Published at : 27 Dec 2021
Volume : IJtech
Vol 12, No 7 (2021)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v12i7.5357
Andrey Zaytsev | Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, St.Petersburg, Polytechnicheskaya, 29, 195251, |
Nikolay Dmitriev | Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, St.Petersburg, Polytechnicheskaya, 29, 195251, |
Dmitriy Rodionov | Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, St.Petersburg, Polytechnicheskaya, 29, 195251, |
Tengiz Magradze | Georgian Technical University, 77, M. Kostava Street, Tbilisi 0171, Georgia |
The purpose
of this article is to consider the innovative potential of alternative energy
at the level of an economic entity in the context of increasing the global
significance of the transition to the circular economy. The authors consider
the conceptual provisions of the circular economy and the place of alternative
energy in it, as well as justify the possibility of increasing the level of
innovation through the implementation of "clean" energy development
programs. As an assessment of the innovative potential of alternative energy at
the level of an economic entity, the authors propose an integral model that
takes into account the specified parameters of innovation. To adapt the idea,
the authors chose the enterprise management level, since it is at this level
that the greatest innovative activity which can affect the diffusion of
"circular" innovations is manifested. The article proposes to analyze
the economic entities who implement recycling for the further production of
energy resources. For the parametric integral assessment, the weighting coefficients
of the key performance indicators were set. The analysis of the number of
companies revealed a strong correlation between the integral indicator of
innovation potential and the level of circular energy efficiency.
Alternative energy; Circular economy; Innovative potential; Innovative energy; Innovative development; Renewable energy
The trends of the 21st century are
directly related to the extensive growth of energy resource consumption,
primarily in industrial production, which consumes more than 80% of the world's
energy output (Zhiltsov et al., 2020).
However, this practice causes serious problems with the quality of the
resources used as well as their impact on sustainable development. It is
necessary to be critical of the dominant paradigm of science and technology,
the vision of which does not always correspond to the maintenance of global
sustainability (Azzopardi, 2017). Thus,
sustainable development becomes the main direction of the strategic functioning
of the macroeconomic space, the achievement of which is associated with the
creation of an appropriate innovation potential (Bermejo,
2014).
Over the past two years, the global community has been discussing the threats to and opportunities for energy development in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the emergence of new negative externalities that pose barriers to achieving global sustainable development. It is necessary to highlight the current problems, which include a sharp increase in household waste and other non-recyclable resources. Their use in the energy context has not yet been fully considered in the scientific and practical environments and is ignored in practice by many developing countries (Chen, 2020; Sarkodie and Owusu, 2020). At the same time, innovative development can give significant impetus to the formation of a circular economy and provide a comprehensive approach to the transformation of the ecological and economic space of the territories, creating conditions for reducing not only the volume of waste, but also the negative consequences of traditional energy. The functioning of innovative activities of the business sector based on the principles of sustainable development will lead to the creation of the necessary tools for eco-efficiency and methods of economic management aimed at solving the socio-economic problems of our time in the long term (Witjes and Lozano, 2016).
From the authors’ point of view,
innovation potential is a significant indicator of economic activity, since it
determines the availability of opportunities to modernize and create innovative
infrastructure through the large-scale technological renewal of individual
entities and entire sectors of the national economy (Rudskaia
et al., 2017; Zaborovskaya et al., 2019). Alternative energy, as a
high-tech industry, is able to create a sufficient level of innovation
potential, and its focus on matching the closed-cycle economy will allow to
extract additional energy efficiency from secondary raw materials waste (Murray et al., 2017; Chernysheva et al., 2019).
To date, the adaptive cycles of
ecosystems have been facing serious challenges, which can only be overcome
through innovative means. Circular models should take into account the energy
needs of society, and therefore consider ways to obtain "clean"
energy that does not create negative socio-environmental externalities for the
state and society. Thus, the key goal of this article is to consider the
innovative potential of alternative energy at the level of an economic entity
in the context of the transition to the circular economy. To achieve this goal,
the proposal is to determine the current innovative state of alternative
energy; analyze the conceptual provisions of the circular economy; consider the
place of alternative energy in circular models; and build a model for assessing
the innovative potential of alternative energy enterprises. The solution of the
set tasks will allow us to justify the growth of the level of innovation
through the implementation of "clean" energy development programs and
to identify the key determinants of the construction of the circular economic
system.
As
a result of this research, a comprehensive analysis of alternative energy in
the context of the transition to the circular economy was carried out, which
allowed us to develop the theoretical and practical material of the concept of
the circular economy, which is currently actively popularized in the scientific
and practical environment. In considering the main areas of research regarding
this issue, the authors determined the current state of alternative energy and
its prospects for development, worked out the issues of the circular economy
and the possibility of its acceleration, and also reflected on the place of
alternative energy sources in circular models, which opens the way for expanded
research in this field. Based on the analysis of the perspectives in the
scientific community, a methodology, the essence of which comprised building an
integrated model that allows to assess the innovative potential of alternative
energy at the level of an economic entity, was proposed. The innovative
potential of enterprises allows us to talk about the development of
"clean" ways of obtaining energy resources. It has been proven that
such a practice is in the interests of society and the state, since it can
solve not only regional problems, but also threatening externalities on a
global scale.
The research is partially funded by the
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation under the
strategic academic leadership program 'Priority 2030' (Agreement
075-15-2021-1333 dated 30.09.2021).
Azzopardi, B., 2017. Sustainable
Development in Energy Systems. Sustainable Development in Energy Systems. Springer, Cham, Switzerland
Balashova, E., Sharipova, S., 2019. The Role of Big Data in the
Sustainable Business Strategy. In: Proceedings of the 33rd IBIMA Conference. Granada, Spain,
pp. 8839–8844
Bataev, A.V., 2018. Analysis and Development the Digital Economy in The
World. In: Proceedings of
the 31st IBIMA Conference. Milan, Italy, pp. 61–71
Bermejo, R., 2014. Handbook for a Sustainable
Economy. Handbook for a Sustainable Economy.
Springer Science, New York, USA
Bhattacharyya, S.C., 2019. Energy Economics: Concepts,
Issues, Markets and Governance. Springer, UK
Boulding, K.E., 1966. The Economics of Knowledge and the Knowledge of
Economics. The American Economic Review, Volume 56(1/2), pp. 1–13
Bressanelli, G., Perona, M., Saccani, N., 2019. Challenges In Supply
Chain Redesign for the Circular Economy: A Literature Review and a Multiple
Case Study. International Journal
of Production Research, Volume 57(23), pp.
7395–7422
Chen, S., 2020. What Implications does COVID-19 have on Sustainable Economic
Development in the Medium and Long Terms? Frontiers
of Economics in China, Volume 15(3), pp. 380–395
Chernysheva, N.A., Perskaya, V.V., Petrov, A.M., Bakulina, A.A., 2019.
Green Energy for Belt and Road Initiative: Economic Aspects Today and in the Future.
International Journal of Energy Economics and
Policy, Volume 9(5), pp. 178–185
Common, M., Stagl, S., 2005. Ecological Economics: An introduction.
Ecological Economics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
UK
Detemple, J.,
Kitapbayev, Y., 2020. The Value of Green Energy Under Regulation Uncertainty. Energy Economics, Volume 89(2),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104807
Dmitriev, N.,
Zaytsev, A., Dubanevich, L., 2020. Determining the Strategic Prospects of an
Enterprise by Assessing the Dynamics of its Intellectual Rent. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Volume 16(4), pp. 187–197
Doukas, H., Flamos, A., Lieu, J., 2018. Understanding
Risks and Uncertainties in Energy and Climate Policy: Multidisciplinary Methods
and Tools for a Low Carbon Society. Springer,
Cham
Elder-Vass, D., 2016. Profit and Gift in the Digital Economy.
University Press, Cambridge, UK
Elfani, M., 2011. The Impact of Renewable Energy on Employment in
Indonesia. International Journal of Technology, Volume 2(1), pp. 47–55
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N., Hultink, E., 2017. The
Circular Economy – A New Sustainability Paradigm? Journal
of Cleaner Production, Volume 143, pp. 757–768
Gorovoy, A., Dmitriev, N., Zaytsev, A., 2020. Development of the
Methodology for Calculating the Intellectual Rent of an Industrial Enterprise. In: Proceedings of
the ICICKM. Toronto, Canada, pp. 158–169
Guan, J., Yan, Y., 2016. Technological Proximity and Recombinative
Innovation in the Alternative Energy Field. Research
Policy, Volume 45(7), pp. 1460–1473
Ilchenko, S., Rodionov, D., Zaytsev, A., Dmitriev, N., 2020. Assessing
Intellectual Capital from the Perspective of its Rental Income Performance. International Journal of Technology, Volume 11(8), pp. 1489–1498
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkert, M., 2017. Conceptualizing the
Circular Economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Volume 127, pp. 221–232
Madureira, N.L., 2014. Key Concepts in
Energy. Key Concepts in Energy. Springer, Cham
Mamrayeva, D., Stybaeyeva, A., Tashenova, L., 2018. The Research of
Global Innovation Capital. Economic Annals-XXI, Volume 167(9–10), pp. 4–7
Masi, D., Day, S., Godsell, J., 2017. Supply Chain Configurations in
the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, Volume 9(9),
pp. 1–22
Matos, F., Vairinhos, V., Selig, P.M., Edvinsson, L., 2018. Intellectual Capital Management as a Driver of
Sustainability: Perspectives for Organizations and Society. Springer, Cham
Mikalauskiene, A., Atkociuniene, Z., 2019. Knowledge Management Impact
on Sustainable Development. Montenegrin Journal
of Economics, Volume 15(4), pp. 149–160
Murray, A., Skene, K., Haynes, K., 2017. The Circular Economy: An
Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global
Context. Journal of Business Ethics, Volume 3(1), pp. 369–380
Rudskaia, I., Rodionov, D., Degtereva, V., 2017. Assessment of the Effectiveness
of Regional Innovation Systems in Russia. In: Proceedings of the 29th IBIMA Conference. pp. 3437–3449
Sarkodie, S.A., Owusu, P.A., 2020. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Waste
Management. Environment,
Development and Sustainability, Volume (23),
pp. 7951–7960
Schwarz, P.M., 2017. Energy Economics. Energy Economics. Taylor &
Francis, London, UK
Scott, T., 2013. The Sustainable Business: A Practitioner’s Guide to
Achieving Long-Term Profitability and Competitiveness. 2nd ed.
Routledge, London, UK
Soderbaum, P., 2013. Ecological Economics:
Political Economics for Social and Environmental Development. Ecological
Economics: Political Economics for Social and Environmental Development. Routledge, London, UK
SR15, 2018. Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
SRCCL, 2019. Special Report on Climate Change and Land.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
Vasetskaya, N., Gaevskaia, T., 2019. Digitalization as an instrument
for economic growth. In: Proceedings of the 33rd IBIMA Conference. Granada, Spain,
pp. 8914–8919
Witjes, S., Lozano, R., 2016. Towards a More Circular Economy: Proposing
a Framework Linking Sustainable Public Procurement and Sustainable Business
Models. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Volume 112, pp. 37–44
Woodhead, R., Berawi, M.A., 2020. Value Creation and The Pursuit of
Multi Factor Productivity Improvement. International
Journal of Technology, Volume 11(1), pp. 111–122
Zaborovskaya, O., Kudryavtseva, T., Zhogova, E., 2019. Examination of
Mechanisms of Regional Sustainable Development Strategy as Exemplified by the Leningrad
Region. International Journal of Engineering and
Advanced Technology, Volume 9(1), pp. 5065–5076
Zaytsev, A., Rodionov, D., Dmitriev, N., Faisullin, R., 2020. Building
a Model for Managing the Market Value of an Industrial Enterprise based on
Regulating its Innovation Activity. Academy of Strategic
Management Journal, Volume 19(4), pp. 1–13
Zaytsev, A., Talerchik, S., Dmitriev, N., 2021. Evaluating Rental
Factors of Innovation Sustainability in Russian Regions using Index Methods. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Volume 17(2), pp. 93–103
Zhiltsov, S., Dmitriev, N., Zaytsev, A. 2020. Economic Aspects of the
Need to Develop Green Energy. Business. Education. Law, Volume 53(4), pp. 63–70