Published at : 25 Jan 2024
Volume : IJtech
Vol 15, No 1 (2024)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v15i1.6057
Ikhwan Shah Tisadi Tukiat | Sustainable Manufacturing and Recycling Technology (SMART), Advanced Manufacturing & Materials Center (AMMC), Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, |
Nur Kamilah Yusuf | Sustainable Manufacturing and Recycling Technology (SMART), Advanced Manufacturing & Materials Center (AMMC), Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, |
Haikal Khaireez | Sustainable Manufacturing and Recycling Technology (SMART), Advanced Manufacturing & Materials Center (AMMC), Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, |
Sami Al-Alimi | Sustainable Manufacturing and Recycling Technology (SMART), Advanced Manufacturing & Materials Center (AMMC), Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, |
Mohd Amri Lajis | Sustainable Manufacturing and Recycling Technology (SMART), Advanced Manufacturing & Materials Center (AMMC), Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, |
Shazarel Shamsudin | Sustainable Manufacturing and Recycling Technology (SMART), Advanced Manufacturing & Materials Center (AMMC), Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, |
Nasha Emieza Ruhaizat | Sustainable Manufacturing and Recycling Technology (SMART), Advanced Manufacturing & Materials Center (AMMC), Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, |
The
influences of rare earth (RE) samarium (Sm) added contents to ZRE1 (Mg-Zn-Zr)
magnesium (Mg) cast alloy over strength properties to be investigated. Sm at
0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 wt.% were added separately as an alloying element to
ZRE1 alloy. Optical Microscope (OM), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), and
scanning electron microscope Energy-dispersive X-ray (SEM/EDS) were used to
investigate the microstructure of alloy, while mechanical properties
investigated include Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS)and Micro-Hardness (MH)
tests. The result revealed that as the Sm level reached 1.5 wt.%, the grain
size decreased by 20.9 %. Additionally, UTS and Yield Strength (YS) showed
improvements of 8.5 % and 7.9 %, respectively, with the addition of 1.5 wt.% of
Sm. In addition, elongation and hardness have been improved by 32.3 % and 10.9 %
respectively at 1.5 wt.% Sm addition. Mg-Zn-Ce-Sm was formed as a new phase
upon the addition of Sm and was detected via XRD analysis. The addition of Sm
to the ZRE1 alloy had significant effects on the refinement of the material's
microstructure, leading to an increase in its mechanical and physical
properties. Therefore, the new ZRE1-RE magnesium alloy was developed.
Magnesium ZRE1 alloy; Microstructure and mechanical properties; Metal forming and materials refinement
Magnesium (Mg) alloys have great potential as engineering materials
because of their high specific strength, low density, high stiffness, excellent
electromagnetic shielding characteristics, superior damping capacity, and good
machinability (Kristanto, Gusniani, and Ratna, 2015;
Rzychon, Kielbus, and Szala, 2008). Mg alloys have sparked
enormous interest in aerospace, defense, electronics, and automotive industries
in recent years. However, Mg application in engineering is still limited due to
high material cost, poor corrosion resistance as well as low strength,
durability, fatigue life, ductility, toughness, and creep resistance (Purnama et al., 2020; Kiani et al., 2017;
Adrian, 2012). The addition of RE metal to Mg alloy could overcome its weakness
and further improve its properties.
According to (Jahedi, McWilliams, and Knezevic, 2018), the rare-earth elements containing Mg alloys could (i) increase ductility and strength while reducing the anisotropy and tension/compression asymmetry, (ii) higher resistance to creep and corrosion, (iii) improve biodegradability, (iv) reduce flammability, (v) retain high-temperature strength, (vi) improve elongation to fracture, (vii) grain boundary strengthening and (viii) improve fatigue resistance and fracture toughness. Zinc (Zn) is the second most effective and common alloying material to produce Mg alloy after aluminum (Al). The addition of zinc in Mg alloy increases room-temperature strength, increases alloy fluidity in casting, and improves corrosion resistance (Moosbrugger, 2017). In addition, recent research shows that adding RE elements to Mg-Zn alloy can further improve various mechanical and chemical properties. The most common RE metal additions in Mg-Zn alloy are Cerium, Lanthanum, Gadolinium, Neodymium, and Yttrium (Al-Alimi et al., 2021; Materialstechnology, 2019).
ZRE1 is one of
many Mg alloys available in the market nowadays. ZRE1 is an Mg alloy containing
RE metal with the addition of zinc and zirconium, forming Mg-RE-Zn-Zr (Ahmad et al., 2017a). The detailed
chemical composition of the ZRE1 alloy is shown in Table 1. ZRE1 exhibits
superior high-temperature creep resistance (Ferro,
Saccone, and Delfino, 2013) and resistance to stress relaxation compared
to that of benchmark alloy AE42 (Rzychon, Kielbus, and Szala, 2008). The presence of RE in ZRE1 makes the alloy free
of microporosity and holds up to hot cracking, which at the same time offers
good weldability (Ferro, Saccone, and Delfino, 2013).
Currently, ZRE1 is used in the aerospace industry for intermediate casings on
Tay engines, gearboxes of RB211 engines, and gearboxes of Tay engines (Materialstechnology, 2019).
Table 1 Chemical composition of the ZRE1 alloy in wt.% (Rzychon, Kielbus, and Szala, 2008)
Zn |
RE |
Zr |
Ni |
Si |
Cu |
Mn |
Fe |
Mg |
2.7 |
3.18 |
0.53 |
<0.001 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.02 |
0.002 |
balance |
Research by (Ahmad et al., 2017a)
explored the effect of Praseodymium (Pr) addition on the microstructure and
hardness of cast ZRE1 Mg alloy. They reported that 1 wt.% Pr addition on ZRE1
cast alloy reduces the grain size of ZRE1 alloy by around 37%. Meanwhile, the
addition of Pr improves the hardness value of ZRE1 by 24 %. This is due to the
effect of grain refinement and the effect of the second phase (Mg-Zn)12 RE and
intermetallic compound (Mg-Zn-Ce-Pr). In their study, Ahmad
et al. (2016) extended their research to examine the effects of
Gadolinium on the microstructure and hardness of ZRE1 cast alloy. They found
out that the addition of 3 wt.% heavy RE Gadolinium (Gd) reduce grain size by
28% and increased the volume fraction of eutectic secondary phase while at the
same time improving the hardness by 34%.
Samarium (Sm) is one of the RE elements with
huge potential to form Mg alloy. Researchers have been applied Sm as an
alloying element for various Mg alloys for a long time (Guan
et al., 2018). The addition of Sm to Mg alloy could reduce grain
size, improve corrosion resistance, enhance yield strength and ultimate tensile
strength, improve toughness, and at the same time, better elongation to Mg
alloys, as shown in Table 2. However, to the best of our knowledge, researchers
still have not given any attention to the influence of Sm addition on
microstructures and mechanical properties of as-cast ZRE1 alloy. Sm is an
orthorhombic structure with good solid-solution and precipitation strengthening
in Mg alloys (Li, Xu, and Tong, 2019).
Additionally, Sm costs are lower compared to Nd, Y, and Gd in the market (Lucas et al., 2014). Based on the Rare
Earth Metal price, Sm is the cheapest RE of all, only beaten by Ce and La in
price (Institute of Rare Earths and Strategic
Metals eV, 2020). Additionally, Sm is the seventh most abundant RE in
earth’s crust, with 7.1 ppm. Among all earth’s elements, Sm is the 40th most
abundant and widely available than silver, tin, and gold (Enghag, 2004).
Hence, researchers have conducted studies on the
effect of Sm addition to various magnesium systems such as Mg-6.0Zn-0.5Zr alloy
(ZK60) (Guan et al., 2018),
Mg-11Gd-2Y-0.6Al (Chen et al., 2019),
Mg-Al-Zn (AZ61) (Anawati, Asoh, and Ono, 2018; Chen
et al., 2015) Al-Zr-Ce (Kirman, Zulfia, and
Suharno, 2016) and Mg-5Y-2Nd-0.5Zr (Yunwei et
al., 2018). It is found the application of 1.5 wt.% Sm additive in
Mg- 6.0Zn-0.5Zr alloy (ZK60) refined the grains of the as-cast sample, while
the extruded sample shows even finer (Guan et
al., 2018). At the same time, Sm addition further improves the
strength of ZK60 alloy due to fine grain strengthening and precipitation
strengthening. This outcome is consistent with Chen
et al. (2019) findings, where they demonstrated a refined grain
structure and improved tensile strength in the microstructure and mechanical
properties of the Mg-Gd-Y-Sm-Al alloy. This corresponds to a study on the
effects of samarium addition to the AZ61 (Mg-Al-Zn) magnesium alloy, resulting
not only in a refined microstructure but also in improved ultimate tensile
strength and elongation. However, excessive Sm addition could cause the
coarsening of grain, leading to the decline of strength and plasticity (Rady et al., 2019; Al-Alimi, Lajis, and
Shamsudin, 2017).
Table 2 Previous study on RE addition to Mg alloy
Researcher |
Mg alloy |
RE addition |
Result |
Liu et al. (2016) |
Mg-Zn-Zr |
Ce, Y |
Improve YS,
UTS |
Rogal et al. (2019) |
E21 Mg-Gd-Nd-Zn-Zr |
Nd-Y |
Improve YS, plasticity, hardness |
Ahmad et al. (2017a) |
ZRE1
Mg-RE-Zn-Zr |
Pr |
Reduces grain
size, improves hardness |
Ahmad et al. (2016) |
ZRE1 Mg-RE-Zn-Zr |
Gd |
Increased volume fraction, improved
hardness |
Guan et al. (2018) |
ZK60 Mg-Zn-Zr |
Sm |
Improves
strength |
Chen et al. (2019) |
Mg-Gd-Y-Sm-Al |
Sm |
Improved TS, microstructure |
Chen et al. (2015) |
AZ61
Mg-Al-Zn-Mn |
Sm |
Refined
microstructure, improved UTS, EL |
Yunwei et al. (2018) |
Mg-Y-Nd-Zr |
Sm |
Improve UTS, YS and hardness |
Liu et al. (2021) |
AZ41
Mg-Al-Zn-Mn |
Sm |
Improve UTS,
YS and EL |
Rokhlin et al. (2021) |
Mg-Gd |
Sm |
Increase strength |
Samarium also has unique properties that make it useful for various
applications other than as an alloying element in metals. Chauhan, Lohra, and Langyan (2020) found that
ternary samarium (III) complexes exhibit fascinating optical properties, making
them potentially useful in bio-assays, electroluminescent devices, and liquid
lasers. Luo et al. (2019) synthesized
a novel samarium complex that emits red light and has potential as a red light
emitting material for LEDs. Meanwhile Hashmi et
al. (2019) studied the effects of samarium incorporation in ZnO thin
films and found that it affected the optical and electrical characteristics of
the films, making them suitable for use in optical devices for UV and blue
emission. Marzouk and Hammad (2020) found that samarium oxide affects the structural and optical properties
of bismuth glass, making it suitable for photonic applications. Sadeq and Morshidy (2020) showed that samarium
oxide influences the structural, optical, and electrical properties of
alumino-borate glasses, making them good optical filters. Overall, the papers
suggest that samarium has unique properties that make it useful for various
applications in optics, electronics, and materials science.
An Mg base alloy (ZRE1 Mg cast) was supplied
by ILM Ventures Ltd., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia in ingot cast. The base alloy was
melted in an electrical resistance furnace with a steel crucible under a
cover-gas mixture of 99 vol% Argon (Ar) and 1 vol% of Sulfur hexafluoride
(SF6), both from Linde and supplied by Linde Malaysia Sdn Bhd, Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia. Sm from Merck, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia was added in contents of 0.5 wt.%,
1.0 wt.%, 1.5 wt.% and 2.0 wt.% separately as small pieces after the base alloy
melted at approximately 730°C. After the addition, the melt was stirred for
approximately 30 minutes to ensure stabilization, homogeneous composition, and
dissolution of the alloying elements. The molten metal was then poured into a
permanent steel mold preheated to 400°C. The cast was then left to cool down to
room temperature before being removed from the mold. The graphical abstract of
the research methodology and the melt-stir casting setup are shown in Figure 1
and Figure 2, respectively.
Figure 1
All microstructure analysis samples were cut from the center of the cast alloy. The sample was then prepared using the ASTM Standard Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens (ASTM, 2011; Geels et al., 2007) grinding/polishing procedures before final etching with 4 vol% picric acid in ethanol solution. An optical microscope (Nikon Eclipse LV150NL) and image analysis software (IMT i-Solution DT v12.0) was used to measure the grain size and volume fraction. In addition, the specimens were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) (Hitachi SU1510) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) (Bruker D8 Advance) for microstructure study and phase formed in the Mg alloy. A permanent preheated mild-steel mold was used to produce cylindrical tensile test specimens. The melt was neatly poured at 730 ± 5 °C into the preheated permanent steel mold after being skimmed and stirred. The castings were machined using CNC turning to achieve precise specimen dimensions based on the requirement of ASTM B557M (ASTM International, 2015).
Figure 2 Melt-stir casting setup with Argon and SF6 gas shield
XRD analysis was performed on Figure 3 and
the selected specimens to identify the phases present in the ZRE1-xSm alloys;
the results are shown in 1. It can be seen that the base alloy consisted of phase and Mg-Zn-Ce secondary intermetallic phase. The phase was found
in a hexagonal structure, while the secondary phase was a tetragonal structure.
The position of peaks originating from Mg are exactly equivalent to Mg standard
peaks as reported by (Sheggaf et al., 2017;
Wang et al., 2014). phase was found to possess a hexagonal
structure with crystallographic parameters of (a = 3.20936; b = 3.20936;
c = 5.21120) while the Mg-Zn-Ce phase was tetragonal with (a = 3.83100;
b = 3.83100; c = 3.83100) crystallographic parameters. Similar
phases were obtained by other Mg-Zn-Zr with RE addition alloys (Sheggaf et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2016).
Figure 3 XRD pattern of ZRE1-xSM
alloys
Furthermore, the XRD pattern also detected other phases in
the base ZRE1 alloy, which is MgZn2 and Zn2Zr3.
These phases form in small amounts and dissolve inside the Mg matrix of the
base alloy (Sheggaf et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2016). MgZn2 has a
hexagonal crystal structure with crystallographic parameters (a = 5.22250;
b = 5.22250; c = 8.56840) while Zn2Zr3
has a tetragonal crystal structure and (a = 7.63300; b = 7.63300;
c = 6.96500) crystallographic parameters. The addition of the rare
earth element Sm to the ZRE1 base alloy resulted in the detection of the
MgZn(Ce,Sm) phase within the sensitivity limits of XRD, manifesting at the same
peaks as the secondary phase of the ZRE1 base alloy. The emergence of this
MgZn(Ce,Sm) phase indicates the transformation of a new phase from the
secondary phase of the ZRE1 base alloy (Sheggaf et
al., 2017). The new MgZn (Ce, Sm) intermetallic phase has a hexagonal
crystal structure with (a = 14.61900; b = 14.61900; c = 8.70800) crystallographic parameters. Additionally, the Mg-Zn-Sm intermetallic phase
was detected at ZRE1-2.0 Sm alloy at the same peak of MgZn(Ce, Sm). This phase
shows that both phases were crystallized and combined at the alloy grain
boundaries (Sheggaf et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2016). Previous studies also
found the same result, where the MgZnRE phase was formed as a secondary
intermetallic phase (Sheggaf et al., 2017).
The addition of Sm does not change the crystalline size and
shape of before and after adding Sm. Both samples have a hexagonal
structure with crystallographic parameters of (a = 3.20936; b = 3.20936;
c = 5.21120) and structure angle alpha 90o - beta 90o
- gamma 120o. However, there are slight changes in the crystalline
size of the MgZn2 crystal structure. Even though both samples
possess MgZn2 in a hexagonal structure, the size decreases from (a
= 5.22250; b = 5.22250; c = 8.56840) for base ZRE1 alloy to (a
= 5.22100; b = 5.22100; c = 8.56700) . Small changes in the c value
may be due to the addition of Sm, which has a large-sized atom in comparison to
a small atom of Mg, pushing the MgZn2 crystal compound to squeeze
slightly and squish its hexagonal structure size. According to one theory by Ke-Jie et al. (2009), when a solid
solidifies, Sm atoms are squeezed through the solid-liquid barrier, causing
constitutional supercooling and assisting in the development of a nucleus.
Furthermore, the mechanical properties of the material are
mainly caused by the type, distribution, amount, and morphology of the
intermetallic phase (Sheggaf et al., 2017).
The MgZnRE intermetallic phase has a long periodic piling ordered structure and
is coherent with the phase matrix. In Figure 4, the property-making MgZnRE
phase becomes a strengthening mechanism of MgZn alloys, thus improving
mechanical properties (Liu et al., 2016).
The strengthening of Mg alloys is due to the solid solution of the RE atoms in
borderline sizes together with secondary phase hardening of the MgZnRE
intermetallic compound (Yang et al., 2008).
The RE addition to Mg-Zn alloys formed intermetallic phases that improved the
strength of the Mg alloy. This improvement was caused by grain boundary
strengthening of the MgZnRE phase and MgZn (Ce, Sm) phase crystallized along the
grain boundaries. At the same time, the matrix phase and intermetallic phase
form a rigid atomic bonding by obstructing slip dislocation of MG-Zn-RE alloy
planes, thus strengthening the material further (Tekumalla
et al., 2014). Furthermore, both secondary phases, MgZn2
and Zn2Zr3 from ZRE1 base alloy, disappear completely
with the addition of Sm. This may be due to the addition of RE, which reduces
the solubility of Zn in the Mg matrix. As a result, the phases may not develop
or may form in small quantities, potentially beyond the detection limit of the
XRD spectrum (Huang et al., 2009).
Figure
4 shows optical microscopes taken from the ZRE1 base alloy and alloy with Sm
addition. The alloy microstructure consists of matrix (marked A) and
secondary phase crystalline along the grain boundary (marked B). The secondary
intermetallic phase forms in location B are known from XRD data as Mg-Zn-Ce,
MgZn2, and Zn2Zr3. The secondary phase at the
microstructure grain boundary shows massive morphology in a dark contrast
color. The Sm addition to the alloy changes the microstructure of the ZRE1 base
alloy. Similarly, research by (Sheggaf et al.,
2017) and (Kusrini et al., 2021)
showed that ZRE1 base alloys microstructure changes with the addition of Pr.