors. Resources,
Conservation and Recycling, 95, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.004
Budiyarto, A., Clarke, B., & Ross, K.
(2025). Overview of waste bank application in Indonesian regencies. Waste
Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 43(3), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X241242697
Caferra, R., D’Adamo, I., & Morone,
P. (2023). Wasting energy or energizing waste? the public acceptance of
waste-to-energy technology. Energy, 263, 126123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126123
Fatimah, Y. A., Govindan, K.,
Murniningsih, R., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 based sustainable
circular economy approach for smart waste management system to achieve
sustainable development goals: A case study of Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 269, 122263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122263
Ferronato, N., Maalouf, A., Mertenat, A.,
Saini, A., Khanal, A., Copertaro, B., Yeo, D., Jalalipour, H., Raldúa Veuthey,
J., Ulloa-Murillo, L. M., Thottathil, M. S., Shuaib, N. A. B., Caplin, R.,
& Mohandas, V. J. (2024). A review of plastic waste circular actions in
seven developing countries to achieve sustainable development goals. Waste
Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 42
(6), 436–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X231188664
Greenacre, M. (2017). Correspondence
analysis in practice (3rd). Chapman; Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315369983
Hansmann, R., & Binder, C. R. (2020).
Determinants of different types of positive environmental behaviors: An
analysis of public and private sphere actions. Sustainability, 12(20), 8547. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208547
Harfadli, M. M., Ramadan, B. S., Ulimaz,
M., Rachman, I., & Matsumoto, T. (2025). Environmental impact and priority
assessment of municipal solid waste management scenarios in Balikpapan City,
Indonesia. Cleaner Waste Systems, 10, 100223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100223
Knickmeyer, D. (2020). Social factors
influencing household waste separation: A literature review on good practices
to improve the recycling performance of urban areas. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 245, 118605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118605
Kurniawan, T. A., Meidiana, C., Dzarfan
Othman, M. H., Goh, H. H., & Chew, K. W. (2023). Strengthening waste
recycling industry in Malang (Indonesia): Lessons from waste management in the
era of Industry 4.0. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 135296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135296
Liu, L., & Hsu, Y. (2022). Motivating
factors behind the public’s use of smart recycling systems: Perceived
playfulness and environmental concern. Humanities and Social Sciences
Communications, 9(1), 328. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01347-6
Melese, M., Assefa, Y., & Meselu, Y.
(2025). Determinants of household-level solid waste sorting practice: The case
of Bure town, North-western Ethiopia. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1), 2483388. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2483388
Miafodzyeva, S., & Brandt, N. (2013).
Recycling behaviour among householders: Synthesizing determinants via a
meta-analysis. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 4(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-012-9144-4
Nguyen, T. T. P., Zhu, D., & Le, N.
P. (2015). Factors influencing waste separation intention of residential
households in a developing country: Evidence from Hanoi, Vietnam. Habitat
International, 48, 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.013
Ogawa, A., Pandyaswargo, A. H.,
Tsubouchi, R., & Onoda, H. (2023). Demonstration of a contactless waste
collection system: A Japanese case study. IET Smart Cities, 5(4), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1049/smc2.12065
Pandyaswargo, A. H., Rachman, I.,
Maghfiroh, M. F. N., Kharisma, V., & Onoda, H. (2025). Do Indonesians
separate their waste? can smart tech bridge the gap? IEEE European Technology
and Engineering Management Summit (E-TEMS), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/E-TEMS64751.2025.11239094
Piao, X., & Managi, S. (2024).
Determinants of pro-environmental behaviour: Effects of socioeconomic,
subjective, and psychological well-being factors from 37 countries. Humanities
and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1293. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03790-z
Prabowo, B., Simanjuntak, F. S. H.,
Saldi, Z. S., Samyudia, Y., & Widjojo, I. J. (2019). Assessment of waste to
energy technology in Indonesia: A techno-economical perspective on a 1000
ton/day scenario. International Journal of Technology, 10(6), 1228–1234. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i6.3607
Putri, C. M., & Hanum, F. (2021).
Konflik warga terdampak dengan pengelola TPST Piyungan, Bantul, di Yogyakarta.
E-Societas: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.21831/e-societas.v10i4.17176
Rejeb, A., & Zailani, S. (2023).
Blockchain technology and the circular economy: A systematic literature review.
Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 11(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d10.0436
Sembiring, E., Fenitra, R. M., Dangkua,
A. R., Khoeriyah, Z. B. A., Van Der Laan, A. Z., Fan, Y., Ceschin, F., &
Jobling, S. (2024). Improving household waste management in Indonesia: A
mixed-methods approach for waste sorting. Cleaner Waste Systems, 9, 100185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100185
Shan, C., Onoda, H., & Pandyaswargo,
A. H. (2025). Readiness status of smart waste collection and processing
technologies for plastic waste recycling. In Ecodesign for circular value
creation: Volume i (pp. 393–406). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9068-5\
25
Shan, C., Pandyaswargo, A. H., Ogawa, A.,
Tsubouchi, R., & Onoda, H. (2024). Japanese public perceptions on smart bin
potential to support PAYT systems. Waste
Management, 177, 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.02.003
Shukor, J. A., Omar, M. F., Kasim, M. M., Jamaludin, M. H., & Naim, M.
A. (2018). Assessment of composting technologies for organic waste
management. International Journal of Technology, 9(8), 1579–1587. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i8.2754
Supriyadi, S., Kriwoken, L. K., & Birley,
I. (2000). Solid waste management solutions for Semarang, Indonesia. Waste
Management & Research, 18(6), 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X0001800606
Tan, S., & Taeihagh, A. (2020). Smart
city governance in developing countries: A systematic literature review.
Sustainability, 12(3), 899. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030899
Tonglet, M., Phillips, P. S., & Read,
A. D. (2004). Using the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the
determinants of recycling behaviour: A case study from Brixworth, UK.
Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41(3), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.11.001
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G.
B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology:
Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
World Bank. (2019). Indonesia –
improvement of solid waste management to support regional and metropolitan
cities project. Retrieved July 24, 2026, from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/608321575860426737/pdf/IndonesiaImprovement-of-Solid-Waste-Management-to-Support-Regional-and-Metropolitan-Cities-Project.pdf
Zhao, W., Hao, J. L., Gong, G., Fischer, T., & Liu, Y. (2025). Applying digital technologies in construction waste management for facilitating sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, 123560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123560