Effects of LLDPE on Mechanical Properties, Degradation Performance, and Water Absorption of Thermoplastic Sago Starch Blends

Title: Effects of LLDPE on Mechanical Properties, Degradation Performance, and Water Absorption of Thermoplastic Sago Starch Blends

Authors
Authors and Affiliations

Denny Akbar Tanjung, Novesar Jamarun, Syukri Arief, Hermansyah Aziz, Boy Isfa, Ahmad Hafizullah Ritonga, Vivi Sisca

Corresponding email: novesarjamarun@sci.unand.ac.id

Published at : 18 Jan 2023
Volume : IJtech Vol 14, No 1 (2023)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v14i1.4926

Cite this article as:
Tanjung, D.A., Jamarun, N., Arief, S., Aziz, H., Isfa, B., Ritonga, A.H., Sisca, V., 2023. Effects of LLDPE on Mechanical Properties, Degradation Performance, and Water Absorption of Thermoplastic Sago Starch Blends. International Journal of Technology. Volume 14(1), pp. 173-184

573

Downloads

Denny Akbar Tanjung	Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Medan Area, Medan-20223, Indonesia
Novesar Jamarun	Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Andalas, Padang-25163, Indonesia
Syukri Arief	Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Andalas, Padang-25163, Indonesia
Hermansyah Aziz	Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Andalas, Padang-25163, Indonesia
Boy Isfa	Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Andalas, Padang-25163, Indonesia
Ahmad Hafizullah Ritonga	Institut Kesehatan Medistra Lubuk Pakam, Deli Serdang-20512, Indonesia
Vivi Sisca	Department of Biology Education, STKIP YPM Bangko, Jambi 37313-Indonesia

Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract

Effects of LLDPE on Mechanical Properties, Degradation Performance, and Water Absorption of Thermoplastic Sago Starch Blends

The purpose of this study was to improve the mechanical and physical properties, degradation performance, and water absorption of a thermoplastic mixture of sago starch with the addition of Linear Low-Density Polyethylene (LLDPE). The method used is the grafting method where polyethylene is grafted onto Maleic Anhydride (LLDPE-g-MA). In this research, Thermoplastics Sago Starch (TPSS) was made with a mixture of Sago Starch (65%) and Glycerol (35%), added with water as a solution. Compatibilizer (PE-g-MA) was made by reacting LLDPE (88%) and Maleate Anhydride (9%) with an additional initiator of Benzoyl Peroxide (3%). The concentration of LLDPE varied from 10,15, 20, 25, and 30%. Substances were mixed into an internal mixer Thermo Haake Polydrive with a speed of 100 mm/minute, for 15 minutes. The concentration of 30% LLDPE produced the highest tensile strength and elongation at a break of 4.30 N/mm2 and 2.15%, respectively. Simultaneously, as LLDPE concentration increased, Young's Modulus decreased. This was powered by the morphology of the sampling surface, with the occurred reaction of adhesion interface or dispersion of LLDPE toward the whole surface with the assistance of compatibilizer as connecting substance between hydrophilic polymer and a hydrophobic polymer, which could improve the properties of mechanical. The formation of ester groups from the reaction of inter groups of hydroxyls derived from the starch with the groups of anhydride derived from the mixture of compatibilizer was visibly seen at the peak of 1693 cm^-1. The degradation performance of the TPSS: LLDPE mixture with a ratio of 70:30 showed good performance where the degradation continued to increase up to 42% on the 30th day of degradation in freshwater, 18% in seawater, and 17% in soil burial. While the water absorption test showed that the higher concentration of LLDPE, the lower speed of water absorption.

Keywords

Bioplastics; Compatibilizer, Coupling agent, Grafting, Starch

Introduction

In 2018, the production of global plastic was nearly 360 million tons (Barnaba et al., 2020). Meanwhile, the production of bioplastic reached just 2.01 million tons or 0.56 percent of global plastic production (European Bioplastics, 2017). The increasing market of bioplastics could reduce dependency on fossil-based source and transform to be a biobased society (Imre et al., 2019; Geueke et al., 2018 ). Nowadays, approximately 80% of the world's plastic production is not recycled (Blank et al., 2020) and the usage of plastics polluting is on the rise (Sidek et al., 2019). Bioplastic, which by definition is biodegradable and/or gained from a renewable source, is a sustainable alternative to conventional plastic and its production capacity is estimated to increase to 2.43 million tonnes in 2024(European Bioplastics, 2018).

Bioplastics are made from natural polymeric materials such as starch, cellulose, and fats (Amni et al., 2020; Hasan et al., 2019; Silviana & Subagio, 2019; Judawisastra et al., 2018; Suharty et al., 2014). However, bioplastic cannot completely replace the function of conventional plastic yet. Starch-based bioplastic possesses some weaknesses, e.g., low mechanical properties, high water sensitivity (Kaewtatip & Tanrattanakul, 2012; Gáspáret et al., 2005), and rigidness. It is due to the characteristic of Starch that tends to coagulate and create a stressed area that is concentrated, resulting in worse mechanical characteristics (Vinhas et al., 2007; Pedroso & Rosa, 2005). This is because starch has a tendency to coagulate, creating a concentrated area of stress that degrades the material's mechanical characteristics, and it shows fast absorption at high concentrations of starch (Abdorreza et al., 2011). Mixing thermoplastic starch with synthetic polymers such as polyethylene can increase its mechanical characteristics (Zaman & Beg, 2021; Majid et al.,2009; Wang & Sun, 2004).

However, due to the difference in polarity where natural polymers are hydrophilic/polar and synthetic polymers are hydrophobic/non-polar so that the two materials are incompatible, the Compatibilizer is needed to unite them through the grafting method. The addition of the compatibilizer is expected to increase the homogeneity of the mixed solution and improve the adhesion between the phase (Sari et al., 2020; Imre & Pukánszky, 2013).

This research examined how different environments (freshwater, seawater, and soil) affected the tensile characteristics, morphology, water absorption, and biodegradation performance of LLDPE. The distribution morphology of LLDPE on the surface was also in evaluation.

Experimental Methods

2.1. Material

Sago starch Parang brand is a production of Warna Jaya Indonesia. Obtained from the traditional market of Serpong-Tangerang, Indonesia. Moisture content was 14%. Low Linear Density of Polyethylene (LLDPE) UF 1810S1 Pellet with density: 0.922 g/m³, Melt Index (190⁰C/2.16 kg): 1.0g/10 min, melting point 122⁰C, obtained from PT. Chandra Asri Petrochemical Tbk (TPIA) Cilegon-Indonesia. Maleic anhydride for sinthesis Merck KGaA, 64271 Darmstadt Germany, Benzoyl peroxide Merck for sinthesis Merck KGaA, 64271 Darmstadt Germany and Glycerol Analytical Reagent merck Univar Produksi Ajax Finechem. These can beobtained from the Rudang shop Medan-Indonesia.

2.2. Preparation of TPSS

In order to prepare TPSS, sago starch and glycerol were reacted at a ratio of 65:35, and water was added at a concentration of up to 250% of the amount of sago starch. The mixture is heated to 100°C until it turns into gelatin. To reduce the water content in TPSS gelatin to 5%, it is oven-dried for 24 hours at 80°C (Majid et al,, 2009). Figure 1 depicts a flowchart of the process of TPSS preparation.

Figure 1 Flow diagram of the process of preparation of TPSS

2.3. Preparation of Compatibilizer

The blends were mixed with Haake Polydrive Thermo. LLDPE was first added into the mixing chamber, followed by Maleate Anhydride after 5 minutes of a mixture, then Benzoyl Peroxide (BPO) was added at last. The mixture was completed at 150⁰C and a speed of 100 rpm, with the mixture’s total time, being 15 minutes. The composition comparison of LLDPE: Maleate Anhydrous: Benzoyl Peroxide, the ratio was 88:9:3. The compound was removed, cooled, and cut into pellets. Figure 2 illustrates a Flow Diagram of the Compatibilizer (LLDPE-g-MA) Preparation Process.

Figure 2 Flow diagram of the process of preparation of Compatibilizer (LLDPE-g-MA)

2.4. Preparation of TPSS/LLDPE/PE-g-MA blends

The mixture preparation of TPSS / LLDPE/PE-g-MA was the final phase in this research, in which the whole phases that have been prepared above would be mixed here, such as TPSS, LLDPE, and compatibilizer. The compound was produced by mixing TPSS and LLDPE with the comparison of 90:10, 85:15, 80:20, 75:25, and 70:30. PE-g-MA was used with an amount of 10 wt. % based on the weight of TPSS (Majid et al., 2009). Figure 3 shows the process flow diagram of the TPSS/LLDPE/LLDPE-g-MA (compatibilizer) preparation.

Figure 3 Flow diagram of the process of preparation of TPSS/LLDPE/LLDPE-g-MA (Compatibilizer)

2.5. Compression Molding

The blend of TPSS / LLDPE was printed with hydraulic pressure compression at a temperature of 150⁰C for 15 minutes. The pressure was increased to its maximum every 5 minutes. All compression molded sheets by ASTM D638 Type 1.

2.6. Tensile Properties

A tensile test was carried out by examining the machine of Universal Band Tensilon with the specimen of ASTM D638 Type 1. The temperature in the chamber was 25⁰C, humidity on 60% RHdn, 10mm speed/minute. 3 Specimens were used to obtain the average value of Tensile Strength, Elongation at Break, and Modulus Young.

2.7. Spectroscopy Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR)

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR; Perkin Elmer System 2000) was utilized to obtain qualitative information on the groups and chemical characteristics of TPSS / LLDPE blends. For each spectrum, 45 scans with a resolution of 4 cm-1 were recorded consecutively with Wd: 9:5 mm. The sample was measured in the form of a 1-millimeter-thick layer produced through hot-press molding.

2.8. Test of Morphology

The scanning test of Electron Microscopy (SEM) was carried out to evaluate the morphology surface of the blended sampling of TPSS / LLDPE. The sampling was dried up in the oven to reduce water content and avoid electrostatic filling as well as worse resolution. By the time of sampling surface inspection, it was installed on the piece of aluminum stubs and sputter-coated with a thin layer of gold.

2.9. Test of Water Absorption

The sampling sheet was cut into a dimension of 20mm x 20mm (Obasi et al., 2015) with a thickness of 3mm. It was then washed with aquadest and dried up to 80% for 12 hours, cooled down in a desiccator, and weighed to gain initial weight. It was then immersed into aquadest for ten days with a chamber temperature of 28-30⁰C and reweighed to gain weight afterward.

2.10. Test of Biodegradability

The compatible blend of TPSS / LLDPE with a dimension of 20mm x 20mm with a thickness of 3 mm was examined with different condition control (Spaccini et al., 2016; Maran et al., 2014). The first sampling was stored in a container containing just fresh water. The second one was immersed in seawater. The test for weight loss was done every 10, 20, and 30 days.

2.11. Test of Soil burial

The sampling was buried at a 10mm depth from the surface of alluvial soil (Henry & Isaac, 2014) which was placed in the holed box. Regularly wet it to keep its humidity. The weight loss of the samples was monitored at regular intervals of 10, 20, and 30^thdays. The test was carried out by washing the sample with aquadest, drying it up at chamber temperature until its weight remained constant, and then weighing it.

2.12. Analysis of Thermogravimetric (TGA)

The implemented analysis of Thermogravimetric was STA module with channel TGDTA 7300. The measurement was done at 7.73 mg with a heating rate of 10⁰C/minute. The heating was begun at 30C to 650⁰C. The rate of nitrogen gas was 50 mL/min.

Results and Discussion

3.1. Mechanical Properties

The Tensile Strength (TS), Elongation at Break (EB), and Young’s Modulus (YM) from the blend of TPSS/LLDPE Compatibilized, as shown in Figure 1, showing the affecting result of additional LLDPE, at the combination of PE –g-MA as a compatibilizer on the tensile strength and elongation at break, experienced continuous increase with the increased concentration of LLDPE from 3.20 N/mm² become 4.30 N/mm² and 0.72% to 2.15% at the maximum concentration at LLDPE 30% concentration (Matzinos et al., 2001) as can be seen in Table 1. When the young modulus decreased from 447N/mm2 to 201N/mm2 due to the higher concentration of LLDPE, the young modulus decreased as well. Figure 4-6 illustrates the Tensile Strength (TS), Young's Modulus (YM), and elongation break charts of TPSS/LLDPE compatibilizer blends.

Table 1 Mechanical Properties Test of TPSS/LLDPE-Compatibilizer

LLDPE Content (%)	Tensile Strength (N/mm²)	Elongation at Break (%)	Young Modulus (N/mm²)	Reference
0	1.80	0.38	479	(Majid et al., 2009)
10	3.20	0.72	448
15	3.39	1.25	271
20	3.60	1.43	252
25	3.82	1.60	239
30	4.31	2.50	205

Figure 4 Tensile strength (TS) and Young’s Modulus (YM) test of TPSS/LLDPE compatibilizer blends

Figure 5 Elongation at Break test of TPSS/LLDPE compatibilizer blends

Figure 6 Young Modulus test of TPSS/LLDPE compatibilizer blends

3.2. FTIR

In the TPSS spectrum, there was a wide peak of characteristics at 939-1058 cm^-1 as the strain peak of COO, which together with hydroxyl at 3000-3675 cm^-1. While the spectrum of copolymer that was used as a compatibilizer shows the peak of anhydride groups at 1707 cm^-1. The blended peak of TPSS/LLDPE compatibilizer emerged at 1084 cm^-1 and 1148 cm^-1 identified as Ester groups which were formed from the reactions of hydroxyl groups at 3265 cm-1 in the TPSS spectrum with the anhydride groups in the spectrum of PE-g-MA at 1693 cm^-1. Likewise, previous studies reported the formation of an ester group. (Majid et al., 2009; Bikiaris & Panayiotou, 1998). The FTIR spectra of TPSS, PE-g-MA, and TPSS/LLDPE Compatibilized blends are shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7 The Spectra of TPSS, PE-g-MA, and TPSS/LLDPE Compatibilized blends

3.3. Test of Morphology

Morphology affects the mechanical properties of a product and polymer dispersion evenly, indicating that interface and adhesion have increased. On the other hand, the occurrence of agglomeration in the polymer, shows that there was a worse interface reaction, in which agent dispersion, formed the copolymer with its kind. Differences in polarity were one of the causative factors. As in this TPSS/LLDPE blend, TPSS was the main component of the major blend on the polarized matrix. While LDDPE was the minor component of the dispersed phase, which was expected to be the non-polarizing reinforcing agent. Figure 8 shows how the difference in polarity led to an uneven distribution, which shows that the LLDPE is grouped or aggregated. (Rodriguez-Gonzalez et al., 2003; Yoo et al., 2001). To unite the natural polymer of hydrophilic with the synthesis polymer, which is hydrophobic, the coupling agent needs an ordinary connector, known as a compatibilizer. In the case of LLDPE, this minor polymer was evenly distributed throughout the blend, providing evidence of interface activity in a heterogeneous polymer blend. This is supported by the fact that bioplastic's mechanical properties increase when compatibilizers are added. Figure 9 shows an SEM image of a compatible blend of TPSS/LLDPE at a 20% LLDPE concentration, scaled to 1:150.

Figure 8 SEM Image of TPSS/LLDPE Uncompatibilized blends, (20% concentration of LLDPE) with scale 1: 150

Figure 9 SEM Image of TPSS/LLDPE Compatibilized blends, (20% concentration of LLDPE) with scale 1: 150

3.4. Water Absorption Test

The balance of TPSS water absorption was increased to 120% as can be seen in Figure 10. This resulted from the hydrophilic nature of the starch due to the many hydroxyl groups available to react with the water (Vinhas et al., 2007). The compatibilizer blend of TPSS and LLDPE demonstrates that the balance of water absorption decreased as LLDPE concentration increased. This was probably due to the decrease in the number of hydroxyl groups from starch as the concentration of TPSS decreased, which could have reacted with a water molecule (Obasi et al., 2015; Majid et al., 2009; Gáspár et al., 2005).

Figure 10 Equilibrium of water uptake test for TPSS/LLDPE Compatibilized blends

3.5. Biodegradability Test

In this degradation test, the three conditions were shown in figure 11-13, namely, freshwater immersion, seawater immersion, and being buried in the ground. In general, it could be said that the sample size weight of compatible blend-based bioplastics made from TPSS and LLDPE was going down as the quantity of concentrated LLDPE and time went up. For example, the sampling weight of freshwater decreased from 46 to 42% at concentrated LLDPE 10 to 30% of concentrated LLDPE until the 30^th Day. Meanwhile, the decrease of seawater sampling weight from 56 to 18% at a concentrated LLDPE of 10- 30%, as well as the decreased percentage of soil buried sampling achieved 50% at a concentrated LLDPE of 30%, with the decomposition of 17% at the 30^th Days. The more concentration of LLDPE contained in bioplastic, the smaller percentage of degradation rate (Abdullah et al., 2013). Table 2 contains specific data.

Table 2 Performance of degradation in 3 conditions

Condition	Time (day)	LLDPE Concentrations						Reference
Condition	Time (day)	0%	10%	15%	20%	25%	30%	Reference
Fresh Water	10	17	46	43	40	38	36	(Ashok et al., 2018)
	20	33	58	53	49	44	40
	30	56	64	57	53	48	42
Sea Water	10	15	47	43	38	11	9
	20	31	52	48	45	17	14
	30	52	56	52	49	21	18
Soil Burial	10	14	34	32	23	15	13
	20	29	47	43	37	19	15
	30	49	50	47	46	23	17

Figure 11 Degradation test of TPSS/LLDPE Compatibilized blends in freshwater

Figure 12 Degradation test of TPSS/LLDPE Compatibilized blends in Seawater

Figure 13 Degradation test of TPSS/LLDPE Compatibilized blends in Soil Burial

3.6. Analysis of Thermogravimetric (TGA)

The Thermogravimetric Analysis technique was used to determine the thermal decomposition and stability of the mixed TPSS/LLDPE compatibilizer film. Thermal decomposition occurs in four stages. The initial stage of degradation occurs at a temperature of 201.1⁰C with a mass loss of 17.1%. At this stage, there is evaporation or dehydration of water into H₂ and O₂gases at a temperature of 100⁰C with a mass loss of 6.36%. According to the findings (González Seligra et al., 2016), plasticizer compounds (glycerol) evaporate between the first and second stages at temperatures between 125 and 290°C. This thermal decomposition will continue along with the increase in temperature into compounds to other compounds. The initial thermal decomposition of plasticized starch occurs at around 300⁰C, during the second stage. At this stage, hydrogen groups are removed, and the starch carbon chain is decomposed and depolymerized (Nascimento et al., 2012). Furthermore, in the third stage, polyethylene begins to degrade at a temperature of 400°C, producing gas and hydrocarbon oil (Abdullah et al., 2013). The curve of TGA shows that degradation of TPSS /LLDPE compatibilized blends does not show a significant reduction in each phase. This indicates that the amount of mass loss in each temperature increase at each stage is almost the same (stable). The results of the TGA curve are presented in Figure 14.

Figure 14 The TGA Spectrum of TPSS/LLDPE Compatibilized blends

Conclusion

The addition of LLDPE as a strength agent followed by a compatibilizer between the blend of TPSS and LLDPE could inadvertently rectify the weaknesses of bioplastics, such as their low mechanical properties and high water absorption. The increase in concentrated LLDPE or the decrease in concentrated TPSS could reduce the water absorption percentage. Meanwhile, the degradation rate of blended TPSS/LLDPE decreased because the hydroxyl groups of TPSS getting less reacted with water molecules or were degraded by water. In this case, dispersed particles of LLDPE in the compatible blend are significantly better than those in the incompatible one. Future studies will focus on TPPS/LLDPE/Compatibilizer blends.

Acknowledgement

Thank you to LPDP for funding this research (2020).

References

Abdorreza, M.N., Cheng, L.H., Karim, A.A., 2011. Effects of Plasticizers on Thermal Properties and Heat Sealability of Sago Starch Films. Food Hydrocolloids, Volume 25(1), pp. 56–60

Abdullah, M.A.A., Mamat, M., Awang, M., Kusrini, E., Mubin, F.A.N., Sudin, N.H., 2013. Effect of trihexyltetradecylphosphonium on thermal degradation properties of low linear density polyethylene/montmorillonite nanocomposites. International Journal of Technology, Volume 4(2), pp. 129–135

Amni, C., Ismet, A.S., Akbar, S., 2020. Mechanical properties of bioplastics janeng starch (dioscorea hispida) film with glycerol and zinc oxide as reinforcement. Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, Volume 13(1), pp. 275–281

Ashok, A., Abhijith, R., Rejeesh, C.R., 2018. Material characterization of starch-derived biodegradable plastics and their mechanical property estimation. Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 5(1), pp. 2163–2170

Barnaba, G., Carita, S., Costantino, S., Gallo, M.D., Giordano, R., 2020. L’ Impiego degli imballaggi in plastica nel settore alimentare (The use of plastic packaging in the food sector). Youth Network for Government September, pp. 1–13

Bikiaris, D., Panayiotou, C., 1998. LDPE/starch blends compatibilized with PE?g?MA copolymers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Volume 70(8), pp. 1503–1521

Blank, L.M, Narancic, T., Mampel, J., Tiso, T., O'Connor, K., 2020. Biotechnological upcycling of plastic waste and other non-conventional feedstocks in a circular economy. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, Volume 62, pp. 212–219

European Bioplastics. 2017.Report - Bioplastic Marked Data 2017. Bioplastics market data 2017, global production capacities of bioplastics 2017-2022: 1–7. https://docs.europeanbioplastics.org/publications/market_data/2017/Report_Bioplastics_Market_Data_2017.pdf.

European Bioplastics. 2018. Bioplastics Market Data 2018. Berlin. https://www.european-bioplastics.org/new-market-data-the-positive-trend-for-the-bioplastics-industry-remains-stable/.

Gáspár, M., Benko, Z., Dogossy, G., Reczey, K., Czigany, T., 2005. Reducing water absorption in compostable starch-based plastics. Polymer Degradation and Stability, Volume 90(3), pp. 563–569

Geueke, B., Groh, K., Muncke, J., 2018. Food packaging in the circular economy: overview of chemical safety aspects for commonly used materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 193, pp. 491–505

Hasan, M., Zulfadli, M., Rahmayani, R.F.I., Fajri, G., Fansuri, H., 2019. Thermomechanical and morphology of biodegradable film made of taro starch and chitosan plasticized by castor oil. Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, Volume 12(3), pp. 1390–1398

Henry, C., Isaac, O., 2014. Cassava starch-mixed polypropylene biodegradable polymer: preparation, characterization, and effects of biodegradation products on growth of plants. International Journal of Science and Research, Volume 3(7), pp. 802–807

Imre, B., Pukánszky, B., 2013. Compatibilization in bio-based and biodegradable polymer blends. European Polymer Journal, Volume 49(6), pp. 1215–1233

Imre, B., García, L., Puglia, D., Vilaplana, F., 2019. Reactive compatibilization of plant polysaccharides and biobased polymers: review on current strategies, expectations, and reality. Carbohydrate Polymers, Volume 209, pp. 20–37

Judawisastra, H., Sitohang. R.D.R., Taufiq, D.I., Mardiyati, 2018. The Fabrication of Yam Bean (Pachyrizous Erosus) Starch-Based Bioplastics. International Journal of Technology, Volume 9(2), pp. 345–352.

Kaewtatip, K., Tanrattanakul, V., 2012. Structure and properties of pregelatinized cassava starch/kaolin composites. Materials and Design, Volume 37, pp. 423–428

Majid, R.A., Ismail, H., Taib, R.M., 2009. Effects of PE-g-MA on tensile properties, morphology, and water absorption of LDPE/thermoplastic sago starch blends. Polymer - Plastics Technology and Engineering, Volume 48(9), pp. 919–924

Maran, J.P., Sivakumara, V., Thirugnanasambandhama, K., Sridhar, R., 2014. Degradation behavior of biocomposites based on cassava starch buried under indoor soil conditions. Carbohydrate Polymers, Volume 101(1), pp. 20–28

Matzinos, P., Bikiaris, D., Kokkou, S., Panayiotou, S., 2001. Processing and characterization of LDPE/starch products. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Volume 79, pp. 2548–2557

Nascimento, T.A., Calado, V., Carvalho, C.W.P., 2012. Development and characterization of a flexible film based on starch and passion fruit mesocarp flour with nanoparticles. Food Research International, Volume 49(1), pp. 588–595

Obasi, H.C., Egeolu, F.C., Oparaji, O.D., 2015. Comparative analysis of the tensile and biodegradable performances of some selected modified starch filled polypropylene blends. American Journal of Chemistry and Materials Science, Volume 2(2), pp. 6–13

Pedroso, A.G., Rosa, D.S., 2005. Effects of the compatibilizer PE-G-GMA on the mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of virgin and reprocessed LDPE/corn starch blends. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, Volume 16(4), pp. 310–317

Rodriguez-Gonzalez, F.J., Ramsay, B.A., Favis, B.D., 2003. High-performance LDPE/thermoplastic starch blends: a sustainable alternative to pure polyethylene. Polymer, Volume 44(5), pp. 1517–1526

Sari, T.I., Saputra, A.H., Bismo, S., Maspanger, D.R., 2020. deproteinized natural rubber grafted with polyacrylonitrile (PAN)/polystyrene (PS) and degradation of its mechanical properties by dimethyl ether. International Journal of Technology, Volume 11(1), pp. 15–25

Seligra, P.G., Jaramillo, C.M., Famá, L., Goyanes, S., 2016. Data of Thermal Degradation and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Starch-Glycerol Based Films with Citric Acid as Crosslinking Agent. Data in Brief, Volume 7, 1331–34

Sidek, I.S., Draman. S.F.S., Abdullah, S.R.S., Anuar, N., 2019. i tech mag current development on bioplastics and its future prospects: an introductory review. INWASCON Technology Magazine, Volume 1, pp. 3–8

Silviana, S., Subagio, A., 2019. Biocomposite characterization of bagasse starch derived from cassava reinforced by acetylated bamboo cellulose and plasticized by epoxidized waste cooking oil. Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, Volume12(3), pp. 1470–1477

Spaccini, S.R., Todisco D., Drosos, M., Nebbioso, A., Piccolo,A., 2016. Decomposition of bio-degradable plastic polymer in a real on-farm composting process. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, Volume 3(1), pp. 1–13

Suharty, N.S., Mathialagan, M., Ismail, H., Wirjosentono, B., Firdaus, M., Wardani, G.K., 2014. Tensile properties and biodegradability of rice husk powder-filled recycled polypropylene composites: effect of crude palm oil and trimethylolpropane diacrylate. Journal of Physical Science, Volume 25(2), pp. 55–71.

Vinhas, G.M., Lima S.M.D., Santos, L.A., Lima, M.A.G.D.A., Almeida Y.M.B.D., 2007. Evaluation of the types of starch for preparation of ldpe/starch blends. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, Volume 50(3), pp. 361–370

Wang, Y.J., Liu, W., Sun, Z., 2004. Effects of glycerol and PE-g-MA on morphology, thermal and tensile properties of LDPE and rice starch blends. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Volume 92(1), pp. 344–350

Yoo, S.I., Lee, T.Y., Yoon, J.S., Lee, I.M., Kim, M.N., Lee, H.S., 2001. Interfacial adhesion reaction of polyethylene and starch blends using maleated polyethylene reactive compatibilizer. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Volume 83(4), pp. 767–776

Zaman, H.U., Beg, M.D.H., 2021. Study on binary low-density polyethylene (LDPE)/thermoplastic sago starch (TPS) blend composites. Progress in Applied science and Technology, Volume 11(1), pp. 53–65

Download PDF

Who cite this paper

Table of Contents

Article