• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 17, No 3 (2026)

Comparative Acoustic Emission Signature Analysis of Magnesium and Steel in Microblanking Process Using Wavelet Scattering Transform

Comparative Acoustic Emission Signature Analysis of Magnesium and Steel in Microblanking Process Using Wavelet Scattering Transform

Title: Comparative Acoustic Emission Signature Analysis of Magnesium and Steel in Microblanking Process Using Wavelet Scattering Transform
Siska Titik Dwiyati, Irwan Setyanto, Gandjar Kiswanto, Sugeng Supriadi, Tegoeh Tjahjowidodo

Corresponding email:


Cite this article as:
Dwiyati, S. T., Setyanto, I., Kiswanto, G., Supriadi, S., & Tjahjowidodo, T. (2026). Comparative acoustic emission signature analysis of magnesium and steel in microblanking process using wavelet scattering transform. International Journal of Technology, 17 (3), 1147–1162


7
Downloads
Siska Titik Dwiyati Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia
Irwan Setyanto Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia
Gandjar Kiswanto Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia
Sugeng Supriadi Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia
Tegoeh Tjahjowidodo Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Sint-Katelijne-Waver, 2860, Belgium
Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract
Comparative Acoustic Emission Signature Analysis of Magnesium and Steel in Microblanking Process Using Wavelet Scattering Transform

Real-time defect detection is essential for advanced in-process quality inspection systems, particularly for identifying complex crack formations in small-scale products through automated methods. Acoustic emission (AE) enables the rapid detection of crack initiation, making it a highly effective technique for modern manufacturing processes. This study presents a comparative analysis of AE signatures generated during the microblanking process of magnesium and SK-5 steel. Experiments were conducted using a proprietary 5 kN micro-forming machine on 0.1-mm-thick SK-5 steel and 0.5-mm-thick magnesium plates, representing materials with contrasting mechanical properties. This study evaluates and compares various signal processing methods, including the fast Fourier transform (FFT) and the wavelet scattering transform (WST), in terms of their effectiveness in identifying crack initiation events. The wavelet scattering transform exhibited enhanced sensitivity for detecting crack initiation in both materials, with distinct signature patterns identified between the magnesium and SK-5 steel specimens. However, there were limitations for softer materials or when the original signal amplitude was lower than the system noise level. Overall, this comparative analysis provides valuable insights for developing material-specific acoustic emission monitoring systems for microforming applications.

Real-time defect detection is essential for advanced in-process quality inspection systems, particularly for identifying complex crack formations in small-scale products through automated methods. Aco

References

Abdollahi-Mamoudan, F., Ibarra-Castanedo, C., & Maldague, X. P. V. (2025). Non-destructive testing and evaluation of hybrid and advanced structures: A comprehensive review of methods, applications, and emerging trends. Sensors, 25, 3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25123635

Agletdinov, E., Pomponi, E., Merson, D., & Vinogradov, A. (2016). A novel Bayesian approach to acoustic emission data analysis. Ultrasonics, 72, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2016.07.014

Alcaraz, J. Y., Sharma, A., & Tjahjowidodo, T. (2024). Predicting porosity in wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) using wavelet scattering networks and sparse principal component analysis. Welding in the World, 68, 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-024-01709-5

Al-Jumaili, S. K., Eaton, M. J., Holford, K. M., Pearson, M. R., Crivelli, D., & Pullin, R. (2018). Characterisation of fatigue damage in composites using an Acoustic Emission Parameter Correction Technique. Composites Part B: Engineering, 151, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.020

Allwood, J. M., Ashby, M. F., Gutowski, T. G., & Worrell, E. (2013). Material efficiency: Providing material services with less material production. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 371, 20120496. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0496

Altan, T., & Tekkaya, A. E. (2012). Classification and description of sheet metal forming operations. In Sheet metal forming: Fundamentals. ASM International.

Barat, V., Marchenkov, A., & Elizarov, S. (2019). Estimation of fatigue crack AE emissivity based on the Palmer–Heald model. Applied Sciences, 9 (22). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224851

Barile, C., Casavola, C., Pappalettera, G., & Kannan, V. P. (2020). Application of different acoustic emission descriptors in damage assessment of fiber reinforced plastics: A comprehensive review. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 235 (107083). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107083

Caso, E., Fernandez-Del-Rincon, A., Garcia, P., Diez-Ibarbia, A., & Sanchez-Espiga, J. (2023). An experimental study of acoustic emissions from active surface degradation in planetary gears. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.110090

Dwiyati, S. T., Kiswanto, G., & Supriadi, S. (2025). Development of a room-temperature microforming process applied to pure magnesium treated by annealing in bioabsorbable miniplate implant applications. Results in Engineering, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107051

Ferrando Chacon, J. L., Kappatos, V., Balachandran, W., & Gan, T. H. (2015). A novel approach for incipient defect detection in rolling bearings using acoustic emission technique. Applied Acoustics, 89, 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.09.002

Ghassemali, E., Tan, M. J., Jarfors, A., & Lim, S. (2012). Progressive microforming process: Towards the mass production of micro-parts using sheet metal. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66, 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4352-4

Han, Z., Luo, H., Sun, C., Li, J., Papaelias, M., & Davis, C. (2014). Acoustic emission study of fatigue crack propagation in extruded AZ31 magnesium alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 597, 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.083

He, X., Yan, Z., Liang, H., & Wang, D. (2023). Corrosion fatigue acoustic emission characteristics and evaluation of friction stir welding joints of AZ31 magnesium alloy in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 25, 4582–4594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.240

Herbirowo, S., Yuwono, A. H., Sofyan, N., Imaduddin, A., Pramono, A. W., Supriyadi, S., & Mohamed, J. J. (2023). Development of magnesium diboride superconducting wires through hot working with different initial filling density. International Journal of Technology, 14. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v14i7.6695

Hidle, E. L., Hestmo, R. H., Adsen, O. S., Lange, H., & Vinogradov, A. (2022). Early detection of subsurface fatigue cracks in rolling element bearings by the knowledge-based analysis of acoustic emission. Sensors, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145187

Ingarao, G., Di Lorenzo, R., & Micari, F. (2011). Sustainability issues in sheet metal forming processes: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.10.005

Kiswanto, G., Mahmudah, A., & Supriadi, S. (2013). Development and testing of 5 kN micro forming machine for micro part manufacturing. 13th Quality in Research, 84.

Kumar, P., Maiti, J., & Gunasekaran, A. (2018). Impact of quality management systems on firm performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35, 1034–1059.

Li, H., & Fu, M. (2019). Deformation-based processing of materials: Behavior, performance, modeling, and control. Elsevier.

Linderov, M., Segel, C., Weidner, A., Biermann, H., & Vinogradov, A. (2014). Deformation mechanisms in austenitic TRIP/TWIP steels at room and elevated temperature investigated by acoustic emission and scanning electron microscopy. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 597, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.094

Ma, J., Tang, X., Hou, Y., Li, H., Lin, J., & Fu, M. W. (2025). Defects in metal-forming: Formation mechanism, prediction and avoidance. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2025.104268

Mu, W., Gao, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, G., & Hu, H. (2022). Modeling and analysis of acoustic emission generated by fatigue cracking. Sensors, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031208

Nurcahyo, R., Wibowo, A. D., Robasa, R., & Cahyati, I. (2019). Development of a strategic manufacturing plan from a resource-based perspective. International Journal of Technology, 10. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i1.2140

Ono, K. (2005). Current understanding of mechanisms of acoustic emission. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 40, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1243/030932405X7674

Richeton, T., Weiss, J., & Louchet, F. (2005). Dislocation avalanches: Role of temperature, grain size and strain hardening. Acta Materialia, 53, 4463–4471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.007

Seleznev, M., Gustmann, T., Friebel, J. M., Peuker, U. A., Kühn, U., Hufenbach, J. K., Biermann, H., & Weidner, A. (2022). In situ detection of cracks during laser powder bed fusion using acoustic emission monitoring. Additive Manufacturing Letters, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addlet.2022.100099

Shiraiwa, T., Tamura, K., & Enoki, M. (2019). Analysis of kinking and twinning behavior in extruded Mg–Y–Zn alloys by acoustic emission method with supervised machine learning technique. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 768, 138473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.138473

Sutherland, J. W., Skerlos, S. J., Haapala, K. R., Cooper, D., Zhao, F., & Huang, A. (2020). Industrial sustainability: Reviewing the past and envisioning the future. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 142, 110806.

Twardowski, P., Tabaszewski, M., Wiciak-Piku?a, M., & Felusiak-Czyryca, A. (2021). Identification of tool wear using acoustic emission signal and machine learning methods. Precision Engineering, 72, 738–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.07.019

Unterberg, M., Voights, H., Weiser, I. F., Feuerhack, A., Trauth, D., & Bergs, T. (2021). Wear monitoring in fine blanking processes using feature based analysis of acoustic emission signals. Procedia CIRP, 104, 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.028

Vallen Systeme. (2013). Codes, standards, practices, and guidelines related to acoustic emission (AE).

Vinogradov, A., Lazarev, A., Linderov, M., Weidner, A., & Biermann, H. (2013). Kinetics of deformation processes in high-alloyed cast transformation-induced plasticity/twinning-induced plasticity steels determined by acoustic emission and scanning electron microscopy: Influence of austenite stability on deformation mechanisms. Acta Materialia, 61, 2434–2449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.016

Wang, S. B., Yan, Z. F., Zhang, H. X., He, X. L., Dong, P., Wang, W. X., & Wang, Z. R. (2022). Acoustic and thermal energy evolution of AZ31B magnesium alloy under static tensile deformation. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 20, 1645–1658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.169

Wijaya, I. G. P. S., & Kencanawati, N. N. (2014). Denoising acoustic emission signal using wavelet transforms for determining the micro crack location inside of concrete. International Journal of Technology, 5, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v5i3.613

Wu, L., Liang, W., & Sha, D. (2022). A novel adaptive noise reduction method for field natural gas pipeline defect detection signals. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 199, 104761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104761

Xu, K., Lyu, J., & Manoochehri, S. (2022). In situ process monitoring using acoustic emission and laser scanning techniques based on machine learning models. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 84, 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.002

Zárate Boris, A., Caicedo Juan, M., Yu, J., & Ziehl, P. (2012). Probabilistic prognosis of fatigue crack growth using acoustic emission data. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 138, 1101–1111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000414

Zhang, H., & Lin, Z. (2023). Analytical solution of acoustic emission in soft material with cracks by using reciprocity theorem. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108996

Zhang, X., Wang, K., Wang, Y., Shen, Y., & Hu, H. (2020). Rail crack detection using acoustic emission technique by joint optimization noise clustering and time window feature detection. Applied Acoustics, 160, 107141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107141

Zhu, R., Fang, S., Sun, W., & Chi, D. (2023). Study on acoustic emission characteristics of fatigue damage of A7N01 aluminum alloy for high-speed trains. Materials, 16, 4362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16124362