|Triandriani Mustikawati||Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia|
|Yandi Andri Yatmo||Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia|
|Paramita Atmodiwirjo||Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia|
paper addresses the issue of wayfinding and human movement in a complex
building. It focuses on the operations people perform to enable themselves to
move from one place to another during the process of searching for a
destination in a building. The wayfinding operations build upon the concept of tours and maps proposed by de Certeau (1984).
This paper analyses how the tours and
the maps operations were employed and
distributed in a wayfinding journey within a building, with these operations enabling
visitors to reach a certain destination in the building. The tours and maps operations were revealed by looking into the wayfinding
narrative based on observations of participants executing wayfinding tasks. The
results of the study indicate that the length of a wayfinding journey conforms
to the number of operations performed.
Both tours and maps operations had the same role in
regulating the movements in the wayfinding journeys. While the tours operations regulated how people
moved from place to place, the maps operations
supported their movements by giving information from the surrounding
environment. Understanding movement mechanisms by exploring operations in a
wayfinding journey could contribute to the development of digital navigation
systems for indoor wayfinding.
Complex building; Journey; Movement; Operation; Wayfinding
Finding a way through a public building can be quite a challenge, especially for a new visitor who is not familiar with the environment. Public buildings have become complex environments with many building masses and rooms connected by complex networks of corridors (Passini, 1992). People search and reach a destination by moving from one place to another in a building (Ingold, 2011). The difficulty in finding a destination may also mean problems with moving through places and relating them together within a building. These problems can result in loss of time, money, or even life caused by missed flights, delays of medical service, or being trapped in an emergency situation. Understanding wayfinding mechanisms is essential to developing wayfinding systems that support an efficient movement for locating the desired destination.
Wayfinding has been widely discussed as a complex cognitive process (Golledge, 1999; Spiers and Maguire, 2008; Jamshidi and Pati, 2020). In short, wayfinding is simply a matter of moving from one place to another in a building or other, larger environment. It is based on a perception-action approach that involves continually adjusted movement according to an ongoing perceptual process (Ingold, 2011; Heft, 2013); however, there is a lack of discussion on how people move during the search. Meanwhile, the development of digital technology for indoor wayfinding and navigation does not follow the rapid development of digital outdoor navigation. The Global Positioning System (GPS) that has been used for digital outdoor navigation cannot work properly and accurately in buildings (Karimi, 2015). Some infrastructures are being developed to assist navigation in buildings, but these are still focused on the use of positioning technology based in space (Gu et al., 2009; Deak et al., 2012) rather than the movement mechanism being the basis of wayfinding. The wayfinding movement mechanism ought to be explored for the development of future digital indoor wayfinding systems.
This paper will discuss the movement aspect of wayfinding by revealing the way of operations involved during wayfinding. Operation refers to a schema of actions that describe how people do something (de Certeau, 1984). In this study, the spatial operations in a wayfinding journey will be analyzed through the tours and maps approach (de Certeau, 1984). In particular, this study attempts to analyze the role of the two operations types, the tours and the maps, within a sequence of a wayfinding journey in a hospital building. Some studies in hospital and healthcare facilities have revealed the role of spatial configuration in hospital performance (Johanes and Atmodiwirjo, 2015; Yatmo et al., 2018; Sengke et al., 2020; Yatmo et al., 2021), including issues with wayfinding (Pati et al., 2015; Carpman et al., 2016; Johanes and Yatmo, 2018). This current study demonstrates how the movement of visitors can take place in a particular spatial configuration of a hospital.
This study has demonstrated how the mechanism of movement can be discovered by looking at the operations performed during wayfinding. It shows that operations during wayfinding can be revealed by looking at the narratives of wayfinding journeys, which shows how a wayfinding journey is composed of tours and maps operations. The result indicates that the tours operations regulate all the movements involved during wayfinding, while the maps operations regulate how visual senses work to read the surrounding environment and provide information for connecting all the movements. Both operations work together as the movement mechanism during the search for the destination in a building.
Different subjects might perform different wayfinding operations, demonstrating that each operation is related to the situation and condition around the subject. The different operations would take the subject through different routes with different wayfinding and spatial experiences. However, a pattern of operations might be performed in a situation and condition related to a particular spatial configuration. These patterns have not been discussed in this paper and might be investigated in further studies.
This study offers a way
of understanding movement mechanisms by exploring operations in a wayfinding
journey. The findings of the study demonstrate a mechanism that may contribute to
the future development of digital indoor wayfinding systems.
This paper is
part of a doctoral dissertation. The study was supported by a Penelitian Dasar Research
Grant from the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, number: NKB-039/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2021.
The authors would like to thank the management of RSUD Saiful
Anwar Malang, Indonesia for the support and cooperation during the
Atmodiwirjo, P., Johanes, M., Yatmo, Y.A., 2019. Mapping Stories: Representing Urban Everyday Narratives and Operations. Urban Design International, Volume 24(4), pp. 225–240
Austin, T., 2018. Some Distinctive Features of Narrative Environments. Interiority, Volume 1(2), pp. 153–172
Carpman, J.R., Grant, M.A., Kirchen, E.M., 2016. Design That Cares: Planning Health Facilities for Patients and Visitors (Third edition). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass
De Certeau, M., 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life (Nachdr.). Berkeley: Univ. of California Press
Deak, G., Curran, K., Condell, J., 2012. A Survey of Active and Passive Indoor Localisation Systems. Computer Communications, Volume 35(16), pp. 1939–1954
Downs, R.M., Stea, D., 1977. Maps in Minds: Reflections on Cognitive Mapping. New York: Harper & Row
Golledge, R.G. (Ed.), 1999. Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Gu, Y., Lo, A., Niemegeers, I., 2009. A Survey of Indoor Positioning Systems for Wireless Personal Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Volume 11(1), pp. 13–32
Guano, E., 2003. A Stroll Through la Boca: The Politics and Poetics of Spatial Experience in a Buenos Aires Neighborhood. Space and Culture, Volume 6(4), pp. 356–376
Heft, H., 2013. Wayfinding, Navigation, and Environmental Cognition from A Naturalist’s Stance. In: Handbook of Spatial Cognition, D. Waller & L. Nadel (Eds.), American Psychological Association, Washington, USA, pp. 265–294
Ingold, T., 2011. The Perception of The Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge
Jamshidi, S., Pati, D., 2020. A Narrative Review of Theories of Wayfinding within the Interior Environment. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, Volume 14(1), pp. 290–303
Johanes, M., Atmodiwirjo, P., 2015. Visibility Analysis of Hospital Inpatient Ward. International Journal of Technology, Volume 6(3), pp. 400–409
Johanes, M., Yatmo, Y.A., 2018. Application of Visibility Analysis and Visualisation in Hospital Wayfinding Sign Design. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), Volume 45(1), pp. 1–8
Karimi, H.A. (Ed.)., 2015. Indoor Wayfinding and Navigation. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group
Lozanovska, M., 2002. Architectural Frontier/Spatial Story: The Problematic of Representing the Everyday. Space and Culture, Volume 5(2), pp. 140–151
Montello, D., Sas, C., 2006. Human Factors of Wayfinding in Navigation. In: International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, Second Edition—3 Volume Set, W. Karwowski (Ed.), CRC Press
Passini, R., 1992. Wayfinding in Architecture. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
Pati, D., Harvey, T.E., Willis, D.A., Pati, S., 2015. Identifying Elements of the Health Care Environment That Contribute to Wayfinding. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, Volume 8(3), pp. 44–67
Pilegaard, A., 2021. Between Inhabited Interiors and Interiors on Display: Exploring Spatial Boundaries at Rosenborg Castle. Interiority, Volume 4(2), pp. 139–158
Sengke, M.M.C., Atmodiwirjo, P., Yatmo, Y.A., Johanes, M., 2020. Design Consideration for Window Placement to Provide the View within the Patient's Visual Range. Journal of Design and Built Environment, Volume 20(1), pp. 13–23
Sengke, M.M., Mustikawati, T., 2019. The Visual Mechanisms of Seeing in Experiencing the Interior. Interiority, Volume 2(2), pp. 213–229
Spiers, H.J., Maguire, E.A., 2008. The Dynamic Nature of Cognition During Wayfinding. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Volume 28(3), pp. 232–249
Stafford, L., 2019. Contested Interiority: Sense of Outsideness/Insideness Conveyed through Everyday Interactions with University Campus Doors. Interiority, Volume 2(1), pp. 25–41
Xia, J., Arrowsmith, C., Jackson, M., Cartwright, W., 2008. The Wayfinding Process Relationships between Decision-Making and Landmark Utility. Tourism Management, Volume 29(3), pp. 445–457
Yatmo, Y.A., Atmodiwirjo, P., Paramita, K.D., 2017. Topological Reading of Movement Connectivity in Sensory Integration Space for Autistic Children. Space and Culture, Volume 20(1), pp. 24–41
Yatmo, Y.A., Harahap, M.M.Y., Atmodiwirjo, P., 2021. Modular Isolation Units for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Conditions in Response to Hospital Surges Resulting from the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Technology, Volume 12(1), pp. 43–53
Yatmo, Y.A., Putra, N., Harahap, M.M.Y., Saginatari, D.P., 2018. Evaluation of Spatial Layout in Health Care Waiting Areas based on Simulation of Droplet Movement Trace. International Journal of Technology, Volume 9(5), pp. 888–897
Zacharias, J., 2001. Path Choice and Visual
Stimuli: Signs of Human Activity and Architecture. Journal of Environmental
Psychology, Volume 21(4), pp. 341–352