• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 11, No 4 (2020)

Revisited the Technology Acceptance Model with E-Trust for Peer-to-Peer Lending in Indonesia (Perspective from Fintech Users)

Sevenpri Candra, Fauziyah Nuruttarwiyah, Indri Hanung Hapsari

Corresponding email: seven@binus.ac.id


Cite this article as:
Candra, S., Nuruttarwiyah, F., Hapsari, I.H., 2020. Revisited the Technology Acceptance Model with E-Trust for Peer-to-Peer Lending in Indonesia (Perspective from Fintech Users). International Journal of Technology. Volume 11(4), pp. 710-721

29
Downloads
Sevenpri Candra Management Department, BINUS Business School Undergraduate Program, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia 11480
Fauziyah Nuruttarwiyah Management Department, BINUS Online Learning, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia 11480
Indri Hanung Hapsari Management Department, BINUS Online Learning, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia 11480
Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract
image

The rapid increase in the number of fintech companies in Indonesia in the past three years has attracted the attention of many stakeholders, including the government, investors, conventional bank management, and even the general public. The phenomenon of the development of peer-to-peer  lending fintech companies in Indonesia is supported by the increasing demand of consumers. The research objective is to provide insight into the determinants of consumer interest in using fintech applications, using the technology acceptance model  by added e-trust variables . The data analysis method used structural equation modeling with WarpPLS 6.0 software. Questionnaires were distributed to fintech consumers in Indonesia, with a total sample of 379 respondents. The results of this study indicate that the dimensions of e-trust contribute to determining the perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude to adopt peer-to-peer lending fintech services, and intention to use peer-to-peer lending applications.

Attitude; E-trust; Intention to use; Perceived ease of use; Perceived usefulness

Introduction

    The term fintech is an abbreviation of the words "financial" and "technology " that means an innovation in the field of financial services that combines technology and financial service activities (Schueffel, 2016; Ketterer, 2017). Fintech is a new sector in the financial industry that combines various technologies to support trade, corporate business, and services to retail consumers (Gibson, 2015; Micu and Micu, 2016; Temelkov, 2018). It has been very popular in various countries in the last ten years (Arner et al., 2015; Prawirasasra, 2018; KPMG, 2018; Jünger and Mietzner, 2019). Indonesia has great potential for the development of fintech. With a population of around 250 million and gross domestic product in the first quarter of 2018 reached IDR 3,505.3 trillion (Badan Pusat Statistik, 2018). Fintech is one of product that born in the digital era and this is innovation for financial industry (Berawi, 2014; Accenture, 2019). This can be seen from the popularity of fintech in Indonesia, which is in line with the increasing use of internet services and number of smartphone users. However, the results of Sjamsudin's study (2019) show that the market share of fintech in the financial services sector is still relatively small compared to the market share of banks. But, the rapid increase in the number of fintech companies in Indonesia  over  the  past  three  years  has  attracted  the  attention  of  many stakeholders, including the government, investors, conventional bank management, and even the general public (Davis et al., 2017; Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 2017; Dipa, 2018).

Fintech can be divided into four sectors, namely e-payment/e-wallet, crowdfunding and peer-to-peer lending, risk and investment management, and market aggregators (Bank Indonesia, 2017). According to Hadad (2017), fintech in Indonesia increased every year until 2016; there are 165 fintech listed in the Indonesian Fintech Association and Indonesian Government Financial Services Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 2017). The most widely developed is fintech for payment systems (e-payment/e-wallet) is 42% , while peer-to-peer lending is18% (Hadad, 2017; Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 2017; Dipa, 2018; Duwitmu, 2019; Franedya, 2019; Setyowati, 2019; Sjamsudin, 2019). The role of fintech is expected to provide equal distribution of the welfare of the population in Indonesia, especially by encouraging micro, small, and medium enterprises (KPMG, 2018).

Peer-to-peer lending is a fintech that is suitable for providing limited capital solutions for small and medium enterprises. The total increase in lender account entities in Java, outside Java, and abroad from 2017 to July 2019 was 149.94% (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 2017; AlphaJWCVentures, 2019; Kurniawan et al., 2019). The fintech peer-to-peer lending operating system offers convenience for its users through web-based platforms  and smartphone applications  (Kurniawan et al., 2019; Suyanto and Kurniawan, 2019). In addition, there were 52 companies using applications on their website or web-based platforms. Peer-to-peer lending offers easy terms, flexible guarantees, and speed of service to borrowers to obtain loans through fintech services with competitive interest rates (Aaron et al., 2017; Hadad, 2017; Nursyirwan, 2018; Sjamsudin, 2019). The average time to process a loan disbursement is between 2– 3 days. Behind the convenience of fintech there are some risks that can be dangerous for users (Xie et al., 2016; Suyanto and Kurniawan, 2019). According to Giudici (2018), investing in peer-to-peer lending has a high risk because peer-to-peer platforms have less information about their borrowers, compared to banks, and are less able to handle asymmetric information.

Although peer-to-peer lending services have a variety of risks in their use, several studies have shown an increase in the interest of companies, markets, and the public in using these services (Magee, 2011; Frame and White, 2014; Xie et al., 2016; Prayogo, 2017; Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 2019; Gozali et al., 2020). The number of fintech service providers continues to increase, and some of the results of previous studies conclude that consumer acceptance is a major determinant of the development of fintech in a country (Agarwal et al., 2009; Ben Mansour, 2016). Referring to Alalwan et al. (2015), Candra (2013), and Suyanto and Kurniawan (2019) has confirmed the results of previous studies that the resistance factor is a major barrier for consumers in adopting technology-based financial services. This study aims to provide information about the factors that influence a prospective customer's acceptance of these services and these findings will help service providers or start-ups in designing appropriate fintech lending promotion strategies so that, in the long run, they can contribute to spurring digital economic growth in Indonesia.

Conclusion

The ability to understand information and the benefits of using online loan applications among target users in Indonesia are still major factors in adopting a new technology at the level of use, so we suggest additional research that is oriented toward users of banking services on the internet, especially peer-to-peer lending fintech application services. By knowing the specific desires of the segments of society studied, the banking industry, particularly digital banking that develops fintech peer-to-peer lending, can focus on understanding and increasing people's desires about what features must be provided to provide banking services and improve operational efficiency.

This study intentionally examined the role of e-trust in the use of peer-to-peer lending fintech applications by banking consumers in Indonesia. It is evident that the e-trust dimension contributed to determining the perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitude to adopt peer-to-peer lending fintech services and the intention to use the peer-to-peer fintech lending applications. In addition, this study also shows the importance of the role of e-trust variables in determining the perceived benefits, attitudes toward internet banking, and behavioral intentions. The users' perception that electronic transactions are easy and can be controlled is very important for internet banking business adoption because ease of use and trust creates control and perception of usability.

An implication of this research is the importance of the digital banking industry, especially the fintech peer-to-peer lending application service, owning and developing an internet banking system that is easy to use and has features that suit user needs. Given the large number of resources that have been invested in realizing the internet banking system globally, it is very important to ensure that user will use fintech lending applications. To achieve this goal, special attention is needed to design fintech peer-to-peer lending application displays that are easy to use, useful, and reliable. Internet banking industry players need to develop confidence in perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, user credibility, and integrity regarding fintech peer-to-peer lending applications.

This research still has some limitations and allows for further research. This research is an empirical study conducted with an observational research approach carried out at one time. This results in a lack of ability of the study results to reflect temporal changes in research construction, especially when internet banking technology is changing very rapidly. Future research efforts in the future should also be done to validate intention to use through the actual use of the system.

References

Aaron, M., Rivadeneyra, F., Sohal, S., 2017. Fintech: Is This Time Different? A Framework for Assessing Risks and Opportunities for Central Banks (No. 2017–10). Bank of Canada. Available Online at https://www.bankofcanada.ca/2017/07/staff-discussion-paper-2017-10/,  Accessed on August 2, 2018

Accenture., 2019. Future of FinTech and Banking—Accenture. Accenture. Available Online at https://www.accenture.com/sg-en/insight-future-fintech-banking, Accessed on August 4, 2018

Agarwal, R., Rastogi, S., Mehrotra, A., 2009. Customers’ Perspectives Regarding e-banking in an Emerging Economy. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Volume 16(5), pp. 340–351

Alalwan, A.A., Baabdullah, A.M., Rana, N.P., Tamilmani, K., Dwivedi, Y.K., 2018. Examining Adoption of Mobile Internet in Saudi Arabia: Extending TAM with Perceived Enjoyment, Innovativeness and Trust. Technology in Society, Volume 55, pp. 100–110

Alalwan, A.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P., Lal, B., Williams, M.D., 2015. Consumer Adoption of Internet Banking in Jordan: Examining the Role of Hedonic Motivation, Habit, Self-efficacy and Trust. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Volume 20(2), pp. 145–157

AlphaJWCVentures., 2019. Fintech Indonesia: 8 Popular Fintech Companies. AlphaJWCVentures. Available Online at https://www.alphajwc.com/en/fintech-indonesia/, Accessed on August 20, 2018

Alsajjan, B., Dennis, C., 2010. Internet Banking Acceptance Model: Cross-market Examination. Journal of Business Research, Volume 63(9-10), pp. 957–963

Arner, D.W., Barberis, J.N., Buckley, R.P., 2015. The Evolution of Fintech: A New Post-Crisis Paradigm? (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2676553). Social Science Research Network

Badan Pusat Statistik, 2018. Available Online at https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2018/10/05/02d80724b71eb684620a2e88/pdb-indonesia-triwulanan-2014-2018, Accessed on October 6, 2018

Bank Indonesia, 2017. Bank Indonesia Issues Provisions for the Implementation of Financial Technology—Central Bank of the Republic of Indonesia [Bank Indonesia]. Available Online at https://www.bi.go.id/id/ruang-media/siaran-pers/Pages/sp_199317.aspx, Accessed on August 20, 2018

Ben Mansour, K., 2016. An analysis of Business’ Acceptance of Internet Banking: An Integration of E-trust to the TAM. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Volume 31(8), pp. 982–994

Berawi, M.A., 2014. Creating Alternatives through Design and Technology Innovation. International Journal of Technology, Volume 5(1), pp. 1–2

Candra, S., 2013. Revisit Technology Acceptance Model for Internet Banking (Case Study: Public Banking in Indonesia). In: International Conference on Computer, Networks and Communication Engineering (ICCNCE 2013)

Cohen, J., 2013. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge, New york https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, Volume 13(3), pp. 319–340

Davis, K., Maddock, R., Foo, M., 2017. Catching up with Indonesia’s Fintech Industry. Law and Financial Markets Review, Volume 11(1), pp. 33–40

Dipa, M., 2018. Kredivo is on the List of the 100 Most Innovative Fintech Startups in the World. Warta Kota. Available Online at https://wartakota.tribunnews.com/2018/11/24/kredivo-masuk-daftar-100-startup-tekfin-paling-inovatif-di-dunia, Accessed on November 24, 2018

Duwitmu, 2019. Review Koinworks, Investree, Amartha | Investasi P2P Lending Terbaik. Duwitmu.Com. Available Online at https://duwitmu.com/investasi/koinworks-investree-amartha-investasi-p2p-2019/, Accessed on July 1, 2019

Ezzi, S.W., 2014. A Theoretical Model for Internet Banking: Beyond Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use. Archives of Business Research, Volume 2(2), pp. 31–46

Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley. Available Online at https://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html, Accessed on July 1, 2018

Frame, W.S., White, L.J., 2014. Technological Change, Financial Innovation, and Diffusion in Banking (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2380060). Social Science Research Network. Available Online at https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2380060, Accessed on August 1, 2018

Franedya, R., 2019. Revealed! GoPay Transaction in 2018 Reached Rp 87 T. CNBC Indonesia. Available Online at https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20190211103125-37-54742/terungkap-transaksi-gopay-di-2018-tembus-rp-87-t, Accessed on July 7, 2019

Gibson, J., 2015. The Impact FinTech is having on the Financial Services Industry in Ireland. Master’s Thesis, Graduate Program, Dublin Business School, Irlandia

Giudici, P., 2018. Fintech Risk Management: A Research Challenge for Artificial Intelligence in Finance. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, Volume 1, Article 1

Gozali, L., Masrom, M., Zagloel, T.Y.M., Haron, H.N., Garza-Reyes, J.A., Tjahjono, B., Irawan, A. P., Daywin, F.J., Syamas, A.F., Susanto, S., Aliwarga, H.K.K., Marie, I.A., 2020. Performance Factors for Successful Business Incubators in Indonesian Public Universities. International Journal of Technology, Volume 11(1), pp. 156–166

Hadad, M.D., 2017. Financial Technology (FinTech) di Indonesia [Indonesia Banking School]. Kuliah Umum Tentang FinTech – IBS. Available Online at http://www.ibs.ac.id/img/doc/MDH%20%20FinTech%20IBS%20June%202017.pdf, Accessed on August 2, 2018

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th Edition. Pearson Education, London

Hampshire, C., 2017. A Mixed Methods Empirical Exploration of UK Consumer Perceptions of Trust, Risk and Usefulness of Mobile Payments. International Journal of Bank Marketing, Volume 35(3), pp. 354–369

Jünger, M., Mietzner, M., 2019. Banking Goes Digital: The Adoption of FinTech Services by German Households. Finance Research Letters, Volume 34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.08.008

Ketterer, J.A., 2017. Digital Finance: New Times, New Challenges, New Opportunities. Inter-American Development Bank. Available Online at https://publications.iadb.org/en/digital-finance-new-times-new-challenges-new-opportunities, Accessed on August 2, 2018

Kock, N., 2010. Using WarpPLS in E-collaboration Studies: An Overview of Five Main Analysis Steps. International Journal of E-Collaboration (IJeC), Volume 6(4), pp. 1–11

KPMG., 2018. The Fintech Edge: Peer-to-peer Lending - KPMG Indonesia. KPMG. Available Online at https://home.kpmg/id/en/home/insights/2018/11/id-the-fintech-edge-p2p-lending.html, Accessed on August 20, 2018

Kurniawan, T.A., Wardani, D.K., Widhayati, L., 2019. Pengaruh Keberterimaan Layanan Peer to Peer Lending Kepada UMKM Sebagai Pengguna dengan Menggunakan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (The Effect of Acceptance of Peer to Peer Lending Service to MSMEs as Users using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Method). Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Dan Humaniora, Volume 5(2), pp. 151–160

Lee, M.-C., 2009. Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking: An Integration of TAM and TPB with Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Volume 8(3), 130–141

Magee, J., 2011. Peer-to-Peer Lending in the United States: Surviving after Dodd-Frank. North Carolina Banking Institute, Volume 15(1), p. 139

Micu, I., Micu, A., 2016. Financial Technology (Fintech) and Its Implementation on the Romanian Non-banking Capital Market. SEA - Practical Application of Science, Volume 11, pp. 379–384

Nui Polatoglu, V., Ekin, S., 2001. An Empirical Investigation of the Turkish consumers’ Acceptance of Internet Banking Services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, Volume 19(4), pp. 156–165

Nursyirwan, A.S., 2018. Kemudahan Jadi Alasan Masyarakat Meminjam Lewat Fintech (Ease is the Reason People Borrow Through Fintech). Antara News. Available Online at https://www.antaranews.com/berita/741266/kemudahan-jadi-alasan-masyarakat-meminjam-lewat-fintech, Accessed on August 20, 2018

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 2017. Fintech Statistic. Available Online at https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/data-dan-statistik/fintech/Default.aspx, Accessed on August 3, 2018

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 2019. Penyelenggara Fintech Terdaftar dan Berizin di OJK per 7 Agustus 2019 (Fintech Providers Registered and Licensed at OJK as of August 7, 2019). Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Available Online at https://www.ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/publikasi/Pages/Penyelenggara-Fintech-Terdaftar-dan-Berizin-di-OJK-per-7-Agustus-2019.aspx, Accessed on August 9, 2019

Prawirasasra, K.P., 2018. Financial Technology in Indonesia: Disruptive or Collaborative? Reports on Economics and Finance, Volume 4(2), pp. 83–90

Prayogo, H.S., 2017. Ini Dia Peraih Indonesia Digital Innovation Award 2017 (Here is the Indonesian Digital Innovation Award Winner). Warta Ekonomi. Available Online at https://www.wartaekonomi.co.id/read144717/ini-dia-peraih-indonesia-digital-innovation-award-2017, Accessed on August 2, 2018

Santoso, H., Abdinagoro, S.B., Arief, M., 2019. The Role of Digital Literacy in Supporting Performance Through Innovative Work Behavior: The Case of Indonesia’s Telecommunications Industry. International Journal of Technology, Volume 10(8), pp. 1558–1566

Schueffel, P., 2016. Taming the Beast: A Scientific Definition of Fintech. Journal of Innovation Management, Volume 4(4), pp. 32–54

Sekaran, U., Bougie, R., 2016. Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach, 7th Edition. Wiley. Available Online at https://www.wiley.com/en-id/Research+Methods+For+Business%3A+A+Skill+Building+Approach%2C+7th+Edition-p-9781119266846, Accessed on August 2, 2018

Setyowati, D., 2019. Riset: Kalahkan OVO, GoPay Paling Banyak Digunakan Tahun Ini - Katadata.co.id. (Research: Defeat OVO, GoPay Most Used This Year - Katadata.co.id.) Available Online at https://katadata.co.id/berita/2019/11/27/riset-kalahkan-ovo-gopay-paling-banyak-digunakan-tahun-ini, Accessed on November 27, 2019

Sjamsudin, S.H., 2019. The Impact of the Development of Fintech on the Existing Financial Services in Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Research in Technology and Innovation, Volume 1(1), pp. 14–23

Smith, D.A., Langfield-Smith, K.M., 2004. Structural Equation Modeling in Management Accounting Research: Critical Analysis and Opportunities. Journal of Accounting Literature, Volume 23, pp. 49–86

Sun, J., Chi, T., 2019. Investigating the Adoption of Apparel m-commerce in the US Market. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, Voluem 31(4), pp. 544–563

Suyanto, S., Kurniawan, T.A., 2019. Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Kepercayaan Penggunaan FinTech pada UMKM dengan Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Factors Affecting the Level of Trust in the Use of FinTech in MSMEs using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)). AKMENIKA, Volume 16(1), Article 1

Taylor, S., Todd, P.A., 1995. Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research, Volume 6(2), pp. 144–176

Temelkov, Z., 2018. Fintech Firms Opportunity or Threat for Banks? International Journal of Information, Business and Management, Volume 10(1), pp. 138–144

Triandis, H.C., 1980. Values, Attitudes, and Interpersonal Behavior. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Volume 27, pp. 195–259

Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., 1996. A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decision Sciences, Volume 27(3), pp. 451–481

Wang, Y.D., Emurian, H.H., 2005. An Overview of Online Trust: Concepts, Elements, and Implications. Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 21(1), pp. 105–125

Xie, P., Zou, C., Liu, H., 2016. The Fundamentals of Internet Finance and Its Policy Implications in China. China Economic Journal, Volume 9(3), pp. 240–252

Zhou, T., 2011. Examining the Critical Success Factors of Mobile Website Adoption. Online Information Review, Volume 35(4), pp. 636–652