Published at : 19 Jul 2021
Volume : IJtech
Vol 12, No 3 (2021)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v12i3.4126
Nedyomukti Imam Syafii | Department of Architecture and Planning, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Grafika No. 2 Kampus UGM, Yogyakarta 55281 |
Masayuki Ichinose | Graduate School of Urban Environmental Sciences, Department of Architecture and Building Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, Japan 192-0397 |
Eiko Kumakura | Urban Planning Division, Urban Planning Department, National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management, 1 Tachihara, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan 305-0802 |
Steve Kardinal Jusuf | Engineering, Singapore Institute of Technology, 10 Dover Drive, Singapore, 138683 |
Wong Nyuk Hien | Department of the Built Environment, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, 4 Architecture Drive, #03-04, Singapore 117566 |
Kohei Chigusa | Shimizu Corporation, 3-5-7 Honmachi, Chuo-ku, Osaka 541-8520, Japan |
Yasunobu Ashie | Department of Environmental Engineering, Building Research Institute, 1 Tachihara, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki-ken 305-0802, Japan |
Effective utilization of urban surface modification
and landscaping through appropriate planning and design is becoming
increasingly important. In contrast to the large number of studies on urban
microclimates, few studies have directly focused on the outdoor thermal
environment, in particular those investigating the role of water bodies. To
optimize the usage of water bodies and to identify the distinguishing factors
that may affect the benefits of cooling, a coupled computational fluid dynamics
calculation and surface temperature calculation were used to estimate the
cooling influence of water bodies on urban microclimates. The study presented
in this paper simulated nine unique cases of a simplified urban neighborhood to
evaluate the unique effect of different water pond configurations. In summary,
within the urban canyon, the study results highlight the importance of a water
body’s configuration and positioning. Relative to prevailing winds, larger
water pond surfaces tended to produce a better thermal environment, while
equally distributed water ponds seemed to influence a wider area.
Cooling effect; Numerical modeling; Thermal environment; Urban canyon; Water body
Considerable
variations in land usage, land cover, and urban surface texture in a city
contribute to various urban problems, such as an urban heat island (UHI). UHI,
where the urban area is warmer than the rural area, affects a building’s energy
consumption as well as the occupant’s thermal comfort, health, and well-being (Brontowiyono et al., 2011; Wibowo and Salleh, 2018; Ibrahim et al., 2018).
This generates interest among planners and designers in UHI mitigating
strategies. Although still limited, research has beenconducted on a water body’s ability to
ameliorate a warm urban microclimate. Generally, these studies have shown that
the air temperature is 1–5°C lower near water bodies (e.g., lakes, rivers,
wetlands, and ponds) in comparison to adjacent built-up areas, particularly during
the day (Jusuf et al., 2009; Völker et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2017; Jin et al., 2017; Syafii et al., 2017a; Cai et al., 2018; Jacobs et al., 2020). However, there is still a
lack of design consideration in arranging effective water bodies to improve urban
thermal environments. Therefore, further investigation is needed to verify the
mitigating capacity of water bodies and to advance the current understanding of
the influential factors that may be useful for planners and designers.
This paper presented
the results from a parametric study with a hypothetically urban neighborhood in
which the water surface area, spatial configuration, and water temperature were
varied. Most of the factors affecting cooling of air temperature (pond
sizes, arrangements, and thermal capacity) were considered. Coupled numerical
modeling, surface temperature calculation, and CFD calculation were used to
obtain a better understanding of the effects of these influential factors and
to determine the most effective design consideration for a water body’s
application inside the urban canyon, where buildings and other urban elements
might influence a pond’s microclimate benefits. Parametric studies using
numerical simulation have the advantage of allowing a broad sample of urban
surface modifications to be analyzed and compared, thanks to the rapid
development of computational technology.
The results show that the air temperature is lower near water bodies
than near a hard surface (concrete). The water body's ability to reduce the air
temperature can be seen as a positive indicator for achieving enhanced thermal
environments. Furthermore, the cooling effect of water bodies in urban canyons
is influenced by, and depends on, the size and distribution of the water bodies
with respect to wind speed and direction. Generally, with the same water
surface area, the cases with EQD configurations were able to influence a much
larger area of the canyon while the cases with centered configurations tended
to generate a greater amount of cool air. Additionally, by keeping the
water temperature low, the cooling intensity from the ponds increased
significantly. The greatest effect from the chilled water pond occurred in the
larger bodies of water.
However,
the current study is limited to a simplified urban residential microclimate.
Due to the complexity of the urban structure, surface materials, and other
factors, the study’s conclusion may not be appropriate for higher-density urban
city spaces. Thus, potential future research on the cooling impact of water
bodies could include factors, such as the influence of other types of water
bodies (e.g., flowing water, water spray, water wall, etc.) in combination with
other surface modifications (e.g., trees, shading devices, etc.), a more detailed
water bodies form factor, or even exposure to a different predominant
microclimate. Furthermore, the current study demonstrates the possibility of
enhancing the cooling benefits of water bodies by introducing chilled water,
which needs further investigation.
Ashie, Y., Kono, T., 2011. Urban-scale CFD
Analysis in Support of a Climate-sensitive Design for the Tokyo Bay Area. International
Journal of Climatology, Volume 31(2), pp. 174–188
Ashie, Y., Kagiya, K., 2010. High
Resolution Numerical Simulation on the Urban Heat Island of the Entire 2 Wards
of Tokyo using Earth Simulator. Technical note of National Institute for Land
and Infrastructure Management no. 583, National Institute for Land and
Infrastructure Management, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and
Tourism, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan
Brontowiyono, W., Lupiyanto, R., Wijaya,
D., Hamidin, J., 2011. Urban Heat Islands Mitigation by Green Open Space (GOS)
Canopy Improvement: A Case of Yogyakarta Urban Area (YUA), Indonesia. International
Journal of Technology, Volume 2(3), pp. 207–214
Ca, V.T., Asaeda, T., Ashie, Y., 1999.
Development of a Numerical Model for the Evaluation of the Urban Thermal
Environment. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,
Volume 81(1–3), pp. 181–196
Cai, Z., Han, G., Chen, M., 2018. Do Water
Bodies Play an Important Role in the Relationship between Urban Form and Land
Surface Temperature? Sustainable Cities and Society, Volume 39, pp.
487–498
Ibrahim, S.H., Ibrahim, N.I.A., Wahid, J.,
Goh, N.A., Koesmeri, D.R.A., Nawi, M.N.M., 2018. The Impact of Road Pavement on
Urban Heat Island (UHI) Phenomenon. International Journal of Technology,
Volume 9(8), pp. 1597–1608
Ichinose, T., Shimodozono, K. Hanaki, K.,
1999. Impact of Anthropogenic Heat on Urban Climate in Tokyo. Atmospheric
Environment, Volume 33(24-25), pp. 3897–3909
Ihara, T., Aida, H., Yoshida, Y., Handa,
T., Matsuhashi, R., Ishitani, H., 2003. Evaluation of CO2 Emissions
Reduction Effect from the Building by Introducing High Light-reflective and
High Heat-emissive Paint Considering Urban Thermal Environment. In: Proceedings
of the 19th Conference on Energy, Economy, and Environment, Tokyo,
Japan, pp. 655–660
Jacobs, C., Klok, L., Bruse, M., Cortesão,
J., Lenzholzer, S., Kluck, J., 2020. Are Urban Water Bodies Really Cooling? Urban
Climate, Volume 32, pp. 1–14
Jin, H., Shao, T., Zhang, R., 2017. Effect
of Water Body Forms on Microclimate of Residential District. Energy Procedia,
Volume 134, pp. 256–265
Jusuf, S.K., Wong, N.H., Syafii, N.I., 2009.
Influence of Water Feature on Temperature Condition Hot Humid Climate. In: iNTA-SEGA
2009-Bridging Innovation, Technology and Tradition, Thailand
Lu, J., Li, Q., Zeng, L.,
Chen, J., Liu, G., Li, Y., Li, W., Huang, K., 2017. A Micro-climatic Study on
Cooling Effect of an Urban Park in a Hot and Humid Climate. Sustainable Cities
and Society, Volume 32, pp. 513–522
Syafii, N.I., Ichinose, M., Kumakura, E.,
Jusuf, S.K., Chigusa, K., Wong, N.H., 2017a. Thermal Environment Assessment
around Bodies of Water in Urban Canyons: A Scale Model Study. Sustainable
Cities and Society, Volume 34, pp. 79–89
Syafii, N.I., Ichinose, M., Kumakura, E.,
Jusuf, S.K., Chigusa, K., Wong, N.H., 2017b. Enhancing the Potential Cooling
Benefits of Urban Water Bodies. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and
Planning, Volume 14, pp. 29–40
Theeuwes, N.E., Solcerova, A., Steeneveld,
G.J., 2013. Modelling the Influence of Open Water Surfaces on the Summertime
Temperature and Thermal Comfort in the City. Journal of Geophysical
Research: Atmospheres, Volume 118, pp. 8881–8896
Völker, S., Baumeister, H., Claßen, T.,
Hornberg, C., Kistemann, T., 2013. Evidence for the Temperature-mitigating
Capacity of Urban Blue Space: A Health
Geographic Perspective. Erdkunde, Volume 67(4), pp. 355–371
Wibowo,
A., Salleh, K.O., 2018. Land Cover Types and Their Effect on the Urban Heat
Signature of University Campuses using Remote Sensing. International Journal
of Technology, Volume 9(3), pp. 479–490