• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 12, No 1 (2021)

Application of Cavitation Ozonation Process on Recalcitrant Organic Matter Degradation from Stabilized Landfill Leachate

Application of Cavitation Ozonation Process on Recalcitrant Organic Matter Degradation from Stabilized Landfill Leachate

Title: Application of Cavitation Ozonation Process on Recalcitrant Organic Matter Degradation from Stabilized Landfill Leachate
Setyo Sarwanto Moersidik, Letti Annasari, Rudi Nugroho

Corresponding email:


Cite this article as:
Moersidik, S.S., Annasari, L., Nugroho, R., 2021. Application of Cavitation Ozonation Process on Recalcitrant Organic Matter Degradation from Stabilized Landfill Leachate. International Journal of Technology. Volume 12(1), pp. 78-89

227
Downloads
Setyo Sarwanto Moersidik Environmental Engineering Study Program, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Letti Annasari Environmental Engineering Study Program, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Rudi Nugroho Center of Technology for the Environment, Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology, Geosystem technology 820 Building, Puspiptek, Serpong, Tangerang 15314, Indonesia
Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract
Application of Cavitation Ozonation Process on Recalcitrant Organic Matter Degradation from Stabilized Landfill Leachate

Treatment of stabilized leachate as a by-product of municipal landfills has been a significant challenge as the leachate contains recalcitrant organic matter which has low biodegradability. In this study, the efficacy of the advanced oxidation process using cavitation–ozonation to remove recalcitrant organic matter in leachate samples from TPST Bantar Gebang was evaluated. Several operational and process parameters including pH, ozone flowrate, and contact time were varied to determine the best conditions for removing recalcitrant organic matter represented by Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD). This study determined the optimum operating conditions for the cavitation–ozonation process: pH 11, ozone discharge of 3 L/min, and contact time of 30 minutes. The result was a COD removal efficiency of 20.37%, an increase of 52.06% in the concentration of BOD5, and a 90% increase in the ratio of BOD5 to COD. This study has shown that cavitation–ozonation is an effective pre-treatment, as it increases the biodegradability of stabilized leachate and reduces the load on subsequent treatment processes.

Cavitation–ozonation; Leachate treatment; Recalcitrant organic matter

Introduction

Population growth has led to considerable increases in municipal solid waste generation. This is a significant concern as, without proper management, the amounts of solid waste burden the environmental carrying capacity. Improper management of solid waste creates leachate—water that leaks into the cells of waste. When it percolates the leachate brings dissolved and suspended material from the waste decomposition process (Tchobanoglous et al., 1993). Several factors significantly influence the generation leachate in landfills: the water content in the waste, precipitation, evaporation, the composition of organic waste, operational mode, and groundwater flows (Xing et al., 2013). Leachate should not be discharged into water bodies without being treated to remove high levels of organic matter. The possible results when leachate is not managed properly include fires and explosions, unpleasant odors, and the pollution of groundwater and surface water (Abd El-Salam and Abu-Zuid, 2015).

The Bantar Gebang Integrated Waste Treatment Area (TPST Bantar Gebang) in Bekasi, West Java, is one of the largest landfill sites in Indonesia.  Every day it receives 6500-7000 tons of municipal waste generated in Indonesia’s Capital, Jakarta (Azanella, 2018). Bantar Gebang has five landfill zones and four leachate treatment plants (LTPs), where leachate is treated before being discharged into water bodies. The fundamental challenge in leachate treatment is to reduce the high concentration of recalcitrant organic compounds, which are difficult to degrade biologically. The presence of these compounds is indicated by high levels of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and a low ratio of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) to COD (Gulyas, 1997). A predominant composition of recalcitrant organic compounds (> 60% of total organic carbon) is humic acids(Monje-Ramirez and Velásquez, 2004).

Various technologies have been implemented to remove recalcitrant organic compounds from stabilized leachate. Coagulation and chemical oxidation, chemical precipitation, activated carbon adsorption, and membrane processes are methods that have been recommended for treating stabilized leachate (Amokrane et al., 1997). Using FeCl3 as the coagulant has been shown to remove about 82% to 85% of COD in leachate (Long et al., 2017). A three-step treatment process of aerobic activated sludge biological pre-oxidation (ASBO), coagulation/sedimentation, and photo-oxidation through a photo-Fenton (PF) reaction has yielded BOD concentrations less than 150 mg/L at the effluent (Silva et al., 2017). Nurrohman and Wardjito (2016) reported satisfactory results from combining physical and chemical treatments to remove low biodegradable contaminants using a flotation and coagulation process, whereas Lubis et al. (2019) removed more than 90% of COD in low biodegradable wastewater using electrocoagulation. Recently, there has been increased use of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) to remove organic contaminants from wastewater. This is because the high oxidative power of ozone increases the biodegradability of the wastewater (Zhou et al., 2010, Gautam et al., 2019, Karamah et al., 2019). Pure ozone (O3) and a combined gas (O3/H2O2) were applied to increase the biodegradability of leachate. This increased the maximum BOD5 by about 110% (Wang et al., 2004). Another study suggested that the AOP of raw leachate could remove 16% to 33% COD from raw leachate (Xu et al., 2018). The combination of photoelectron-oxidation (PEO) and NaClO enhanced Fe2+ coagulation was able to remove 75% to 85% of COD (Qiao et al., 2018). Removing up to 85% of COD was achieved by combining ozone with hydrogen peroxide or persulfate in the AOP process (Gautam et al., 2019).

There are critical benefits of applying AOP to treat landfill leachate. First, it does not generate harmful byproduct compounds into the environment. Second, the process is relatively rapid and more efficient in improving the biodegradability ofthe organic contaminant (Yasar et al., 2006). In this process, recalcitrant organic compounds are converted into stable organic compounds with a lower molecular weight. Third, AOP also oxidizes organic compounds into the most stable oxidation form, CO2 and water, by complete mineralization. Thus, its biodegradability increases. Fourth, the remaining unreacted ozone is released into the air and decomposes into oxygen (Sharma et al., 2011).

Several studies have shown that leachate produced from TPST Bantar Gebang was contaminating the surrounding aquatic environment, and they suggested stricter operation of the landfill and more effective leachate treatment (Pujiindiyati and Sidauruk, 2015; Pujiindiyati et al., 2019). Unfortunately, despite its several benefits, there have been very few studies of the application of AOP to remove recalcitrant organic matter. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the applicability of using the cavitation–ozonation process to treat leachate generated from landfills in Indonesia.

 The evaluation was based on sets of experiments using samples collected from TPST Bantar Gebang. Outcomes included removal of recalcitrant organic compounds and improvement of the biodegradability of organic compounds. This process was carried out under alkaline conditions to encourage the formation of hydroxyl radicals, a strong oxidizing agent.

Conclusion

In this study, the leachate from TPST Bantar Gebang was categorized as stabilized landfill leachate, characterized by a low BOD5/COD ratio of 0.089 (< 0.1), pH 8.5 (> 7.5), COD concentration of 3186.32 mg/L (< 4000 mg/L), ammonia concentration of 576 mg/L (> 400 mg/L), and low metal concentration. The evaluation of the operational and process parameters of AOP in removing COD from leachate found that the optimal operating conditions for the cavitation–ozonation process were pH 11, ozone discharge of 3 L/min, and contact time of 30 min. Using those parameters, the efficiency of removing recalcitrant organic compounds (represented by COD) on the cavitation–ozonation process in optimal conditions was 20.37%, the increase in BOD5 concentration was 52.06%, and the ratio of BOD5/COD increased by 90% from 0.098 to 0.188. Finally, the analysis of the kinetics of the removal of recalcitrant organic compounds (represented by the COD parameter) on the cavitation–ozonation process was a second-order reaction. The reaction rate of COD removal (k) was 5×10-8 M-1 s-1. This study has shown the efficacy of the cavitation–ozonation process as a pre-treatment for stabilized leachate before biological treatment, as it increases the BOD5 concentration resulting in leachate with more biodegradability.

References

Abd El-Salam, M.M., Abu-Zuid, G.I., 2015. Impact of Landfill Leachate on the Groundwater Quality: A Case Study in Egypt. Journal of Advanced Research, Volume 6(4), pp. 579586

Aljuboury, D.A.D., Palaniandy, P., 2017. Kinetic Study of Inorganic Carbon (IC) Removal and COD Removal from Refinery Wastewater by Solar Photo-Fenton. Global Nest Journal, Volume 19(4), pp. 641649

Amaral-Silva, N., Martin, R.C., Castro-Silva, S., Quinta-Ferreira, R.M.l., 2016. Ozonation and Perozonation on the Biodegradability Improvement of a Landfill Leachate, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, Volume 4(1), pp. 527533

Amokrane, A., Comel, C., Veron, J., 1997. Landfill Leachates Pretreatment by Coagulation-Flocculation. Water Research, Volume 31(11), pp. 27752782

Azanella, L.A., 2018. 110 Hektar hingga 7.000 Ton Sampah Per Hari, Ini 5 Fakta TPST Bantargebang (110 hectares to 7,000 tons of waste per day, these are 5 facts about the Bantargebang Landfill). Available Online at https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2018/10/22/ 18391161/110-hektar-hingga-7000-ton-sampah-per-hari-ini-5-fakta-tpst-bantargebang?page=all. Accessed on 15 July 2020

Cortez, S., Teixeira, P., Oliveira, R., Mota, M., 2010a. Denitrification of a Landfill Leachate with High Nitrate Concentration in an Anoxic Rotating Biological Contactor. Biodegradation, Volume 22, pp. 661671

Cortez, S., Teixeira, P., Oliveira, R., Mota, M., 2010b. Ozonation as Polishing Treatment of Mature Landfill Leachate. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volume 182, pp. 730734

Deng, Y., Zhu, X., Chen, N., Feng, C., Wang, H., Kuang, P., Hu, W., 2020. Review on Electrochemical System for Landfill Leachate Treatment: Performance, Mechanism, Application, Shortcoming, and Improvement Scheme. Science of the Total Environment, Volume 745, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140768.

Foo, K.Y., Hameed, B.H., 2009. An Overview of Landfill Leachate Treatment via Activated Carbon Adsorption. Journal of hazardous Materials, Volume 171, pp. 5460

Gao, J., Oloibiri, V., Chys, M., Audenaert, W., Decostere, B., He, Y., Van Langenhove, H., Demeestere, K., Van Hulle, S.W.H., 2015. The Present Status of Landfill Leachate Treatment and its Development Trend from a Technological Point of View. Reviews in Environment Science and Bio/Technology, Volume 14, pp. 93122

Gautam, P., Kumar, S., Lokhandwala, S., 2019. Advanced Oxidation Processes for Treatment of Leachate from Hazardous Waste Landfill: A Critical Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 237, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117639

Gulyas, H., 1997. Processes for the Removal of Recalcitrant Organics from Industrial Wastewaters. Water Science and Technology, Volume 36(2), pp. 916

Karamah, E.F., Anindita, L., Amelia, D., Kusrini, E., Bismo, S., 2019. Tofu Industrial Wastewater Treatment with Ozonation and the Adsorption Method using Natural Zeolite. International Journal of Technology, Volume 10(8), pp. 14981504

Karamah, E.F., Bismo, S., Annasari, L., Purwanto, W.W., 2010. Mass Transfer Study on Micro-bubbles Ozonation in a Bubble Column. International Journal of Chemical Engineering Research, Volume 2(2), pp. 243252

Kurniawan, T.A., Lo, W.H., Chan, G., 2006. Degradation of Recalcitrant Compounds from Stabilized Landfill Leachate using a Combination of Ozone-GAC Adsorption Treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volume 137(1), pp. 443455

Lenntech., 2014. Ozone Decomposition. Available Online at http://www.lenntech.com/library/ozone/decomposition/ozone-decomposition.htm accessed on 15 July 2020

Long, Y., Xu, J., Shen, D., Du, Y., Feng, H., 2017. Effective Removal of Contaminants in Landfill Leachate Membrane Concentrates by Coagulation. Chemosphere, Volume 167, pp. 512519

Lubis, M., Fujianti, D., Zahara, R., Darmadi, D., 2019. The Optimization of the Electrocoagulation of Palm Oil Mill Effluent with a Box-Behnken Design. International Journal of Technology, Volume 10(1), pp. 137146

Moersidik, S.S., Nugroho, R., Handayani, M., Pratama, M.A., 2020. Optimization and Reaction Kinetics on the Removal of Nickel and COD from Wastewater from Electroplating Industry using Electrocoagulation and Advanced Oxidation Processes. Heliyon, Volume 6(2), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03319

Monje-Ramirez, I., De Velásquez, M.T.O., 2004. Removal and Transformation of Recalcitrant Organic Matter from Stabilized Saline Landfill Leachates by Coagulation–Ozonation Coupling Processes. Water Research, Volume 38(9), pp. 23592367

Munter, R., 2001. Advanced Oxidation Processes – Current Status and Prospects. In: Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, Chemistry, Volume 50, pp. 5980

Ntampou, X., Zouboulis, A.I., Samaras, P., 2006. Appropriate Combination of Physico-Chemical Methods (Coagulation/Flocculation and Ozonation) for the Efficient Treatment of Landfill Leachates. Chemosphere, Volume 62(5), pp. 722730

Nurrohman N., Warjito, W., 2016. The Influence of Frother in Flotation Using Electrolysis for Batik Dyeing Waste Separation. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Mesin, 2(1), pp. 22-29

Pujiindiyati, E.R., Sidauruk, P., 2015. Study of Leachate Contamination in Bantar Gebang Landfill to its Shallow Groundwater using Natural Isotope Tracers of 18O, 2H and 3H. Atom Indonesia, Volume 41(1), pp. 3139

Pujiindiyati, E.R., Satrio, S., Prasetio R., 2019. Major Ions for Tracing Leachate Migration within Shallow Groundwater in the Vicinity of Municipal Landfill in Bantar Gebang – Bekasi. Indonesia Journal of Chemistry, Volume 19 (1), pp. 1929

Qiao, M., Zhao, X., Wei, X., 2018. Characterization and Treatment of Landfill Leachate Membrane Concentrate by Fe2+/NaClO Combined with Advanced Oxidation Processes. Scientific Reports, Volume 8(12525), pp. 19

Ratanatamskul, C., Auesuntrachun, P., 2009. Removal of COD and Colour from Old-Landfill Leachate by Advanced Oxidation Processes. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, Volume 4(3-4), pp. 470480

Sawyer, C.N., McCarty, P.L., Parkin, G.F., 2003. Chemistry for Environmental Engineering and Science. 5th Edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill

Sharma, S., Ruparelia, J.P., Petel, M.L., 2011. A General Review on Advanced Oxidation Processes for Waste Water Treatment. In: Paper presented at International Conference on Current Trends in Technology, pp. 382481, Institute of Technology, Nirma University, 2011

Silva, T.F.C.V., Soares, P.A., Manenti, D.R., Fonseca, A., Saraiva, I., Boaventura, R.A.R., Vilar, V.J.P., 2017. An Innovative Multistage Treatment System for Sanitary Landfill Leachate Depuration: Studies at Pilot-Scale. Science of the Total Environment, Volume 576, pp. 99117

Singh, S.K., Moody, C.M., Townsend, T.G., 2014. Ozonation Pretreatment for Stabilized Landfill Leachate High-Pressure Membrane Treatment. Desalination, Volume 344, pp. 163170

Tchobanoglous, G., Theisen, H., Vigil, S.A., 1993. Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues. Singapore: McGraw Hill

Tizaoui, C., Bouselmi, L., Mansouri, L., Ghrabi, A., 2007. Landfill Leachate Treatment with Ozone and Ozone/Hydrogen Peroxide Systems. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volume 140(1-2), pp. 316324

Wang, F., El-Din, M.G., Smith, D.W., 2004. Oxidation of Aged Raw Landfill Leachate with O3 Only and O3 /H2O2: Treatment Efficiency and Molecular Size Distribution Analysis. Ozone: Science and Engineering, Volume 26(3), pp. 287298

Xing, W., Lu, W., Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Deng, W., Christensen, T.H., 2013. Environmental Impact Assessment of Leachate Recirculation in Landfill of Municipal Solid Waste by Comparing with Evaporation and Discharge (EASEWASTE). Waste Management, Volume 33(2), pp. 382389

Xu, Q., Siracusa, G., di Gregorio, S., Yuan, Q., 2018. COD Removal from Biologically Stabilized Landfill Leachate using Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs). Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Volume 120, pp. 278285

Yasar, A., Ahmad, N., Chaundry, M.N., Rehman, M.S.U., Khan, A.A.A., 2006. Ozone for Color and COD Removal of Raw and Anaerobically Biotreated Combined Industrial Wastewater. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Volume 17(2), 289–294

Zhou, Q., Li, W., Hua, T., 2010. Removal of Organic Matter from Landfill Leachate by Advanced Oxidation Processes: A Review. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, Volume 2010