Published at : 17 Dec 2020
Volume : IJtech
Vol 11, No 7 (2020)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v11i7.4458
Mochammad Mirza Yusuf Harahap | Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
Rini Suryantini | Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
Kristanti Dewi Paramita | Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
Yandi Andri Yatmo | Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
This study investigated the utilization of currently available energy
and its implication on the ecological production of architecture materials. The
study focused on the sun-drying process used by craftsmen in the traditional
brickmaking process, arguing that such a practice demonstrates ways of utilizing
current energy that are informed by local knowledge and are ecological. Such a brick drying process was observed at two sites of traditional
brickmaking in Central Java, Indonesia. The result of the study indicated that
the drying process in brickmaking utilized various exposure strategies to maximize
the potential amount of heat from the sun that can be transferred to the bricks, which in turn influenced the flow of the
production process. The study then discussed the potential applications of such
knowledge in the modern brick manufacturing process to create a more ecological
production of architecture materials.
Architecture material; Ecology; Local knowledge; Sun-drying; Traditional brickmaking
The population increase has contributed to a high demand for bricks in our society (Holley, 2009), triggering the industrialization of brickmaking. The production of bricks on a large scale, however, is notorious for its environmental impact (Darain et al., 2015) as it contributes to air pollution (Tahir and Rafique, 2009; Darain et al., 2015) and excessive land cultivation, resulting in a threat to the ecosystem (Singh and Asgher, 2005). The forces behind the industrialization of brickmaking have mostly ignored the threat and tend to solely emphasize the efficiency of brickmaking to meet the demand without fully considering its environmental impacts (Holley, 2009). The practice is in contrast with the spirit of positive development that not only facilitates economic activity, but also the idea of sustainability, which considers environmental impacts (Berawi, 2016; Baper et al., 2020). This is unfortunate especially considering that industrialization that utilizes recent technology could be a means of mitigating unwanted environmental impacts through its expected capability for sustainability (Yusuf et al., 2018).
Notably, the traditional brickmaking practice performed by local craftsmen on a relatively small scale is a process that is connected to the wider ecology (Atmodiwirjo et al., 2018). Traditional brickmaking is a process based on local knowledge that is focused on the environmental cycle of natural resources and using the renewable energy available in nature (McDonough, 1996). However, such a use of natural resources is not necessarily straightforward. Various strategies are required to attain the maximum usage of the energy that is currently available. This, in turn, influences the overall flow of production. Therefore, understanding such strategies is key to promoting energy usage that is more ecologically friendly. With this in mind, this paper attempts to explore the utilization of current energy in traditional brick production, particularly sun exposure and wind currents. This paper will begin by outlining the significance of the current energy discussion in architecture material production, focusing on the drying phase of traditional brickmaking as a model of current energy use. Then, the traditional brickmaking process that were observed will be examined, and connections will be drawn between the energy uses in brickmaking and their relation to other elements and stages in the overall production process. This exploration will be followed by the discussion of the findings of the study and the potential implication of the results on the production of architecture materials.
The sun-drying
phase in traditional brickmaking, as observed at the two locations of the
study, Ambarawa and Welahan, demonstrated the use of current energy as part of
the ecological aspect of architecture material production. Such a use of
current energy drove the stages and responses that shaped the process of
sun-drying, from maximum exposure to less exposure to the heat from the sun in
order to achieve a certain level of dryness. In achieving this dryness, what
mattered was not only the environmental conditions but also the craftsmen’s
strategies of alternating between or maximizing different forms of current
energy. These strategies influenced the way the bricks were laid down,
arranged, positioned, stacked, and covered and were constrained by the consistency
of the clay mixture, the field space availability, and the low-tech equipment
that limited the potential interventions that could be performed during the
process. Interestingly, the craftsmen’s strategies and responses informed a production
of architecture material intertwined with everyday life. They depicted spatial
operations that were conducted in a quotidian environment instead of in a
controlled and strict one (Atmodiwirjo and Yatmo,
2019). Other than the display of such strategies, the use of current
energy also drove the fluctuating flow of the different production stages,
influencing the beginning and the end of each phase beyond the drying phase.
This paper points
out that the use of current energy, the craftsmen’s strategies, and the
fluctuating flow of brick production, which often consists of phases done
simultaneously, provides potential knowledge for the future industrialization
of brickmaking. An important lesson, for example, can be derived from the way
efficiency is achieved through developing local strategies instead of relying
on the innovation of the machines. In addition, while the fluctuating flow of
brick production may not seem beneficial, it provides enough time to prepare
for the firing process, which requires a high amount of an immediate form of
energy and accumulation of material. In this sense, investigating the current
energy use expands the understanding of efficient, ecological methods that
focus on the interconnection between humans, materials, and the environment.
This study, however, only focused on the qualitative aspects of the sun-drying
phase. Future studies which focus more on the quantitative aspects of the
process may develop a better understanding of such efficiency by exploring in
detail, the temporality of the production process, measuring the time taken by
craftsmen to mold, stack, arrange, and relocate each brick in order to inform
the flow of overall brick production. In future studies, an airflow simulation might
also be conducted to investigate the optimal gap needed between the bricks to
dry them thoroughly.
This research is
supported by Penelitian Dasar Ristekdikti 2020, a research grant (contract
number: NKB-69/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2020) provided by The Ministry of Research,
Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
R1-A-4458-20201130075300.jpg | Figure 1 |
R1-A-4458-20201130075319.jpg | Figure 2 |
Atmodiwirjo,
P., Johanes, M., Saginatari, D.P., Yatmo, Y.A., 2018. Ecological Aspects of the
Traditional Brick Making Process in Pedurungan Kidul, Central Java. E3S Web of Conferences, Volume 67, p. 04034
Atmodiwirjo, P., Yatmo, Y.A., 2019. Interiority in
Everyday Space: A Dialogue between Materiality and Occupation. Interiority, Volume 2(1), pp. 1–4
Atmodiwirjo, P.,
Yatmo, Y.A., 2020. Tanahku Indonesia:
On Materialscape as the Materiality
of a Nation. Architecture and Culture,
pp. 1–22, DOI: 10.1080/20507828.2020.1774850
Baper, S.,
Khayat, M., Hasan, L., 2020. Towards Regenerative Architecture: Material
Effectiveness. International Journal of
Technology. Volume 11(4), pp. 722–731
Berawi, M.A., 2016.
Accelerating Sustainable Infrastructure Development: Assuring Well-Being and
Ensuring Environmental Sustainability. International
Journal of Technology, Volume 7(4), pp. 527–529
Carey, J., 2018.
Indeterminate duration. Interiority, Volume
1(2), pp. 185–202
Dalk?l?ç,
N., Nabiko?lu, A., 2017. Traditional Manufacturing of Clay Brick used in the
Historical Buildings of Diyarbakir (Turkey). Frontiers of Architectural Research, Volume 6(3), pp. 346–359
Darain,
K.M.ud., Jumaat, M.Z., Islam, A.B.M.S., Obaydullah, M., Iqbal, A., Adham,
Md.I., Rahman, Md.M., 2015. Energy Efficient Brick Kilns for Sustainable
Environment. Desalination and Water
Treatment, Volume 57(1), pp. 105–114
Demir,
I., 2008. Effect of Organic Residues Addition on the Technological Properties of
Clay Bricks. Waste Management, Volume
28(3), pp. 622–627
Gomes,
E., Hossain, I., 2003. Transition from Traditional Brick Manufacturing to More
Sustainable Practices. Energy and Sustainable
Development, Volume 7(2), pp. 66–76
Gualtieri,
A.F., Ricchi, A., Gualtieri, L.M., Maretti, S., Tamburini, M., 2016. Kinetic Study
of the Drying Process of Clay Bricks. Journal
of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Volume 123(1), pp. 153–167
Handayani,
S., 2010. Kualitas Batu Bata Merah dengan Penambahan Serbuk Gergaji (Quality of
Red Bricks with the Addition of Sawdust). Jurnal
Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, Volume 12(1), pp. 41–50
Holley,
I.B., 2009. The Mechanization of Brickmaking. Technology and Culture, Volume 50(1), pp. 82–102
Johanes, M.,
Wahid, A.R., 2018. Tanahku Indonesia: Celebrating the Indigenous Interior. Interiority, Volume 1(1), pp. 79–86
Kadir,
A.A., Sarani, N.A., 2012. An Overview of Wastes Recycling in Fired Clay Bricks.
International Journal of Integrated
Engineering, Volume 4(2), pp. 53–69
Lakho,
N.A., Zardari, M.A., 2016. Structural Properties of Baked Clay Bricks Fired
with Alternate Fuels. Engineering, Volume
8(10), pp. 676–683
McDonough,
W., 1996. Design, Ecology, Ethics and the Making of Things. In: Theorizing a
New Agenda for Architecture: An Anthology of Architectural Theory.
Princeton Architectural Press, pp. 400–407
Nuroso,
H., Supriyadi., Sudarmin, S., Sarwi., 2018. Identification of Indigenous
Science in the Brick-Making Process through Ethnoscience Study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Volume
983(1), pp. 1–5
Sadar, J.S., 2018.
Quasi-Materials and the Making of Interior Atmospheres. Interiority, Volume 1(1), pp. 49–63
Sarkar,
R., Kurar, R., Gupta, A.K., Mudgal, A., Gupta, V., 2017. Use of Paper Mill Waste
for Brick Making. Cogent Engineering,
Volume 4(1), pp. 1–15
Singh,
A.L., Asgher, S., 2005. Impact of Brick Kilns on Land Use/Landcover Changes around
Aligarh City, India. Habitat
International, Volume 29(3), pp. 591–602
Sudarsana,
I.K., Budiwati, I.A.M., Wijaya, Y.A., 2011. Karakteristik Batu Bata Tanpa
Pembakaran Terbuat dari Abu Sekam Padi dan Serbuk Batu Tabas (Characteristics
of Uncooked Bricks Made from Rice Husk Ash and Tabas Stone Powder). Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil, Volume 15(1),
pp. 93–101
Tahir,
S.N.A., Rafique, M., 2009. Emission of Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) from Burning of
Biomass in Brick Kilns. Environmental
Forensics, Volume 10(4), pp. 265–267
Wahid, A.R.,
Yatmo, Y.A., Paramita, K.D., 2020. More than Just a Material Perfection:
Preserved Human-Environment Relationship in Traditional Brick-Making Scenarios.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
Volume 1655, pp. 1–7
Yusuf, M.F.,
Ashari, H., Razalli, M.R., 2018. Environmental Technological Innovation and Its
Contribution to Sustainable Development. International
Journal of Technology, Volume 9(8), pp. 1569–1578