Assessment of The Impact of Services and Digitalization Level on The Infrastructure Development in Oil and Gas Regions
Corresponding email: babkin_ia@spbstu.ru
Published at : 29 Dec 2023
Volume : IJtech
Vol 14, No 8 (2023)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v14i8.6855
Glukhov, V., Shchepinin, V., Lyubek, Y., Babkin, I., Karimov, D., 2023. Assessment of The Impact of Services and Digitalization Level on The Infrastructure Development in Oil and Gas Regions. International Journal of Technology. Volume 14(8), pp. 1810-1820
| Vladimir Glukhov | Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaia Street, 29, Saint Petersburg,195251, Russia |
| Vladimir Shchepinin | Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaia Street, 29, Saint Petersburg,195251, Russia |
| Yulia Lyubek | Department of Industrial Economics, Saint Petersburg Mining University, Vasilyevsky Island 21 Line, Saint Petersburg, 199106, Russia |
| Ivan Babkin | Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaia Street, 29, Saint Petersburg,195251, Russia |
| Dier Karimov | Faculty of Economics, Department of Economic Theory, National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan |
The relevance and feasibility of
studying the problem lie in increasing the investment attractiveness of oil and gas enterprises by activating regional
services in mineral
resource specialization based
on the extensive infrastructure being created. The purpose of this study is to
establish a typology for infrastructure services catering to oil and gas
enterprises by enhancing the service component and implementing digitalization
programs in the regions specializing in mineral resources in Russia. The work substantiates the conceptual foundations of an integrated approach to the formation of infrastructure for economic systems
of mineral resource
specialization and related
services in the form of a synthesis
of concepts of reproductive, structural-functional, and systemic
approaches. An analysis of the current state of the methodology for implementing a typology of
infrastructure services for oil and gas enterprises in the Russian Federation and abroad was carried out. The
formation of innovative infrastructure facilities was substantiated through economic modelling of the influence of
oilfield services and the level of development
of the territory's digitalization on the development of infrastructure
facilities in oil and gas regions.
Infrastructure; Oil and gas complex enterprise; Region of mineral resources specialization; Service; Typology
The innovative scenario for sustainable long-term socio-economic development is characterized by strengthening the investment focus of economic
growth and the country’s
position in the world economy. Sustainable development is directed towards
establishing a modern, innovative infrastructure foundation for both the
national economy and regional economies. It seeks to foster the
self-development of territorial economic systems by cultivating a competitive
sector of high-tech industries.
In the
process of markets formation of markets, a transformation of infrastructure schemes
took place towards
the complication of the
infrastructure component of the economy due to a certain transformation of
relations in the “producer-consumer” system,
leading to the need for differentiation and customization of products, which was emphasized in the work of
(Vasilenko
et al., 2020).
Following the direction of global trends, the process of
infrastructure formation in Russia developed progressively, reflecting the
nature of the development of productive forces and relations at each stage of
economic development, which was clearly presented in the works of (Babkin
et
al., 2021). In modern conditions, resulting
from the emergence
of an innovative economy, a systematic
idea of infrastructure is being formed, which was substantiated in the works of
(Varnavskii, 2021), (Konoplyanik, 2017), (Tatarkin, 2016), (Van-Van,
2011), and
others. The presented idea is conditioned by the reproductive nature of
the infrastructure, the presentation of its structural composition, and the
broad interpenetrating nature
of functions.
The specialization deepening
contributed to the use of concepts of the system methodology
in the sectoral aspect, primarily in the process of forming the infrastructure
of territorial systems of mineral
resources specialization, which was emphasized in the works of foreign scientists (Mahmood
et
al., 2023), (Diez, Marangé, and Levrat, 2017) and Russian researchers (Litvinenko et al.,
2023), (Matrokhina, Makhovikov, and Khaikin, 2023),
(Litvinenko and Sergeev, 2019), and others.
In this regard, increasing the investment attractiveness of oil and gas enterprises by activating services
based on the infrastructure being created contributes to the sustainable development of territories.
Progressive economic development, reflecting at each stage the characteristics of productive forces and relationships, predetermined the transformation of infrastructure schemes
and service components towards their complexity, which was reflected
in the evolution of approaches, starting with
reproductive and taking
shape in a systemic approach.
Based on the studies of the classics of economic thought, who first outlined the role of infrastructure
in the social division of labor, as well as the works of K. Marx, who emphasized the need for the
development of infrastructure as “general conditions of production”, a reproduction approach
was formed.
The expansion of the infrastructure component contributed to the emergence
of a structural approach, the main principles of which were laid down
in the works of scientists of the neoclassical direction, who were at the origins of the concept revealed infrastructure as a large-scale sector of the economy with a complex
structure with moving boundaries. Further changes
are associated with the introduction of institutional tools into the modeling
of economic processes within system boundaries, which was clearly presented in the works
of scientists of the institutional.
The expansion of positions and the structural complexity of
services helped attract the attention
of scientists to the analysis of ongoing processes within the framework of a
systemic orientation in the second
half of the twentieth century. In this regard, the following works are important: (Tatarkin,
2016), who raises issues of optimal location
of production within the boundaries of territorial systems (Burström et al., 2021; Babkin et al.,
2021; Byankin et
al., 2021; Berawi, 2020), emphasizing the importance
of management in the formation of complex economic
systems; (Kleiner, 2023), substantiating restrictions affecting the regional development within the boundaries of territorial systems.
The importance of developing the industrial infrastructure
of the oil and gas sector can be found
in the works of foreign scientists (Mahmood et al., 2023), emphasizing the connection between the formation of infrastructure facilities and sustainable
development of regions; (Lindholt and Glomsrod, 2022), focusing on features of the territorial development of the oil and
gas sector. The focus on a
sustainable factor in the development of oil and gas production is also confirmed in the works of domestic
scientists (Cherepovitsyn and Rutenko, 2022; Il'inskii and
Tan-Syuivei, 2017), analyzing the fundamental concepts
and methods of strategic planning, as well as (Zemtsov
et
al., 2020), emphasizes the sustainability of the development of the territory
and the national economy as a whole, (Ponomarenko,
Galevski, and Marin, 2022; Kryukov and Tokarev, 2022; Tereshko and
Rudskaya, 2021), indicating the complexity of the development of production in the regions.
Activation of the service component
within the boundaries of the development of economic
structures, contributing to the complexity of the development of the territory,
is presented in works of (Matrokhina, Makhovikov, and Khaikin, 2023; Vasilenko et al., 2020; Krainova, 2018). The authors
note that as the digital economy
develops, there is a gradual change in relations
in the assessment of the impact
of services and digitalization level on the infrastructure development in
oil and gas regions “producer-consumer” system, which affects the development
of economic systems. The use of economic and mathematical approaches in forecasting the formation of infrastructure facilities within the boundaries of
territorial development is noted in the works of (Matrokhina, Makhovikov, and Khaikin, 2023; Zipir and Chernova, 2020; Nedosekin and Reishakhrit, 2019; Kozlov,
Teslya, and Chernogorskii, 2018). For the purpose
of innovative formation of infrastructure and related services, digital
transformation is necessary, leading
to the creation of objects that correspond to the new way of life, as noted by (Ilyushin, 2022; Zaytsev et al., 2021; Zagloel et
al., 2021; Kuklina, 2021; Razmanova and Andrukhova, 2020; Abukova,
Dmitrievskii, and Eremin, 2017). Thus, in conditions
of an innovative economy formation,
the presentation of infrastructure from a systemic perspective allows us to
talk about the formation of
integrated economic structures. The presented idea is due to the features of
infrastructure and related services within the boundaries of economic
structures, the composition of the infrastructure, and industry characteristics.
Result
The theoretical results of the study on the formation of the
infrastructure of economic systems
indicate the evolutionary nature of its expansion. This nature is associated
with the reproductive approach to the
development of infrastructure and emerging services within economic
systems. At the same time, depending on the characteristics of the reproduction process, several directions of schemes for the formation of
infrastructure facilities and service objects created
on this basis have been identified. One direction is associated with the activation of infrastructure-service
relations at stages of the reproduction process as capital is transformed in the circulation (Figure
1). A more complex form (Figure 2) is associated with the self-increasing nature of the movement of
various forms of infrastructure and the service formed on this basis, and assumes a cyclical
representation of various
forms of infrastructure.
Figure 1 The formation of the infrastructure and service connections from the standpoint of the reproduction approach (first approach)
Figure 2 The formation of the infrastructure and service connections from the standpoint of the reproduction approach (the first extended approach). (In figures: M, C, P - money, commodity, production capital, MP - means of production, LF - labor force)
The second direction of the formation of infrastructure and service facilities is associated with phases of the reproduction process as social value is created. At the same time, an infrastructure of the phases of the reproduction process will be formed at each level, supplemented by service enterprises (Figure 3).
Figure 3 Formation of infrastructure from the perspective of a service cube (second approach)
In modern conditions associated with the innovative orientation
of economic growth, a systematic direction
in infrastructure development is being formalized. Analyzing infrastructure
from the standpoint of the presented approach requires consideration of the
features of the evolutionary
development of the system, the specifics of the
formation of industrial
agglomerations within the boundaries of systems, the level of innovative
activity of enterprises, the
availability of service programs, and the use of digital technologies. To
evaluate the impact of the aforementioned factors on the formation of an
innovation-active infrastructure within the development boundaries of economic
systems specializing in mineral resources, refer to the provided diagram (Figure
4).
Each group of factors presented
above is evaluated
using integral characteristics. The monitoring indicators are based on a method for determining the integral indicator in each group based on the integration of partial analysis
indicators. Thus, rating characteristics are formed for various options
for investment processes in the region.
Figure 4 Comprehensive assessment of the formation of the innovation-active infrastructure
To do this, this research presents an assessment of the influence of
the factors listed above on the formation of infrastructure within the boundaries of economic systems of oil and gas specialization in Russia (Table
1).
Table 1 Analysis of the natural resource
potential of the territorial-economic system
of Russia*)
*) as a percentage of the total
for the Russian
Federation. The calculation was carried out based on
the materials of the State
report “On the State and use of mineral resources of the
Russian Federation in 2020
The analysis of data in
Table 1 indicates that the sustainability of economic systems specializing in
oil and gas in Russia, particularly in the territories of Siberia, the Far
East, and part of the European zone (the Northern region), is primarily
influenced by substantial natural resource potential. Consequently, in regions
characterized by a high concentration of extractive industries and an
insufficient level of infrastructure development (Tables 2-3), enterprises tend
to merge through horizontal integration, with a predominant focus on the fuel
and energy sector.
The sustainable development
of regions of oil and gas specialization, including the Volga, Ural, and
Siberian districts, is largely determined by the high
level of production diversification and increased innovative activity of industry
production (Table 2). The results of the analysis indicate
that the active use of digital technologies occurs in the economic systems of
the Volga and Ural Federal Districts,
which have significant oil and gas potential and are characterized by a high
level of infrastructure development (20.4 and 23.4, respectively), increased
innovative activity of organizations (15.5 and
10.2) and a high level of civilization (at level 30).
In addition, the analysis shows that the activities of
domestic oil service companies are carried out in a narrow range of services
provided (mainly of a drilling
nature) in a limited area, in the regions of Siberia and the Far East.
Meanwhile, infrastructure facilities of an innovative nature are concentrated
in the regions of the Central
and Northwestern districts (Table
3).
Table 2 Infrastructure development indicators by regions of Russia *)
|
Federal District |
Infrastructure developme nt |
Development of transport infrastructur e |
Development of energy infrastructure |
Development of social infrastructu re |
Development of utility infrastructure |
Development of telecommuni cations infrastructure |
|
1. Central |
7.77 |
8.54 |
6.90 |
7.49 |
7.83 |
9.87 |
|
2. North-western |
6.91 |
7.01 |
5.87 |
6.38 |
8.25 |
8.40 |
|
3. South |
5.72 |
3.98 |
5.48 |
5.85 |
7.37 |
6.89 |
|
4. North Caucasian |
5.48 |
3.49 |
4.73 |
5.06 |
8.07 |
6.15 |
|
5. Privolzhsky |
6.05 |
3.23 |
5.68 |
7.05 |
7.65 |
7.44 |
|
6.
Ural |
6.55 |
4.34 |
8.78 |
6.55 |
7.62 |
6.97 |
|
7. Siberian |
6.25 |
4.64 |
8.49 |
6.15 |
7.24 |
7.81 |
|
8. Far
Eastern |
5.96 |
3.60 |
5.71 |
7.14 |
7.30 |
7.48 |
Note: *) – the index of development of infrastructure services by type is presented (Russian Infrastructure Development Index – 2020 (Indeks Razvitiya Infrastruktury Rossii, 2020).
Table 3 Indicators of innovative development by regions
of Russia
|
Federal District |
Infrastructure Services Development
Index*) |
Drilling Services Development
Index**) |
Digitalization Development Index***) |
Innovation Activity Index****) |
|
1. Central |
7.77 |
1 |
31 |
12.5 |
|
2. North-western |
6.91 |
5 |
30 |
10.8 |
|
3. South |
5.72 |
4 |
29 |
8.0 |
|
4. North
Caucasian |
5.48 |
2 |
23 |
3.5 |
|
5. Privolzhsky |
6.05 |
31 |
30 |
15.5 |
|
6.
Ural |
6.55 |
38 |
30 |
10.2 |
|
7. Siberian |
6.25 |
18 |
28 |
9.8 |
|
8. Far
Eastern |
5.96 |
6 |
27 |
6.9 |
Note. Compiled by the author based on sources: *) - Russian Infrastructure Development Index - 2020. **) - Review of the Russian oilfield services market - 2020. ***) - Indicators of the digital economy - 2020. ****) - Indicators of innovation activity - 2020.
The obtained results of the analysis make it possible to form a
typology of infrastructure services in the region of oil and gas specialization
(production, social and everyday infrastructure, market infrastructure,
infrastructure for supporting the development of systems, institutional
infrastructure of the regions) and related services, directed along the vector
of innovative development (depending on the form of social division of labor
development), taking into account the innovation of developments in the system
and the level of digitalization of activities, participating in the creation of
an infrastructure and service cube (Figure 5). Additionally, based on the
results of the analysis, an economic and statistical model was presented,
reflecting the influence of oilfield services and the level of development of
the territory’s digitalization on the development of infrastructure
facilities in regions of oil and gas specialization (Figure 6).
The presented
model was carried out based on regression analysis and the establishment of correlation dependencies of the main indicators characterizing the influence of factor characteristics (the
level of digitalization and innovative activity, the level of development of services) (Table 3) on the functional one - infrastructure development in the regions of Russia. Among many research
options, model y = -2.006- 0.043×x1+0.151×x2, which is a linear multiple
regression of the dependence of the infrastructure factor on digitalization and the level of service
development, showed qualitative results (based on the
coefficient of determination R2 = 0.78, p -statistics, shares of the residual sum of squares in the
total sum of squares and comparison of F-score
according to the table data).
Figure 5 Formation of the infrastructure of industrial agglomerations within the boundaries of the development of economic systems
Figure 6 Regression analysis results
The results of the study indicate that the development of digitalization and oil services in regions of oil and gas specialization, the Urals, Siberia and the Far East have a significant impact on the formation of the infrastructure. Thus, the presented model will make it possible to manage the formation of innovative infrastructure facilities in the regions of the Urals and Siberia and will also allow planning the development of the infrastructure in promising regions of hydrocarbon production, in particular in the Far East, Eastern Siberia, in the North-West region, and on the continental shelf of Russia.
Discussion
As the innovative scenario for the development of the national
economy is implemented, a new institutional environment is being formed in the country,
which makes changes to the organizational chart of relations between the
state and private structures when developing projects related
to the formation of the infrastructure and service
facilities. What is presented is
especially important for economic systems of oil and gas specialization, for which
strategic development is determined by:
- geological
features: deterioration of the structure of oil reserves due to an increase in the share of hard-to-recover reserves (Il’inskii and Tan, 2017);
- technological
features: the use of import substitution and parallel import procedures (Babkin et al., 2021);
- production
features: the concentration of a significant volume of oil production in highly
productive fields while leaving small and medium-sized fields, as written
by (Kryukov and Tokarev, 2022) and etc.;
- economic
features: increased wear and tear of fixed assets associated with oil and gas
production during the strategic sustainable development of enterprises, as
noted by (Mahmood et al., 2023; Cherepovitsyn and Rutenko,
2022);
- financial
features: changes in the structure of financial resources and planned project
financing schemes (Ponomarenko, Galevski, and Marin, 2022).
The highlighted features underscore the necessity of predicting the development of economic systems and infrastructure facilities, particularly in the territories of the Urals, Siberia, and the Far East, as emphasized by the authors in this work. In addition, to increase the efficiency of geological exploration and oil and gas production, the importance of using digital technologies is increasing, making it possible to increase the level of investment attractiveness of oil and gas facilities in economic systems and to include these components in forecast dependencies. Moreover, the “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” program being implemented at the country level is focused on the active use of end-to-end technologies and digital control platforms.
The study of the process
of activation of services based on the formation of the infrastructure of economic systems of oil
and gas specialization in Russia in conditions of using innovative tools of a systemic orientation allows
concluding. The infrastructure of economic systems of oil
and gas specialization formed as a result of evolutionary development is presented
as an integral economic system that ensures market interaction of business
units both within the system and with external
agents and takes into account the specifics of the formation of oil and
gas agglomerations within the boundaries of sustainable development. Sustainable development of
economic systems of oil and gas specialization is largely determined by significant natural resource
potential, as well as the formation of industrial agglomerations of an innovative type, characterized by the
innovative infrastructure and high-tech oil services, the attractiveness of which is explained by the high level of diversification
of production, increased innovative activity of industry production, high level of
digitalization in the regions.
Managing the formation of innovative infrastructure facilities in the economic
systems of the Urals and Siberia, as well as planning the development of
infrastructure facilities in
promising hydrocarbon production territories, is possible through economic modeling of the impact of oilfield
services and the level of development
of digitalization on the development
of infrastructure facilities in regions of oil and gas specialization, which contributes to the complexity of development. The presented model will make it possible to plan the
development of infrastructure and services within the boundaries of economic
systems. This will also be important for the strategic development of economic
systems specializing in mineral resources. To make the study more detailed,
additional factors can be used within individual economic systems, which can be
done in the following studies.
The research was financed as part of the project "Development of a
methodology for instrumental base formation for analysis and modeling of the spatial
socio-economic development of systems based on internal reserves
in the context of digitalization" (FSEG-
2023-0008).
Abukova, L.A., Dmitrievskii, A.N, Eremin, N.A., 2017. Tsifrovaya
Modernizatsiya Neftegazovogo Kompleksa Rossii (Digital Modernization of The
Russian Oil And Gas Complex). Neftyanoe Khozyaistvo, Volume 11, pp.
54–58
Babkin, A., Glukhov, V., Shkarupeta, E.,
Kharitonova, N., Barabaner, H., 2021. Methodology for Assessing Industrial
Ecosystem Maturity in the Framework of Digital Technology Implementation.
International Journal of Technology, Volume 12(7), pp. 1397–1406
Berawi, M.A., 2020. Managing Nature 5.0: The
Role of Digital Technologies in the Circular Economy. International Journal
of Technology, Volume 11(4), pp. 652–655
Burström, T., Parida, V., Lahti, T., Wincent,
J., 2021. AI-Enabled Business-Model Innovation and Transformation in Industrial
Ecosystems: A Framework, Model and Outline for Further Research. Journal of
Business Research, Volume 127, pp. 85–95
Byankin, A.S., Babkin, A.V., Baykov, E.A.,
Burdakova, G.I., Usanov, G.I., 2021. Strategies for The Development of Complex
Organizational and Economic Systems in The Conditions of Digitalization. Lecture Notes in Networks
and Systems, Volume 200, pp. 381–388
Cherepovitsyn, A., Rutenko, E., 2022.
Strategic Planning of Oil and Gas Companies: The Decarbonization Transition. Energies,
Volume 15, p. 6163
Diez, L., Marangé,
P., Levrat, É., 2017. Regeneration Management Tool for Industrial
Ecosystem. IFAC-PapersOnLine, Volume 50(1), pp. 12950–12955
Gosudarstvennyi doklad «O sostoyanii i
ispol'zovanii mineral'no-syr'evykh resursov RF v 2020g». Available at: https://www.mnr.gov.ru/upload/iblock/74a/GD_msb-2020.pdf/gosudarstvennyy_doklad_o_sostoyanii_i_ispolzovanii_mineralno_syrevykh_resursov_2020/?special_version=Y,
(accessed 02.09.2022). (Link not to be accessed)
Il'inskii, A.A., Tan-Syuivei, 2017.
Formirovanie Mekhanizma Ustoichivogo Razvitiya Neftedobyvayushchego Kompleksa
Na Baze Marginal'nykh Mestorozhdenii. (Formation of a Mechanism for The
Development of The Oil Production Complex Based on Marginal Fields). Neftegazovaya
Geologiya. Teoriya I Praktika, Volume 12(3), p. 7
Ilyushin, Y.V., 2022. Development of a
Process Control System for the Production of High- Paraffin Oil. Energies, Volume
15, p. 6462
Indicators of innovation activity
- 2020. Available online at https://issek.hse.ru/news/589979747.html, Accessed
on September 2, 2022.
Indicators of the digital economy, 2020.
Available online at https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/484533334.pdf, Accessed
on September 2, 2022.
Kleiner, G.V., 2023. Sistemnaya Paradigm Kak
Teoreticheskaya Osnova Strategicheskogo Upravleniya Ekonomikoi V Sovremennykh
Usloviyakh (System Paradigm As A Theoretical Basis For Operational Management
Of The Economy In Modern Conditions). Upravlencheskie Nauki, Volume 13(1),
pp. 6–19
Konoplyanik, A.A., 2017. Quo Vadis: Otsenka
Effektivnosti Tret'ego Energopaketa ES Ilipodgotovka Novoi «Linii Kerzona»?
(Quo Vadis: Assessing The Effectiveness of The Third EU Energy Package or
Preparing A New “Curzon Line”?). Neft', Gaz, Pravo, Volume 4, pp. 42–53
Kozlov, A.V., Teslya,
A.B., Chernogorskii, S.A., 2018. Game Theory Model of State Investment Into
Territories of Advanced Development in The Regions of Mineral Resources
Specialization. Journal of Mining Institute, Volume 234, pp. 673–682
Krainova, E.A., 2018. Nefteservis V Mesto
VINK (Oil Service Instead of Vertically Integrated Oil Companies). Oil&Gas
Journal Russia, Volume 8, p. 128
Kryukov, V.A., Tokarev, A.N., 2022.
Formirovanie Uslovii Dlya Osvoeniya Trudnoizvlekaemykh Zapasov Nefti: Neobkhodimost'
Ucheta Regional'nykh Aspektov (Formation of Conditions For The Development Of
Hard-To-Recover Oil Reserves: The Need To Take Into Account Regional Aspects). Ekonomika
Regiona, Volume 18(3), pp. 755–769
Kuklina, E.A., 2021. Strategiya Tsifrovoi
Transformatsii Kak Instrument Realizatsii Biznes-Strategii Kompanii
Neftegazovogo Sektora Sovremennoi Rossii (Digital Transformation Strategy as a
Tool for Implementing The Business Strategy of a Company in The Oil and Gas
Sector of Modern Russia). Upravlencheskoe Konsul'tirovanie, Volume 6, pp.
40–53
Lindholt, L., Glomsrod, S., 2022. The Role of
the Arctic in Future Global Petroleum Supply. Available online at
https://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/DP/dp645.pdf, Accessed on September 2, 2022
Litvinenko, V.S., Petrov, E.I., Vasilevskaya,
D.V., Yakovenko, A.V., Naumov, I.A., Ratnikov, M.A., 2023. Otsenka Roli
Gosudarstva V Upravlenii Mineral'nymiresursami (Assessing The Role of The State
in The Management of Mineral Resources). Zapiski Gornogo instituta,
Voume 259, pp. 95–111
Litvinenko, V.S.,
Sergeev, I.B., 2019. Innovations as a Factor in the Development of
the Natural Resources Sector. Studies on Russian Economic Development,
Volume 30, pp. 635–643
Mahmood, Y., Afrin, T., Huang, Y., Yodo, N.,
2023. Sustainable Development for Oil and Gas Infrastructure from Risk,
Reliability, and Resilience Perspectives. Sustainability, Volume 15, p. 4953
Matrokhina, K.V., Makhovikov, A.B., Khaikin,
M.M., 2023. Razvitie Metodologii Stsenarnogo Analiza Investitsionnykh Proektov
Predpriyatii Mineral'no- Syr'evogokompleksa (Development of A Methodology For
Scenario Analysis Of Alternative Projects Of Enterprises of The Mineral
Resource Complex). Zapiski Gornogo Instituta, Volume 259, pp. 112–124
Nedosekin, A.O.,
Reishakhrit, E.I, 2019. Strategicheskii Podkhod K Otsenke
Ekonomicheskoi Ustoichivosti Ob"Ektov Mineral'no-Syr'evogo Kompleksa
Rossii. (Strategic Approach To Stabilizing The Economic Sustainability Of
Russian Mineral Resources Complex Objects). Zapiski Gornogo Instituta, Volume
237, pp. 354–360
Ponomarenko, T.V., Galevski, S.G., Marin, E.A., 2022. Economic
Evaluation of Oil and Gas Projects: Justification of Engineering Solutions in
the Implementation of Field Development Projects. Energies, Volume 15,
pp. 1-22.
Razmanova, S.V., Andrukhova, O.V., 2020.
Nefteservisnye Kompanii V Ramkakh Tsivrovizatsii Ekonomiki: Otsenka Perspektiv
Innovatsionnogo Razvitiya (Oil Service Companies Within The Framework of The
Digitalization of The Economy: Assessing The Prospects For Innovative
Development). Zapiski Gornogo Instituta, Volume 244, pp. 482–492
Review of the Russian
oilfield services market – 2020. Available online at https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ru/Documents/energy-resources/Russian/oil-gas-russia-survey.pdf,
Accessed on September 2, 2022.
Russian Infrastructure
Development Index - 2020. Available online
at https://infraoneresearch.ru/index_id/2020, Accessed on September 2, 2022
Tatarkin, A.I., 2016. Regional targeting of the economic policy of the Russian Federation as an institution of regional spatial development. Available online at https://www.researc hgate.net/publication/299361581_Regional_Targeting_of_the_Economic_Policy_of_the_Russian_Federation_as_
an_Institution_of_Regional_Spatial_Development,
Accessed on September 2, 2022
Tereshko, E., Rudskaya, I., 2021. A
Systematic Approach to the Management of a Construction Complex under the
Conditions of Digitalization. International Journal of Technology, Volume
12(7), pp. 1437–1447
Van-Van, E.A.P., 2011. The Main Principles of
Formation of Mineral and Raw Materials Sintering at High North. Mining Informational
and Analytical Bulletin, Volume 1, pp. 367–373
Varnavskii, V.G., 2021. The Global
Transportation and Logistics Infrastructure. Herald of the Russian Academy
of Sciences this Link is Disabled, Volume 91(1), pp. 65–72
Vasilenko, N.V., Kirsanova, N.Y., Lapinskas,
A.A., Makhova, L.A., Khaykin, M.M., 2020. Issues for Development of Economic
System for Subsurface Resource Management in Russia Through Lens of Economic
Process Servitization. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy,
Volume 10(1), pp. 44–48
Zagloel, T.Y.M., Surjandari, I., Berawi,
M.A., Asvial, M., Harwahyu, R., Suryanegara, M., Setiawan, E.A., Suwartha, N.,
Maknun, I.J., 2021. Digital Economy and Technology Development. International
Journal of Technology, Volume 12(7), pp. 1323–1327
Zaytsev, A., Dmitriev, N., Rodionov, D.,
Magradze, T., 2021. Assessment of the Innovative Potential of Alternative
Energy in the Context of the Transition to the Circular Economy. International
Journal of Technology, Volume 12(7), pp. 1328–1338
Zemtsov, S.P., 2020. Ekologicheskaya
Effektivnost' Iustoichivoe Razvitie Regionovrossii Za
Dvadtsatiletiesyr'evogorosta (Environmental Efficiency and Sustainable
Development Of Russian Regions In Twenty Years Of Economic Growth). Ekonomicheskaya
Politika, Volume 15(2), pp. 18–47
Zipir, V.G., Chernova, O.S., 2020. Povyshenie
Effektivnosti Proektirovaniya Razrabotki Novogo Gazokondensatnogo Aktiva
Metodami Integrirovannogo Modelirovaniya. (Increasing The Efficiency Of
Planning The Development Of New Methods For Gas Condensate Assets Of Complex
Analysis). Izvestiya Tomskogo Politekhnicheskogo Universiteta. Inzhiniring
Georesursov, Volume 331(1), pp. 54–63