Published at : 09 Dec 2021
Volume : IJtech
Vol 12, No 5 (2021)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v12i5.5202
Mohammed Ali Berawi | 1. Departement of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia 2. Center for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Faculty of Engin |
Cantika Rahmalia Putri | Center for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
Mustika Sari | Center for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
Agatha Vania Salim | Center for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
Gunawan Saroji | Center for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
Perdana Miraj | 1. Center for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia 2. Management of Built Environment, Delft University of Te |
To
achieve its vision of becoming a developed and prosperous economy in 2045,
Indonesia focuses on expanding its regional development by developing its six
economic corridors based on each corridor’s potential industries. Therefore,
adequate infrastructure that improves regional connectivity and drives economic
activities should be developed to help accelerate the industrial development in
each economic corridor. This paper examines the financial feasibility of
investing in industrial supporting infrastructure projects and develops
financing and institutional schemes for the implementation of public-private
partnerships to enhance the attractiveness of the projects for the private
sector. The results of life-cycle cost analysis and system dynamics simulation
show that with a required initial cost of USD 254 million and operation and
maintenance (OM) cost of USD 224.29 million, the development is deemed
financially feasible, generating a revenue of USD 872.38 million for a 40-year
concession period. From the 45 cost-sharing scenarios investigated, the optimal
internal rate of return (IRR) value of 15.62% was obtained, with the private
sector covering 64.14% of the initial cost and 73.61% of the OM cost, as well
as gaining 76.62% of the total revenue.
Financing scheme; Industrial development; Infrastructure projects; Public-private partnership
As stated by President Joko Widodo in the Vision of Indonesia 2045, an optimistic goal to become a developed country and the fifth-largest economy in the world has been set for Indonesia when it marks its 100th anniversary of independence in 2045 (Negara and Ramayandi, 2020). To realize this vision, the government has committed to reforming its resource-based economy into an economy based on manufacturing and modern services by investing in equitable infrastructure regional development that is adequate and well-integrated (Tijaja and Faisal, 2014). The development is focused on increasing connectivity with economic growth centers and decreasing disparities among regions
The Master Plan for Acceleration and Expansion of Indonesia's Economic Development (MP3EI) was established by the government to achieve equitable regional development. In this master plan, Indonesia’s regions are divided into six economic corridors, which include the Sumatera Corridor, Java Corridor, Kalimantan Corridor, Sulawesi Corridor, Bali-Nusa Tenggara Corridor, and Papua-Maluku Corridor, with the integration of three essential elements: the development of six economic corridors, improvement of integrated connectivity, and acceleration of the human resource capacity and development of science and technology to support each corridor’s economic activities (Berawi et al., 2020).
Previous research has shown that economic growth is
positively affected by the development of infrastructure assets (Komarova et al., 2014); a higher number of infrastructure assets as well as their higher
quality can reduce income inequality (Calderón and Servén, 2004), which implies that infrastructure development has the potential to
reduce poverty (López, 2003) effectively. These
positive impacts can be attributed to the increased production capacity
prompted by the provision of industrial infrastructure (e.g., factories and
smelters) and the increased ease of mobility and transportation to distribute
commodities and deliver services provided by transportation infrastructure,
such as roads, ports, airports, and docks (Palei, 2015; Snieška and Bruneckiene, 2009).
Despite its positive impacts, infrastructure
development requires a very high financial cost (Hansen et al., 2018). The Indonesian National
Planning Agency/Bappenas (2020)
estimated that the government could only cover 37% of the budget required to
finance infrastructure development. Consequently, there is a financing gap that
needs to be covered by other sources, for example, through partnership with the
private sector, known as the public-private partnership (PPP) scheme.
Research on the industrial development conducted in
these past few years shows that its acceleration could be achieved by
considering the characteristics of competitiveness and the region's potential
resources (Timmer et al., 2011). Several papers have also recommended investment in urban development
and connectivity infrastructure to support industrial development, providing
mobility and accessibility for humans and goods (Azolibe and Okonkwo, 2020; Zhang et al., 2021). However, these studies have not yet developed a project financing
scheme.
One of the key strategies for Indonesia to achieve its vision of being a developed economy by 2045 is through infrastructure development and thereby improving connectivity in the economic corridors to facilitate economic activities. However, as the government experiences budget constraints for funding the required infrastructure development, the involvement of alternative financing sources through a partnership scheme involving the private sector is necessary. The optimal cost-sharing scenario of the PPP financing scheme for industrial infrastructure development in the six economic corridors in Indonesia proposed in this study generated an IRR of 15.62%, which demonstrates that the cost-sharing scheme provides a more optimal financing option with a higher IRR value and equitable allocation of responsibilities and risks.
An institutional scheme for project development was developed to adhere to the proposed financing scheme, which involves planning consultants, JICA, BAPPENAS, National Public Procurement Agency, financial institutions, IIGF, private companies, and state-owned enterprises as the operators of the industries. Synergy among these entities would be required to ensure that the infrastructure projects delivered through the PPP scheme could support Indonesia in realizing its economic development vision for the year 2045. This study encourages further research to consider the social benefits obtained from infrastructure development as a positive externality that increases a project’s financial feasibility.
This
research was supported by the Ministry of Research and Technology, Republic of
Indonesia (NKB-2853/UN2.RST/HKP/05/00/2020).
Azolibe, C.B., Okonkwo, J.J., 2020.
Infrastructure development and industrial sector productivity in Sub-Saharan
Africa. Journal of Economics and Development, Volume 22(1), pp. 91–109
Bank Indonesia, 2021. BI 7-Day (Reverse) Repo Rate. Bank Indonesia. Available
Online at https://www.bi.go.id/en/statistik/indikator/bi-7day-rr.aspx
BAPPENAS, 2020. Public-Private Partnerships Infrastructure Project Plan in
Indonesia 2020
Berawi, M.A., Miraj, P., Sidqi, H.,
2017. Economic Corridor of Industrial Development in Indonesia. In: IOP
Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Volume 109(1)
Berawi, M.A., Nabila, A., Gunawan,
Miraj, P., Rahman, H.A., Berawi, A.R.B., 2018. Analysis of Life Cycle Cost and
Public-Private Partnership in the Development of Walini City as Technology Park.
International Journal of Technology, Volume 9(7), pp. 1469–1479
Berawi, M.A., Susantono, B., Miraj,
P., Sari, M., Saroji, G., Berawi, A.R.B., Sidqi, H., 2020. Accelerating Nation
Competitiveness Through Economic Corridor Development: Indonesia Masterplan
Revisited. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1273
CCIS, pp. 77–100
Blank, L., Tarquin, A., 2013.
Engineering Economy; Seventh Edition. Journal of Chemical Information and
Modeling, pp. 1–645
Calderón, C., Servén, L., 2004. The
Effects of Infrastructure Development on Growth and Income Distribution. Policy
Research Working Paper, Volume 3400,
pp. 1–43
Hansen, S., Too, E., Le, T., 2018.
Lessons Learned from a Cancelled Urban Transport Project in a Developing
Country: The Importance of the Front-End Planning Phase. International
Journal of Technology, Volume 9(5),
pp. 898–909
Kelly, J., Morledge, R., Wilkinson,
S., 2003. Value in Construction. Blackwell Publishing in conjunction
with RICS Foundation
Kim, J., Wi, S., 2019. Delivering
Economic Benefits from Public–Private Partnerships: The Experience of the
Republic of Korea. In A. Deep, J. Kim, & M. Lee (Eds.), Realizing the
Potential of Public–Private Partnerships to Advance Asia’s Infrastructure
Development (p. 359). Asian Development Bank
Komarova, V.N., Zjablova, O.V.,
Denmukhametov, R.R., 2014. An Infrastructure Factor in Regional Competitiveness.
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 5, pp. 1–6
López, H., 2003. Macroeconomics and Inequality.
In Washington DC: The World Bank Processed, pp. 1–29
Mandasari, V., Wahyuni, E.T., 2019.
Infrastructure Development by Public-Private Partnership in Indonesia: A
Systematic Literature Review. CSID Journal of Infrastructure Development,
Volume 2(2), pp. 153–160
Mian, M.A., Vélez-Pareja, I., 2007.
Applicability of the Classic WACC Concept in Practice. Latin American
Business Review, Volume 8(2),
pp. 19–40
Negara, S.D., Ramayandi, A., 2020.
Laying the Foundations for Future Growth Acceleration? Bulletin of
Indonesian Economic Studies, Volume 56(1),
pp. 1–21
Palei, T., 2015. Assessing the Impact
of Infrastructure on Economic Growth and Global Competitiveness. Procedia
Economics and Finance, Volume 23,
pp. 168–175
Piroozfar, P., Pomponi, F., Farr,
E.R.P., 2016. Life Cycle Assessment of Domestic Hot Water Systems: A Comparative
Analysis. International Journal of Construction Management, Volume 16(2), pp. 109–125
Snieška, V., Bruneckiene, J., 2009.
Measurement of Lithuanian Regions by Regional Competitiveness Index. Engineering
Economics, Volume 1(61),
pp. 45–57
Sterman, J.D., 2000. System
Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
Strano, A., Irene De Luca, A.,
Falcone, G., Iofrida, N., Stillitano, T., Gulisano, G., 2013. Economic and Environmental
Sustainability Assessment of Wine Grape Production Scenarios in Southern Italy.
Agricultural Sciences, Volume 4(5B), pp. 12–20
Tijaja, J., Faisal, M., 2014.
Industrial Policy in Indonesia: A Global Value Chain Perspective. In:
The ADB Economics Working Paper Series (No. 411), pp. 1–44
Timmer, M.P., Inklaar, R., OMahony,
M., van Ark, B., 2011. The Industry Origins of Aggregate Growth. Economic
Growth in Europe, pp. 152–188
WACC Expert, 2020. WACC for
Construction and Materials Sector in Indonesia
Yuliawati, E., Hadiwardoyo, S.P.,
Susantono, B., Tjahjono, T., 2015. System Dynamics Model for Airport
Characterization in Hub-and-Spoke Networks. International Journal of
Technology, Volume 6(5),
pp. 733–742
Zhang,
J., Zhang, R., Xu, J., Wang, J., Shi, G., 2021. Infrastructure Investment and
Regional Economic Growth: Evidence from Yangtze River Economic Zone. Land,
Volume 10(3), pp. 1–14