Published at : 18 Sep 2024
Volume : IJtech
Vol 15, No 5 (2024)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v15i5.7086
Lubis M. Sobron Yamin | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tarumanagara University, 11440 Jakarta, Indonesia |
Muhammad Zulkarnain | Fakulti Teknologi Kejuruteraan Mekanikal, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, 75450 Ayer Keroh, Melaka, Malaysia |
Steven Darmawan | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tarumanagara University, 11440 Jakarta, Indonesia |
Silvi Ariyanti | Department of Industry Engineering, Mercubuana University, 11650 Jakarta Indonesia |
Ibham Veza | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bung Karno University, 10320 Jakarta, Indonesia |
Mohd Badzli Bakri | Fakulti Teknologi Kejuruteraan Mekanikal, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, 75450 Ayer Keroh, Melaka, Malaysia |
The heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units
in vehicles can produce significant noise, lowering the sound quality inside
the vehicle and reducing passenger comfort. While noise control methods are
available, they can be expensive and harmful to the environment. To address these
issues, this study aims to investigate using low-cost and biodegradable natural
materials, specifically coconut fibers, for vehicle HVAC noise control. The
study utilized coconut fibers, which have sound absorption properties reaching
42 dBA, to treat an actual Perodua HVAC unit. The treatment targeted the HVAC
noise spectrum at low, medium, and high blower speeds, resulting in reduced
Sound Pressure Levels (SPL) at the passenger's ear position. The composite was
applied to the air inlet head and inlet channel of the HVAC system using a
specific combination of coconut fiber content. The research identified the
sources of noise in the highest contributions that occurred at the blower fan
unit and treated the required areas. In terms of numerical data, the results
showed that the treatment significantly reduced the noise level by 11 dBA.
Additionally, the experiment found that the 8% fiber ratio at low speed
decreased by 14.28% following the treatment. Similarly, the fiber ratio at
medium and high speeds saw reductions of 15.47% and 17.56%, respectively. This
study presents a promising solution for reducing noise in vehicle HVAC units
using cost-effective and eco-friendly materials. Future research should focus
on optimizing coconut fiber ratios, evaluating long-term durability and
biodegradability, validating real-world applicability, and establishing
standardized testing protocols to improve and confirm the effectiveness of
coconut fiber-based noise control in automotive HVAC systems.
Biodegradable materials; Coconut fibers; HVAC noise control; Natural fiber absorber; Noise reduction; Vehicle acoustic comfort
A vehicle's interior sound quality is crucial and requires attention to Noise, Vibration, and Harshness (NVH). The reduction of noise inside a car improves passenger comfort and driving experience and reduces distraction. Enhanced sound quality also influences customer perception of the automotive product, making the vehicle more attractive and competitive (Jennings et al., 2010). Advancements in research and development over the past two decades have revolutionized vehicle engines, making them quieter and delivering superior sound. This progress has resulted in increased perceptibility of secondary sound sources within the vehicle cabin, such as heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems, entertainment systems, and audio driver assist systems. Among these sources, the HVAC system stands out as the most dominant noise source in the vehicle's interior space, operating continuously while the vehicle is in motion (Singh and Mohanty, 2018). It is fascinating to observe the increasing attention given to the study and reduction of aeroacoustics noise generated by automotive Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems, particularly in electric vehicles where other sources of noise are comparatively less significant (Fei and Wang, 2023; Hariharan et al., 2022). Improving acoustic comfort is crucial, and this involves reducing noise from the ventilation system, as well as addressing wind noise and other noise sources (Sun et al., 2024a; Zhou et al., 2023; Taheri, Hosseini, and Razban, 2022; Back et al., 2021). The HVAC noise is classified into low-frequency and high-frequency components, which helps to understand the sources and characteristics of the noise. Humming and buzzing sounds are typically associated with low-frequency noise emanating from components such as blowers and condensers. Notably, these noises may not be as perceptually irritating as high-frequency tonal noises, but they still play a significant role in overall cabin noise (Yoon et al., 2020).
Passengers can be
particularly disturbed by tonal noises at high frequencies. These noises can
come from air outlets, channels, and system discontinuities such as junctions.
These stand out against background noise and can make it seem like the overall
noise level has increased, leading to discomfort (Zhou et
al., 2023). It is essential to reduce both low-frequency
and high-frequency noise components in automotive HVAC systems to achieve
premium acoustic comfort for vehicle occupants. This may involve redesigning
components to minimize vibration and turbulence, optimizing airflow paths to
reduce turbulence and pressure fluctuations, and using sound-absorbing
materials or baffles to dampen noise propagation.
For optimal
performance, HVAC units have a blower that generates noise (Amer, 2024; Hasegawa and Sakaue, 2024; Sun et al., 2024b; Li et
al., 2024; Fei and Wang, 2023; Gowree et al., 2023; Qingyi et
al., 2023). To reduce this noise, conventional strategies
involve designing changes to the blower and its blades (Sun, Xu, and Shi, 2021; Smith, Filippone, and Bojdo, 2020;
Han et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2019). While design changes can reduce this noise, it needs to focus on
post-production noise control strategies for existing units (Yang, Wang, and Wang, 2023; Pulvirenti, Totaro, and Parizet, 2023; Loreto et al.,
2020). Two methods for post-production noise control
are active and passive noise control. Passive noise control is more
cost-effective and works best at frequencies above 500 Hz, providing noise
reduction throughout the interior space. For example, synthetic sound-absorbing
materials such as micro-perforates, fiberglass, glass wool, and polypropylene
can achieve up to 6-10 dB noise reduction (Mohammadi
et al., 2024; Tao et al., 2021). However, these materials were expensive and had a high carbon
footprint. Additionally, they are not biodegradable or recyclable, making them
an unsustainable choice. Although active noise control can be effective, it is
expensive and only works in specific areas of the vehicle's interior space. To
minimize noise pollution and promote sustainability, the method should
prioritize passive noise control using environmentally friendly materials.
The airflow powered by
machines often generates noise due to the air flowing around them, especially
in low-mach-number flows. Flow-induced noise reduction strategies typically
fall into two categories: active control and passive control (Shige et al., 2024).
Several studies have adopted the passive control approach to reduce
flow-induced noise. This method entails replacing specific parts of the object,
which are exposed to fluid flow, with porous material. By doing so, the noise
is significantly reduced without altering the shape of the object. Notably, the
automotive industry shifted towards Natural Fiber (NR) materials for noise
control since they are sustainable, cost-effective, and effective. Materials
like jute, cotton, flax, kenaf, hemp, coconut coir, bamboo curls, and bananas
are excellent sound absorbers, affordable, lightweight, and environmentally
friendly (Bisheh, 2024; Nawawithan et al., 2024; Singh et al., 2024; 2023;
Dattatreya et al., 2023; Sahib-dua et al., 2023; Patel, Mishra, and Choudhary, 2022;
Hariprasad et al., 2020; Hadiji et al., 2020). NRs are also versatile and can be molded into
various shapes, making them a flexible option for different components. Using
NR materials, manufacturers can achieve effective noise control while reducing
production costs and meeting sustainability goals. Moreover, this trend
reflects broader industry efforts towards eco-friendly and cost-efficient
solutions in automotive design and manufacturing. According to Mago et al. (2022),
Rubber-Bamboo Biochar (BB) composite has been proven to be the most effective natural
material for sound absorption. They used NR to treat a sound absorber in an
automotive unit, and the Sound Transmission Loss (STL) was significantly
increased by 8% and 11% compared to NR composites upon adding 10 and 20 per
hundred rubber of BB, respectively. Recent studies have proven that NR/polymer
composites reinforced with porous fabric exhibit excellent sound energy
absorption properties. Notably, the hollow conjugated cross-section provides
the maximum noise absorption. Nonwoven fabrics composed of biodegradable and
recyclable jute caddies and flax comber noil also have significant noise
absorption properties despite being inexpensive. In addition, a higher punch
density results in better compactness of nonwoven fabric, which leads to improved
sound absorption properties. Meanwhile, layered nonwoven structures are
responsible for better sound absorption properties due to the presence of an
air layer (Paul, Ahirwar, and Behera, 2022).
Nearly all NRs play a
crucial role in absorbing unwanted sound. NR sound absorbers are available in
the form of raw materials, fiber assemblies, and composites. The study of
absorption materials is crucial to understanding the relationship between
material and sound absorption coefficient, as well as overall performance.
Properly designed materials can optimize the prevention of noise from the
source and enhance STL. Moreover, various studies have proposed optimization
strategies for noise control in material design. Firstly, material designs are
characterized through measurement testing and analyzed for sound transmission
characteristics of the composite using experiments (Zulkarnain
et al., 2024; Choudhary et al., 2023; Ciach et
al., 2022; Abdi et al., 2021;
Bhingare and Prakash 2021;
Yang, et al., 2020; Da-Silva et al., 2019). Secondly, numerical studies, such as Finite Element
Analysis (FEA), are utilized to optimize and validate the transmission loss and
vibration through composite materials (Lim, Yaw, and Chen, 2022;
Araújo and Madeira, 2020; Soltani et al., 2020). These studies indicate that optimized design can significantly
mitigate the spread of noise contaminants and enhance acoustical contributions.
Several studies have suggested that NR sound absorbers offer many advantages
over conventional absorbers. However, not all NRs have the necessary properties
to replace mineral fiber and glass fiber. Therefore, it is crucial to compare
the sound absorption properties of NRs and conventional absorbers. To compare
the differences among the absorbers, the sound absorption curves presented by
the previous researcher (Yang et al., 2020) have been separately displayed in the absorption
coefficient results. Thicker absorbers made of coir fiber exhibit better sound
absorption properties than thinner absorbers, such as Yucca Gloriosa fiber.
Moreover, coir fiber demonstrates good absorption agreement with a coefficient
of around 0.95 in the frequency range of 63-6,300 Hz. Thicker absorbers made of
coir fiber with a loose fiber structure demonstrate worse sound absorption
compared to thinner absorbers. Accordingly, most natural absorbers demonstrate
better sound absorption than glass fiber. The utilization of natural resources
in composite production offers a more environmentally friendly approach to
pollution reduction. The effectiveness of bamboo biochar as a filler in natural
rubber composites for vibration and noise control has been investigated by Mago et al. (2022) and Khair et al. (2015).
Materials like rubber (Corredor -Bedoya, Zoppi, and
Serpa, 2017), wool (Ilangovan
et al., 2022), single layer micro-perforated panel (Esraa et al., 2022), Sludge and Fly Ash (Hiadayani
et al., 2023), and silica (Yusoff et al., 2023) are
commonly used to absorb vibrations and noise pollution in engineering
applications. Natural fibers are favored due to their eco-friendly nature,
competitive mechanical performance, and renewable availability throughout the
year.
Furthermore, advanced
computational simulation testing methodologies can help identify noise sources
and evaluate the effectiveness of noise reduction measures. This can facilitate
the development of quieter HVAC systems for automotive applications. The
previous researcher approached reducing noise in commercial electric vehicle
HVAC systems. A multifaceted set of wind tunnel numerical simulations and
practical applications demonstrated significant reductions of over 20 dB in
their design. Researchers studied the noise generation of air outlets in a
car's HVAC system. They simulated the flow and acoustic perturbations using a
hybrid aeroacoustics simulation and also experimented to observe the
interaction between the throttle valve and fins (Ravichandran
et al., 2024). In addition,
numerical analysis has been successfully used to analyze the noise emitted by
automobiles (Zhang et al., 2022), especially the noise generated by the exhaust system, which
significantly impacts human health. To improve this situation, CFD analysis was
conducted on the existing muffler and three newly designed mufflers, considering
the inlet velocity. The results indicated that increasing the pressure drop
(improving aerodynamic performance) also reduced noise pollution (Kalita and Singh, 2022).
The methodology used to perform
numerical evaluations and experimental noise control methods involved four main
steps, as depicted in Appendix 1.
First, an impedance tube was used to evaluate the coconut composite's sound
absorption and transmission loss, and raw data was collected to characterize
the composite's properties in noise absorption capabilities. In the second
step, the main contribution of noise produced by the vehicle's HVAC system was
evaluated, followed by a numerical method to analyze the appropriate treatment
to be implemented in the HVAC system. Finally, the coconut composite treatment
in the HVAC system was analyzed experimentally in the last step.
2.1. Description of the HVAC unit
The HVAC unit being studied was a
Malaysian vehicle produced by Perodua. It has an 850 cc engine and is made of
plastic. The unit consists of several key components, including a fresh air
inlet, recirculation inlet, and outlet vents, as illustrated in Appendix 2. The observation focuses on
higher noise levels produced by the HVAC system based on measurements, and
several factors could contribute to this phenomenon. This includes blower
speed, air flow restriction, vibration, and restriction. The air enters the unit through the recirculation inlet vent
(number 1), passes through the blower, and then flows over the evaporator.
2.2. Coconut fiber extraction process
The process of extracting coconut fiber
from the inner flesh of coconuts involves peeling, shredding, cleaning, and
sun-drying. To reveal the inner flesh, a machete is used to peel the outer skin
of coconuts. Consequently, the shredding breaks down the fibrous material into
smaller strands, making it easier to process. The shredded coconut fiber is
then cleansed with distilled water to remove any impurities and sun-dried to
remove excess moisture. The physical coir fiber is generally short, ranging
from 15 to 18 cm, with a diameter varying from 0.1 to 0.5 mm.
2.3. Coconut coir fiber treatment
The alkali treatment process for coconut
fiber enhances its flexibility and purity. The process involves soaking the
fiber in a 2% NaOH solution to break down impurities, as displayed in Appendix 3. After rinsing, the fiber
is neutralized and dried to remove excess moisture. The completely treated
fiber is then oven-dried to ensure its purity and readiness. This treatment
process produces high-quality coconut fiber that is suitable for various
applications. By following these steps, manufacturers can produce coconut fiber
that meets industry standards.
2.4. Mixing
Process
In the composite manufacturing process
described, a mixture of polyester and hardener is combined with coconut fiber
at different weight ratios to create composite samples with varying properties.
The following outlines the measurement and mixing procedure for the polyester
and hardener, as per the provided specifications:
Polyester Measurement: Each composite
sample is measured with a total of 350 g of polyester. This specific amount
serves as the base material for the composite and plays a crucial role in
determining its overall composition and characteristics. The
Polyester used in this study was Unsaturated polyester resin (UPR), with key
ingredients such as phthalic anhydride, isophthalic acid, maleic anhydride,
styrene monomer, and glycols supplied by LEZO, China.
Hardener Measurement: The
hardener is added to the polyester at a specific weight ratio to initiate the
curing process and ensure proper adhesion between the polyester and coconut
fiber. According to Table 1, a hardener ratio of 4% is used for the ideal
mixture. Mixture Preparation: The polyester and hardener are thoroughly mixed
to ensure uniform distribution and proper activation of the curing process. To
ensure optimal composite performance, care must be taken to achieve a consistent
blend of polyester and hardener.
Table 1 Mixture of filler content in composite
Polyester (g) |
Hardener (g) |
Fiber (g) |
Total Weight (g) |
Fiber Weight (%) |
Hardener (%) |
336 |
14 |
0 |
350 |
0 |
4 |
329.28 |
13.72 |
7 |
350 |
2 |
4 |
322.56 |
13.44 |
14 |
350 |
4 |
4 |
315.84 |
13.16 |
21 |
350 |
6 |
4 |
309.12 |
12.88 |
28 |
350 |
8 |
4 |
Coconut Fiber Addition: Once the polyester and hardener mixture is
prepared, coconut fiber is added to achieve the desired weight ratio specified
for each composite sample. This step involves combining the polyester-hardener
mixture with the specified amount of coconut fiber and thoroughly mixing them
to ensure proper fiber impregnation.
Composite Sample Preparation: After
mixing the polyester, hardener, and coconut fiber, the composite mixture is
molded or cast into the desired shape or form and allowed to cure according to
the manufacturer's instructions. This results in the formation of composite
samples with varying fiber content and properties suitable for testing and
evaluation.
By following these steps and carefully
controlling the ratios of polyester, hardener, and coconut fiber, researchers
can produce composite samples with predictable and consistent properties,
allowing for accurate analysis and comparison of different formulations.
Mixing Polyester and Hardener: The
polyester and hardener mixture, as displayed in Appendix 4, is prepared. This mixture is carefully blended to
ensure proper curing process activation and achieve the desired properties in
the composite material. Pouring Polyester-Hardener Mixture: With the coconut
fiber in place within the mold, the polyester-hardener mixture is slowly poured
into the mold. The pouring process is conducted in a controlled manner to
ensure even coverage and distribution of the mixture over the entire bottom
area of the mold. This ensures a smooth and flawless finish through the lay-up
technique.: As the polyester-hardener mixture fills the mold, attention is paid
to achieving a smooth and flawless surface finish to the fiber stacking. This
may involve using tools or techniques to spread the mixture evenly and
eliminate any air bubbles or irregularities. Curing Process: Once the mold is
filled with the polyester-hardener mixture, the composite material is allowed
to cure. The curing process initiates the chemical reaction between the
polyester and hardener, forming a solid and durable composite product.
2.5. Material Testing
The ACUPRO Version 4.5 impedance tube was utilized to measure the acoustic properties of materials and systems according to ISO 10534-1 (ISO, 2002) and ASTM E2611 standards for transmission loss measurement. The ACUPRO tube is made of stainless steel and has an internal diameter of 38 mm, and it is equipped with supports and leveling screws. The operating frequency range level was from 50 Hz to 5,000 Hz, and four microphones were used for measurement. The impedance tube was employed to measure both the sound absorption coefficient and the transmission loss across the specified frequency ranges. This is where the sound absorption coefficient determines the amount of sound energy absorbed by a material and provides insights into the material's ability to absorb sound. Transmission loss, on the other hand, evaluates the reduction in sound energy as it passes through a material or system, indicating the effectiveness of the material or system in blocking sound transmission. Appendix 5 displays samples testing of 38 mm in diameter that were prepared for both the sound absorption coefficient and transmission loss testing.
2.6. Noise evaluation of the baseline HVAC unit
The binaural sounds measured at each
point have the possibility of noise produced by digital sound level meter AS804
to analyze sound quality. Correspondingly, we obtain the Sound Pressure Levels
(SPL) with decibel (dB) units in a range of 30 to 130 dB (±1.5 dB). Appendix 6 illustrates the equipment used for
detecting and measuring the noise evaluation of the HVAC system. In this
context, an anemometer is utilized to measure the airflow speed, providing
results within the range of 0 m/s - 30 m/s (±1 m/s). The temperature is
measured in degrees Celsius (°C) within a range of 0 – 50 (±0.5°C).
The process of selecting appropriate
measurement sites within an HVAC system requires several steps to ensure
precise and representative data collection. Here is a step-by-step guide on how
it can be performed: 1. Identify specific locations within the HVAC system
where measurements need to be taken. 2. Select evaluation points providing
representative information about the system's efficiency. 3. Properly position
and calibrate the experimental equipment. 4. Start the vehicle's engine and
turn on the air conditioning system. 5. Conduct measurements of airflow,
temperature, and other relevant parameters at each designated measurement
point. 6. Analyze the collected data to evaluate the HVAC system's performance
and identify improvement areas.
Decibel (dB) measurements and frequency
ranges were collected in the HVAC system, revealing that the highest A-weighted
(dBA) values occurred closest to the fresh air inlet, denoted as number 1 in Appendix 2. This is due to the
proximity to the blower (speed motor) and airflow restriction. Appendix 7 illustrates the recorded
noise level data using a mini sound meter to evaluate the noise in the
recirculation inlet section on maximum power. The measurements were obtained in
a silent environment to ensure precise readings of noise levels. Additionally,
noise, flow, and temperature were recorded from all air outlet valves in the
cabin, with 10 s readings for each. Based on the speed motor specification, it
was given at 1,500 rpm and 5 kg of mass and produced 25 Hz of frequency for
top-speed running. This critical data enables precise analysis of noise sources generated
by HVAC ductwork. Additionally, it is essential for conducting numerical
analysis during noise spectrum measurement.
2.7. Numerical Analysis
The numerical method used in designing
the HVAC system considered the documented loudness data and SPL distribution
closest to the source. ANSYS, a FEA tool, was used to analyze the composite and
help with the actual design, to reduce the SPL power. At the same time, the
acoustic solver in ANSYS used the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the
structure for simulation. Modal analysis was employed as a linear dynamics
analysis technique as presented in Equation (1). To solve the dynamic response
of the structure, the equation of motion was used, where acceleration,
velocity, and displacement for all points over the structure were the unknowns:
where M,
While for harmonic motion, the
oscillation of a simple spring-mass system, the ANSYS is using Equation (2). It
is a periodic motion, which can be described by an amplitude, frequency, and
phase angle:
where A,
2.8. Computational domain and details
The computational domain includes the
fresh air inlet head and inlet channel. The motor was placed at the inlet
channel, which is the noise source. The dimensions of the fresh air inlet can
be observed in Appendix 8(A),
while the computational domain size is 20 cm x 20 cm x 20 cm, as illustrated in
Appendix 8(B). Appendix 8(C)
presents an observation on reducing noise using coconut fiber composite.
2.9. Boundary Condition
To accurately simulate acoustic
pressure, a constant frequency of 25 Hz was set at the inlet channel boundary,
perpendicular to the flow direction. The noise frequency often matches the
frequency of the structure's vibration and is transmitted through the air or
other media. It is crucial to consider each material's specific conditions, considering
its density. Hence, an acoustic region and a radiation boundary were set at the
outer boundaries of the domain to ensure an impeccable simulation. It must be
included in the geometry to incorporate material composite for noise treatment.
Note that a solid physical interface was introduced to separate the air as the
domain and the object dimension. At the same time, the sound source was
presented using a mass source, and the model was ready to start the simulation
process. Accordingly, this approach enhances the accuracy of our acoustic
simulations and ensures the best results.
2.10. Noise
Control Experimental
The final stage of the methodology involves treating the
HVAC unit by lining the recirculation inlet or air flow paths with coconut
composite and filling the cavities inside the ductwork near the blower intake.
The detailed treatment is described in Appendix
8(C), which illustrates the recirculation inlet being covered by coconut
composite. Meanwhile, a varied ratio of coconut composite effects is observed
in airflow and noise absorption analysis.
The alkaline treatment enhances the coconut fibers
for composite applications by cleaning their surfaces, increasing roughness,
and modifying the material. In addition, this process degrades lignin and
hemicellulose, theirby improving the mechanical properties. Coconut fibers are
successfully used in cellulose mercerization before making fiber composites.
3.1.
Noise Absorption Testing
The study aimed to observe the sound absorption
coefficient based on varying filler content ranging from 0 to 8 wt.% The
results suggested that the sound absorption coefficient was diverse across
different frequency ranges. The 6 wt.% of filler content had the highest sound
absorption coefficient at 0.9869, while polyester had the lowest at 0.832, as
displayed in Figure 1. This indicates that the sound absorption coefficient is
close to 1 and had an improvement of around 18.62% compared to polyester.
Further observations discovered that the frequency absorption values at 2,268
Hz presented earlier than other composite filler content. This frequency was
valid; good results were expected for the frequency ranges between 45.6 £ f £
4,559 Hz for coconut (Da-Silva et al., 2019).
In Figure
2, it can be observed how the transmission loss in coconut fiber
composites predicted by DB is affected by filler content. As we add more
filler, the composite effectively counters the sound (dB), as the linear line
suggests. The transmission loss values increase with the addition of filler
content. However, the results reveal that only 2 wt.% of filler content
demonstrated the highest sound (dB) absorbance, which then becomes lower and
remains constant. This result was most likely caused by an uneven distribution
of the fibers and agglomeration during composite fabrication. Therefore, to
ensure the best sound-absorbing results, it is crucial to maintain an even
distribution of the fibers during the fabrication process.
Figure 1 The sound absorption average of coconut fiber
Figure 2 Transmission loss
against filler content of coconut fiber
3.2.
Numerical Analysis
3.2.1. Validation
This
study aimed to validate a proposed simulation method by comparing it to experimental
results. The simulation began by performing A-weighted Mic SPL to understand
the distribution characteristics of thin HVAC channels, which were HVAC systems
without composite treatment, to match the experimental results. The initial
observation found that the A-weighted Mic SPL closely matched the recording
level of the experimental results. This is shown in Figure 3, which
demonstrates the relationship between reading performance from the HVAC channel
and A-weighted Mic SPL within the frequency range of 1.25 Hz to 25 Hz. The
maximum frequency of 25 Hz could produce an A-weighted Mic SPL of 58.165 dB,
comparable to the experiment results, where the maximum was 58.1 from the
equipment reading.
Figure 3 Far-Field weighted Mic SPL
3.3.
A-weighted frequency band SPL Observation
This
study utilized the numerical simulation for A-weight PSL and far-field phase (o)
analysis on the HVAC channel treatment effect. Appendix 9 displays the contour distribution of the A-weighted
frequency band SPL of inlet fresh air half-cut. The simulation predicts the
measured A-weighted frequency band SPL within a combination of coconut fiber
composite treatment, and most of the contour distribution was well met. In the
A-weighted frequency band, the SPL distribution pattern was dominated by a
solid HVAC channel and then distributed to the air, especially on the inlet
fresh air part. The simulated A-weighted frequency level was higher when the
area was near the open channel. For comparison, the simulated A-weighted
frequency level without coconut treatment was higher than that measured with
coconut treatment. It can be observed by plotting the A-weighted frequency band
SPL graph against coconut fiber content (wt.%). The value in the contour was
beginning higher at 0 wt.% and then became lower by adding the coconut fiber
event; the fiber effect came down slowly. The plotting was observed at any
single point inside the channel. Meanwhile, the neck area point inside the
channel was focused on presenting the coconut fiber effect, making it a
powerful solution that should be considered for any related issues, as
illustrated in Figure 4.
Figure 5 displays how the far-field phase (o)
is affected by coconut fiber. The analysis successfully demonstrated that the
far-field phase (o) could be accurately analyzed with adding coconut
fiber. The results indicated a decreasing trend in the far-field phase (o)
as coconut fiber content increased under varied frequency loads. The fiber
effect decreased dramatically when coconut content was at 8 wt.%. Notably, at a
low frequency of 5 Hz, the far-field phase (o) was recorded higher
in the inlet channel and vice versa. As a result, the simulation proves that
coconut fiber composite treatment is an effective solution to achieve noise
control, and this method could guide the experiment to control noise.
Figure 4 A-weighted frequency band SPL effect
Figure 5 Far field phase (o) against inlet
duct system treatment
3.4. Experimental
Table
2 presents the airflow readings obtained before installing the composite
material when there was no fiber in the recirculation inlet area. The data was
collected at a frequency of 10 s, with four data sets obtained at 0 seconds.
Each type of blower speed was counted for 10 s to get the average airflow
value. The first reading at 10 s recorded a value of 3.0 m/s, followed by 4.1
m/s at 20 s and 5.9 m/s at 30 s. The airflow readings were recorded at
different blower speeds, including low, medium, and high speeds During the
experiment, we measured the noise level of the HVAC system. We specifically
focused on measuring the A-weighted SPL near the air outlets in the cabin. It
is worth noting that each blower's speed had a different noise level. However, it
is important to mention that the noise level did not fluctuate with changes in
blower speed. The noise level was measured at a point in the recirculation
inlet area where the volume was high. This point was then measured, and the
noise level was discovered to vary before the composite treatment to obtain the
actual value of the noise level. The distance from the diffuser was considered
to test the noise level, and the actual value was obtained after measuring
along a distance of 0.5 m. The noise measurement was conducted at noon for both
experiments in a quiet environment to obtain the best result.
Table 2 Airflow reading without composite treatment
Fan Condition |
Airflow, m/s |
Temperature, oC |
A-Weighted SPL, dB |
Low |
3.2 |
19.22 |
59.52 |
|
2.97 |
18.17 |
59.47 |
|
3.1 |
19.1 |
59.51 |
Medium |
4.12 |
19.22 |
62.72 |
|
4.05 |
18.17 |
62.67 |
|
4.1 |
19.1 |
62.71 |
High |
5.92 |
18.92 |
71.22 |
|
5.87 |
18.87 |
71.17 |
|
5.91 |
19.91 |
71.21 |
3.5.
Treatment Composite Plate
The
use of composite materials in a vehicle's HVAC system can enhance its
efficiency and performance, as depicted in Appendix 10. By placing the composite treatment in the
recirculation area where high sound levels are produced due to the blower's
kinetic energy, a diverse approach can be taken towards improving the system.
Table
3 compares how airflow changes with different ratios of fiber. The experiment
used fiber ratios of 0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, and 8% at low, medium, and high speeds.
The anemometer sensor measured the airflow speed in front of the duct vent
where the recirculation air area outlet is located. Consequently, each data
result was recorded for 10 s for each fiber ratio at low, medium, and high
speeds. It is crucial to obtain precise results to compare the airflow changes
before and after composite treatment. Note that the results should remain
constant. The collected data has revealed that the presence of the composite in
the recirculation inlet area does not affect the airflow speed. Furthermore, the
results have exhibited insignificant changes in the low, medium, and high
airflow speeds. As per the data depicted in Table 3, the airflow speeds at low,
medium, and high levels remained almost similar compared to those without
treatment conditions. Hence, it can be observed that no disturbance was
discovered in the airflow when the composite was located inside the critical
point of the HVAC system. Therefore, the condition relies on the consistency
and stability of airflow speeds while producing the variation speed.
Table 3 Airflow speed measurement by composite
treatment conditions
Fiber Content |
Low Speed, m/s |
Medium Speed, m/s |
High Speed, m/s |
0% |
2.62 |
3.32 |
5.2 |
2.57 |
3.27 |
4.97 | |
2.61 |
2.31 |
5.1 | |
2% |
2.62 |
3.52 |
5.2 |
2.57 |
3.47 |
4.97 | |
2.61 |
3.51 |
5.1 | |
4% |
2.62 |
3.32 |
5.2 |
2.57 |
3.27 |
4.97 | |
2.61 |
2.31 |
5.1 | |
6% |
2.62 |
3.32 |
5.2 |
2.57 |
3.27 |
4.97 | |
2.61 |
2.31 |
5.1 | |
8% |
2.72 |
3.62 |
5.72 |
2.67 |
3.57 |
5.7 | |
2.71 |
3.61 |
5.47 |
Further study focused on noise control.
Figure 6 illustrates the comparison results of the noise level in dBs by
various composite treatments. The findings are compelling and are highlighted
in Appendix 9. The data suggests
that the highest noise level occurred at 0 wt.% of composite treatment and
increased with the velocity flow. However, the study also discovered that
increasing the composite's fiber content reduced noise levels significantly.
This trend is a crucial factor in controlling noise levels in the cabin. The
recorded data indicates that the lowest noise levels occurred at 8 wt.% within
51 dB to 58.7 dB of the A-weighted scale. The method data suggests that the
temperature is constant for every sample. Furthermore, the results can be
accurately measured by measuring the time for every fiber ratio at 20 s from
low speed to high speed and repeatedly taking the time for 0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, and
8%. In addition, these findings demonstrate the significance of controlling
fiber content in the composite to reduce noise levels effectively.
Table 4 Temperature measurement by composite
treatment conditions
Fiber Content |
Low Speed, oC |
Medium Speed, oC |
High Speed, oC |
0% |
19.42 |
19.1 |
18.52 |
19.37 |
18.97 |
18.47 | |
19.41 |
18.98 |
18.51 | |
2% |
19.72 |
19.62 |
19.52 |
19.67 |
19.57 |
19.47 | |
19.1 |
19.61 |
19.51 | |
4% |
18.52 |
19.42 |
18.42 |
18.47 |
19.37 |
18.37 | |
18.51 |
19.41 |
18.41 | |
6% |
19.42 |
18.92 |
18.92 |
19.37 |
18.87 |
18.87 | |
19.41 |
18.91 |
18.91 | |
8% |
19.42 |
19.42 |
18.92 |
19.37 |
19.37 |
18.87 | |
19.41 |
19.41 |
18.91 |
The noise that enters a vehicle's HVAC system
can come from various sources (Chen
et al., 2023; Deryabin, 2022). Firstly, the noise generated by the engine, which
reverberates through the vehicle's structure, can cause a rumbling or buzzing
effect in the HVAC components. Additionally, the noise generated during air
intake through intake systems and exhaust noise produced during combustion can
contribute to cabin acoustics and impact the HVAC components. Furthermore,
specific components in the car, like fans, pumps, and belts, can produce
distinct noises that affect the HVAC system. Finally, squeaks and vibrations
caused by incorrectly installed or loose HVAC systems or vehicle components can
amplify the overall noise level of the HVAC system in vehicles. This phenomenon
is similar to that reported by previous researchers (Singh and Mohanty, 2018). They proposed using jute felt and waste
cotton for noise control in the HVAC system. After conducting various trials, a
treatment was identified that effectively minimized noise while minimizing
costs and weight. This treatment was applied to the typical HVAC noise spectrum
at medium-high blower speed, resulting in a 4 dB reduction in SPL at the
passenger's ear position, with a minimum reduction of 3.6 dBs per blower speed.
Moreover, the treatment led to a substantial 24% reduction in loudness level,
equivalent to 7 sones. Consequently, it has been determined that treating the
HVAC unit makes it safer for prolonged exposure to sound. Therefore, it can be
concluded that treating HVAC sounds significantly reduces the likelihood of
their occurrence. Furthermore, the application of this treatment has greatly
enhanced the sound quality within the vehicle's interior space. This leads to a
considerable reduction in the annoyance caused by the HVAC sound and the
overall vehicle interior soundscape.
Figure 6 Noise reading with composite treatment
The
study discovered that using coconut fiber can effectively reduce HVAC noise,
resulting in a quieter and more comfortable atmosphere for car occupants. The
numerical analysis demonstrated that coconut fiber is highly effective at
absorbing sound on high-contribution sources of noise treatment (11 dBA). The
results revealed that the airflow percentage difference between before and
after the composite treatment for an 8% fiber ratio in low-speed airflow was
6.67%. In medium speed, the percentage difference was 12.20%, while in
high-speed airflow, it was 6.78%. For temperature, the percentage difference
between before and after the composite treatment for an 8% fiber ratio in low
speed was 1.04%, while in medium and high-speed airflow, the percentage
difference was 0%. Furthermore, the noise measurement percentage difference
between before and after composite treatment of 8% fiber ratio for low speed
was 14.28%. Similarly, the fiber ratio for medium speed and high speed was
reduced by 15.47% and 17.56%, respectively. The noise measurement results
demonstrate a significant difference between before and after the composite
treatment. Therefore, future research
should prioritize the optimization of the coconut fiber ratio at different
speeds to achieve maximum efficiency in reducing noise. Additionally, it is
essential to thoroughly examine long-term durability and biodegradability to
ensure sustainability throughout prolonged usage. Comparative evaluations with
other NRs, such as jute, cotton, and flax, can help establish the most
efficient material for controlling HVAC noise.
On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding
author expresses their appreciation to Fakulti Teknologi Kejuruteraan Melaka,
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM) for facilitating the research in the
form of laboratory equipment and simulation computer software. I would like to
express my sincere appreciation to Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia, for
their invaluable support. The expertise and constructive feedback from faculty
members significantly contributed to the manuscript and the research.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
R2-CE-7086-20240712144511.pdf | Appendices |
Abdi, D.D., Monazzam, M., Taban, E.,
Putra, A., Golbabaei, F., Khadem, M., 2021. Sound Absorption Performance of
Natural Fiber Composite from Chrome Shave and Coffee Silver Skin. Applied Acoustics, Volume 182, p. 108264
Amer, M., 2024. An
Innovative Noise Reduction Blower Fan Housing Design Used In Electronics
Cooling. Measurement: Energy, Volume 1, p. 100002.
Araújo, A.L., Madeira, J.F.A., 2020.
Multiobjective Optimization Solutions for Noise Reduction in Composite Sandwich
Panels Using Active Control. Composite
Structures, Volume 247, p. 112440
Back, J., Lee,
S.K., Lee, S.M., An, K., Kwon, D.H., Park, D. C., 2021. Design and
Implementation of Comfort-Quality HVAC Sound Inside a Vehicle Cabin. Applied
Acoustics, Volume 177, p. 107940
Bhingare, N.H.,
Prakash, S., 2021. An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation Of Coconut
Coir Material For Sound Absorption Characteristics. Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 43, pp. 1545–1551
Bisheh, H., 2024.
Design and Analysis of Hybrid Natural/Synthetic Fibre-Reinforced Composite
Automotive Drive Shafts. Structures, Volume 61, p. 106057
Chen, W., Liu,
Z., Hu, L., Li, X., Sun, Y., Cheng, C., He, S., Lu, C., 2023. A Low-Complexity
Multi-Channel Active Noise Control System Using Local Secondary Path Estimation
And Clustered Control Strategy For Vehicle Interior Engine Noise. Mechanical
Systems and Signal Processing, Volume 204, p. 110786
Choudhary, S.,
Haloi, J., Sain, M.K., Saraswat, P., Kumar, V., 2023. Systematic Literature
Review on Thermal and Acoustic Characteristics of Natural Fibre Polymer
Composites for Automobile Applications. In:
Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 2023, p. 349
Ciach, M., Fara?,
H., Fröhlich, A., Fedy?, I., 2022. Contrasting
Effects of Light and Noise Pollution Interact with Natural Vegetation Remnants:
Human-Related Indicators Of The Habitat Suitability For Ungulates In The Urban
Landscape. Ecological Indicators,
Volume 142, p. 109261
Corredor-Bedoya, A.C., Zoppi, R.A., Serpa A.L., 2017.
Composites of Scrap Tire Rubber Particles and Adhesive Mortar E Noise
Insulation Potential. Cement and Concrete
Composites, Volume 82, pp. 46–66
Da-Silva, C.C.B., Terashima, F.J.H.,
Barbieri, N., De-Lima, K.F., 2019. Sound Absorption Coefficient Assessment of
Sisal, Coconut Husk and Sugar Cane Fibers For Low Frequencies Based on Three
Different Methods. Applied Acoustics,
Volume 156, pp. 92–100
Dattatreya, K.,
Kumar, S.S., Prasad, V.V.S.H., Pati, P.R., 2023. Mechanical Properties Of Waste
Natural Fibers/Fillers Reinforced Epoxy Hybrid Composites for Automotive
Applications. Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 2023, p. 001
Deryabin, I., 2022. On Reducing the
Noise of the Internal Combustion Engine of a Motor Vehicle. Transportation
Research Procedia, Volume 61, pp. 505–509
Esraa, A.,
Putra, A., Mosa, A., Dan, R.M., Attia, O.H., 2022. An Empirical Model for
Optimizing the Sound Absorption of Single Layer MPP Based on Response Surface
Methodology. International Journal of Technology, Volume 13(3), pp.
496–507
Fei, F., Wang,
D., 2023. The Influence of The Non-Uniform Airflow on The Energy and Cooling
Performance of The Simplified Electric Vehicle Front End Cooling Module. Applied Thermal Engineering, Volume 233, p. 121216
Gowree, E.R.,
Jaroslawski, T., Mellot, B., Gojon, R., 2023. Noise Reduction on Low Reynolds
Number Rotors by Boundary Layer Transition. Applied Acoustics, Volume 210,
p. 109446
Hadiji, H.,
Assarar, M., Zouari, W., Pierre, F., Behlouli, K., Zouari, B., Ayad, R., 2020.
Damping Analysis of Nonwoven Natural Fibre-Reinforced Polypropylene Composites
Used in Automotive Interior Parts. Polymer Testing, Volume 89, p. 106692
Han, S., Wang,
X., Wang, P., Dong, H., Jin, Z., 2023. Effects of Blade Tip Thicknesses on
Hydrodynamic and Noise Performance of Ducted Propellers. Ocean Engineering,
Volume 289, p. 116270
Hariharan, C.,
Gunadevan, D., Prakash, S.A., Latha, K., Raj, V.A.A., Velraj, R., 2022.
Simulation of Battery Energy Consumption in an Electric Car With Traction and
HVAC Model For a Given Source and Destination For Reducing The Range Anxiety of
The Driver. Energy, Volume 249, p. 123657
Hariprasad, K.,
Ravichandran, K., Jayaseelan, V., Muthuramalingam, T., 2020. Acoustic and
Mechanical Characterisation of Polypropylene Composites Reinforced by Natural
Fibres for Automotive Applications. Journal of Materials Research and
Technology, Volume 9(6), pp. 14029–14035
Hasegawa, M.,
Sakaue, H., 2024. Propeller-Noise Reduction by Microfiber Coating on a Blade
Surface. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Volume 371, p. 115273
Hiadayani, T.R.,
Wirjosentono, B., Nasution, D.Y., Tamrin, 2023. Preparation and
Characterization of Sound-Absorbent Based on Polystyrene Reinforced Primary
Sludge and Fly Ash from Pulp Mill. International Journal of Technology,
Volume 14(3), pp. 649–658
Ilangovan, M.,
Navada, A.P., Guna, V., Touchaleaume, F., Saulnier, B., Grohens, Y., Reddy, N.,
2022. Hybrid Biocomposites with High Thermal and Noise
Insulation From Discarded Wool, Poultry Feathers, and Their Blends. Construction and Building Materials,
Volume 345, p. 128324
Jennings, P.A., Dunne, G., Williams, R.,
Giudice, S., 2010. Tools and Techniques for Understanding The Fundamentals Of
Automotive Sound Quality. In: Proceedings of the Institution of
Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, Volume 224(10),
pp. 1263–1278
Jiang, B., Wang,
J., Yang, X., Wang, W., Ding, Y., 2019. Tonal Noise Reduction by Unevenly
Spaced Blades in a Forward-Curved-Blades Centrifugal Fan. Applied Acoustics,
Volume 146, pp. 172–183
Kalita, U., Singh, M., 2022.
Optimization of a Reactive Muffler used in Four-Cylinder Petrol Engine into
Hybrid Muffler by using CFD Analysis. Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume
50, pp. 1936–1945
Khair, F., Putra,
A., Nor, M., Selamat, M., 2015. Enhancement on Acoustical Performance of Feed
‘Imperata Cylindrica’. In: Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering
Research Day, Volume 192(3), pp. 601–608
Li, T., Fang,
X., Yin, J., Wang, Y., Wang, S., Wen, J., 2024. Integrated Adjustable Acoustic Metacage
For Multi-Frequency Noise Reduction. Applied Acoustics, Volume 217, p. 109841
Lim, C.W., Yaw,
Z., Chen, Z., 2022. Periodic and Aperiodic 3-D Composite Metastructures with
Ultrawide Bandgap for Vibration and Noise Control. Composite Structures, Volume 287, p. 115324
Loreto, S.D.,
Serpilli, F., Lori, V., Squartini, S., 2020. Sound Quality Evaluation of
Kitchen Hoods. Applied Acoustics, Volume 168, p. 107415
Mago, J., Negi,
A., Pant, K.K., Fatima, S., 2022. Development of Natural Rubber-Bamboo Biochar
Composites for Vibration and Noise Control Applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 373, p. 133760
Mohammadi, M., Taban, E., Tan, W.H.,
Din, N.B.C., Putra, A., Berardi, U., 2024. Recent Progress in Natural Fiber
Reinforced Composite as Sound Absorber Material. Journal of Building
Engineering, Volume 84, p. 108514
Nawawithan, N.,
Kittisakpairach, P., Nithiboonyapun, S., Ruangjirakit, K., Jongpradist, P., 2024. Design and Performance Simulation of
Hybrid Hemp/Glass Fiber Composites for Automotive Front Bumper Beams. Composite
Structures, Volume 335, p. 118003
Patel, N.K.,
Mishra, V., Choudhary, T., 2022. Fabrication and Characterization of Epoxy
Composites Reinforced With Jute Fibers And Coconut Fibers: A Mechanical Study. In:
Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 67, pp. 495–500
Paul, P.,
Ahirwar, M., Behera, B.K., 2022. Acoustic Behaviour Of Needle Punched Nonwoven
Structures Produced From Various Natural And Synthetic Fibers. Applied
Acoustics, Volume 199, p. 109043
Pulvirenti, G.,
Totaro, N., Parizet, E., 2023. A Perceptual Evaluation of Numerical Errors in
Acoustic FEM Simulation For Sound Quality Applications. Applied Acoustics,
Volume 207, p. 109295
Qingyi, S.,
Haodong, X., Jian, C., Jiangtao, Z., 2023. Experimental And Numerical Study On
A New Noise Reduction Design For A Small Axial Fan. Applied Acoustics, Volume
211, p. 109535
Ravichandran,
A., Logdesser, A., Peller, N., Manhart, M., 2024. Acoustic Resonances in an
Automotive HVAC Outlet. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Volume 569, p. 118051
Sahib-dua,
Khatri, H., Naveen, J, Jawaid, M.,
Jayakrishna, K., Norrrahim, M.N.F., Rashedi, A., 2023. Potential of
Natural Fiber Based Polymeric Composites For Cleaner Automotive Component
Production -A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Material Research and
Technology, Volume 25, pp. 1086–1104
Shige, K.,
Terashima, O., Inasawa, A., Komatsuzaki, T., Sakai, Y., Kusano, T., 2024. On
The Reduction of The Flow-Induced Noise Using Porous Material Plates With High
Acoustic Transmissibility. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Volume 568,
p. 117967
Singh, S.,
Mohanty, A.R., 2018. HVAC Noise Control Using Natural Materials To Improve
Vehicle Interior Sound Quality. Applied Acoustics, Volume 140, pp. 100–109
Singh, T., da
Silva Gehlen, G., Singh, V., Ferreira, N. F., de Barros, L. Y., Lasch, G., Poletto,
J.C., Neis, P.D., 2024. Selection of
Automotive Brake Friction Composites Reinforced by Agro-Waste and Natural
Fiber: An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. Results in
Engineering, Volume 22, p. 102030
Singh, T., Silva-Gehlen,
G.D., Ferreira, N.F., de Barros L.Y., Lasch, G., Poletto, J.C., Ali, S., Patric
Neis, P.D., 2023. Automotive Brake Friction Composite Materials Using Natural
Grewia Optiva Fibers. Journal of Material Research and Technology,
Volume 26 (2023), pp. 6966–6983
Smith, D.A.,
Filippone, A., Bojdo, N., 2020. Noise Reduction Of A Counter Rotating Open
Rotor Through A Locked Blade Row. Aerospace Science and Technology, Volume
98, p. 105637
Soltani, P., Taban,
E., Faridan, M., Samaei, S.E., Amininasab, S., 2020. Experimental and
Computational Investigation of Sound Absorption Performance of Sustainable
Porous Material: Yucca Gloriosa Fiber. Applied Acoustics, Volume 157, p.
106999
Sun, X., Zhang,
C., Shen, C., Cheng, W., Cui, Z., Wu, Z., Chen, Z., Zhao, L., 2024a. Reduction of
Interaction Noise using Grooved Cylinder and Wavy Leading Edge Airfoil. Journal
of Fluids and Structures, Volume 125, p. 104082
Sun, Y., Xu, G.,
Shi, Y., 2021. Numerical Investigation on Noise Reduction of Rotor Blade-Vortex
Interaction Using Blade Surface Jet Blowing. Aerospace Science and
Technology, Volume 116, p. 106868
Sun, Z., Tian,
J., Zheng, Y., Zhu, X., Du, Z., Ouyang, H., 2024b. Design of Sinusoidal-Shaped Inlet Duct For
Acoustic Mode Modulation Noise Reduction of Cooling Fan. Applied Acoustics,
Volume 216, p. 109741
Taheri, S.,
Hosseini, P., Razban, A., 2022. Model Predictive Control of Heating,
Ventilation, And Air Conditioning (HVAC) Systems: A State-Of-The-Art Review. Journal
of Building Engineering, Volume 60, p. 105067
Tao, Y., Ren,
M., Zhang, H., Peijs, T., 2021. Recent Progress in Acoustic Materials And Noise
Control Strategies–A Review. Applied Materials Today, Volume 24, p. 101141
Yang, L., Wang,
P., Wang, J., 2023. Research on Evaluation Model for Vehicle Interior Sound
Quality Based on An Optimized BiLSTM Using Genetic Algorithm. Mechanical
Systems and Signal Processing, Volume 204, p. 110827
Yang, T., Hu,
L., Xiong, X., Oetru, M., Noman, M.T., Mishra, R., Militky, J.. 2020. Sound
Absorption Properties of Natural Fibers: A Review. Sustainability MDPI, Volume 12(20), pp. 1–25
Yoon, S., Song,
D., Kim, J., Kim, J., Lim, H., Koo, J., 2020. Identifying Stack-Driven Indoor
Environmental Problems and Associated Pressure Difference In High-Rise
Residential Buildings: Airflow Noise And Draft. Building and Environment, Volume
168, p. 106483
Yusoff, N.M.,
Lee, H.K., Ng, E.K., Rosli, N.S., Abdullah, C.A.C., Alresheedi, M.T., Mahdi,
M.A., 2023. Titania-Coated Silica Nanocomposite For L-Band Noise-Like Pulse
Fiber Laser. Journal of Luminescence,
Volume 258, p. 119779
Zhang, B., Zhai,
Z., Lun, X., Cui, H., Lan, Y., 2022. Test Analysis And Numerical Simulation of
Noise From Forage Crushers. Applied Acoustics, Volume 196, p. 108873
Zhou, S.L.,
Shah, A.A., Leung, P.K., Zhu, X., Liao, Q., 2023. A Comprehensive Review of The
Applications Of Machine Learning for HVAC. DeCarbon, Volume 2, p. 100023
Zulkarnain, M.,
Harny, I., Insdrawaty, M.I., Azman, M.I.F., Azmi, M.I.A., Kusrini, E., 2024.
Study on Nature Fiber Composite for Noise Material Control. International
Journal of Technology, Volume 15(3), pp. 618–627