Published at : 29 May 2026
Volume : IJtech
Vol 17, No 3 (2026)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v17i3.8430
| Gustavo Alexis Flores-Fernandez | Science Area, Universidad Tecnologica del Peru, Piura, 20001, Peru |
| Miguel Jiménez-Carrión | Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Piura, Castilla-Piura, 20002, Peru |
| María Laura Agripina Muro-Zúñiga | Science Area, Universidad Tecnologica del Peru, Piura, 20001, Peru |
| Juan Manuel Oliva Nuñez | Science Area, Universidad Tecnologica del Peru, Piura, 20001, Peru |
| Maria Yedidia Alburqueque Trelles | Science Area, Universidad Tecnologica del Peru, Piura, 20001, Peru |
A multi-objective neuro-fuzzy control strategy is proposed for a Van de Vusse continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR), a benchmark system characterized by nonlinear dynamics and non-minimum phase behavior. The controller is based on a multi-input multi-output adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) whose parameters are optimized using the NSGA-II algorithm. The proposed framework adjusts membership functions, rule consequents, and integral gains simultaneously within a Pareto-based formulation that considers tracking performance (ITAE) and control effort. The results of the closed-loop simulation indicate improved performance compared to a classically tuned parallel PID controller and a non-optimized ANFIS baseline. The optimized controller reduces the ITAE from 159.17 (PID) and 50.29 (baseline ANFIS) to 2.51, while operating within thermal safety constraints. The controller can compensate for the inverse response dynamics within the simulated conditions. Robustness analysis under ±10% parametric uncertainty demonstrates stable performance within the evaluated scenario, although broader uncertainties, such as measurement noise and actuator dynamics, were not considered. Targeted ANOVA provides limited insight into the influence of selected integral gains, identifying the flow-related gain as a relevant factor, but does not constitute a comprehensive statistical validation of the full controller structure. Overall, the proposed ANFIS–NSGA-II framework is presented as a simulation-based proof of concept that shows potential for nonlinear process control. However, further validation under more realistic conditions and experimental implementation is required to assess its practical applicability and generalizability.
Neuro-fuzzy control; Nonlinear systems; Non-minimum phase systems; NSGA-II; Van de Vusse reactor
Aghbashlo, M., Hosseinpour, S., & Tabatabaei,
M. (2016). Exergetic optimization of continuous photobiological hydrogen
production using hybrid ANFIS–NSGA-II. Energy, 96, 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.084
Aguilar-López, R., Mata-Machuca, J.,
& Godinez-Cantillo, V. (2021). TITO control strategy for uncertain
exothermic reactors. Processes, 9(5), 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9050873
Alfaro-Balaguer, V., Vega, S., Iza, J.,
Robalino, I., Rueda, M., Sinchiguano, P., & Camacho, O. (2025). Control of
inverse response processes by direct synthesis control: A CSTR case study. IEEE
Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAC64704.2025.11259301
Åström, K., & Hägglund, T. (2006). Advanced
PID control. ISA.
Bagheri, P., & Khodabakhshian, A.
(2014). NSGA-II based multiobjective PID controller tuning for DC motor drives.
International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems, 4(3),
322–330. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijpeds.v4i3.5976
Bagheri, P., & Mognjerdi, A. (2013).
Multi-objective optimization of ANFIS structure. International Conference on
Intelligent and Advanced Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIAS.2007.4658384
Bertone, A., Jafelice, R., & Goes, B.
(2018). Classic and fuzzy type-2 control for the Van de Vusse reactor. Trends
in Computational and Applied Mathematics, 19(2), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.5540/03.2018.006.02.0258
Coello Coello, C. (2004). Evolutionary
multiobjective optimization: Theoretical advances and applications.
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5184-0
Coello Coello, C. (2006). Evolutionary
multi-objective optimization: A historical view of the field. IEEE
Computational Intelligence Magazine, 1(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2006.1597059
Davila, J., Fridman, L., & Levant, A.
(2005). Second-order sliding-mode observer for mechanical systems. IEEE
Transactions on Automatic Control, 50(11), 1785–1789. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2005.858636
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., &
Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm:
NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
Dostal, P., & Bobal, V. (2012).
Neuro-fuzzy control design of chemical processes. Foundations of Computing
and Decision Sciences, 37(4), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10209-011-0014-6
Fraga, E. (2019). Multi-objective
optimization for dynamic processes. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 74,
601–606. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1974101
Govindharaj, I., Dinesh Kumar, K.,
Balamurugan, S., Yazhinian, S., Anandh, R., et al. (2024). Sensorless
vector-controlled induction motor drives: Boosting performance with adaptive
neuro-fuzzy inference system integrated augmented MRAS. MethodsX, 13,
102992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.102992
Hesami, M., Alizadeh, M., Naderi, R.,
& Tohidfar, M. (2020). Forecasting and optimizing agrobacterium-mediated
genetic transformation via ensemble model–fruit fly optimization algorithm: A
data mining approach using chrysanthemum databases. PLoS ONE, 15(9),
e0239901. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239901
Hofer, A., Matuš?, R., Prokop, R., &
Vojt?šek, J. (2023). Nonlinear control of Van de Vusse reactor using feedback
linearization. Chemical Engineering Science, 265, 118223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2023.118223
Jiang, Q., & Wang, P. (2025). NSGA-II
algorithm based control parameters optimization strategy for megawatt novel
nuclear power systems. Energy, 316, 134444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.134444
Lamba, R., & Raghu, N. (2013).
Analysis of Van de Vusse reactor using model predictive control. International
Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3(6), 236–240.
Lima, F., Faria, R., Curvelo, R.,
Cadorini, M., Echeverry, C., de Souza, M. J., & Secchi, A. (2023).
Nonlinear model predictive control approaches for a Van de Vusse reactor. Processes,
11(4), 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11041102
Liu, C., Liu, C., & Li, J. (2025).
Multi-model collaborative optimization using NSGA-II decision framework. Metals,
15(8), 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15080905
Liu, Y., Chu, M., Ye, Q., Li, J., &
Han, D. (2024). Multi-objective optimization of FCC separation system based on
NSGA-II. Chemical Engineering Science, 302, 120829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2024.120829
Mohamed, Z., Ali, A., & Dabour, W.
(2025). Optimizing adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system model based chaotic
Harris Hawks algorithm for stock prediction. Scientific Reports, 15,
32529. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15022-8
Mousavi, S., Castellanos-Cárdenas, D.,
Posada, N., Orozco-Duque, A., Sepúlveda-Cano, L., Castrillón, F., Camacho, O.,
& Vásquez, R. (2024). A review on data-driven model-free sliding mode
control. Algorithms, 17(12), 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/a17120543
O’Dwyer, A. (2009). Handbook of PI and
PID controller tuning rules (3rd ed.). Imperial College Press. https://doi.org/10.1142/p575
Prokop, R., Matu?s?u, R., &
Vojt?e?sek, J. (2020). Feedback control of chemical reactors by modern
principles. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 81, 805–810. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2081135
Rahman, A., Ihsan, S., & Hassan, N.
(2022). A fuzzy-logic-controlled two-speed electromagnetic gearbox for electric
vehicles. International Journal of Technology, 13(2), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i2.3913
Rangaiah, G., Feng, Z., & Hoadley, A.
(2020). Multi-objective optimization applications in chemical process
engineering: Tutorial and review. Processes, 8(5), 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8050508
Reyes, O., S?anchez, G., & Strefezza,
M. (2009). Multi-objective genetic algorithm for tuning a neuro-fuzzy
controller. ICINCO, 2, 383–386. https://doi.org/10.5220/0002210103830386
Seborg, D., Edgar, T., Mellichamp, D.,
& Doyle, F. (2010). Process dynamics and control (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Sevindik, M., G?urgen, A., Krupodorova,
T., Uysal, I?., & Ko?cer, O. (2024). A hybrid artificial neural network and
multi-objective genetic algorithm approach to optimize extraction conditions of
mentha longifolia and biological activities. Scientific Reports, 14,
31403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83029-8
Talpur, N., Abdulkadir, S., Alhussian,
H., Hasan, M., & Khan, M. (2023). Deep neuro-fuzzy system application
trends, challenges, and future perspectives: A systematic survey. Artificial
Intelligence Review, 56(2), 865–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10188-3
Velioglu, M., Zhai, S., Rupprecht, S.,
Mitsos, A., Jupke, A., & Dahmen, M. (2024). Physics-informed neural
networks for dynamic process operations. Computers & Chemical
Engineering, 192, 108899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108899
Verma, S., Pant, M., & Sn?a?sel, V.
(2021). A comprehensive review on nsga-ii for multi-objective combinatorial
optimization problems. IEEE
Access, 9, 175809–175828.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070634
Widiatmoko, P., Devianto, H., Irawan, S., Vinka, A., Sukmana, I., Saputera,
W., Eviani, M., & Prakoso, T. (2025). Optimizing reactor
configuration and electrode geometry for enhanced electrochemical reduction of
co2. International Journal of Technology, 16(6), 1956–1968. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v16i6.7547
Williams, A. (2021). Performance and robustness of alternate nonlinear control system designs for a nonlinear isothermal cstr. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(21), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.12.022
Zhu, B., Liu, L., Zhang, L., Liu, M., Duanmu, Y., Chen, Y., Dang, P., & Li, J. (2022). A variable-order fuzzy logic controller design method for an unmanned underwater vehicle based on nsga-ii. Fractal and Fractional, 6(10), 577. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6100577