|Jati Utomo Dwi Hatmoko||Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto SH, Tembalang, Semarang 50275, Indonesia|
|Pertiwi Kusuma Astuti||Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Selamat Sri University, Kendal 51351, Indonesia|
|Sani Nur Farania||Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto SH, Tembalang, Semarang 50275, Indonesia|
are inevitable during the construction phase of a project. In particular,
contractors may respond to the project risks by accepting, avoiding,
mitigating, or transferring the risks to other parties. This study aims to
explore the use of insurance as one of the risk response mechanisms by
contractors. Data were collected through observation of project documents and
semi-structured interviews with contractors from five construction projects and
four insurance companies. This research identified 42 risks, which are
categorized into three levels: 26% low, 48% moderate, and 26% high. Of these,
the contractors expected only 20 risks (48%) to be insured, whereas the
insurance companies considered only 19 risks (45%) insurable. The risks were
mapped on a four-quadrant matrix based on a combination of contractors'
expectations for insuring or not insuring project risks, and the insurance
company policies against those risks. The matrix revealed that 12 (29%) risks
were ideal (insured-insurable), 7 (17%) were overlooked (uninsured-insurable),
15 (36%) were considered reasonable (uninsured-uninsurable), and 8 (19%) were
categorized as critical (insured-uninsurable). These findings serve as a
reference for the construction industry
stakeholders in decision-making related to project risk management.
Construction projects; Contractors; Insurance; Insurance companies; Risks
The construction industry is commonly associated with greater risks compared to other industries due to its unique characteristics and complexity (El-Sayegh and Mansour, 2015; Liao and Chiang, 2015). Failure to manage risks can adversely affect project performance in terms of cost, quality, and completion time (Famiyeh et al., 2017). Therefore, risks need to be appropriately identified, assessed, monitored and administered to ensure the project’s course is maintained (PMI, 2017).
The literature classifies project risks as site-related, natural disaster, human, labor-related, material, construction operations, project environment, health and safety, political and regulatory-related risks, and financial risks (San Santoso et al., 2003; Shehu et al., 2014; Khodeir et al., 2015; El-Sayegh and Mansour, 2015; Jarkas and Haupt, 2015; Hidayatno et al., 2015; Wu et al., 2017; Dang et al., 2017; Famiyeh et al., 2017; Shrestha et al., 2017; Nguyen et al., 2018; Sundoko et al., 2018; Siraj and Fayek, 2019; West et al., 2019; Issa et al., 2020; Adafin et al., 2020). Such structured risk classification may contribute to the effectiveness and quality of the risk identification process and create a better understanding of the nature of the risk sources (Bu-Qammaz et al., 2009; Banaitiene and Banaitis, 2012; Lekan et al., 2019). Project stakeholders need to understand and identify risks early to implement an appropriate response strategy to minimize the possibility of negative impacts (Wang et al., 2004). The use of construction insurance is considered an effective way of transferring risks and protecting projects from losses (Wang et al., 2004). Jiang et al. (2019) stated that the success of complex projects is highly dependent on construction insurance.
This study aims to explore the use of insurance as one of the risk response mechanisms by contractors. The objectives are to identify risks and conduct qualitative risk analysis, to investigate contractor expectations on the use of insurance for project risks, to identify policy of the insurance companies against the risks, and to map the gap between contractor expectations and insurance company policy.
This study aims to explore the use of insurance as one of the risk response mechanisms by contractors using five construction projects and four insurance companies as case studies. Of the identified 42 risks in 11 categories, 26% distributed as low-, 48% as moderate-, and 26% as high-level risks, 48% of which the contractors expected to insure, although the insurance companies considered only 45% insurable. To map the identified risks, this study generated an IdOvReC matrix based on a combination of contractor expectations and the insurance company policies.
The results of this study are expected to provide information on the use of insurance in construction projects and the gaps that between what is expected to be insured and what the insurance company may consider insurable. Although the data was obtained from five reviewed projects and the views of four insurance companies, the results are expected to represent the general views of both sides. However, as each project is unique and insurance products continue to evolve according to market dynamics, the real implementation may vary in accordance with the particular construction project or insurance company. Nevertheless, these results can be used as a reference for stakeholders in the construction industry in making decisions related to project risk management. Further research can be done by developing quantitative models of the relationship between the patterns of risk events that occur in projects and the claims in insurance companies. This can help deepen the understanding of the real implementation of construction project insurance.
Adafin, J., Rotimi, J. O., Wilkinson, S., 2020. An Evaluation of Risk Factors Impacting Project Budget Performance in New Zealand. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-03-2019-0056
Banaitiene, N., Banaitis, A., 2012. Risk Management in Construction Projects. Risk Management–Current Issues and Challenges. N. Banaitiene (ed.), IntechOpen Limited, London
Bu-Qammaz, A.S., Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M.T., 2009. Risk Assessment of International Construction Projects Using the Analytic Network Process. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Volume 36(7), pp. 1170–1181
Dang, C.N., Le-Hoai, L., Kim, S.Y., Van Nguyen, C., Lee, Y.D. Lee, S.H., 2017. Identification of Risk Patterns in Vietnamese Road and Bridge Construction. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, Volume 7(1), pp. 59–72
El-Sayegh, S.M., Mansour, M.H., 2015. Risk Assessment and Allocation in Highway Construction Projects in the UAE. Journal of Management in Engineering, Volume 31(6), p. 04015004, doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000365
Famiyeh, S., Amoatey, C.T., Adaku, E., Agbenohevi, C.S., 2017. Major Causes of Construction Time and Cost Overruns. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Volume 15(2), pp. 181–198
Halwatura, R., 2015. Effectiveness of Contractors All Risk (Car) Insurance Policies in Road Construction Projects. Journal of Basic and Applied Research International, Volume 9(1), pp. 56–67
Hidayatno, A., Moeis, A.O., Sutrisno, A., Maulidiah, W., 2015. Risk Impact Analysis on the Investment of Drinking Water Supply System Development using Project Risk Management. International Journal of Technology, Volume 6(5), pp. 894–904
Iyer, K. C., Kumar, R., Singh, S. P., 2020. Understanding the Role of Contractor Capability in Risk Management: A Comparative Case Study of Two Similar Projects. Construction Management and Economics, Volume 38(3), pp. 223–238
Issa, U.H., Mosaad, S.A., Hassan, M.S., 2020. Evaluation and Selection of Construction Projects based on Risk Analysis. Structures, Volume 27, pp. 361–370
Jarkas, A.M. Haupt, T.C., 2015. Major Construction Risk Factors Considered by General Contractors in Qatar. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Volume 13(1), pp. 165–194
Jiang, Y., Luo, Y., Xu, X., 2019. Flood Insurance in China: Recommendations based on a Comparative Analysis of Flood Insurance in Developed Countries. Environmental Earth Sciences, Volume 78(93), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8059-9
Khodeir, L.M., Mohamed, A.H.M., 2015. Identifying the Latest Risk Probabilities Affecting Construction Projects in Egypt According to Political and Economic Variables. HBRC journal, Volume 11(1), pp. 129–135
Lekan, A., Samuel, O., Faith, O., Ladi, A., Adegbenjo, A., Peter, N.J., 2019. The Building Informatics Approach to Modelling Construction Quality Assurance Parameters to Prevent Structural Collapse of Building. International Journal of Technology, Volume 10(2), pp. 386–393
Liao, C.W., Chiang, T.L., 2015. The Examination of Workers’ Compensation for Occupational Fatalities in the Construction Industry. Safety science, Volume 72, pp. 363–370
Liu, J., Li, B., Lin, B., Nguyen, V., 2007. Key Issues and Challenges of Risk Management and Insurance in China's Construction Industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Volume 107(3), pp. 382–396
Liu, J., Lin, S., Feng, Y., 2018. Understanding Why Chinese Contractors Are Not Willing to Purchase Construction Insurance. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Volume 25(2), pp. 257–272
Nguyen, D.A., Garvin, M.J., Gonzalez, E.E., 2018. Risk Allocation in US Public-Private Partnership Highway Project Contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Volume 144(5), pp. 04018017-1–04018017-13
Owusu-Manu, D.G., Ghansah, F.A., Darko, A., Asiedu, R.O., 2020. Service Quality of Insurance in Complex Project Deals in the Construction Industry in Ghana. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print, DOI: 10.1108/IJBPA-09-2019-0078
PMI, 2017. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK). 6th Edition, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute
San Santoso, D., Ogunlana, S.O., Minato, T., 2003. Assessment of Risks in High Rise Building Construction in Jakarta. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Volume 10(1), pp. 43–55
Shehu, Z., Endut, I.R., Akintoye, A., 2014. Factors Contributing to Project Time and Hence Cost Overrun in the Malaysian Construction Industry. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, Volume 19 (1), pp. 55–75
Shrestha, A., Chan, T.K., Aibinu, A.A., Chen, C., Martek, I., 2017. Risks in PPP Water Projects in China: Perspective of Local Governments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Volume 143(7), p. 05017006, doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001313
Siraj, N.B., Fayek, A.R., 2019. Risk Identification and Common Risks in Construction: Literature Review and Content Analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Volume 145(9), doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001685
Sundoko, H.F., Akbar, R., Zulkaidi, D., Argo, T. A., 2018. Perception of Terror Risk and of the Security of Counter-Terrorism Design in Public Spaces. International Journal of Technology, Volume 9(3), pp. 491–500
Wang, Y., Lo, H.P., Yang, Y., 2004. An Integrated Framework for Service Quality, Customer Value, Satisfaction: Evidence from China's Telecommunication Industry. Information Systems Frontiers, Volume 6(4), pp. 325–340
West, C., Kenway, S., Hassall, M. Yuan, Z., 2019. Integrated Project Risk Management for Residential Recycled-Water Schemes in Australia. Journal of Management in Engineering, Volume 35(2), doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000677
Z., Nisar, T., Kapletia, D., Prabhakar, G., 2017. Risk Factors for Project
Success in the Chinese Construction Industry. Journal of Manufacturing
Technology Management, Volume 28(7), pp. 850–866