Published at : 09 May 2023
Volume : IJtech
Vol 14, No 3 (2023)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v14i3.5116
Zulkarnain | Industrial Technology of Printing and Packaging, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Depok, 16425, Indonesia |
Machfud | Agroindustrial Engineering, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia |
Marimin | Agroindustrial Engineering, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia |
Emmy Darmawati | Mechanical and Biosystem Engineering, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia |
Sugiarto | Agroindustrial Engineering, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia |
There
are still many micro-business actors who package their products with the appearance
of less attractive packaging. However, it is not easy for micro-business actors
to create product packaging ideas that is able to be accepted by the broad
market. This study aimed to determine the attributes of packaging labels,
determine the most influential graphic elements, and generate tone and manner
for label specialty coffee packaging. Label attribute was analyzed with FAST
and Pairwise Comparison methods. The graphic element was analyzed with the QFD
method. The visual perception was analyzed with the Mind Mapping method
quantified by the PCA method. It was concluded that experts expect more product
information clarity and the impression of premium products on coffee packaging
labels. In addition, experts also expect convenience in reading the information
needed on packaging labels. Based on graphic element analysis, the priorities
of the graphic element of packaging were 1) identity of the coffee product; 2)
text hierarchy; 3) color labels; and 4) typical label style. The must-have tone
and manner for specialty coffee packaging labels were familiar (friendly),
premium, simple, and special.
Graphic concept; Packaging labels; PCA; QFD; Specialty coffee
Packaging is one of
the problem’s solutions to attract consumers because it deals with consumers
directly (Natadjaja, 2007). An attractive
visual image of packaging is bount to be noticed, easily recognized, and
recalled by consumers. Reimann et al. (2010)
stated that packaging aesthetics significantly increased consumer reaction
time. Meanwhile, Clement, Kristensen, and
Grønhaug (2013) state
that consumers had fragmented visual attention when shopping and that their
visual attention was influenced and disrupted simultaneously by shelf displays.
The overall view (packaging appearance, branding, and prices) of coffee
packaging is considered during the consumer purchase process (Harith, Ting, and Zakaria 2014). This means that the packaging has the
role of conveying messages from producers to consumers and also as advertising
media (marketing).
Every business actor has his own
message for his customers. Labels on the packaging are used as a media of
communication with consumers. The label is the identity of a product as well as
the corporate identity because, in it, there are the contents that must be well
conveyed to consumers (Hidayat, 2009).
Therefore, it is very important that the packaging design creates an
emotional bond to the consumers at the first time (Harith, Ting, and Zakaria, 2014).
Based on previous research
searches, there were packaging design research that have the basis of packaging
attributes (Ježovi?ová, Tur?ínková, and
Drexler, 2016; Krstic, 2014; Sinaga, Evanila, and
Dewi, 2012) and packaging elements (Djatna and Kurniati, 2015; Poturak, 2014; Deliya and Parmar, 2012; Qing et al.,
2012; Orth and Malkewitz, 2008). However, no research has been found
that integrates packaging attributes and packaging design elements in a
packaging design process, so this is a contribution to this research.
Integration of the two is important to be able to meet the needs of consumers
and generate creative ideas in the packaging design process. The packaging
attribute in question is the characteristic that characterizes a package, while
what is meant by the design element is an important part or element of a
package (such as color, typography, or image).
In addition, based on
previous research traces also found engineering design approach (Djatna and Kurniati, 2015; Suzianti et al., 2015;
Parada, Mayuet, and Gámez, 2019)
and graphic design approach (Hariono and
Zaini, 2017; Halder, Ganguly, and Singh 2016;
Hidayat and Wahmuda, 2013). The engineering design approach has
more certain, rational, and objective properties, while the graphic design
approach has subjective and emotional properties. However, no research was
found that integrated the engineering design approach and graphic design
approach, so the integration of the two approaches in the packaging design
process contributed to this research.
The object of this research
is specialty coffee packaging on the micro-scale industry in Indonesia. Aknesia, Daryanto, and Kirbrandoko (2015) state that specialty coffee is coffee that has been processed through
various stages of strict processing, that gives it premium quality, have a
distinctive taste according to its origin. The origin of the coffee area
certainly offers certain quality features and specifications (Arrieta, Núñez, and Mendoza, 2020). Some types of specialty coffee in Indonesian are Mandailing and Lintong
Coffee (Sumatera Utara), Gayo Mountain Coffee (Aceh), Java Arabica Coffee (Jawa
Timur), Bali-Kintamani Coffee (Bali), Toraja and Kalosi Coffee (Sulawesi
Selatan), Flores-Bajawa Coffee (NTT), Baliem Coffee (Papua), and Luwak Arabica
Coffee (Sudjarmoko, 2013).
Good coffee packaging has a
tendency to make customers opinion that the coffee product is high quality and
processed through a good processing mechanism. Consumer buying interest is
increasing in more modern packaging (Corso and
Benassi, 2015). In addition, consumers also choose products that have
packaging standards, even though the prices are higher than other products (Reimann et al., 2010). Therefore, the
micro-scale industry must improve its product packaging so that it attracts
more customers and able to be sold to supermarkets (Pramono,
Iqbal, and Wulandari, 2015).
The development of a good
and attractive packaging label design is still a problem for specialty coffee
micro businesses. Some problems encountered including (1) micro business actors
do not understand the packaging label attributes that are most decisive, to
make it easier and inexpensive to apply, (2) they do not understand the visual
identity that needs to be given to the packaging label, and (3) it is not easy
to create the right packaging character.
Based on the aforementioned
problems, this study aims to determine the attributes of the packaging label; to
determine the most influential graphic elements, and to generate the tone and
manner of the packaging design, where the tone and manner are a set of values,
personality, characters that are expected to trigger consumer buying decisions.
2.1. Research Framework
The term label in this research is part
of the packaging affixed to the packaging in the form of images or writings
that function as information about the product and seller, while the graphic
element is an important part of graphic design that has its own meaning and
message. Label attributes and graphic elements of the Specialty Coffee
packaging were determined by considering the suitability between the insight of
customer, business actors, and packaging design experts. Examples of label attributes
are good readability, good label printing, clear product information, and so
on. While examples of graphic elements are the identity of coffee products,
label colors, regional cultural imagery, and so on.
The visual perception was generated by looking at the results of the analysis of design elements and a number of samples of the labels that already existed. The visual perception in question is consumer perception of packaging visually. Some packaging samples is able to be seen in Figure 1. Analysis of label attributes is needed to determine the main properties required for a package, while graphical element analysis is needed to find out the most important part needed in the package. While the analysis of visual perception is done to obtain tone and manner, which in the end is a graphic concept model. These three things should be known by business actors in designing their product packaging. This research framework is able to be seen in Figure 2.
Figure 1 Coffee packaging samples
Figure 2 Research
framework
2.2. Data Collection Method
Data collection methods are adjusted
according to the needs of the analysis, as shown in Table 1. A set of
instruments was arranged in a way to facilitate the process of data collection
and analysis.
In the early stages, field observations
were conducted on 21 consumers, 7 business actors, and 1 expert to get an
overview of the packaging of specialty coffee that is on the market. The
intended consumers are coffee connoisseurs who have good knowledge of specialty
coffee, while business actors are those who play a direct role in the
processing and packaging of specialty coffee, and the intended experts are
packaging design experts. Data collection was done in several ways:
1) Study literature based on packaging
literature related to label attributes and graphic elements.
2) Questionnaire I, to obtain expert judgment
toward label attributes and HOQ matrix. Five experts were selected based on
educational, professional, and experience. These experts are coffee (observer)
consumers, business actors, academicians, researchers, and packaging design practitioners.
3) Brainstorming consists of 2 stages. Phase
I was carried out to absorb as many as possible visual perception words from 27
participants, while Phase II was carried out to evaluate visual perception
words by 5 participants whose output was a semantic differential questionnaire.
4) Questionnaire II, to obtain packaging
assessment based on visual perception words conducted through questionnaires to
30 respondents (general consumers) by purposive sampling. The determination of
respondents based on criteria that influences the purchase of coffee consisting
of habits, education, income, and employment (Utami,
2009). There were 16 coffee packaging samples assessed. Data
recapitulation of the average value of the results of the visual perception
assessment of 16 packaging samples was processed using Minitab 16 software.
Table 1 Data used
Analysis |
Data |
Source |
How to obtain data |
- |
·
Packaging attribute data |
·
Expert ·
Specialty coffee consumers ·
Coffee business actors |
·
Field observations ·
Literature ·
Discussion and interview |
Label attribute analysis |
·
Label attribute assessment data |
Expert |
·
Survey (questionnaire) |
Graphical element analysis |
·
Assessment data of HOQ matrix of
packaging label |
Expert |
·
Survey (questionnaire) |
Visual perception analysis |
·
Consumer perception data ·
Data on consumer perception ratings |
Consumer general |
·
Brainstorming ·
survey (questionnaire) |
2.3. Data Analysis Methods
1) Determination
of Packaging Label Attributes
The Function Analysis System Technique
(FAST) was used to describe the results of the identification of packaging
label attributes. The identification was based on literature, interviews of
Specialty Coffee business actors (producers), and consumers. The results of the
identification obtained were communicated to the expert for validation
purposes. For weighting, three experts assessed the packaging label attributes.
The results of the assessment were aggregated with the average geometry, then
calculated by the Pairwise comparison method.
2) Determining
Graphic Elements
Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is
used to translate customer requirements into product elements (Hartono, Santoso, and Prayogo, 2017). QFD approach through the HOQ (House of
Quality) matrix was used to generate priority for graphic elements.
Identification of graphic design elements was done by conducting interviews
with 7 coffee shop business actors. The HOQ connected label attributes and
graphic elements to Specialty Coffee product packaging labels. The assessment
on HOQ was carried out by representatives of expert consumers, Specialty Coffee
business actors, and packaging design experts. The score is as follows: score 0
means there is no relationship, score 1 means a weak relationship, score 3
means a medium relationship, and score 9 means a strong relationship.
3) Determination of Visual
Perceptions
Based on a number of
priority graphic elements, as many visual perception words were generated as
possible with the mind mapping method. Mind mapping is a popular technique for
visualizing relationships among various concepts using meaningful radial
displays (Vitulli and Giles, 2016). In this
method, visual perception words were generated by writing them radially. These
words could have any relationship (no restrictions). Relationships could be
obtained such as cause and effect, synonyms, antonyms, identical,
characteristics, and others.
The Mind Mapping process was
done by brainstorming, and the end result was a semantic differential
questionnaire. Respondents filled out the questionnaire by giving a value to a
number of pairs of visual perception words for each packaging label. The rating
scale was -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3. The -3 value was the value that had the
strongest tendency towards visual perception on the left side, while the value
3 was the value that had the strongest tendency towards visual perception on
the right side. A value of 0 was a value that did not have a tendency to visual
perception, both towards the word perception on the left and right segments.
From the assessment of a number of respondents, then the average was calculated
on each word of visual perception and each sample. This average rating was used
as input in data processing using the Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
method.
In this research, the
application of the PCA method used Minitab 16 software. The purposes of
applying the PCA method were 1) to find or reduce the dimensions of the
dataset; 2) to obtain meaningful new basic variables (Paul,
Suman, and Sultan, 2013). Furthermore, Karamizadeh et al. (2013) mentioned that
PCA was a tool to reduce multidimensional data to lower dimensions but still
retained most of the information.
Assessment of visual
perception words was carried out by 30 respondents with data collection methods
by purposive sampling based on criteria influencing the purchase of coffee,
namely habits, education, income, and employment. Visual perception word
assessment data was processed so that it generated the tone and manner that
would be used in the packaging design process.
3.1. Packaging Label Attribute Analysis
The results of expert
judgment calculation in the form of weight. The value of Consistency Ratio
obtained was 0.05. The Consistency Ratio values below 0.1 indicated that the assessment
of the attribute ratio of the experts was consistent. Based on the weighting of
each attribute, the three main attributes that the experts assessed were: 1)
informing the product clearly (0.257); 2) giving an impression of quality
products (0.166); 3) providing good readability (0.156). The results of this
analysis indicate that experts expect more product information clarity and the
impression of premium products on coffee packaging labels. In addition, experts
also expect convenience in reading the information needed on packaging labels.
3.2. Graphic Element Analysis
According to Rusko et al. (2011), graphic elements
consist of typography, color, and image. Typography (information), color, and
image play a key role in decision-making and ensure consumer attention (Ksenia, 2013). Furthermore, Mohebbi (2014) states that graphic elements play a
key role in promoting sales. Typography, color, and image are extracted through
discussions with producers (Specialty Coffee business actors) and then validated
by experts. Typography is one element that has a significant influence (Grobelny and Michalski, 2015). Typographic
elements generated elements using Bahasa Indonesia, text hierarchy, coffee
product identity, company name information, information on how to brew,
information on how to store, product physical information, and weight
information. Color elements generated label color elements. Image elements
generated regional cultural image elements and typical label styles.
The weight of the label attribute was
obtained from the results of the label attribute analysis. Based on the results
of calculations on HOQ, priority was obtained on the packaging graphic
elements: 1) coffee product identity; 2) text hierarchy; 3) color label; 4)
typical label style; 5) weight information; 6) company name information; 7)
product physical information; 8) Bahasa Indonesia; 9) information on how to
present; 10) information on how to storage; and 11) regional cultural image. In
(Figure 3) a House of Quality label for Specialty Coffee product packaging is
presented.
The element
"coffee product identity" fulfilled all the attributes of the label
with the relationship value = 9, except for the "get low cost"
attribute that had a relation value = 1. The "text hierarchy" element
fulfilled all the label attributes, except the "obtaining cheap packaging
costs" attribute. Furthermore, the "label color" element met all
attributes, but it is the third priority.
The element of "coffee product identity" became an element with first priority because it was the most important element so that it could be distinguished from other products or brands. The second priority was the "text hierarchy" element which guides the customer to read flow. Thus, this could strengthen the message conveyed. The third priority was the "color label" element to make it easier for consumers to remember their products. The "typical label style" element was more intended to adjust to target preferences.
Figure 3 HOQ for
packaging label
3.3. Visual Perception Analysis
Four priority graphic
elements used in mind mapping methods were coffee product identity, text
hierarchy, label color, and typical label style. Mind mapping is very useful in
design work because it is very effective to work through the important steps of
the design process, such as collecting thoughts, generating ideas, entering the
creative flow, and connecting words to images (Airey,
2010). Graphic elements were developed into visual perception words for
16 samples of Specialty Coffee packaging labels that had been selected. The
selection of product samples was based on graphic designs that had characters
and differentiated from each other. The label samples were Northsider, Café
Bamba, Noah Barn, Gustavo, Tobi's, Black Mountain Roast, Java Tilu, Coffee
Circle, Coffindo, Borneo Roasters, Kopakaki, Never Ending, Coffee Gardens,
Malabar Mountain Coffee, Otten Coffee, Cafe Tellus.
Phase I brainstorming positioned "Specialty Coffee packaging labels" at its center. Then a branch was formed which began with "coffee product identity", "text hierarchy", "label color", and "typical label style". Words of visual perception were raised from these branches. One by one the visual perception was written and connected. For example, the "label color" appeared to be related to "dynamic", and "dynamic" appeared to be associated with "expensive". The results of mind mapping are shown in (Figure 4).
Figure 4 Mind
mapping of visual perception
Phase
II brainstorming, visual perception words appearing in mind mapping, was
arranged to be 25 pairs of visual perception words then validated by a
packaging design expert. Then, 25 pairs of words were namely 1) smooth &
rough (hard); 2) economical & expensive; 3) little color & many colors;
4) young & adults; 5) feminine & masculine; 6) mild & complex; 7)
ancient & modern; 8) rigid & flexible; 9) classic & trendy; 10)
general & typical; 11) conservative & dynamic; 12) illustrative &
photography; 13) cheerful & serious; 14) natural & artificial; 15) standard
& superior; 16) dark & bright; 17) vintage & innovative; 18) simple
& luxurious; 19) ordinary & attractive; 20) regular coffee &
special coffee; 21) abstract & clear (realist); 22) plain & artistic;
23) dimension & flat; 24) inclusive & exclusive; 25) conventional &
classy.
Interpretation of PC loading Table 2, by
looking at the highest value on PC1, PC2, PC3, and PC4. This study takes a
minimum limit of 0.200, assuming the correlation needed on the word visual
perception is sufficient to form tone and manner. The highest value range on
PC1 is in the words of visual perception: general, inclusive, and cheerful
(fun). On PC2, the highest value is found in the words of perception:
minimalist, expensive, bright, dynamic, modern, and superior. Meanwhile, the
word perception group on PC3 is trendy, abstract, economical, and ordinary. The
perception words on PC4 are young, unique, and luxurious.
3.4. Graphic Concept Model
The visual perception word
group on PC1, PC2, PC3, and PC4 is represented by 4 keywords based on expert
opinions on graphic design and packaging design. These four keywords are called
tone and manner which serves as an important guide in designing specialty
coffee packaging labels. This tone and manner are translated into moodboards in
the form of color, typography, image, layout, and others in the next process.
The blend of principal components, visual perceptions, and tone and manner
forms a graphic concept model, as shown in Figure 5. PC1 has the highest
eigenvalue, which is 13,969 with a proportion of 27.9% which means that PC1 is
the main tone and manner. PC2 has an eigenvalue of 12.025 with a proportion of
24.1% which means that PC1 becomes the second main tone and manner. Then the
next sequence is PC3 by 20.3%, and PC4 by 16.1%.
Table 2 PC loading value
No |
Variable |
PC1 |
PC2 |
PC3 |
PC4 |
|
No |
Variable |
PC1 |
PC2 |
PC3 |
PC4 |
1 |
smooth |
0.051 |
-0.256 |
0.044 |
0.135 |
|
26 |
serious |
0.179 |
-0.032 |
-0.124 |
-0.139 |
2 |
rough (hard) |
0.177 |
-0.001 |
-0.141 |
-0.179 |
|
27 |
natural |
0.031 |
-0.188 |
0.172 |
0.177 |
3 |
economical |
0.009 |
-0.067 |
0.259 |
-0.164 |
|
28 |
artificial |
0.051 |
-0.185 |
-0.189 |
-0.036 |
4 |
expensive |
0.132 |
0.210 |
-0.015 |
0.112 |
|
29 |
standard |
-0.131 |
-0.206 |
0.111 |
0.048 |
5 |
little color |
0.137 |
0.095 |
0.115 |
0.162 |
|
30 |
superior |
0.082 |
0.255 |
0.097 |
-0.047 |
6 |
many colors |
-0.202 |
-0.090 |
-0.024 |
-0.198 |
|
31 |
dark |
0.196 |
-0.173 |
0.066 |
-0.068 |
7 |
young |
0.128 |
-0.130 |
-0.068 |
0.236 |
|
32 |
bright |
-0.175 |
0.212 |
-0.023 |
-0.057 |
8 |
adults |
0.162 |
0.046 |
-0.121 |
-0.064 |
|
33 |
vintage |
0.027 |
-0.160 |
-0.231 |
-0.013 |
9 |
feminine |
0.035 |
-0.186 |
0.089 |
-0.211 |
|
34 |
innovative |
-0.204 |
0.069 |
-0.032 |
-0.209 |
10 |
masculine |
0.031 |
0.075 |
0.125 |
-0.099 |
|
35 |
simple |
-0.053 |
0.002 |
0.167 |
-0.289 |
11 |
minimalist |
0.049 |
0.200 |
0.114 |
0.021 |
|
36 |
luxurious |
-0.051 |
0.160 |
-0.052 |
0.266 |
12 |
complex |
-0.249 |
-0.054 |
0.056 |
-0.020 |
|
37 |
ordinary |
0.045 |
-0.068 |
0.299 |
-0.003 |
13 |
ancient |
0.111 |
-0.108 |
-0.044 |
0.078 |
|
38 |
attractive |
-0.229 |
-0.079 |
0.015 |
0.153 |
14 |
modern |
0.009 |
0.217 |
0.111 |
-0.136 |
|
39 |
regular coffee |
-0.114 |
-0.047 |
-0.136 |
-0.274 |
15 |
rigid |
0.013 |
0.074 |
-0.300 |
0.050 |
|
40 |
special coffee |
-0.166 |
0.012 |
-0.180 |
0.162 |
16 |
flexible |
-0.189 |
-0.150 |
0.009 |
-0.112 |
|
41 |
abstract |
-0.120 |
0.097 |
0.227 |
0.136 |
17 |
classic |
0.033 |
-0.248 |
-0.076 |
0.041 |
|
42 |
clear (realist) |
0.116 |
0.090 |
-0.257 |
0.063 |
18 |
trendy |
-0.169 |
-0.087 |
0.218 |
0.057 |
|
43 |
plain |
0.062 |
-0.233 |
-0.050 |
-0.031 |
19 |
general |
0.206 |
0.138 |
0.069 |
-0.105 |
|
44 |
artistic |
-0.225 |
-0.016 |
-0.132 |
-0.019 |
20 |
typical |
-0.132 |
0.121 |
-0.073 |
0.242 |
|
45 |
dimension |
-0.077 |
0.161 |
-0.160 |
-0.203 |
21 |
conservative |
-0.195 |
0.056 |
-0.126 |
-0.177 |
|
46 |
flat |
0.064 |
0.185 |
-0.214 |
-0.043 |
22 |
dynamic |
-0.153 |
0.213 |
0.052 |
-0.109 |
|
47 |
inclusive |
0.238 |
0.002 |
0.024 |
-0.139 |
23 |
illustrative |
-0.201 |
-0.072 |
-0.090 |
0.137 |
|
48 |
exclusive |
-0.089 |
0.175 |
0.146 |
0.161 |
24 |
photography |
0.199 |
0.077 |
0.090 |
0.169 |
|
49 |
conventional |
-0.066 |
0.014 |
-0.261 |
0.135 |
25 |
cheerful |
0.257 |
-0.023 |
-0.036 |
-0.080 |
|
50 |
classy |
0.040 |
0.177 |
0.045 |
0.032 |
Description: PC1 =
principal component 1; PC2 = principal component 2; PC3 = principal component
3; etc.
Visual perception words on
PC1 are general, inclusive, and cheerful (fun). PC2 consists of visual
perception words: minimalist, expensive, bright, dynamic, modern, and superior.
While on PC3 it consists of visual perception words: trendy, abstract,
economical, and ordinary. Finally, PC4 consists of visual perception words:
young, typical, and luxurious. The collection of words of visual perception on
each PC is represented by a word tone and manner.
The results of discussions
with experts, that visual perception words on PC1, PC2, PC3, and PC4 are
represented in a row are familiar (friendly), premium, simple, and special.
Visual perception words: general, inclusive, and cheerful (fun) are represented
by a familiar word which is the first tone and manner of concern because it has
the largest proportion (27.9%). Visual perception words: minimalist, expensive,
bright, dynamic, modern, and superior are represented in premium words. Visual
perception words: trendy, abstract, economical, and ordinary are represented in
a simple word. Visual perception words: young, typical, and luxurious are
represented in a special word.
3.5. Discussion
Some things that must be
considered in designing a label (graphic) specialty coffee packaging based on
the results of this study are as follows:
1)
The identity of
coffee products is a top priority, meaning that these elements must appear
dominant so that consumers are able to easily see them. In addition, the
identity element of coffee products is also useful so that they are able to be
distinguished from coffee products or other brands. Coffee product identity
usually consists of information on product name, coffee's geographical origin,
planting height, varieties, coffee processing, specific plantations, coffee
flavor, roasting level, roasting date, and physical product.
2)
The text
hierarchy is the element that guides consumers to the flow of reading. Text
(information) must be distinguished between the main information and supporting
information, then determined the order of information needed by consumers.
Thus, this is able to strengthen the message delivered.
3)
Label colors
must be optimized to make it easier for consumers to read products, build
aesthetic and attractive perceptions, and build an impression of product
quality.
4)
The style of
coffee packaging labels must be made distinctive. This is more intended to
adjust to the target preferences.
Figure 5 Graphic concept
model for Specialty Coffee packaging labels
Good packaging must have the
right character. This character is in the form of a series of adjectives which
are usually called tone and manner. These adjectives (tone and manner) guide
the packaging visualization such as color selection, typography, images, and
other visual elements. Based on the results of the study obtained tone and
manner of specialty coffee packaging are familiar (friendly), premium, simple,
and special. The nuances that have to be more dominant are familiar and
premium. This is very important in designing packaging so that it is able to
create emotional attachment in the minds of consumers at first glance (Harith, Ting, and Zakaria, 2014).
The tone and manner in the
results of this study is able to be used for market areas in Indonesia because
this study has respondents who come from various regions in Indonesia and use
packaging samples in Indonesia. However, the visualization of packaging labels
in each region is able to be different because in translating the tone and
manner of the words (familiar, premium, simple, special) are influenced by the
visualizer and each culture.
Attractive
product packaging is bound to be noticed and easily recognized by consumers.
Packaging has the role of conveying messages from producers to consumers as
well as advertising media (marketing). Advertising media on Specialty Coffee
packaging is generally located on the packaging label. A good packaging label
started with the right label attributes, graphic elements, and tone and manner.
Around the 7 label attributes for Specialty Coffee packaging, three of the most
influential label attributes were identified: 1) informing the product clearly;
2) giving an impression of quality products; and 3) providing good readability.
The most influential graphic elements were coffee product identity, and text
hierarchy. label color, and typical label style. The identity of coffee
products must appear dominant so that it is easily seen by consumers. The
identity of coffee products usually consists of information on the product
name, geographical origin of coffee, planting height, variety, coffee
processing, specific plantation, coffee taste, roasting level, roasting date,
and physical product. Text hierarchy to distinguish between main information and
supporting information. Thus, it is able to strengthen the message conveyed.
The color of the label must be optimized to make it easier for consumers to
read the product, build an aesthetic and attractive perception, and build an
impression of product quality. The style of the coffee packaging label must be
unique. It is more intended to adjust to the preferences of the target. The
tone and manner that must be built for Specialty Coffee packaging labels were
familiar (friendly), premium, simple, and special. This research provides an
overview of how to produce tone and manner for specialty coffee packaging
labels that begin with label attributes, graphic elements, and visual
perception. For other packaging design research, it is able to use a series of
design processes and methods in this research. Further research is able to be
done by designing programs/applications that is able to interpret a collection
of words (text mining) into tone and manner words.
Airey, D., 2010. Logo Design Love: A Guide to Creating Iconic
Brand Identities. New Riders, USA
Aknesia, V., Daryanto, A., Kirbrandoko, 2015. Business Development
Strategy For Specialty Coffee. Indonesian
Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, Volume 1(1), pp. 12–22
Arrieta, A.A., Núñez, Y.E., Mendoza, J.M., 2020. Mini-Electronic
Tongue Used To Discriminate Between Coffee Samples Of Different Geographical
Origin. International Journal of
Technology, Volume 11(2), pp. 288–298
Clement, J., Kristensen, T., Grønhaug,
K., 2013. Understanding Consumers’ In-Store Visual Perception: The Influence of
Package Design Features on Visual Attention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Volume 20(2), pp.
234–239
Corso, M.P., Benassi, M.D.T., 2015. Packaging Attributes of Antioxidant-Rich
Instant Coffee And Their Influenc.E On The Purchase Intent. Beverages, Volume 1, pp. 273–291
Deliya, M.M., Parmar, B., 2012. Role of Packaging on Consumer
Buying Behavior–Patan District. Global
Journal of Management and Business Research, Volume 12(10), pp. 48–67
Djatna, T., Kurniati, W.D., 2015. A System Analysis and Design For
Packaging Design Of Powder Shaped Fresheners Based on Kansei Engineering. Procedia Manufacturing, Volume 4, pp.
115–123
Grobelny, J., Michalski, R., 2015. Computers in Human Behavior the
Role Of Background Color, Inter-Letter Spacing, And Font Size On Preferences In
The Digital Presentation Of A Product. Computers
in Human Behavior, Volume 43, pp. 85–100
Halder, S., Ganguly, D., Singh, V.P., 2016. Design Process and its
Application on The Improvement (Re-Design) of The Coke Bottle. International Journal of Advanced Packaging
Technology, Volume 4(1), pp. 185–199
Hariono, R.F., Zaini, 2017. Pengembangan Desain Kemasan Sekunder
Parfum Merk Griya Parfumes Sidoarjo (Development Of Secondary Packaging
Design For Perfumes For The Griya Parfumes Sidoarjo Brand). Jurnal Pendidikan
Seni Rupa. Volume 5(1), pp. 128–135
Harith, Z.T., Ting, C.H., Zakaria, N.N.A., 2014. Coffee Packaging:
Consumer Perception On Appearance, Branding, And Pricing. International Food Research Journal, Volume 21(3), pp. 849–853
Hartono, M., Santoso, A., Prayogo, D.N., 2017. How Kansei
Engineering, Kano And QFD Can Improve Logistics Services. International Journal of Technology, Volume 8(6), pp. 1070–1081
Hidayat, M.J., 2009. Analisis Industri Budaya Pada Desain Produk
Kemasan Makanan Industri Kecil Menengah (IKM) (Cultural Industry Analysis on
Food Packaging Product Design for Small And Medium Industries (SMI)). Jurnal Penelitian Seni Budaya, Volume
1(2), pp. 141–151
Hidayat, M.J., Wahmuda, F., 2013. Pengembangan Desain Kemasan
Kerajinan Di Kawasan Suramadu (Development Of Craft Packaging Designs In The
Suramadu Area). Jurnal Pengkajian dan
Penciptaan Seni, Volume 4(1), pp. 118–129
Ježovi?ová, K., Tur?ínková, J., Drexler, D., 2016. The Influence of
Package Attributes on Consumer Perception At The Market With Healthy Food. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et
Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Volume 64(6), pp. 1919–1926
Karamizadeh, S., Abdullah, S.M., Manaf, A.A., Zamani, M., Hooman,
A., 2013. An Overview of Principal Component Analysis. Journal Of Signal and Information Processing, Volume 4, pp. 173–175
Krstic, J., 2014. Using Possibility of QFD Method For Development
of the “Ready-To-Go” Package. Acta
Graphica, Volume 25, pp. 37–46
Ksenia, P., 2013. Packaging Design as A Marketing Tool and
Desire To Purchase. Bachelor’s Thesis, Saimaa University of Applied Science,
South Karelia (Finland)
Mohebbi, B., 2014. The art of Packaging: An Investigation into The
Role of Color in Packaging, Marketing, And Branding. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, Volume 3, pp.
92–102
Natadjaja, L., 2007. Analisa Elemen Grafis Desain Kemasan Indomie
Goreng Pasar Lokal Dan Ekspor (Analysis of Graphic Elements of Fried Indomie
Packaging Design for Local And Export Markets). Nirmana, Volume 9, pp. 20–30
Orth, U.R., Malkewitz, K., 2008. Holistic Package Design and
Consumer Brand Impressions. Journal of
Marketing, Volume 72, pp. 64–81
Parada, L.R., Mayuet, P.F., Gámez, 2019. Custom Design of Packaging
Through Advanced Technologies: A Case Study Applied to Apples. Materials, Volume 12(467), pp. 1–19
Paul, L.C., Al Suman, A., Sultan, N., 2013. Methodological Analysis
of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Method. International Journal of Computational Engineering & Management,
Volume16(2), pp. 32–38
Poturak, M., 2014. Influence Of Product Packaging On Purchase
Decisions. European Journal of Social and
Human Sciences, Volume 3(3), pp. 144–150
Pramono, R.G., Iqbal, M., Wulandari, S., 2015. Design Improvement
Of Packaging Of Kerupuk Strawberry Kencana Mas Using Quality Function
Deployment Method. e-Proceeding of
Engineering, Volume 2(1), pp. 956–965
Qing, H., Kai, Z., Zhang, C.F., Chen, M.R., 2012. Packaging Design
Research And Analysis Based On Graphic Visual. IPCSIT, Volume 28, pp. 148–153
Reimann, M., Zaichkowsky, J., Neuhaus, C., Bender, T., Weber, B.,
2010. Aesthetic Package Design: A Behavioral, Neural, And Psychological
Investigation. Journal of Consumer
Psychology, Volume 20(4), pp. 431–441
Rusko, E., Heinio, S., Korhonen, V., Heilmann, J., Karjalainen, T.M.,
Lahtinen, P., Pitkanen, M., 2011. Messenger Package – Integrating
Technology, Design and Marketing for Future Package Communication. Final
Report, VTT Tiedotteita – Research Notes 2586
Sinaga, F.B., Evanila, S., Dewi, K.H., 2012. Pemilihan Kemasan
Sekunder Cabai Blok Dengan Metode Ahp, Tingkat Kesukaan Konsumen Dan Nilai
Tambah (Selection of Chili Block Secondary Packaging Using The AHP Method,
The Level Of Consumer Preference And Added Value). Jurnal Agroindustri, Volume 2(2), pp. 62–69
Sudjarmoko, B., 2013. Prospek Pengembangan Industrialisasi Kopi Indonesia
(Prospects for The Development of Indonesian Coffee Industrialization). SIRINOV, Volume 1(3), pp. 99–110
Suzianti, A., Rengkung, S., Nurtjahyo, B., Al Rasyid, H., 2015. An
Analysis Of Cognitive-Based Design Of Yogurt Product Packaging. International Journal Technology, Volume
4, pp. 659–669
Utami, R.W., 2009. Segmentasi dan Analisis Perilaku Konsumen Kopi
Bubuk (Segmentation and Analysis Of Ground Coffee Consumer Behavior). Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian (J-SEP), Volume 3(2), pp. 49–58
Vitulli, P., Giles, R., 2016. Mind Mapping: Making Connections with
Images and Color. Delta Journal of
Education, Volume 6(2), pp. 1–10