Published at : 27 Dec 2021
Volume : IJtech Vol 12, No 7 (2021)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v12i7.5360
|Mark Khaykin||Department of Economic Theory, Saint-Petersburg Mining University, 2, 21st Line, St. Petersburg 199106, Russia|
|Olga Toechkina||Department of Foreign Languages, Saint-Petersburg Mining University, 2, 21st Line, St. Petersburg 199106, Russia|
The article deals with the essential nature of a new economic category – “service capital”. Its formation is the logical result of the beginning of the new stage of functioning of economic systems in a post-industrial society. The processes of sustainable development imply global laws governing global economy performance. The authors substantiate the idea that service capital is an economic category and should be studied by modern economic scientists. Most of all, it is connected with institutional theory and is most closely related to institutional capital as a form of manifestation of human capital. Institutional capital is transformed in conditions of an innovative-type service economy and takes the form of service capital. In contrast to institutional capital, it is characterized by some distinctive features discussed in this article. Service capital circulates in the service sector, the importance of which is constantly increasing at all levels of the economy: the mega-, macro-, meso- and microlevels. The article highlights the levels of functioning of service capital. The service capital of each level has sublevels, depending on the criteria chosen for their classification. The authors show that service capital is a special component of human capital. It is inseparable from its bearer, a person, and functions only together with other structural components of human capital. It is established that service capital has been introduced into all branches and sectors of the modern economy, so it functions as intersectoral and interindustry capital. Lastly, the directions of development of the theory of service capital are formulated.
Economic systems servitization; Human capital; Postindustrial economy; Service capital; service sector; Sustainable development
Since the early 1990s, the Russian economy has been transformed according to the global patterns of development of the postindustrial society (Dyatlov, 2016). Some of them should be clarified here.
2. Servitization of social production and consumption. The processes of the servitization of the economy are universal – that is, they are applied to all subjects of the economic life of society, including the end consumer (person), and have spread to several industries. For example, scientists only recently started using the notion “servitization of subsurface resource management” (Vasilenko et al., 2020a). The quality of life of the population in the service economy is largely determined by the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the services produced and consumed, of which the end user is an individual.
3. Russia’s transition to the information stage of socio-economic development. Current research shows that, at present, an “intensive digital transformation” is taking place in many sectors of the Russian economy – for example, the oil and gas complex of Russia (Katysheva and Tsvetkova, 2019; Vasilev et al., 2020) or management (Lyukevich et al., 2020), though digitalization of the Russian economy seems to be a “long-term trend” and its impact on the industry will be seen only after 2025 (Razmanova and Andrukhova, 2020). Information in the modern economy is beginning to perform a multipurpose function (Brynjolfsson and Saunders, 2010; Nedosekin et al., 2019).
4. Innovation of modern production (Hall and Rosenberg, 2010). The intellectual potential of economic entities, the human factor in the decision-making process (including an investment one), the growth of social capital and the efficiency of its use are becoming the determining factors of economic growth (Diebolt and Hippe, 2019). In this case, the “cementing tool” in the processes of the functioning of innovative production is human capital in its broadest, most comprehensive consideration (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, 2017).
In the process of production, development and use of individual and aggregate human capital, the processes of production and consumption of certain services are constantly taking place (Acemoglu and Author, 2012). Any violations or failures in these processes negatively affect the processes of expanded reproduction of human capital. At the same time, the service sector is considered with an extended interpretation. It seems appropriate to consider as services all those informal social interactions of agents of the institutional environment that the representatives of neoclassical economics (as opposed to the institutional ones) do not see as belonging to the field of economic activity (Brožová, 2015). The products mentioned above in the form of services are the result of not only the social interactions of agents but also their economic activities. There are two main reasons for this. First, the decision of agents to make certain interactions is in itself the fact of a certain choice made by them in the use of their own always limited resources (as a way to solve the main problem of the economy). Second, the very fact of performing certain forms and methods of social interaction is always associated with the achievement of certain goals of their participants, which directly or indirectly affect the resource capabilities of the agents of the institutional environment.
The constantly accelerating processes of servitization of economic systems in the context of the development of human capital of society initiate the formation and research of a new category of modern economy such as “service capital”.
The development of the theory of service capital will allow the creation of a conceptual platform for determining the essential role of human capital in the sustainable development of modern society and identifying its new problems and contradictions. Several economic scientists have successfully substantiated a qualitatively new role of human capital in the conditions of the sixth technological order.
In our opinion, the new category of “service capital”, formulated for the first time by the authors of this article, opens a wide path for new research within the framework of theoretical and methodological substantiation of the role of service capital in solving eco- socio-economic problems and developing its tools.
In the context of the increasing intellectualization of production, which occupies a significant place in the service sector, and with the development of the knowledge economy, service capital becomes the most important factor and condition for the sustainable development of eco-socio-economic systems. Resource specialization of the national economy determines the special role of service capital, which ensures the progressive development of the basic component of the mineral resource sector of the economy.
The theory of service capital creates conditions for clarifying the role of the human factor in sustainable development in the context of modern challenges. The existing realities are such that only highly professional key management decisions of a systemic nature in the service sector and with its help are capable and should qualitatively change the economic structure at all its levels: the mega-, macro-, meso- and microlevels.
D., Author, D., 2012. What Does Human Capital Do? A Review of Goldin and Katz’s
the Race between Education and Technology. National
Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper Number 17820, pp. 1–37
Bencsik, A., 2020. Challenges of Management in the Digital Economy. International Journal of Technology, Volume 11(6), pp. 1275–1285
Berawi, M.A., 2020. Managing Nature 5.0: The Role of Digital Technologies in the Circular Economy. International Journal of Technology, Volume 11(4), pp. 652–655
Birchler, U., Bütler, M., 2007. Information Economics. Taylor & Francis
Brožová, D., 2015. Modern Labour Economics: The Neoclassical Paradigm with Institutional Content. Procedia Economics and Finance, Volume 30, pp. 50–56
Brynjolfsson, E., Saunders, A., 2010. Wired for Innovation: How Information Technology is Reshaping the Economy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, 2017. Human Capital Theory: Assessing the Evidence for the Value and Importance of People to Organisational Success. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development
Cherepovitsyn, A., Lipina, S., Evseeva, O., 2018. Innovative Approach to the Development of Mineral Raw Materials of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation. Journal of Mining Institute, Volume 232, pp. 438–444
Diebolt, C., Hippe, R., 2019. The Long-Run Impact of Human Capital on Innovation and Economic Development in the Regions of Europe. Applied Economics, Volume 51(5), pp. 542–563
Dobrinin, A.I., Dyatlov, A.S., Tsyrenova, E.D., 1999. Human Capital in the Transitive Economy: Formation, Evaluation, and Efficiency of Use. Moscow: Nauka
Dyatlov, S.A., 2016. Regulation of the Economy in the Conditions of Transition to Innovative Development. Moscow: INFRA-M
Feigin, G.F., 2015. Global Instability and Strategic Management. Economics and Innovations Management, Volume 6(Part 1), pp. 15–19
Global Innovation Index, 2020. World Intellectual Property Organization. Available Online at https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4514&plang=EN
Hall, B.H., Rosenberg, N. (eds), 2010. Handbook of the Economic of Innovation. Elsevier, Volume 1
Ilinsky, I.V., 2011. Competitiveness of the Human Capital in Russia: State, Problems, Prospects. St. Petersburg: University of Technology and Design
Katysheva, E., Tsvetkova, A., 2019. Economic and Institutional Problems of the Russian Oil and Gas Complex Digital Transformation. STEF92 Technology, Volume 19, pp. 203–208
Khaykin, M., 2007. The Sphere of Services in the Processes of Reproduction of Human Capital. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the St. Petersburg State University of Economics and Finance
Khaykin, M., 2011. Service Capital. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing
Lapinskas, ?., Makhova, L., 2019. Economic Challenges and Problems Related to Natural Resources Management as a Consequence of Human Capital Accumulation. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, Volume 24(5), pp. 138–143
Lyukevich, I., Agranov, A., Lvova, N., Guzikova, L., 2020. Digital Experience: How to Find a Tool for Evaluating Business Economic Risk. International Journal of Technology, Volume 11(6), pp. 1244–1254
Manyika, J., Land, S., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Stamenov, K., Dhingra, D., 2016. Digital Globalization: The New Era of Global Flows. New York, NY: McKinsey Global Institute
Mukhamadeev, I., Makhova, L., Kurilova, A., 2019. The Role of Information Systems for Entrepreneurship Education and Enterprise in Developing Countries. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, Volume 22(1), pp. 546–552
Nedosekin, A., Rejshahrit, E., Kozlovskiy, A., 2019. Strategic Approach to Assessing Economic Sustainability Objects of Mineral Resources Sector of Russia. Journal of Mining Institute, Volume 237, pp. 354–361
Porokhovsky, A.A., 2014. Innovative Approach as the Basis of Modern Economic Development. Regional Economic Journal, Volume 1(5), pp. 5–14
Razmanova, S., Andrukhova, O., 2020. Oilfield Service Companies as Part of Economy Digitalization: Assessment of the Prospects for Innovative Development. Journal of Mining Institute, Volume 244, pp. 482–493
Sasani, A., Rabani, M., Behrooz, A., 2012. Investigating the Effect of Human Capital and Social Capital on Innovation using the Fuzzy AHP Method. New York Science Journal, Volume 5(11), p?. 142–151
Shcherbakova, N., Khaikin, M., 2019. City as an Object of Ecological and Economic Researches: The Example of Russian Cities. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Volume 272(3), pp. 1–13
Sudova, T.L., Spiridonova N.V., 2018. Migration of Human Capital as a Factor of Sustainable Development: A Survey. In: New Challenge of Economic and Business Development – 2018: Productivity and Economic Growth Proceedings, Riga: University of Latvia, pp. 672–683
Sundbo, J., 1998. The Theory of Innovation: Entrepreneurs, Technology and Strategy (New Horizons in the Economics of Innovation). E. Elgar Publishing
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2000. Business and Industry Policy Forum Series: The Service Economy. France: OECD. Available Online at https://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/2090561.pdf
Tsyrenova, A.A., 2006. Development of Human Capital in the Conditions of Transformation of the Institutional Environment. Ulan-Ude: VSSTU Publishing House
Vasilenko, N., 2017. Development of Oil and Gas service as an Organizational Form of Entrepreneurship in the Post-Industrial Economy. Journal of Mining Institute, Volume 227, pp. 597–602
Vasilenko, N., Khaikin, M., Lapinskas, A., 2019. Ways of Achieving the Institutional Equilibrium in the Context of an Emerging Single Digital Space. Studies in Computational Intelligence, Volume 826, pp. 559–567
Vasilenko, N., Khaikin, Kirsanova N., Lapinskas, A., Makhova, L, 2020a. Issues for Development of Economic System for Subsurface Resource Management in Russia through Lens of Economic Process Servitization. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Volume 10(1), pp. 44–48
Vasilenko, N., Linkov, A., Tokareva O., 2020b. The Interaction between Innovative Technologies in the Course of the Institutionalization of the Digital Economy. St. Petersburg, pp. 44–48
Vasilev, Y., Vasileva, P., Tsvetkova, A., 2020. The Study of Spreading Information on Carbon Capture, Utilization and
Storage Technologies in the Social Media. In: 20th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2020, Volume 5.1, pp. 833–839