• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 17, No 3 (2026)

A Fuzzy Delphi Model for Prioritizing Uncaptured Value in Circular Manufacturing: Decision-Making in the Heavy Equipment Industry

A Fuzzy Delphi Model for Prioritizing Uncaptured Value in Circular Manufacturing: Decision-Making in the Heavy Equipment Industry

Title: A Fuzzy Delphi Model for Prioritizing Uncaptured Value in Circular Manufacturing: Decision-Making in the Heavy Equipment Industry
Yudi Syahrullah, Udisubakti Ciptomulyono, Ratna Sari Dewi

Corresponding email:


Cite this article as:
Syahrullah, Y., Ciptomulyono, U., & Dewi, R. S. (2026). A fuzzy delphi model for prioritizing uncaptured value in circular manufacturing: Decision-making in the heavy equipment industry. International Journal of Technology, 17 (3), 786–805.


8
Downloads
Yudi Syahrullah 1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia 2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purbalin
Udisubakti Ciptomulyono Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia
Ratna Sari Dewi Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia
Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract
A Fuzzy Delphi Model for Prioritizing Uncaptured Value in Circular Manufacturing: Decision-Making
in the Heavy Equipment Industry

Manufacturing remains a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and resource depletion, accelerating the transition toward circular business models. Although circular manufacturing seeks to generate economic, social, and environmental value, significant uncaptured value persists and is insufficiently prioritized. This study systematically identifies and prioritizes uncaptured values within circular manufacturing business models. A literature review identified 35 uncaptured values related to sustainable manufacturing business models targeting six captured values aligned with the SDGs. A Fuzzy Delphi survey involving nine experts in heavy equipment and machinery recovery operations was conducted to ensure industrial relevance. Nine uncaptured values met the consensus (75%) and threshold (0.2) criteria and were subsequently prioritized using fuzzy evaluation scores. The retained values primarily reflect core operational constraints, particularly weak quality control in recovery activities, limited availability of viable end-of-life products, and unfavorable recovery end-of-life characteristics. These findings indicate that bottlenecks in reverse supply and recovery execution predominantly drive uncaptured value in circular manufacturing rather than downstream market factors. By providing an expertconsensus prioritization framework, this study advances research on circular business models and offers a practical foundation for targeted mitigation strategies to strengthen value capture and enhance the long-term resilience of circular manufacturing systems.

Circular economy; Fuzzy delphi; Manufacturing; Uncaptured value

Supplementary Material
FilenameDescription
R1-IE-8363-20260223114353.pdf Supplementary File 1_Reliability Testing
R1-IE-8363-20260223114419.pdf Supplementary File 2_Fuzzy Delphi Result
References

Angouria-Tsorochidou, E., Cimpan, C., & Parajuly, K. (2018). Optimized collection of EoL electronic products for circular economy: A techno-economic assessment. Procedia CIRP, 25th CIRP Life Cycle Engineering (LCE) Conference, 69, 986–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.020

Asif, F. M. A., Roci, M., Lieder, M., Rashid, A., Miheli?, A., & Kotnik, S. (2021). A methodological approach to design products for multiple lifecycles in the context of circular manufacturing systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 296, 126534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126534

Bao, X., Wei, W., & Liu, Y. (2022). Remanufacturing lead time planning of the medical device with multi-refurbishing steps. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, 134697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134697

Behl, A., Singh, R., Pereira, V., & Laker, B. (2023). Analysis of Industry 4.0 and circular economy enablers: A step towards resilient sustainable operations management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189, 122363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122363

Berawi, M. A. (2020). Managing Nature 5.0: The role of digital technologies in the circular economy. International Journal of Technology, 11, 291–319. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v11i4.4385

Bertassini, A. C., Zanon, L. G., Azarias, J. G., Gerolamo, M. C., & Ometto, A. R. (2021). Circular business ecosystem innovation: A guide for mapping stakeholders, capturing values, and finding new opportunities. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 436–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.004

Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha: Table 1. BMJ, 314, 572. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572

Bocken, N., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039

Borchardt, M., da Silva, M. G., de Carvalho, M. N. M., Burdzinski, C. S., Kirst, R. W., Pereira, G. M., & da Silva, M. A. (2024). Uncaptured value in the business model: Analysing its modes in social enterprises in the sustainable fashion industry. Journal of Creating Value, 10, 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/23949643231220777

Bui, T.-D., Rosiana, R., Tsai, F.-M., Chiu, A. S. F., & Tseng, M.-L. (2025). Circular economy challenges under uncertainty in the Indonesian fashion industry: A causal hierarchical model. International Journal of Production Economics, 288, 109719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109719

Burhan, Ciptomulyono, U., Singgih, M. L., & Baihaqi, I. (2020). Potential for changing value uncaptured to value captured through circular economy practices. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 472, 012049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/472/1/012049

Burhan, Ciptomulyono, U., Singgih, M. L., & Baihaqi, I. (2021). Sustainable business model innovations in the value uncaptured manufacturing industry: Fitting gains—gain creators. Sustainability, 13, 5647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105647

Charlton, E. (2024). Our resources are running out and these charts show how urgently action is needed [World Economic Forum]. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/03/sustainable-resource-consumption-urgent-un/

Chen, X., Goh, M., Li, B., & Cheng, Y. (2021). Collection strategies and pricing decisions for dual channel EOL products. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 159, 107477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107477

Dat, L. Q., Truc Linh, D. T., Chou, S.-Y., & Yu, V. F. (2012). Optimizing reverse logistic costs for recycling end-of-life electrical and electronic products. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 6380–6387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.12.031

Difrancesco, R. M., & Huchzermeier, A. (2016). Closed-loop supply chains: A guide to theory and practice. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19, 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2015.1116503

EMF, E. M. F. (2021). The circular economy as a de-risking strategy and driver of superior risk-adjusted returns. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/the-circular-economy-as-a-de-risking-strategy-and-driver-of-superior-risk

Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow, C. Y. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1939

Fatemi, F., Ardalan, A., Aguirre, B., Mansouri, N., & Mohammadfam, I. (2017). Constructing the indicators of assessing human vulnerability to industrial chemical accidents: A consensus-based fuzzy Delphi and fuzzy AHP approach. PLoS Curr, 9, ecurrents.dis.526884afe308f8876dce69c545357ecd. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.526884afe308f8876dce69c545357ecd

Fernando, Y., Tseng, M.-L., Aziz, N., Ikhsan, R. B., & Wahyuni-TD, I. S. (2022). Waste-to-energy supply chain management on circular economy capability: An empirical study. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 31, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.01.032

Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S. N., de Carvalho, M. M., & Evans, S. (2018). Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.27629

Gennari, F., & Bocchi, E. (2023). The dark side of the circular economy: The value uncaptured in bioeconomy business models. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21, 516–531. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(4).2023.39

Hamwi, M., Lizarralde, I., & Allais, R. (2025). The circular value navigator: A tool for identifying and transforming linear practices in the circular economy. Sustainability, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210209

Hasim, M. A., Jabar, J., Sufian, A., Ibrahim, N. F., & Khalid, F. A. (2023). Employing fuzzy Delphi techniques to validate the components and contents of E-learning antecedents and usage behavior towards E-learning performance. European Journal of Educational Research, 12, 467–480. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.467

Huang, Y.-F., Azevedo, S. G., Lin, T.-J., Cheng, C.-S., & Lin, C.-T. (2021). Exploring the decisive barriers to achieve circular economy: Strategies for the textile innovation in Taiwan. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1406–1423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.007

ISO. (2024). ISO 59004:2024. https://www.iso.org/standard/80648.html

Jailani, M. A., & Loy, C. K. (2023). The application of fuzzy Delphi method in content validity analysis. IADIS International Conference Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age 2023, 84–90.

Joyce, A., & Paquin, R. L. (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1474–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067

Kim, J., Park, S., & Kim, H. M. (2021). Optimal modular remanufactured product configuration and harvesting planning for end-of-life products. Journal of Mechanical Design, 144. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052389

Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005

Kvadsheim, N. P., Nujen, B. B., Powell, D., & Reke, E. (2021). Realizing value opportunities for a circular economy: Integrating extended value stream mapping and value uncaptured framework. In Advances in production management systems. Artificial intelligence for sustainable and resilient production systems (pp. 739–747). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85874-2_81

Manyara, A. M., Purvis, A., Ciani, O., Collins, G. S., & Taylor, R. S. (2024). Sample size in multistakeholder Delphi surveys: At what minimum sample size do replicability of results stabilize? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 174, 111485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111485

Mayanti, B., & Helo, P. (2024). Circular economy through waste reverse logistics under extended producer responsibility in Finland. Waste Management & Research, 42, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X231168801

Melati, K., Nikam, J., & Nguyen, P. (2021). Barriers and drivers for enterprises to transition to circular economy. https://doi.org/10.51414/sei2021.029

Moloney, P. (2021). Capturing value in the circular economy [Ramboll Group]. https://ramboll.com/ingenuity/capturing-value-in-the-circular-economy

Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140, 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2

Natsir, U., Dipoatmodjo, T., Arjang, A., Hidayat, M., & Mustafa, M. (2021). Eight days a week: Eustress and distress among the athletes. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 9(5), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2021.090512

Osmanovic, S., Barth, H., & Ulvenblad, P. (2024). Uncaptured value in sustainable business model innovation: The missing link. Technological Sustainability, 3, 262–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/TECHS-02-2024-0010

Ostlin, J., Sundin, E., & Björkman, M. (2009). Product life-cycle implications for remanufacturing strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 999–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.02.021

Padilla-Rivera, A., do Carmo, B. B. T., Arcese, G., & Merveille, N. (2021). Social circular economy indicators: Selection through fuzzy Delphi method. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.015

Rexhepi-Mahmutaj, L., Jusufi, N., Krasniqi, B., Mazrekaj, L., & Krasniqi, T. (2025). Barriers to transitioning to circular economy within firms in Western Balkans countries. Frontiers in Sustainability, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2025.1546110

Rutgers, V., & John, C. (2021). Sustainable manufacturing: From vision to action.

Sakao, T., Bocken, N., Nasr, N., & Umeda, Y. (2024). Implementing circular economy activities in manufacturing for environmental sustainability. CIRP Annals, 73, 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2024.06.002

Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Jovanovic, M., & Visnjic, I. (2020). Value creation and value capture alignment in business model innovation: A process view on outcome-based business models. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37, 158–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12516

Suzanne, E., Absi, N., & Borodin, V. (2020). Towards circular economy in production planning: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Operational Research, 287, 168–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.043

Tighnavard Balasbaneh, A., Aldrovandi, S., & Sher, W. (2025). A systematic review of implementing multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches for the circular economy and cost assessment. Sustainability, 17, 5007. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115007

Tolio, T., Bernard, A., Colledani, M., Kara, S., Seliger, G., Duflou, J., Battaia, O., & Takata, S. (2017). Design, management and control of demanufacturing and remanufacturing systems. CIRP Annals, 66, 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.001

Tsai, H.-C., Lee, A.-S., Lee, H.-N., Chen, C.-N., & Liu, Y.-C. (2020). An application of the fuzzy Delphi method and fuzzy AHP on the discussion of training indicators for the regional competition, Taiwan National Skills Competition, in the trade of joinery. Sustainability, 12, 4290. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104290

Tuni, A., Ijomah, W. L., Gutteridge, F., Mirpourian, M., Pfeifer, S., & Copani, G. (2023). Risk assessment for circular business models: A fuzzy Delphi study application for composite materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 389, 135722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135722

UNEP. (2024). Global resources outlook 2024: Bend the trend – pathways to a liveable planet as resource use spikes [International Resource Panel]. https://doi.org/20.500.11822/44901

Wandji, C., Riel, A., Ben Rejeb, H., Kanso, M., & Pitis, F. (2025). Maximizing circular economy benefits for manufacturing companies: A simulation tool for defining and implementing a circular product strategy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 53, 78–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.12.002

Yang, M., Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., & Rana, P. (2017). Value uncaptured perspective for sustainable business model innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1794–1804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.102

Yang, M., Vladimirova, D., & Evans, S. (2017). Creating and capturing value through sustainability: The sustainable value analysis tool. Research-Technology Management, 60, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2017.1301001

Yatoo, A. M., Hamid, B., Sheikh, T. A., Ali, S., Bhat, S. A., Ramola, S., Ali, M. N., Baba, Z. A., & Kumar, S. (2024). Global perspective of municipal solid waste and landfill leachate: generation, composition, eco-toxicity, and sustainable management strategies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 23363–23392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32669-4

Yusoff, H. M., Heng, P. P., Hj Illias, M. R., Karrupayah, S., Fadhli, M. A., & Hod, R. (2024). A qualitative exploration and a fuzzy Delphi validation of high-risk scaffolding tasks and fatigue-related safety behavioural deviation among scaffolders. Heliyon, 10, e34599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34599

Zacharaki, A., Vafeiadis, T., Kolokas, N., Vaxevani, A., Xu, Y., Peschl, M., Ioannidis, D., & Tzovaras, D. (2021). RECLAIM: Toward a new era of refurbishment and remanufacturing of industrial equipment. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3, 570562. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.570562

Zhang, J.-H., & Chen, M. (2015). Assessing the impact of China’s vehicle emission standards on diesel engine remanufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.103