Published at : 29 May 2026
Volume : IJtech
Vol 17, No 3 (2026)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v17i3.8365
| Salbek M. Beketov | Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya st., St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia |
| Maksim V. Dergachev | Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya st., St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia |
| Aleksei M. Gintciak | Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya st., St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia |
| Artem D. Nigmatulin | Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya st., St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia |
| Vasiliy M. Dybulin | Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya st., St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia |
Modern capital construction projects in the oil and gas industry are characterized by a high degree of complexity due to the multi-level structure of work, the significant duration of technological stages, and the strict dependence of task completion dates on available labor resources. In such conditions, traditional calendar and resource planning methods are insufficient to find a balance between the project’s duration and the amount of labor required, which requires the use of multi-criteria optimization methods. The purpose of this study is to develop and test an approach to optimizing the allocation of labor resources using the example of a project for the construction of SDFs. The methodological basis of the work is to use a Pareto optimization model for the composition of project teams, adapted to the company’s organizational and production structure. The Pareto front was obtained as a result of the computational experiments, reflecting compromise solutions between the duration of the project and the total labor costs, and 21 implementation scenarios were identified, of which 17 meet the customer’s time requirements. An analysis of the obtained scenarios showed that the proposed approach provides flexibility in choosing a strategy: from minimizing deadlines while increasing resource costs to optimizing labor costs while maintaining the allowable duration. The use of multi-criteria optimization methods makes it possible to reduce risks and improve the quality of management decisions in projects implemented using a cascade management model.
Allocation of labor resources; Calendar and network planning; Multi-objective optimization; Pareto optimization; Surface field development project
Abdolshah, M. (2014). A review of
resource-constrained project scheduling problems (RCPSP) approaches and
solutions. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management,
& Applied Sciences & Technologies, 5(4), 253–286.
Acar, E., Bayrak, G., Jung, Y., Lee, I.,
Ramu, P., & Ravichandran, S. S. (2021). Modeling, analysis, and
optimization under uncertainties: A review. Structural and Multidisciplinary
Optimization, 64(5), 2909–2945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03026-7
Aghileh, M., Tereso, A., Alvelos, F.,
& Lopes, M. O. M. (2024). Multi-project scheduling under uncertainty and
resource flexibility: A systematic literature review. Production &
Manufacturing Research, 12(1), 2319574. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2024.2319574
Aghileh, M., Tereso, A., Alvelos, F.,
& Lopes, M. O. M. (2025). Multi-project scheduling with uncertainty and
resource flexibility: A narrative review and exploration of future landscapes. Algorithms, 18(6), 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18060314
An, J., Li, S., & Wu, X. P. (2025). Multi-objective planning for
time-cost trade-offs in multi-project parallel environment. Engineering,
Construction and Architectural Management, 32(6), 4051–4073. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2023-0867
Dabirian, S., Abbaspour, S., Khanzadi,
M., & Ahmadi, M. (2022). Dynamic modelling of human resource allocation in
construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management,
22(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1616411
Deb, K. (2001). Nonlinear goal
programming using multi-objective genetic algorithms. Journal of the
Operational Research Society, 52(3), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601089
Farahmand-Mehr, M., & Mousavi, S. M. (2025). Resource-constrained
multi-project scheduling problems considering time-dependent reliability of
resources. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2024-0895
Hartmann, S., & Briskorn, D. (2022).
An updated survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained
project scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research,
297(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.05.004
Iskandar, A., & Allmendinger, R.
(2021). Multi-objective workforce allocation in construction projects. In Applications
of Evolutionary Computation (pp. 50–64). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72699-7_4
Kaveh, A., & Rajabi, F. (2022). Fuzzy
multi-mode resource-constrained discrete time-cost-resource optimization in
project scheduling using ENSCBO. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering,
66(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.19145
Kellenbrink, C., & Helber, S. (2015).
Scheduling resource-constrained projects with a flexible project structure. European
Journal of Operational Research, 246(2), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.003
Keynezhad, B., & Goharshenasan, A.
(2022). A multi-purpose model for optimising project selection and activities
scheduling by balancing resource allocation. International Journal of
Project Organisation and Management, 14(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPOM.2022.10045716
Kizielewicz, B., Shekhovtsov, A., &
Sa?abun, W. (2023). pymcdm—The universal library for solving multi-criteria
decision-making problems. SoftwareX, 22, 101368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2023.101368
Li, Z., Bi, S., Hao, S., & Cui, Y.
(2022). Aboveground biomass estimation in forests with random forest and Monte
Carlo-based uncertainty analysis. Ecological Indicators, 142, 109246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109246
Liang, G., Xu, L., & Chen, L. (2021).
Optimization of enterprise labor resource allocation based on quality
optimization model. Complexity, 2021, 5551762. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5551762
Liu, X. (2022). Labor market resource
allocation optimization based on principal component analysis. Journal of
Mathematics, 2022, 1478013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1478013
Majid, A., Hamidreza, A., Mehran, S.,
& Ehsanollah, Z. (2021). A robust multi-objective optimization model for
project scheduling considering risk and sustainable development criteria. Environment,
Development and Sustainability, 23(8), 11494–11524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01123-z
Nasouri, M., & Delgarm, N. (2024).
Efficiency-based Pareto optimization of building energy consumption and thermal
comfort. Journal of Thermal Science, 33(3), 1037–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-023-1933-5
Pospelov, K. N., Burlutskaya, Z. V.,
Gintciak, A. M., & Troshchenko, K. D. (2023). Multi-parametric optimization
of complex system management scenarios based on simulation models. International
Journal of Technology, 14(8), 1748–1758. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v14i8.6832
Rahman, M. H. F., Chakrabortty, R. K.,
& Ryan, M. J. (2021). Managing uncertainty and disruptions in
resource-constrained project scheduling problems: A real-time reactive
approach. IEEE Access, 9, 45562–45586. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3063766
Rebello, C. M., Martins, M. A., Santana,
D. D., Rodrigues, A. E., Loureiro, J. M., Ribeiro, A. M., & Nogueira, I. B.
(2021). From a Pareto front to Pareto regions: A novel standpoint for
multiobjective optimization. Mathematics, 9(24), 3152. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9243152
Sánchez, M. G., Lalla-Ruiz, E., Gil, A.
F., Castro, C., & Voß, S. (2023). Resource-constrained multi-project
scheduling problem: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research,
309(3), 958–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.09.033
Takleef, F., Ayadi, O., & Masmoudi,
F. (2025). An integrated optimization method for resource-constrained schedule
compression under uncertainty in construction projects. Applied Sciences,
15(8), 4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084089
Talbi, E. G. (2021). Machine learning
into metaheuristics: A survey and taxonomy. ACM Computing Surveys,
54(6), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459664
Wajanawichakon, K., Srisurin, K., &
Ongkunaruk, P. (2025). Multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainable crop
selection in northeast Thailand: An analytical hierarchy process approach. International
Journal of Technology, 16(3), 780–795. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v16i3.7118
Wang, L., Xiao, T., Liu, S., Zhang, W.,
Yang, B., & Chen, L. (2023). Quantification of model uncertainty and
variability for landslide displacement prediction based on Monte Carlo
simulation. Gondwana Research, 123, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.03.006
Wang, T., Abdallah, M., Clevenger, C.,
& Monghasemi, S. (2021). Time–cost–quality trade-off analysis for planning
construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural
Management, 28(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2017-0271
Wang, Z., Li, J., Rangaiah, G. P., &
Wu, Z. (2022). Machine learning aided multi-objective optimization and
multi-criteria decision making. Computers & Chemical Engineering,
165, 107945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107945
Wicaksono, F. D., Arshad, Y. B., &
Sihombing, H. (2019). Monte Carlo net present value for techno-economic
analysis of oil and gas production sharing contract. International Journal
of Technology, 10(4), 829–840. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i4.2051
Yang, Y., & Men, J. (2025).
Multi-objective optimization of construction project management based on
NSGA-II algorithm improvement. International Journal of Advanced Computer
Science & Applications, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2025.0160143
Y?lmaz, M., & Dede, T. (2025).
Optimizing multiobjective time–cost–quality problems in construction projects:
Efficacy of strength Pareto-based Rao algorithms. Journal of Construction
Engineering and Management, 151(5), 04025036. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15551
Zhan, Z., Hu, Y., Xia, P., & Ding, J.
(2024). Multi-objective optimization in construction project management based
on NSGA-III: Pareto front development and decision-making. Buildings,
14(7), 2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072112
Zhang, J. (2021). Modern Monte Carlo methods for efficient uncertainty quantification and propagation: A survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 13(5), e1539. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1539
Zohrehvandi, M., Zohrehvandi, S., Khalilzadeh, M., Amiri, M., Jolai, F., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2024). A multi-objective mathematical programming model for project-scheduling optimization considering customer satisfaction in construction projects. Mathematics, 12(2), 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12020211