Published at : 29 May 2026
Volume : IJtech
Vol 17, No 3 (2026)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v17i3.8115
| Siska Titik Dwiyati | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia |
| Irwan Setyanto | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia |
| Gandjar Kiswanto | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia |
| Sugeng Supriadi | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia |
| Tegoeh Tjahjowidodo | Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Sint-Katelijne-Waver, 2860, Belgium |
Real-time defect detection is essential for advanced in-process quality inspection systems, particularly for identifying complex crack formations in small-scale products through automated methods. Acoustic emission (AE) enables the rapid detection of crack initiation, making it a highly effective technique for modern manufacturing processes. This study presents a comparative analysis of AE signatures generated during the microblanking process of magnesium and SK-5 steel. Experiments were conducted using a proprietary 5 kN micro-forming machine on 0.1-mm-thick SK-5 steel and 0.5-mm-thick magnesium plates, representing materials with contrasting mechanical properties. This study evaluates and compares various signal processing methods, including the fast Fourier transform (FFT) and the wavelet scattering transform (WST), in terms of their effectiveness in identifying crack initiation events. The wavelet scattering transform exhibited enhanced sensitivity for detecting crack initiation in both materials, with distinct signature patterns identified between the magnesium and SK-5 steel specimens. However, there were limitations for softer materials or when the original signal amplitude was lower than the system noise level. Overall, this comparative analysis provides valuable insights for developing material-specific acoustic emission monitoring systems for microforming applications.
Real-time defect detection is essential for advanced in-process quality inspection systems, particularly for identifying complex crack formations in small-scale products through automated methods. Aco
Abdollahi-Mamoudan, F., Ibarra-Castanedo,
C., & Maldague, X. P. V. (2025). Non-destructive testing and evaluation of
hybrid and advanced structures: A comprehensive review of methods,
applications, and emerging trends. Sensors, 25, 3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25123635
Agletdinov, E., Pomponi, E., Merson, D.,
& Vinogradov, A. (2016). A novel Bayesian approach to acoustic emission
data analysis. Ultrasonics, 72, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2016.07.014
Alcaraz, J. Y., Sharma, A., &
Tjahjowidodo, T. (2024). Predicting porosity in wire arc additive manufacturing
(WAAM) using wavelet scattering networks and sparse principal component
analysis. Welding in the World, 68, 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-024-01709-5
Al-Jumaili, S. K., Eaton, M. J., Holford,
K. M., Pearson, M. R., Crivelli, D., & Pullin, R. (2018). Characterisation
of fatigue damage in composites using an Acoustic Emission Parameter Correction
Technique. Composites Part B: Engineering, 151, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.020
Allwood, J. M., Ashby, M. F., Gutowski,
T. G., & Worrell, E. (2013). Material efficiency: Providing material
services with less material production. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society A, 371, 20120496. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0496
Altan, T., & Tekkaya, A. E. (2012).
Classification and description of sheet metal forming operations. In Sheet
metal forming: Fundamentals. ASM International.
Barat, V., Marchenkov, A., &
Elizarov, S. (2019). Estimation of fatigue crack AE emissivity based on the
Palmer–Heald model. Applied Sciences, 9 (22). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224851
Barile, C., Casavola, C., Pappalettera,
G., & Kannan, V. P. (2020). Application of different acoustic emission
descriptors in damage assessment of fiber reinforced plastics: A comprehensive
review. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 235 (107083). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107083
Caso, E., Fernandez-Del-Rincon, A.,
Garcia, P., Diez-Ibarbia, A., & Sanchez-Espiga, J. (2023). An experimental
study of acoustic emissions from active surface degradation in planetary gears.
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.110090
Dwiyati, S. T., Kiswanto, G., & Supriadi, S. (2025). Development
of a room-temperature microforming process applied to pure magnesium treated by
annealing in bioabsorbable miniplate implant applications. Results in
Engineering, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107051
Ferrando Chacon, J. L., Kappatos, V.,
Balachandran, W., & Gan, T. H. (2015). A novel approach for incipient
defect detection in rolling bearings using acoustic emission technique. Applied
Acoustics, 89, 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.09.002
Ghassemali, E., Tan, M. J., Jarfors, A.,
& Lim, S. (2012). Progressive microforming process: Towards the mass
production of micro-parts using sheet metal. The International Journal of
Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66, 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4352-4
Han, Z., Luo, H., Sun, C., Li, J., Papaelias, M., & Davis, C. (2014). Acoustic
emission study of fatigue crack propagation in extruded AZ31 magnesium alloy.
Materials Science and Engineering: A, 597, 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.083
He, X., Yan, Z., Liang, H., & Wang,
D. (2023). Corrosion fatigue acoustic emission characteristics and evaluation
of friction stir welding joints of AZ31 magnesium alloy in 3.5 wt.% NaCl
solution. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 25, 4582–4594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.240
Herbirowo, S., Yuwono, A. H., Sofyan, N.,
Imaduddin, A., Pramono, A. W., Supriyadi, S., & Mohamed, J. J. (2023).
Development of magnesium diboride superconducting wires through hot working
with different initial filling density. International Journal of Technology,
14. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v14i7.6695
Hidle, E. L., Hestmo, R. H., Adsen, O.
S., Lange, H., & Vinogradov, A. (2022). Early detection of subsurface
fatigue cracks in rolling element bearings by the knowledge-based analysis of
acoustic emission. Sensors, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145187
Ingarao, G., Di Lorenzo, R., & Micari, F. (2011). Sustainability
issues in sheet metal forming processes: An overview. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 19, 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.10.005
Kiswanto, G., Mahmudah, A., &
Supriadi, S. (2013). Development and testing of 5 kN micro forming machine for
micro part manufacturing. 13th Quality in Research, 84.
Kumar, P., Maiti, J., & Gunasekaran,
A. (2018). Impact of quality management systems on firm performance.
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35, 1034–1059.
Li, H., & Fu, M. (2019).
Deformation-based processing of materials: Behavior, performance, modeling, and
control. Elsevier.
Linderov, M., Segel, C., Weidner, A., Biermann, H., & Vinogradov, A.
(2014). Deformation mechanisms in austenitic TRIP/TWIP steels at room
and elevated temperature investigated by acoustic emission and scanning
electron microscopy. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 597, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.094
Ma, J., Tang, X., Hou, Y., Li, H., Lin, J., & Fu, M. W. (2025). Defects
in metal-forming: Formation mechanism, prediction and avoidance. International
Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2025.104268
Mu, W., Gao, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, G., & Hu, H. (2022). Modeling
and analysis of acoustic emission generated by fatigue cracking. Sensors, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031208
Nurcahyo, R., Wibowo, A. D., Robasa, R.,
& Cahyati, I. (2019). Development of a strategic manufacturing plan from a
resource-based perspective. International Journal of Technology, 10. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i1.2140
Ono, K. (2005). Current understanding of
mechanisms of acoustic emission. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering
Design, 40, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1243/030932405X7674
Richeton, T., Weiss, J., & Louchet, F. (2005). Dislocation
avalanches: Role of temperature, grain size and strain hardening. Acta Materialia, 53, 4463–4471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.007
Seleznev, M., Gustmann, T., Friebel, J. M., Peuker, U. A., Kühn, U.,
Hufenbach, J. K., Biermann, H., & Weidner, A. (2022). In situ
detection of cracks during laser powder bed fusion using acoustic emission
monitoring. Additive Manufacturing Letters, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addlet.2022.100099
Shiraiwa, T., Tamura, K., & Enoki, M.
(2019). Analysis of kinking and twinning behavior in extruded Mg–Y–Zn alloys by
acoustic emission method with supervised machine learning technique. Materials
Science and Engineering: A, 768, 138473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.138473
Sutherland, J. W., Skerlos, S. J.,
Haapala, K. R., Cooper, D., Zhao, F., & Huang, A. (2020). Industrial
sustainability: Reviewing the past and envisioning the future. Journal of
Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 142, 110806.
Twardowski, P., Tabaszewski, M.,
Wiciak-Piku?a, M., & Felusiak-Czyryca, A. (2021). Identification of tool
wear using acoustic emission signal and machine learning methods. Precision
Engineering, 72, 738–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.07.019
Unterberg, M., Voights, H., Weiser, I.
F., Feuerhack, A., Trauth, D., & Bergs, T. (2021). Wear monitoring in fine
blanking processes using feature based analysis of acoustic emission signals.
Procedia CIRP, 104, 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.028
Vallen Systeme. (2013). Codes, standards,
practices, and guidelines related to acoustic emission (AE).
Vinogradov, A., Lazarev, A., Linderov, M., Weidner, A., & Biermann, H.
(2013). Kinetics of deformation processes in high-alloyed cast
transformation-induced plasticity/twinning-induced plasticity steels determined
by acoustic emission and scanning electron microscopy: Influence of austenite
stability on deformation mechanisms. Acta Materialia, 61, 2434–2449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.016
Wang, S. B., Yan, Z. F., Zhang, H. X.,
He, X. L., Dong, P., Wang, W. X., & Wang, Z. R. (2022). Acoustic and
thermal energy evolution of AZ31B magnesium alloy under static tensile
deformation. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 20, 1645–1658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.169
Wijaya, I. G. P. S., & Kencanawati,
N. N. (2014). Denoising acoustic emission signal using wavelet transforms for
determining the micro crack location inside of concrete. International Journal
of Technology, 5, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v5i3.613
Wu, L., Liang, W., & Sha, D. (2022).
A novel adaptive noise reduction method for field natural gas pipeline defect
detection signals. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 199,
104761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104761
Xu, K., Lyu, J., & Manoochehri, S. (2022). In situ process
monitoring using acoustic emission and laser scanning techniques based on
machine learning models. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 84, 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.002
Zárate Boris, A., Caicedo Juan, M., Yu,
J., & Ziehl, P. (2012). Probabilistic prognosis of fatigue crack growth
using acoustic emission data. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 138, 1101–1111.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000414
Zhang, H., & Lin, Z. (2023).
Analytical solution of acoustic emission in soft material with cracks by using
reciprocity theorem. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108996
Zhang, X., Wang, K., Wang, Y., Shen, Y.,
& Hu, H. (2020). Rail crack detection using acoustic emission technique by
joint optimization noise clustering and time window feature detection. Applied
Acoustics, 160, 107141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107141
Zhu, R., Fang, S., Sun, W., & Chi, D.
(2023). Study on acoustic emission characteristics of fatigue damage of A7N01
aluminum alloy for high-speed trains. Materials, 16, 4362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16124362