• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 12, No 6 (2021)

Effect of Prior Austenite Grain-Size on the Annealing Twin Density and Hardness in the Austenitic Stainless Steel

Effect of Prior Austenite Grain-Size on the Annealing Twin Density and Hardness in the Austenitic Stainless Steel

Title: Effect of Prior Austenite Grain-Size on the Annealing Twin Density and Hardness in the Austenitic Stainless Steel
Mochammad Syaiful Anwar, Rana K. Melinia, Mayang G. Pradisti, Eddy S. Siradj

Corresponding email:


Cite this article as:
Anwar, M.S., Melinia, R.K., Pradisti, M.G., Siradj, E.S., 2021. Effect of Prior Austenite Grain-Size on the Annealing Twin Density and Hardness in the Austenitic Stainless Steel. International Journal of Technology. Volume 12(6), pp. 1149-1160

162
Downloads
Mochammad Syaiful Anwar 1. Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia 2. Research Center for Metallurgy and Materials, Indon
Rana K. Melinia Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Mayang G. Pradisti Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Eddy S. Siradj Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract
Effect of Prior Austenite Grain-Size on the Annealing Twin Density and Hardness in the Austenitic Stainless Steel

The present study examined the effect of prior austenite grain size on twin density and hardness of austenitic stainless steels (ASS). The 253 MA and 316L ASS were subjected to multi-pass cold rolling to reduce thickness up to 2.3 mm. Subsequently, the rolled steels were heat treated at 1100°C at 0, 900, 1800, 2700, and 3600 seconds in a tubular furnace in a hydrogen atmosphere. At the end of the annealing time, the rolled steel was quenched in the cooled zone of the tubular furnace until it reached room temperature in a hydrogen atmosphere. Then, microstructure observation of ASS was done to identify the austenitic grain size and annealing twin, and a hardness test was performed using the micro-Vickers hardness scale. The line intercept method was used to measure the changes in 253 MA and 316L austenitic grain sizes. ImageJ software was used to measure grain size and twin length. The results showed that austenite grains of both steels grew normally; 253 MA ASS had a lower SFE and K value than 316L ASS, which indicated that 253 MA ASS had sluggish grain growth, smaller grains, more easily formed annealing twins, and higher twin density. The Hall–Petch coefficient, K’, of 253 MA ASS was higher than 316L ASS, which resulted in a higher hardness value. The Sellars, Pande and Hall-Petch models were shown to predict austenite grain sizes, twin density, and hardness in 253 MA and 316L ASS.

253 MA Austenitic Stainless Steel, 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel, Grain Size, Twin Length, micro-Vickers hardness

Introduction

Austenitic stainless steel (ASS) is generally employed in the construction, energy, and medical industries (Jujur et al., 2015). The thickness of this steel can be easily reduced through a deformation process at room temperature. The degree of ASS thickness reduction after cold rolling (CR) can affect the strength and ductility of the steel due to strain hardening and martensite introduced into the microstructure. However, Xu et al. (2018b) found that the increment of the grain-boundary density in the untransformed austenite structure of 316LN ASS after a high degree of CR also contributed to increased strength and decreased ductility. Subsequent annealing at a specific temperature resulted in the recrystallization of the austenite grains, which nucleated from martensite and untransformed austenite, and the grain growth process. Grain size was shown to increase with higher annealing temperature and longer duration, consequently decreasing the strength and the increasing ductility of the steel (Xu et al., 2018a).

Studies have been performed to impede the grain growth of steels under annealing. For example, Liu et al. (2020) found that the precipitation of the M6C pinned in the grain boundaries resulted in sluggish grain growth at a specific annealing temperature. Adabavazeh et al. (2017) found that cerium inclusions in SS400 steels resulted in decreased austenite grain growth during annealing at higher temperatures. Lee et al. (2019) discovered that ferritic stainless steels supplemented with nitrogen at around 200 ppm resulted in minimum grain sizes due to the higher pinning force of Ti-N in grain boundaries. Wu et al. (2018) found high concentrations of vanadium in the Nb-free Cr-Mo-V steels, which caused grain size to decrease. However, abnormal grain-growth behavior occurred due to V-rich M8C7 particles observed after the quenching process. Contrarily, Cr-Mo-V steels with the addition of niobium resulted in a precipitate of several small Nb-C particles, which significantly impacted the grain refinement. Naghizadeh and Mirzadeh (2016) reported that molybdenum content in ASS steels significantly impeded grain development during annealing at higher temperatures.

Additionally, annealing twins formed in austenite grains have been shown to depend on the migration rate of grain boundaries during recrystallization (Poddara et al., 2019). The relationship between annealing twins and grain size in austenitic stainless steels continues to interest researchers due to the presence of various alloy contents in these steels. Wang et al. (2016) clarified that the densities of grain boundaries and annealing twins increased with a small increase in grain sizes, which resulted in decreased shape of the memory effect in Fe-Mn-Si–based shape-memory alloys. Jin et al. (2015) found that the number of annealing twin boundaries of Inconel 718 did not increase with an increase in the average grain size. Bozzolo and Bernacki (2020) demonstrated several differences in twin topologies in microstructure after recrystallization and annealing. They further reported that the role of twins was not only impactful in microstructure evolution, but also affected in-service material behaviors. He et al. (2018) found that high purity Al of 25% reduction has many annealing twins grown in the early stages of recrystallization and then disappeared during grain growth. Jin et al. (2015) showed that incremental annealing twin-boundary densities in pure nickel after recrystallization were affected by prior cold deformation levels and initial grain sizes. Hajizadeh et al. (2014) indicated that that annealing twin densities appearing in brass microstructures decreased with increased grain size, as estimated using the model presented by Pande et al. (1990).

The present research studied the relationship between grain sizes, annealing twins, and the hardness of austenitic stainless steels after cold rolling and subsequent annealing with various annealing times. The aim was to clarify the effect of alloy contents in 253 MA   and 316L ASS on changes in grain sizes, annealing twins, and hardness. The empirical Sellars model was used to predict grain growth. Pande et al.’s model was used to predict the annealing twin densities, and the Hall–Petch model was used to predict the hardness of the austenitic stainless steels.


Conclusion

    To study the effect of prior austenite grain size on the annealing twin density and hardness, cold-rolled 253 MA and 316L ASS were heated at 1100? for various annealing durations. Experimental results indicated that grain size increased with increased annealing time. Normal growth occurred in the austenite grain of both steels. The low SFE and K values in 253 MA ASS resulted in sluggish grain growth, smaller grains, easier formation of annealing twins, and higher twin density than in 316L ASS. Higher Hall–Petch coefficients, k’, in 253 MA ASS caused higher shear modulus as well as hardness value than in 316L ASS. Therefore, the Sellars, Pande, and Hall–Petch models were shown to predict grain growth, twin density, and hardness in both 253 MA and 316L ASS.

Acknowledgement

    The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Ministry of Research and Technology/National Research and Innovation Agency Indonesia and the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) for financial support for PUTI Doktor 2020 with contract number NKB-3355/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2020, as well as LIPI Research with contract number SK 197/H/2019. We would also like to thank PT. Cahaya Bina Baja-Sandvik, who supported the procurement of the stainless steel 253 MA.

References

Adabavazeh, Z., Hwang, W.S., Dezfoli, A.R.A., 2017. Pinning Effect of Cerium Inclusions during Austenite Grains Growth in SS400 Steel at 1300°C: A Combined Phase Field and Experimental Study. Crystals, Volume 7(10), pp. 1–9

Ashtiani, H.R.R., Karami, P., 2015. Prediction of the Microstructural Variations of Cold-Worked Pure Aluminum during Annealing Process. Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Material Science, Volume 5, pp. 1–14

Bozzolo, N., Bernacki, M., 2020., Viewpoint on the Formation and Evolution of Annealing Twins During Thermomechanical Processing of FCC Metals and Alloy. Metallalurgical and Materials Transaction A, Volume 51, pp. 2665–2684

Chen, X.P., Li, L.F., Sun, H.F., Wang, L.X., Liu, Q., 2015. Studies on the Evolution of Annealing Twins during Recrystallization and Grain Growth in Highly Rolled Pure Nickel. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Volume 622, pp. 108–113

Dani, M., Parikin, Dimyati, A., Rivai, A.K., Iskandar, R., 2018. A New Precipitation-Hardened Austenitic Stainless Steel Investigated by Electron Microscopy. International Journal of Technology, Volume 9(1), pp. 89–98

Hajizadeh, K., Tajjaly, M., Emadoddin, E., Borhani, E., 2014. Study of Texture, Anisotropy and Formability of Cartridge Brass Sheets. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Volume 588, pp. 690–696

Hall, E.O., 1951. The Deformation and Aging of Mild Steel: III Discussion of Results. In: Proceeding of Physical Society Section B, Volume 64(9), p. 747

Han, D.W., Liu, F., Jia, D., Qi, F., Yang, H.C., Sun, W.R., Hu, Z.Q., 2015. Effect of Mo Addition on the Grain Growth of IN718 Alloy. Materials Science Forum, Volume 816, pp. 594–600

He, Q., Huang, T., Shuai, L., Zhang, Y., Wu, G., Huang, X., Jensen, D.J., 2018. In-Situ Investigation of the Evolution of Annealing Twins in High Purity Aluminium. Scripta Materialia, Volume 153, pp. 68–72

Huang, Y.-C., Su, C.-H., Wu, S.-K., Lin, C., 2019. A Study on the Hall–Petch Relationship and Grain Growth Kinetics in FCC-Structured High/Medium Entropy Alloys. Entropy, Volume 21(3), pp. 1–13

Ilola, R., Hänninen, H., Kauppi, T., 1998. Hot and Cold Rolling of High Nitrogen Cr-Ni and Cr-Mn Austenitic Stainless Steels. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Volume 7(5), pp. 661–666

Jin, Y., Bernacki, M., Agnoli, A., Lin, B., Rohrer, G., Rollett, A., Bozzolo, N., 2016. Evolution of the Annealing Twin Density during ?-Supersolvus Grain Growth in the Nickel-Based Superalloy Inconel™ 718. Metals, Volume 6(1), pp. 1–13

Jin, Y., Lin, B., Rollette, A.D., Rohrer, G.S., Bernacki, M., Bozzolo, N., 2015. Thermo-Mechanical Factors Influencing Annealing Twin Development in Nickel During Recrystallization. Journal of Materials Science, Volume 50(15), pp. 5191–5203

Jujur, I.N., Joni, S., Bakri, A., Wargadipura, A.H.S., 2015. Analysis of Oxide Inclusions on Medical Grade 316L Stainless Steel using Local Raw. International Journal of Technology, Volume 6(7), pp. 1184–1190

Jung, B., Lee, H., Park, H., 2013. Effect of Grain Size on the Indentation Hardness for Polycrystalline Materials by the Modified Strain Gradient Theory. International Journal of Solids and Structures, Volume 50(18), pp. 2719–2724

Karmakar, A., Kundu, S., Roy, S., Neogy, S., Srivastava, D., Chakrabarti, D., 2014. Effect of Microalloying Elements on Austenite Grain Growth in Nb–Ti and Nb–V Steels. Materials Science and Technology, Volume 30(6), pp. 653–664

Kim, B.N., Hiraga, K., Morita, K., 2003. Kinetics of Normal Grain Growth Depending on the Size Distribution of Small Grains. Materials Transactions, Volume 44(11), pp. 2239–2244

Lee, M.H., Kim, R., Park, J.H., 2019. Effect of Nitrogen on Grain Growth and Formability of Ti-Stabilized Ferritic Stainless Steels. Scientific Reports, Volume 9(6369), pp. 1–11

Liu, Z., Tu, X., Wang, X., Liang, J., Yang, Z., Sun, Y., Wang, C., 2020. Carbide Dissolution and Austenite Grain Growth Behavior of a New Ultrahigh-Strength Stainless Steel. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, Volume 27, pp. 732–741

Meyers, M.A., McCowan, C., 1986. Interface Migration and Control of Microstructure. In: Proceedings of an International Symposium Held in Conjunction with ASM's Metals Congress and TMS/AIME Fall Meeting, Detroit, Michigan, USA, pp. 17–21

Moravec, J., Novakova, I., Sobotka, J., Neumann, H., 2019. Determination of Grain Growth Kinetics and Assessment of Welding Effect on Properties of S700MC Steel in the HAZ of Welded Joints. Metals, Volume 9(6), pp. 1–20

Naghizadeh, M., Mirzadeh, H., 2016. Elucidating the Effect of Alloying Elements on the Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steels at Elevated Temperatures. Metallalurgical and Materials Transaction A, Volume 47(12), pp. 5698–5703

Padilha, A.F., Plaut, R.L., Rios, P.R., 2003. Annealing of Cold-worked Austenitic Stainless Steels. ISIJ International, Volume 43(2), pp. 135–143

Pande, C.S., Imam, M.A., Rath, B.B., 1990. Study of Annealing Twins in FCC Metals and Alloys. Metallurgical Transactions A, Volume 21A, pp. 2891–2896

Poddara D., Chakrabortya A., Kumar R.B., 2019. Annealing Twin Evolution in the Grain Growth Stagnant Austenitic Stainless Steel Microstructure. Materials Characterization, Volume 155, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2019.109791

Song, G., Kaisheng, J., Song, H., Zhang, S., 2019. Microstructure Transformation and Twinning Mechanism of 304 Stainless Steel Tube During Hydraulic Bulging. Materials Research Express, Volume 6(12), pp. 1–12

Sta?ko, R., Adrian, H., Adrian, A., 2006. Effect of Nitrogen and Vanadium on Austenite Grain Growth Kinetics of a Low Alloy Steel. Materials Characterization, Volume 56(4), pp. 340–347

Tucho, W.M., Hansen, V., 2021. Studies of Post-Fabrication Heat Treatment of L-PBF-Inconel 718: Effects of Hold Time on Microstructure, Annealing Twins, and Hardness. Metals, Volume 11(2), pp. 1–19

Varin, R.A., Kruszynska, J., 1987. Control of Annealing Twins in Type 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel. Acta Metallurgica, Volume 35(7), pp. 1767–1774

Wang, G., Peng, H., Zhang, C., Wang, S., Wen, Y., 2016. Relationship Among Grain Size, Annealing Twins and Shape Memory Effect in Fe–Mn–Si Based Shape Memory Alloys. Smart Materials and Structures, Volume 25(7), pp. 1–9

Wang, S.W., Song, H.W., Chen, Y., Zhang, S.H., Li, H.H., 2020. Evolution of Annealing Twins and Recrystallization Texture in Thin?Walled Copper Tube During Heat Treatment. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), Volume 33, pp. 1618–1626

Wu, D., Wang, F., Cheng, J., Li, C., 2018. Effect of Nb and V on Austenite Grain Growth Behaviour of the Cr-Mo-V Steel for Brake Discs. High Temperature Material and Process, Volume 37(9–10), pp. 899–907

Xu, D., Ji, C., Zhao, H., Ju, D., Zhu, M., 2017. A New Study on the Growth Behavior of Austenite Grains During Heating Processes. Scientific Reports, Volume 7(1), 3968

Xu, D., Wan, X., Yu, J., Xu, G., Li, G., 2018a. Effect of Cold Deformation on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Austenitic Stainless Steel. Metals, Volume 8(7), pp. 1–14

Xu, D.M., Li, G.Q., Wan, X.L., Misra, R.D.K., Zhang, X.G., Xu, G., Wu, K.M., 2018b. The Effect of Annealing on the Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Properties in Phase Reversed 316LN Austenitic Stainless Steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Volume 720(10), pp. 36–48

Zhou, W., Zhu, J., Zhang, Z., 2020. Austenite Grain Growth Behaviors of La-Microalloyed H13 Steel and Its Effect on Mechanical Properties. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Volume 51, pp. 4662–4673