• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 8, No 7 (2017)

Effects of the Application of a Stern Foil on Ship Resistance: A Case Study of an Orela Crew Boat

Effects of the Application of a Stern Foil on Ship Resistance: A Case Study of an Orela Crew Boat

Title: Effects of the Application of a Stern Foil on Ship Resistance: A Case Study of an Orela Crew Boat
Ketut Suastika, Affan Hidayat, Soegeng Riyadi

Corresponding email:


Published at : 27 Dec 2017
Volume : IJtech Vol 8, No 7 (2017)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v8i7.691

Cite this article as:
Suastika, K., Hidayat, A., Riyadi, S., 2017. Effects of the Application of a Stern Foil on Ship Resistance: A Case Study of an Orela Crew Boat. International Journal of Technology, Volume 8(7), pp. 1266-1275

1,243
Downloads
Ketut Suastika Department of Naval Architecture, Faculty of Marine Technology, ITS Surabaya, Indonesia
Affan Hidayat PT. Orela Shipyard, Ujung Pangkah, Gresik, Indonesia
Soegeng Riyadi PT. Orela Shipyard, Ujung Pangkah, Gresik, Indonesia
Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract
Effects of the Application of a Stern Foil on Ship Resistance: A Case Study of an Orela Crew Boat

The effects of the application of a stern hydrofoil on ship resistance were studied numerically using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and were verified using data from model tests. A 40 m planing-hull Orela crew boat, with target top speed of 28 knots (Froude number, Fr = 0.73), was considered. The stern foil (NACA 64(1)212) was installed with the leading edge positioned precisely below the transom with angle of attack of 2 degrees at elevation 0.853 T below the water surface (where T is the boat’s draft). At relatively low speed (Fr < ~0.45) the application of a stern foil results in an increase in ship resistance (of up to 13.9%), while at relatively high speed (Fr > ~0.55) it results in a decrease in ship resistance (of up to 10.0%). As the Froude number increases, the resistance coefficient (CT) first increases, reaches a maximum value, and then decreases. Its maximum value occurs at Fr ? 0.5, which is consistent with the prediction of a resistance barrier at approximately this Froude number.

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Planing-hull crew boat; Ship resistance; Stern foil; Towing tests

Conclusion

A 40 m planing-hull Orela crew boat was considered in a study utilizing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and towing-tank experiments to investigate the effects of the application of a stern foil on ship resistance. At relatively low speed (Froude number Fr < ~0.45), the stern foil results in an increase in ship resistance (of up to 13.9%), while at relatively high speed (Fr > ~0.55), it results in a decrease in ship resistance (of up to 10.0%). The above results are consistent with the results of previous research utilizing the Hull VaneÒ, though the Hull VaneÒ exhibits a better performance (Bouckaert et al., 2016; Uithof et al., 2017). The resistance barrier is observed to occur at Fr » 0.47, which is in good agreement with the prediction of previous studies (Marshall, 2002; Yousefi et al., 2013). For the case without a foil, the Holtrop-Mennen-Savitsky model (Holtrop and Mennen, 1982; Savitsky, 1964) provides a good prediction for the total resistance coefficient (CT), but it underestimates the value of CT at the resistance barrier (Fr » 0.47).

Acknowledgement

This research project was financially supported by the Indonesian Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (RISTEKDIKTI), under the grant: Penelitian Kerjasama Industri 2017 with contract no. 562/PKS/ITS/2017.

References

Abbott, I.H., von Doenhoff, A.E., 1959. Theory of Wing Sections (Including a Summary of Airfoil Data). New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

Anderson Jr., J.D., 1995. Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Basics with Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Bardina, J.E., Huang, P.G., Coakley, T.J., 1997. Turbulence Modeling Validation, Testing, and Development. NASA Technical Memorandum 110446, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA

Bouckaert, B., Uithof, K., van Oossanen, P., Moerke, N., Nienhuis, B., van Bergen, J., 2015. A Life-cycle Cost Analysis of the Application of a Hull Vane® to an Offshore Patrol Vessel. In: Proceeding of the 13th International Conference on Fast Sea Transport (FAST), Washington DC, USA

Bouckaert, B., Uithof, K., Moerke, N., van Oossanen, P.G., 2016. Hull Vane® on 108-m Holland-Class OPVs: Effects on Fuel Consumption and Seakeeping. In: Proceeding of MAST Conference 2016, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Campana, E.F., Diez, M., Liuzzi, G., Lucidi, S., Pellegrini, R., Piccialli, V., Rinaldi, F., Serani, A., 2017. A Multi-objective DIRECT Algorithm for Ship Hull Optimization. Computational Optimization and Applications, Volume 68(195), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-017-9955-0.

Diez, M., Serani, A., Campana, E.F., Stern, F., 2017. CFD-based Stochastic Optimization of a Destroyer Hull Form for Realistic Ocean Operations. In: Proceeding of the 14th International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation (FAST 2017), Nantes, France

Hirt, C.W., Nichols, B.D., 1981. Volume of Fluid (VoF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, Volume 39(1), pp. 201–225

Holtrop, J., Mennen, G.G.J., 1982. An Approximate Power Prediction Method. International Shipbuilding Progress, Volume 29(335), pp. 166–170

Marshall, R., 2002. All About Powerboats: Understanding Design and Performance. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional

Menter, F.R., 1994. Two-equation Eddy-viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications. AIAA Journal, Volume 32(8), pp. 1598–1605

Mitchel, R.R., Webb, M.B., Roetzel, J.N., Lu, F.K., Dutton, J.C., 2008. A Study of the Base Pressure Distribution of a Slender Body of Square Cross Section. In: Proceeding of the 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibition, Reno, Nevada, pp. 1–8

Ramdlan, G.G., Siswantara, A.I., Budiarso, B., Daryus, A., Pujowidodo, H., 2016. Turbulence Model and Validation of Air Flow in Wind Tunnel. International Journal of Technology, Volume 7(8), pp. 1362–1372

Savitsky, D., 1964. Hydrodynamic Design of Planing Hulls. Marine Technology, Volume 1(1), pp. 71–95

Suastika, K., Nugraha, F., Utama, I.K.A.P., 2017. Parallel-middle-body and Stern-form Relative Significance in the Wake Formation of Single-screw Large Ships. International Journal of Technology, Volume 8(1), pp. 94–103

Uithof, K., Hagemeister, N., Bouckaert, B., van Oossanen, P.G., Moerke, N., 2016. A Systematic Comparison of the Influence of the Hull Vane®, Interceptors, Trim Wedges, and Ballasting on the Performace of the 50-m AMECRC Series #13 Patrol Vessel. In: Warship 2016: Advanced Technologies in Naval Design, Construction, & Operation, 15-16 June 2016, Bath, UK

Uithof, K., van Oossanen, P., Moerke, N., van Oossanen, P.G., Zaaijer, K.S., 2017. An Update on the Development of the Hull Vane®. Available online at www. hullvane.nl, Accessed on March 27, 2017

van Walree, F., 1999. Computational Methods for Hydrofoil Craft in Steady and Unsteady Flow. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

Vaz, G., Jaouen, F., Hoekstra, M., 2009. Free-surface Viscous Flow Computations. Validation of URANS Code FRESCO. In: ASME 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2009), May 31-June 5, 2009, Honolulu, Hawaii

Versteeg, H.K., Malalasekera, W., 2007. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method. Harlow, UK: Longman Scientific

Yousefi, R., Shafaghat, R., Shakeri, M., 2013. Hydrodynamic Analysis Techniques for High-speed Planing Hulls. Applied Ocean Research, Volume 42, pp. 105–113