• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 17, No 3 (2026)

Multi-Objective Optimization of Labor Allocation in Surface Field Development Projects

Multi-Objective Optimization of Labor Allocation in Surface Field Development Projects

Title: Multi-Objective Optimization of Labor Allocation in Surface Field Development Projects
Salbek M. Beketov, Maksim V. Dergachev, Aleksei M. Gintciak, Artem D. Nigmatulin, Vasiliy M. Dybulin

Corresponding email:


Cite this article as:
Beketov, S. M., Dergachev, M. V., Gintciak, A. M., Nigmatulin, A. D., & Dybulin, V. M. (2026). Multi-objective optimization of labor allocation in surface field development projects. International Journal of Technology, 17 (3), 772–785.


10
Downloads
Salbek M. Beketov Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya st., St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia
Maksim V. Dergachev Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya st., St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia
Aleksei M. Gintciak Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya st., St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia
Artem D. Nigmatulin Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya st., St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia
Vasiliy M. Dybulin Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya st., St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia
Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract
Multi-Objective Optimization of Labor Allocation in Surface Field Development Projects

Modern capital construction projects in the oil and gas industry are characterized by a high degree of complexity due to the multi-level structure of work, the significant duration of technological stages, and the strict dependence of task completion dates on available labor resources. In such conditions, traditional calendar and resource planning methods are insufficient to find a balance between the project’s duration and the amount of labor required, which requires the use of multi-criteria optimization methods. The purpose of this study is to develop and test an approach to optimizing the allocation of labor resources using the example of a project for the construction of SDFs. The methodological basis of the work is to use a Pareto optimization model for the composition of project teams, adapted to the company’s organizational and production structure. The Pareto front was obtained as a result of the computational experiments, reflecting compromise solutions between the duration of the project and the total labor costs, and 21 implementation scenarios were identified, of which 17 meet the customer’s time requirements. An analysis of the obtained scenarios showed that the proposed approach provides flexibility in choosing a strategy: from minimizing deadlines while increasing resource costs to optimizing labor costs while maintaining the allowable duration. The use of multi-criteria optimization methods makes it possible to reduce risks and improve the quality of management decisions in projects implemented using a cascade management model.

Allocation of labor resources; Calendar and network planning; Multi-objective optimization; Pareto optimization; Surface field development project

References

Abdolshah, M. (2014). A review of resource-constrained project scheduling problems (RCPSP) approaches and solutions. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 5(4), 253–286.

Acar, E., Bayrak, G., Jung, Y., Lee, I., Ramu, P., & Ravichandran, S. S. (2021). Modeling, analysis, and optimization under uncertainties: A review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 64(5), 2909–2945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03026-7

Aghileh, M., Tereso, A., Alvelos, F., & Lopes, M. O. M. (2024). Multi-project scheduling under uncertainty and resource flexibility: A systematic literature review. Production & Manufacturing Research, 12(1), 2319574. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2024.2319574

Aghileh, M., Tereso, A., Alvelos, F., & Lopes, M. O. M. (2025). Multi-project scheduling with uncertainty and resource flexibility: A narrative review and exploration of future landscapes. Algorithms, 18(6), 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18060314

An, J., Li, S., & Wu, X. P. (2025). Multi-objective planning for time-cost trade-offs in multi-project parallel environment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(6), 4051–4073. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2023-0867

Dabirian, S., Abbaspour, S., Khanzadi, M., & Ahmadi, M. (2022). Dynamic modelling of human resource allocation in construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1616411

Deb, K. (2001). Nonlinear goal programming using multi-objective genetic algorithms. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52(3), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601089

Farahmand-Mehr, M., & Mousavi, S. M. (2025). Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problems considering time-dependent reliability of resources. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2024-0895

Hartmann, S., & Briskorn, D. (2022). An updated survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 297(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.05.004

Iskandar, A., & Allmendinger, R. (2021). Multi-objective workforce allocation in construction projects. In Applications of Evolutionary Computation (pp. 50–64). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72699-7_4

Kaveh, A., & Rajabi, F. (2022). Fuzzy multi-mode resource-constrained discrete time-cost-resource optimization in project scheduling using ENSCBO. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 66(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.19145

Kellenbrink, C., & Helber, S. (2015). Scheduling resource-constrained projects with a flexible project structure. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(2), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.003

Keynezhad, B., & Goharshenasan, A. (2022). A multi-purpose model for optimising project selection and activities scheduling by balancing resource allocation. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 14(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPOM.2022.10045716

Kizielewicz, B., Shekhovtsov, A., & Sa?abun, W. (2023). pymcdm—The universal library for solving multi-criteria decision-making problems. SoftwareX, 22, 101368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2023.101368

Li, Z., Bi, S., Hao, S., & Cui, Y. (2022). Aboveground biomass estimation in forests with random forest and Monte Carlo-based uncertainty analysis. Ecological Indicators, 142, 109246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109246

Liang, G., Xu, L., & Chen, L. (2021). Optimization of enterprise labor resource allocation based on quality optimization model. Complexity, 2021, 5551762. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5551762

Liu, X. (2022). Labor market resource allocation optimization based on principal component analysis. Journal of Mathematics, 2022, 1478013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1478013

Majid, A., Hamidreza, A., Mehran, S., & Ehsanollah, Z. (2021). A robust multi-objective optimization model for project scheduling considering risk and sustainable development criteria. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(8), 11494–11524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01123-z

Nasouri, M., & Delgarm, N. (2024). Efficiency-based Pareto optimization of building energy consumption and thermal comfort. Journal of Thermal Science, 33(3), 1037–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-023-1933-5

Pospelov, K. N., Burlutskaya, Z. V., Gintciak, A. M., & Troshchenko, K. D. (2023). Multi-parametric optimization of complex system management scenarios based on simulation models. International Journal of Technology, 14(8), 1748–1758. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v14i8.6832

Rahman, M. H. F., Chakrabortty, R. K., & Ryan, M. J. (2021). Managing uncertainty and disruptions in resource-constrained project scheduling problems: A real-time reactive approach. IEEE Access, 9, 45562–45586. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3063766

Rebello, C. M., Martins, M. A., Santana, D. D., Rodrigues, A. E., Loureiro, J. M., Ribeiro, A. M., & Nogueira, I. B. (2021). From a Pareto front to Pareto regions: A novel standpoint for multiobjective optimization. Mathematics, 9(24), 3152. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9243152

Sánchez, M. G., Lalla-Ruiz, E., Gil, A. F., Castro, C., & Voß, S. (2023). Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 309(3), 958–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.09.033

Takleef, F., Ayadi, O., & Masmoudi, F. (2025). An integrated optimization method for resource-constrained schedule compression under uncertainty in construction projects. Applied Sciences, 15(8), 4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084089

Talbi, E. G. (2021). Machine learning into metaheuristics: A survey and taxonomy. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459664

Wajanawichakon, K., Srisurin, K., & Ongkunaruk, P. (2025). Multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainable crop selection in northeast Thailand: An analytical hierarchy process approach. International Journal of Technology, 16(3), 780–795. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v16i3.7118

Wang, L., Xiao, T., Liu, S., Zhang, W., Yang, B., & Chen, L. (2023). Quantification of model uncertainty and variability for landslide displacement prediction based on Monte Carlo simulation. Gondwana Research, 123, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.03.006

Wang, T., Abdallah, M., Clevenger, C., & Monghasemi, S. (2021). Time–cost–quality trade-off analysis for planning construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2017-0271

Wang, Z., Li, J., Rangaiah, G. P., & Wu, Z. (2022). Machine learning aided multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision making. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 165, 107945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107945

Wicaksono, F. D., Arshad, Y. B., & Sihombing, H. (2019). Monte Carlo net present value for techno-economic analysis of oil and gas production sharing contract. International Journal of Technology, 10(4), 829–840. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i4.2051

Yang, Y., & Men, J. (2025). Multi-objective optimization of construction project management based on NSGA-II algorithm improvement. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2025.0160143

Y?lmaz, M., & Dede, T. (2025). Optimizing multiobjective time–cost–quality problems in construction projects: Efficacy of strength Pareto-based Rao algorithms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(5), 04025036. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15551

Zhan, Z., Hu, Y., Xia, P., & Ding, J. (2024). Multi-objective optimization in construction project management based on NSGA-III: Pareto front development and decision-making. Buildings, 14(7), 2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072112

Zhang, J. (2021). Modern Monte Carlo methods for efficient uncertainty quantification and propagation: A survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 13(5), e1539. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1539

Zohrehvandi, M., Zohrehvandi, S., Khalilzadeh, M., Amiri, M., Jolai, F., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2024). A multi-objective mathematical programming model for project-scheduling optimization considering customer satisfaction in construction projects. Mathematics, 12(2), 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12020211