Published at : 31 Oct 2023
Volume : IJtech
Vol 14, No 6 (2023)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v14i6.6624
Kalisri Logeswaran Aravindan | Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Selangor, 63100, Malaysia |
Muhammad Aiman Izzat | Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Selangor, 63100, Malaysia |
Thurasamy Ramayah | 1. School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Minden, Penang, 11800, Malaysia, 2. Department of Information Technology & Management, Daffodil International University, Birulia, 1216 |
Thing Soong Chen | Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Selangor, 63100, Malaysia |
Yap Voon Choong | Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Selangor, 63100, Malaysia |
Sanmugam Annamalah | School of Business, SEGI University College, Kuala Lumpur, 50010, Malaysia |
Narinasamy Ilhavenil | Institute of Teacher Education Special Education Campus, Bandar Tun Razak, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia |
Arman Bin Ahmad | Department of Marketing Universiti Kuala Lumpur Business SchoolUniversiti Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
Electric vehicles have been popularized as an
environmentally friendly alternative to fuel-based transportation. The
Malaysian government and vehicle manufacturers have encouraged the adoption of
electric cars, yet Malaysians are seen to be lagging in adopting electric cars.
This study is poised to examine the determinants of consumers' purchase intention
on electricity, underpinned by The Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour. This
quantitative research is set on purposive sampling while PLS-SEM is utilized
for data analysis. Findings from 362 respondents reveal that technology
readiness, perceived cost, perceived symbol, and knowledge lead to electric car
purchase intention. This study provides insights for policymakers and
manufacturers towards encouraging purchase intention of electric cars.
Electric car; Environmentally-friendly; PLS-SEM; Purchase intention
Climate change and carbon
emissions are amongst the most pressing challenges facing mankind on a global
scale. According to NASA (2019), the present symptoms, such as a drastic rise in temperature, reflect
an alarming scenario. In the past, 196 countries, including Malaysia, have
pledged in the Paris Agreement to reduce 45% of carbon emissions by 2030 (United Nations, 2016). In line
with this, the Malaysian government has ingrained this goal, being part of the
National Energy Policy 2022-2040 and the 12th Malaysia Plan.
Promoting environment-friendly transportation systems is essential to prevent catastrophes (Suwartha et al., 2021), especially in Malaysia, where transportation accounts for 30% of energy consumption (Ministry of Transportation Malaysia, 2017). Thus, electric cars are promoted as an efficient option for their ability to operate partially or fully on electric motors and hence consume little to zero fossil fuels in addition to total ownership cost advantages as compared to conventional vehicles (Suwignjo et al., 2023). In the past years, the Malaysian government has encouraged the usage of electric cars by introducing several policies, including the subsidization of electric car sales.
Despite the Malaysian government's encouragement of electric cars through various incentives, the adoption rate remains very low. In 2022, only 10,000 units were recorded, falling significantly short of the target of achieving 100,000 electric cars by the year 2020 (Paul Tan, 2022; Paul Tan, 2016). Therefore, this study is done to uncover the factors that encourage the purchase intention of electric cars, which will eventually facilitate their adoption. Although a string of research was done on the adoption of electric cars, there was a scarcity of examining purchase intention from positive and negative perceptions (He, Zhan, and Hu, 2018) thus this study offers a unique perspective by examining the five determinants of the electric car purchase intention namely technology readiness, perceived cost, perceived symbol, electronic word of mouth, and knowledge based on the Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour (ETPB) model.
2. Theoretical Development and
Literature Review
The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) has been widely employed in purchase intention research. This theory posits that human behavior is governed by behavioral intentions, which are influenced by the person's attitude towards a particular behavior (expectation of its outcomes), subjective norms (social pressure), as well as perceived behavioral control (the extent to which the behavior is easy or difficult to perform). No doubt, TPB has been widely used in various settings, but ETPB is seen to be more apt and fitting for electric car/vehicle research (Shalender and Sharma, 2020) as such, ETPB would yield a better explanation while providing valuable insights into the determinants of electric car purchase intention. The research framework for this study is as follows.
Figure 1 Research framework
2.1. Technology
Readiness
Technology readiness is the
extent to a consumer is open to a technology's development (Tahar et al., 2020) and in
electric cars context, it relates to charging time and range, as well as the
adequacy of infrastructure namely charging stations. In fact, researchers have
especially highlighted charging time and range as a major obstacle in using
electric cars (Whulanza, 2023) but subsequent improvements backdropped by Tesla's investment in
Malaysia is expected to delineate the shortcomings. For instance, newer
electric car models such as Tesla Model S Dual Motor could travel up to 575 km
on a single charge (Electric Vehicle Database, 2023), underlined by initiatives to increase charging
stations in Malaysia (Paul Tan, 2023). Yet, a study by Habich-Sobiegalla,
Kostka, and Anzinger (2018) reveals
technology readiness is insignificant towards electric car purchase intention
in Brazil, China and Russia. Nevertheless, considering the Malaysian context,
the first hypothesis is formulated as follows.
H1:
Technology readiness is positively related to electric car purchase intention.
2.2. Perceived Cost
Perceived cost refers to
the consumers' perception of the monetary expenses involved in owning and
driving an electric car. It encompasses the price of the electric car and
subsequent costs of ownership. Perceived cost impacts purchase (Habich-Sobiegalla, Kostka, and Anzinger, 2018). Similarly, Shen and Wang (2022) argued that moral obligations toward the environment
transpire if the monetary costs involved are lower. Therefore, the second
hypothesis is formulated as follows:
H2:
Perceived cost is negatively related to electric car purchase intention.
2.3. Perceived Symbol
Perceived symbol refers to
the consumers' perception of the status or public image that purchasing an
electric car would garner, as electric cars may not only be a transportation
mode but a status symbol and a reflection of their pro-environmentalist and
innovative identity. Studies have reported a positive relationship between
perceived symbols and electric car purchase intention, such as Okada et al. (2019) in Japan.
Therefore, the third hypothesis is formulated as follows:
H3:
Perceived symbol is positively related to electric car purchase intention.
2.4. Electronic Word of Mouth
Technological advancements have harnessed social media
usage, making it a part of daily life for various purposes, including
testimonials and recommendations (Abed, 2018), thus generating electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM).
Compared to traditional
word-of-mouth, which spreads through face-to-face interactions, electronic
word-of-mouth (eWOM), transmitted through electronic mediums, is considered the
most prevalent means for individuals to share their opinions and reviews (Maulida et al., 2022). Given
the low electric car adoption in Malaysia, eWOM assures information could be
acquired not only from within Malaysia but also from other proponents around
the world (Qiu et al., 2023). Jing (2023) found
that eWOM has a positive, significant, and strongest influence on electric car
purchase intention in Finland, although Riansyah
et al. (2023) reported
a contradicting outcome for Indonesia. This research, however, would formulate
a fourth hypothesis as below, given the forthcoming Tesla’s entry to Malaysia.
H4:
Electronic word of mouth is positively related to electric car purchase
intention.
2.5. Knowledge
Knowledge is the core of consumers’ decision-making (Huang and Ge, 2019), where it facilitates positive attitudes toward ecological products (Amoako, Dzogbenuku, and Abubakari, 2020) while helping to mitigate the perceived risks (Wang, Ma, and Bai, 2019). Thus, consumers tend to be more receptive to electric cars when knowledge such as performance, charging time, range, and benefit are present (Wang et al., 2018). Previous studies have reported a positive and significant relationship between knowledge of electric cars and purchase intention (Kim et al., 2019). Therefore, the following hypothesis is developed.
H5: Knowledge is positively related to electric car purchase intention.
This quantitative research uses a survey questionnaire
adopted or adapted from past validated studies. A purposive sampling method was
employed while the unit of analysis is individuals who own a valid driving
license and fuel-based car. A self-administered Google survey form was given to
500 recipients in Klang Valley and eventually received 362, hence a response
rate of 72.4%. The data was analyzed using PLS-SEM.
4.1. Data Analysis
4.1.1. Data Screening.
The screening was conducted
to ascertain missing values and suspicious patterns guided by Sekaran and Bougie (2020) and Hair et al. (2017),
respectively. In testing for common method bias, Podsakoff,
Mackenzie, and Lee, 2003,
procedural treatment was undertaken, followed by the full-collinearity VIF
method proposed by Kock (2012) using SmartPLS. All VIF values were found to be below 3.3 (Kock, 2015). Thus, this
indicates no serious threat of common method bias.
4.1.2.
Measurement Model
Reliability and convergent
validity were tested based on the composite reliability (CR), factor loading, and average variance
extracted (AVE). Factor loading values between 0.40 and 0.70 can still be
maintained if the composite reliabilities are above 0.70 and the AVE values are
above 0.50 (Hair et al., 2017). As shown in Table 1, all the Composite Reliability was greater than
0.7, and the Average Variance Extracted was also greater than 0.5. Whereas
discriminant validity was done using HTMT (Henseler,
Ringle, and Sarstedt, 2015) with a
cut-off value of 0.85. As seen in Table 2, all the HTMT values of each
construct is found to be below 0.85. Thus, we can conclude that the
measurements are valid and reliable, and all constructs in this study are distinct.
Table 1 Measurement Model
Variable |
Item |
Loadings |
CR |
AVE |
Electronic
Word of Mouth |
EWOM1 |
0.865 |
0.949 |
0.822 |
|
EWOM2 |
0.971 |
|
|
|
EWOM3 |
0.916 |
|
|
|
EWOM4 |
0.872 |
|
|
Knowledge |
KNOW1 |
0.787 |
0.846 |
0.584 |
|
KNOW2 |
0.833 |
|
|
|
KNOW3 |
0.550 |
|
|
|
KNOW4 |
0.851 |
|
|
Perceived
Cost |
PC1 |
0.862 |
0.879 |
0.646 |
|
PC2 |
0.808 |
|
|
|
PC3 |
0.835 |
|
|
|
PC4 |
0.701 |
|
|
Purchase
Intention |
PI1 |
0.848 |
0.945 |
0.810 |
|
PI2 |
0.946 |
|
|
|
PI3 |
0.912 |
|
|
|
PI4 |
0.892 |
|
|
Perceived
Symbol |
PS1 |
0.802 |
0.891 |
0.673 |
|
PS2 |
0.860 |
|
|
|
PS3 |
0.825 |
|
|
|
PS4 |
0.792 |
|
|
Technology
Readiness |
TR1 |
0.830 |
0.794 |
0.501 |
|
TR2 |
0.770 |
|
|
|
TR3 |
0.720 |
|
|
|
TR4 |
0.452 |
|
|
4.1.3.
Structural Model
To test the hypotheses
generated, we ran a bootstrapping with a 5,000 resample (Ramayah et al., 2018; Hair et al., 2017) to generate the standard deviation, t-values, and
p-values. First, we assessed how good is our in-sample prediction by evaluating
the R2. The R2 was 0.561 (Q2 = 0.451), indicating that all 5 variables taken
together can explain 56.1% of the variance in purchase intention, and the
blindfolding procedure with an omission distance of 9 returned a value of
0.451, which was well above the recommended value of 0 thus confirming the
predictive relevance of the model.
Technology Readiness (? =
0.335, p< 0.01), Perceived Symbol (? = 0.303, p< 0.01) and Knowledge (? =
0.289, p< 0.01), and E-WOM (? = 0.074, p< 0.05) were all positively
related to purchase intention while Perceived Cost (? = -0.245, p< 0.01) was
negatively related to purchase intention. Thus, H1, H2, H3, H4 and H5 were
supported.
To test for out-of-sample
prediction, we followed the suggestions of Shmueli et al. (2019) and ran
the PLS-Predict procedure with a 10-fold and 10-repetition setting. As shown in
Table 4, the results returned a Q2_predict of 0.542 for the latent construct
and for the measurement variables; all items showed that the errors in the
Partial Least Squares (PLS) model were lower than the errors in the Linear
Model (LM) thus indicating that our model has a high predictive power.
Table 2 Discriminant Validity (HTMT Ratio)
Variable |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
1. Electronic Word of Mouth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Knowledge |
0.278 |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Perceived Cost |
0.147 |
0.263 |
|
|
|
|
4. Purchase Intention |
0.274 |
0.428 |
0.359 |
|
|
|
5. Perceived Symbol |
0.407 |
0.423 |
0.263 |
0.650 |
|
|
6. Technology Readiness |
0.236 |
0.207 |
0.362 |
0.527 |
0.398 |
|
Table 3 Hypotheses Testing
Hypothesis |
Relationship |
Std.
Beta |
Std.
Dev. |
t-value |
p-value |
BCI
LL |
BCI
UL |
f2 |
H1 |
TR - PI |
0.335 |
0.043 |
7.832 |
p< .001 |
0.263 |
0.401 |
0.207 |
H2 |
PC - PI |
-0.245 |
0.034 |
7.105 |
p< .001 |
-0.298 |
-0.186 |
0.122 |
H3 |
PS - PI |
0.303 |
0.037 |
8.118 |
p< .001 |
0.242 |
0.363 |
0.134 |
H4 |
EWOM - PI |
0.074 |
0.039 |
1.876 |
0.030 |
0.006 |
0.135 |
0.030 |
H5 |
KNOW - PI |
0.289 |
0.043 |
6.686 |
p< .001 |
0.219 |
0.360 |
0.154 |
Table 4 PLS-Predict
|
PLS |
LM |
PLS-LM |
|
|||
MV |
RMSE |
MAE |
RMSE |
MAE |
RMSE |
MAE |
Q²_predict |
PI4 |
0.781 |
0.636 |
0.834 |
0.705 |
-0.053 |
-0.069 |
0.424 |
PI3 |
0.690 |
0.572 |
0.836 |
0.691 |
-0.146 |
-0.119 |
0.474 |
PI2 |
0.628 |
0.512 |
0.760 |
0.642 |
-0.132 |
-0.130 |
0.471 |
PI1 |
0.680 |
0.507 |
0.869 |
0.702 |
-0.189 |
-0.195 |
0.381 |
Based on the findings,
technology readiness is observed to have a positive and significant
relationship with the purchase intention of electric cars. Drawing on previous
studies, Habich-Sobiegalla, Kostka, and Anzinger (2018) contrarily found that technological readiness
insignificantly influenced electric car purchase intention for consumers in
Brazil, China, and Russia. However, in the Malaysian context, there may be a
greater likelihood of increasing the consumers’ purchase intention if
policymakers and electric car manufacturers were to emphasize the technological
facets, such as having more abundant and accessible charging stations,
increasing driving range per charge, and building more electric car service
centers.
Secondly, perceived cost is
found to be negatively related to purchase intention. This finding is
consistent with previous studies (Habich-Sobiegalla, Kostka,
and Anzinger, 2018). Hence, the
Malaysian government could consider introducing more lucrative incentives such
as subsidies and tax reliefs for purchasing electric cars. This may lower the
consumers’ resistance to the high upfront costs of owning an electric car. Not
only that, manufacturers could also work on introducing affordable electric car
models to further attract the interest of mainstream consumers.
Thirdly, the perceived
symbol is found to have a positive and significant relationship with purchase
intention. This finding is consistent with that of previous studies, such as by
Okada et al. (2019). Therefore, promotional efforts for the sale and usage of electric cars
could emphasize electric cars as a status symbol. With that, such efforts could
reflect the pro-environmentalist and innovative image that is commonly
associated with electric car owners.
Fourthly, electronic word-of-mouth
is found to have an insignificant relationship with purchase intention. This
finding is similar to that of a study conducted by Riansyah
et al. (2023), albeit focusing on
a particular electric car model, Wuling Air Electric Car. Thus, it may be more
effective to focus on building offline word-of-mouth by emphasizing offline
promotional strategies. This may include hosting face-to-face events, whereby
consumers can have a firsthand experience with electric cars, as well as
interact with the sales representatives on a more personal level.
Fifthly, knowledge is found
to have a positive and significant relationship with purchase intention. This
finding reflects that of previous studies (Kim et
al., 2019). It is worth noting that while
most respondents are aware of the environmental benefits of electric cars, they
are not as knowledgeable about their economic and technological benefits. Thus,
organizing campaigns and road shows can be beneficial in improving the
consumers’ purchase intention. Better yet, such initiatives can focus on
educating consumers on not only the environmental aspect of electric cars but
also the economic and technological aspects.
In a
nutshell, this study is meant to examine the determinants that influence the
consumers’ purchase intention of electric cars. As the findings have shown,
technology readiness, perceived cost, perceived symbol, and knowledge have a
significant relationship with electric car purchase intention, while electronic
word-of-mouth has an insignificant influence on electric car purchase
intention. However, this study is not without its limitations. For instance,
the data is solely collected from the Klang Valley area. Bearing the fact that
the average household income and education level in Klang Valley are different
as compared to other areas in Malaysia, the results could vary. Additionally,
this study did not consider the influence of owning a second vehicle on
purchase intention, as many households in Malaysia own more than one vehicle.
It is possible that a consumer who is looking to purchase a secondary vehicle
may not be as concerned with similar factors as one who is purchasing a primary
vehicle. Thus, future research may consider addressing these limitations to
garner richer insights into electric car purchase intention.
This
research is funded by Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) Fundamental
Research Grant Scheme, reference code: (FRGS/1/2021/SS01/MMU/02/1).
Abed, S.S., 2018. A Critical
Review of Empirical Research Examining SMEs Adoption from Selected Journals. In:
Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital Era: 17th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference
on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2018. Springer, Cham, pp. 557–587
Amoako, G.K., Dzogbenuku, R.K., Abubakari, A.,
2020. Do Green Knowledge and Attitude Influence the Youth's Green Purchasing?
Theory of Planned Behavior. International Journal of Productivity and
Performance Management, Volume 69(8), pp. 1609–1626
Electric Vehicle Database, 2023. Tesla Model S Dual Motor. Available
online at
https://ev-database.org/car/1404/Tesla-Model-S-Dual-Motor, Accessed on
September 14, 2023
Habich-Sobiegalla, S., Kostka, G., Anzinger, N., 2018. Electric Vehicle
Purchase Intentions of Chinese, Russian and Brazilian Citizens: An
International Comparative Study. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume
205, pp. 188–200
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., 2017. A Primer
on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2th
Edition. USA: Sage Publication
He, X., Zhan, W., Hu, Y., 2018. Consumer Purchase Intention of Electric
Vehicles In China: The Roles Of Perception and Personality. Journal of
Cleaner Production, Volume 204, pp. 1060–1069
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M.,
2015. A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-Based
Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science,
Volume 43(1), pp. 115–135
Huang, X., Ge, J., 2019. Electric Vehicle Development in Beijing: an
Analysis of Consumer Purchase Intention. Journal of Cleaner Production,
Volume 216, pp. 361–372
Jing, L., 2023. Social Media Marketing Strategies in the Electric
Vehicle Industry. Aalto University.
Available online at https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/120837
Accessed on August 29, 2023
Kim, J.H., Lee, G., Park, J.Y., Hong, J., Park, J., 2019. Consumer
Intentions To Purchase Battery Electric Vehicles in Korea, Energy Policy, Volume
132, pp. 736–743
Kock, N., 2015. Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity
Assessment Approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC),
Volume 11(4), pp. 1–10
Kock, N., Lynn, G., 2012. Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results In
Variance-Based SEM: An Illustration and Recommendations. Journal of the
Association for Information Systems, Volume 13(7), pp. 1–40
Maulida, M., Sari, Y., Rohmah, S., 2022, Influence of Electronic Word Of
Mouth (e-WOM), Hedonic Motivation, and Price Value On Consumer's Purchase
Intention Using Social Commerce “TikTok Shop”, In: 2022 Seventh
International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), pp. 1–7
Ministry of Transportation Malaysia, 2017. Malaysia
Stocktaking Report on Sustainable Transport and Climate Change. Available online
at
https://www.transportandclimatechange.org/download/malaysia-stocktaking-repor
t-on-sus tainable-transport-and-climate-change/, Accessed on October 13, 2022
NASA, 2019. Evidence: How Do We Know Climate Change is Real? Available
online at https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/, Accessed on October 19, 2022
Okada, T., Tamaki, T., Managi, S., 2019. Effect of Environmental
Awareness on Purchase Intention and Satisfaction Pertaining to Electric
Vehicles in Japan. Transportation Research Part D. Transport and
Environment, Volume 6, pp. 503–513
Paul Tan, 2016. Malaysia Targets 100,000 Electric Vehicles by 2020.
Available online at https://paultan.org/2016/10/26/malaysia-targets-100000-electric-vehicles-usage-by-2020, Accessed on September
14, 2023
Paul Tan, 2020. More Than 10,000 EVs Registered in Malaysia – JPJ.
Available online at https://paultan.org/2022/12/14/more-than-10000-evs-registered-in-malaysia-jpj/,
Accesed on September 14, 2023
Paul Tan, 2023. Tesla Superchargers in Malaysia – 12 Locations Now; to
Partner Pavilion, Gamuda, Sunway, Quill, MRCB, Levn. Paul Tan. Available online
at https://paultan.org/2023/07/21/tesla-superchargers-in-malaysia-12-locations-now-to-partner-with-pavilion-gamuda-sunway-quill-levn/,
Accessed on September 14, 2023
Podsakoff, P.M., Mackenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., 2003. Common Method Biases
in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of Literature and Recommended
Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, Volume 88 (5), pp. 879–903
Qiu, L., Wang, W., Pang, J., Jiang, Z.J., 2023. The Persuasive Impact of
Emoticons in Online Word-of-Mouth Communication. MIS Quarterly, Volume
47(2) pp. 511–534
Ramayah, T.J.F.H., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H., Memon, M.A., 2018. Partial
Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An
Updated and Practical Guide to Statistical Analysis. 2th
edition. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson
Riansyah, R.A., Usman, O., Febrilia, I., 2023. Pengaruh Price Dan E-Wom
Terhadap Purchase Intention Wuling Air EV Yang Dimediasi Oleh Trust. Nautical:
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, Volume 1(11), pp. 1345–1352 (These should be
accompanied by an English translation of the article title)
Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.M., 2015. SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt:
SmartPLS GmbH. Journal of Service Science and Management, Volume 10(3), pp.
32–49
Sekaran, U., Bougie, R., 2020. Research Methods for Business: A
Skill Building Approach, 8th edition. New York: Wiley
Shalender, K., Sharma, N., 2020. Using Extended Theory of Planned
Behaviour (TPB) To Predict Adoption Intention of Electric Vehicles in India. Environment,
Development and Sustainability, Volume 23(1), pp. 665–681
Shen, M., Wang, J., 2022. The Impact of Pro-environmental Awareness
Components on Green Consumption Behavior: The Moderation Effect of Consumer
Perceived Cost, Policy Incentives, and Face Culture. Frontiers in Psychology,
Volume 13, p. 580823
Suwartha, N., Berawi, M.A., Maknun, I.J., Asvial, M., Harwahyu, R.,
Suryanegara, M., Setiawan, E.A., Yatmo, Y.A., Atmodiwirjo, P., Zagloel, T.Y.M.,
Surjandari, I., Putra, N., Budiyanto, M.A., Wulanza, Y., Kartohardjono, S.,
Kusrini, E., 2021. Shaping Resilience in Urban Society through Digitalization
and Green Technologies for a Sustainable Future. International Journal of
Technology, Volume 12(5), pp. 897–902
Suwignjo,
P., Yuniarto, M.N., Nugraha, Y.U., Desanti, A.F., Sidharta, I., Wiratno, S.E.,
Yuwono, T., 2023. Benefits of Electric Motorcycle in Improving Personal
Sustainable Economy: A View from Indonesia Online Ride-Hailing Rider. International
Journal of Technology, Volume 14(1), pp. 38–53
Tahar, A.,
Riyadh, H.A., Sofyani, H., Purnomo, W.E., 2020. Perceived Ease of Use,
Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Security and Intention to Use E-Filing: The
Role of Technology Readiness. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and
Business, Volume 7(9), pp. 537–547
United Nations, 2016. For A Livable Climate: Net-Zero Commitments Must
Be Backed by Credible Action. Available online at
https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/net-zero-coalition, Accessed on July 21,
2022
Wang, H., Ma, B., Bai, R., 2019. How Does Green Product Knowledge
Effectively Promote Green Purchase Intention? Sustainability, Volume
11(4), p. 1193
Wang, S., Wang, J., Li, J., Wang, J., Liang, L., 2018. Policy
Implications for Promoting The Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Do Consumer’s
Knowledge, Perceived Risk And Financial Incentive Policy Matter? Transportation
Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Volume 117, pp. 58–69
Whulanza,
Y., 2023. Progressing the Sustainable Mobility: View of Electric Vehicles. International
Journal of Technology. Volume 14(3), pp. 455–459