Published at : 29 May 2026
Volume : IJtech
Vol 17, No 3 (2026)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v17i3.8340
| Vladimir Glukhov | Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaya Str., 29, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia |
| Aleksandr Babkin | Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaya Str., 29, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia |
| Elena Shkarupeta | 1. Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaya Str., 29, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia 2. Department of Digital |
| Tatyana Belyatskaya | Department of Management, Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics, P. Brovki Str., 6, Minsk 220013, Belarus |
| Michael Kozukov | Department of Management, Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics, P. Brovki Str., 6, Minsk 220013, Belarus |
| Kaxramon Mambetjanov | Department of Political Economy, National University of Uzbekistan Named After Mirzo Ulugbek, University Str., 4, Tashkent 100174, Uzbekistan |
This study introduces the AI Regional Asymmetry (AIRA) methodology—a comprehensive framework for assessing and mitigating disparities in artificial intelligence (AI) development across countries and regions. Building on economic theories of inequality and resource complementarity, AIRA comprises four interlinked stages: (1) construction of a synthetic AI asymmetry index based on 23 indicators consolidated into four key dimensions — computational chasm, talent gravity, data monopolization, and capital cycle; (2) quantification of asymmetry using economic inequality metrics such as quantile gaps, Gini, and Theil indices; (3) identification of complementary country profiles to form strategic alliances — vertical, horizontal, or multilateral — aimed at resource exchange and imbalance reduction; and (4) scenario modeling to simulate the dynamic impacts of such alliances on global AI market structures. Applied to Belarus as a case study, the methodology reveals potential partnership configurations within the CIS region, with leading economies such as the United States and China, and with developing countries, thereby illustrating opportunities for regional strengthening and global asymmetry reduction. The framework offers policymakers quantitative tools for fostering equitable AI ecosystems, underscoring international cooperation as a strategic pathway to narrow digital divides and promote sustainable, inclusive growth in AI-driven markets.
AI asymmetry; AI governance; AI regional asymmetry; Digital divide; Economic sustainability
| Filename | Description |
|---|---|
| R2-IE-8340-20260515233332.pdf | --- |
Allen, R., & Choudhury, P. (2022).
Algorithm-augmented work and domain experience: The countervailing forces of
ability and aversion. Organization Science, 33(1), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1554
Babkin, A., Glukhov, V., Shkarupeta, E.,
Kharitonova, N., & Barabaner, H. (2021). Methodology for assessing
industrial ecosystem maturity in the framework of digital technology
implementation. International Journal of Technology, 12(7), 1397–1406. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v12i7.5390
Babkin, A., Shkarupeta, E., Kabasheva,
I., Rudaleva, I., & Vicentiy, A. (2022a). A framework for digital
development of industrial systems in the strategic drift to industry 5.0. International
Journal of Technology, 13(7), 1373–1382. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i7.6193
Babkin, A., Shkarupeta, E., Mamrayeva,
D., Tashenova, L., Umarov, A., & Karimov, D. (2025). A
structural-functional model for managing digital maturity in a cluster-based,
innovation-active industrial ecosystem within industry 5.0. International
Journal of Technology, 16(4), 1209–1219. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v16i4.7412
Babkin, A., Tashenova, L., Mamrayeva, D.,
Shkarupeta, Y., Pulyaeva, V., & Leifei, C. (2022b). Digitalization of
industry in russia and kazakhstan: The best practices. International Journal
of Technology, 13(7), 1568–1577. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i7.6200
Beliatskaya, T., & Knyazkova, V.
(2017). Methodology of e-economy infrastructure research. In Managing
service, education and knowledge management in the knowledge economic era
(1st ed., p. 6). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315269146-19
Bran, E., Rughinis, , R., T, urcanu, D.,
& Radovici, A. (2024). Ai leads, cybersecurity follows: Unveiling research
priorities in sustainable development goal-relevant technologies across
nations. Sustainability, 16(20), 8886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208886
Capello, R., Lenzi, C., & Perucca, G.
(2022). The modern solow paradox: In search for explanations. Structural
Change and Economic Dynamics, 63, 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.09.013
Carter, L., Liu, D., & Cantrell, C.
(2020). Exploring the intersection of the digital divide and artificial
intelligence: A hermeneutic literature review. AIS Transactions on
Human-Computer Interaction, 12(4), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00138
Chang, Q., Wu, M., & Zhang, L. (2023). Endogenous growth and
human capital accumulation in a data economy. Structural Change and Economic
Dynamics, 69, 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2023.12.015
Chun, Y., Hur, J., & Hwang, J. (2024). Ai technology
specialization and national competitiveness. PLOS ONE, 19(4), e0301091. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301091
Costas, M. (2022). Tecnolog??a y
desigualdad: La gobernanza tecnol?ogica como nuevo paradigma de la seguridad
internacional. Revista de Estudios de Seguridad Internacional, 8(2),
89–108. https://doi.org/10.18847/1.16.6
Crafts, N. (2021). Artificial
intelligence as a general-purpose technology: An historical perspective. Oxford
Review of Economic Policy, 37(3), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grab012
Dahlin, E. (2021). Mind the gap! on the
future of ai research. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8,
71. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00750-9
Dinker, N. (2024). Artificial
intelligence and inequality: Examining the social divides created by
technological advancements. International Journal of Innovations in Science,
Engineering and Management, 228–236. https://doi.org/10.69968/ijisem.2024v3si2228-236
Festa, G., Elbahri, S., Cuomo, M., Ossorio, M., & Rossi, M. (2023). Fintech
ecosystem as influencer of young entrepreneurial intentions: Empirical findings
from tunisia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24(1), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2021-0220
Filippucci, F., Gal, P., &
Jona-Lasinio, C. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on productivity,
distribution and growth. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, (57).
https://doi.org/10.1787/8d900037-en
Gu, J., & Liu, Z. (2024). A study of
the coupling between the digital economy and regional economic resilience:
Evidence from china. PLOS ONE, 19(1), e0296890. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296890
Guo, Y., Yu, F., Lai, J., & Yuan, X.
(2025). How is aigc shaping the world: An analysis of bibliometrics. Information
Research, 30(iConf), 679–689. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30iconf47227
Hajikhani, A., J?ager, A., Schubert, T.,
& Suominen, A. (2025). Return of the solow-paradox in ai?: Ai-adoption and
firm productivity [Advance online publication]. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7434983/v1
Hung, K. (2024). Artificial intelligence
as planetary assemblages of coloniality: The new power architecture driving a
tiered global data economy. Big Data and Society, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241289443
Jacobides, M., Brusoni, S., &
Candelon, F. (2021). The evolutionary dynamics of the artificial intelligence
ecosystem. Strategy Science, 6(4), 412–435. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2021.0148
Jiang, X., Xue, D., Bai, Y., Wang, W.,
Liu, J., Yang, M., & Su, Y. (2025). Ai4materials: Transforming the
landscape of materials science and engineering. Review of Materials Research,
1(1), 100010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmat.2025.100010
Kalai, M., Becha, H., & Helali, K. (2024). Effect of artificial
intelligence on economic growth in european countries: A symmetric and
asymmetric cointegration based on linear and non-linear ardl approach. Journal
of Economic Structures, 13(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-024-00345-y
Kitsara, I. (2022). Artificial
intelligence and the digital divide: From an innovation perspective. In A.
Bounfour (Ed.), Platforms and artificial intelligence. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90192-9_12
Mykhailova, Y., Savina, N., Lytvynenko, V., & Mykhailov, S. (2024). Entropy-based
evaluation of the impact of education on economic development. Informatics,
Control, Measurement in Economy and Environment Protection, 14(3), 118–122.
https://doi.org/10.35784/iapgos.6358
Qenaat, B., Taj, S., Khan, Z., Khan, M.,
Rabnawaz, M., & Yawar, R. (2025). Toward inclusive growth: Technology in
development economics through the lens of bibliometric analysis. Future
Business Journal, 11(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00474-1
Rahaman, N., Weiss, M., W?uthrich, M.,
Bengio, Y., Li, L., Pal, C., & Sch?olkopf, B. (2024). Language models can
reduce asymmetry in information markets. arXiv preprint,
arXiv:2405.12345. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.14443
Ranade, N., & Eyman, D. (2024).
Introduction: Composing with generative ai. Computers and Composition,
71, 102834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102834
Savastano, M., Spremi?c, M., Stojcic, N.,
& Gobbi, L. (2024). Digital economy: Towards a conceptual research
framework based on bibliometric and in-depth analyses. Management and
Marketing, 19(2), 275–306. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2024-0013
Svoboda, P. (2024). Digital competencies
and artificial intelligence for education: Transformation of the education
system. International Advances in Economic Research, 30, 227–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-024-09896-z
Tian, L., Li, X., Lee, C., &
Spulb?ar, C. (2024). Investigating the asymmetric impact of artificial
intelligence on renewable energy under climate policy uncertainty. Energy
Economics, 137, 107809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107809
Tredinnick, L., & Laybats, C. (2023).
The dangers of generative artificial intelligence. Business Information
Review, 40(2), 46–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/02663821231183756
Vyshnevskyi, O. (2024). Ai as a mitigator
of information asymmetry within platform strategiarchy logic. Economic
Herald of the Donbas, 4(78), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2024-4(78)-5-11
Wagner, D. (2020). Economic patterns in a
world with artificial intelligence. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics
Review, 17(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-019-00157-x
Wan, C., & Wu, Z. (2025). How the
digital intelligence economy can promote regional high-quality development
under the influence of economic policy uncertainty. Sustainability,
17(7), 2869. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072869
Williams, B. (2025). Winning the defining
contest: The us-china artificial intelligence race. The Washington Quarterly,
48(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2025.2517501
Xu, X., & Liang, F. (2024). Research
on the analysis model of regional economic growth differences in china based on
big data and intelligent algorithms. International Journal of High Speed
Electronics and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129156425401779
Zhang, H., Fang, B., He, P., & Gao,
W. (2024). The asymmetric impacts of artificial intelligence and oil shocks on
clean energy industries by considering covid-19. Energy, 291, 130197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.130197
Zhang, K. (2024). Geoeconomics of
us-china tech rivalry and industrial policy. Asia and the Global Economy,
4(2), 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aglobe.2024.100098