Published at : 29 Jan 2020
Volume : IJtech
Vol 11, No 1 (2020)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v11i1.3764
Samsu Hendra Siwi | Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
Yandi Andri Yatmo | Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
Paramita Atmodiwirjo | Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
This paper addresses the
issue of social sustainability in the daily spatial practices in dwellings. In
particular, it discusses the establishment of sacred spaces in the everyday
activities of Moslems in their dwellings, as manifested through the boundaries
between clean and dirty zones related to religious rituals. The study employed
a qualitative approach and the use of a case study as the method. The case
study consists of six Moslem dwellings in urban areas, using in-depth
interviews and observations to obtain data about the activities and behaviors
of the dwellers. The boundaries between clean and dirty zones were found to be
established based on the journey of footwear in the house. The formation of
these boundaries could be considered a mechanism for maintaining the place’s
sustainability—a way to maintain the cultural identity of Moslems in their
dwellings. The sustainability of sacred places was established through social
agreement on the use of spaces and the boundaries defined for temporary spaces.
Moslem dwelling; Sacred spaces; Social sustainability; Spatial agreement; Temporary
Sustainable development
goals are defined by four inseparable sustainability aspects: environmental,
economic, legal, and social sustainability (Suwartha
et al., 2018). One of the goals of social sustainability is the
achievement of well-being and quality of life through connection between the
built environment and social experience (Vallance
et al., 2011). The social sustainability goal will not succeed without
the community, so it is important to understand the role of the community in
maintaining sustainability and promoting well-being in the daily living
environment.
Social sustainability emphasizes the preservation of social values, cultural traditions, and ways of life (Vallance et al., 2011). Culture interacts with cultural identity to influence both individual and collective values (Gudykunst et al., 1996). Cultural identity is an individual's sense of self that comes from the formal or informal membership of a group "that transmits and instils knowledge, beliefs, values, attitudes, traditions, and ways of life" (Jameson, 2007). It is important to consider cultural identity in order to understand a community’s values (Gudykunst & Nishida, 2000). Cultural identity is important as a frame of reference for how individuals define themselves and how they respond to their social relationships (Gudykunst et al., 1996). Therefore, it is important to maintain cultural identity in order to maintain the social sustainability of a particular community.
This
paper addresses the issue of social sustainability as manifested in how
societies maintain their cultural identities through daily spatial practices in
their dwellings. Culture is built into the structure of space and place (Panjaitan, 2017). The main issue addressed in
this study is how to maintain place sustainability in relation to cultural and
religious practices. Specifically, the objective of this study is to explore
the presence as sacred spaces within Moslem dwellings. The discussion of sacred
spaces in dwellings is important because they are the medium that accommodates
spiritual needs, which are ultimately related to the well-being of a dwelling’s
inhabitants. A sacred spaces accommodates the relationship of a person or
community with "the other." The presence of a sacred spaces is an
important aspect of maintaining social sustainability in the dwelling since the
dwelling needs to be the place inhabitants can instill the values of life. The
study of sacred space and religion continues to intersect with everyday habits
and behaviors; environmental beliefs, attitudes, and practices; social
mobility, hybridity, and identity; relations between private and public space;
and geopolitics and territorial imaginations (Della,
2015).
The
idea of sacred spaces in general, is related to divinity. In any religion, a
sacred spaces in the dwelling is often associated with the existence of a
particular kind of object, like an altar or a family temple. As such, a sacred
spaces is often a particular place to perform a religious ritual. However, in
Islam, prayer can be performed anywhere as long as the particular spatial
requirements are met. For Moslems, the practice of compulsory five-times-daily
prayer means that many spaces can be considered sacred, as they may conduct
their daily activities in different spaces throughout the day. The requirement
for sacred spaces in Islam refers to the necessity for prayer activities to be
in accordance with Islamic law, namely the requirement for cleanliness (places
without najis and hadats) and an exact orientation to Kaaba. This
is quite different from the concept proposed by Jackson
and Henrie (2009), where the requirements of sacred spaces are to be
divided into three levels: mystico-religious (related to beliefs), homeland
(ancestral/homeland), and historical ties. Meanwhile, Levi
and Kocher (2013) defines sacred spaces as a phenomenon of
experience, behavior regulation, and aspects of identity. These broad
understandings may explain various dimensions of sacred spaces; however, for
the purpose of this study, we will focus on the establishment of sacred spaces
as related to the requirement of cleanliness in Islamic law.
The agreement regarding the use of footwear in a
dwelling is a way to establish the boundaries between clean and dirty areas,
between sacred and non-sacred areas. The formation of these boundaries could be
considered a mechanism for maintaining the space’s sustainability—a way to
maintain the cultural identity of Moslems in their dwellings. The
sustainability of sacred spaces is established through a social agreement on
the use of spaces and the boundaries defined for temporary spaces. The
boundaries are established through the acts of wearing, changing, and taking
off footwear; the assignment of a particular room—the mushola—as a sacred space; and the laying of the sajadah on the floor for prayer. This
suggests that the boundaries of a sacred space could be established as
permanent as well as transitional and temporary. The agreement of the
inhabitants regarding the use of and requirements for a sacred space is a way
to maintain the social sustainability of the dwelling. It indicates that sacred
spaces exist as a product of a society in relation to activity and time.
This
research is supported by the BPPDN scholarship grant from the Ministry of
Research, Technology and Higher Education. The authors would like to thank all
the informants for their valuable information for this study.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
R2-A-3764-20200102141646.jpg | Abstract |
R2-A-3764-20200102142442.jpg | revision figure 1 |
R2-A-3764-20200102142515.jpg | revision figure 2 |
Adams, K., 2015. Culture, Identity and Cross Cultural
Adjustment. Available Online at
http://www.tohoku-gakuin.ac.jp/research/journal/bk2015/pdf/no01_03.pdf,
Accessed on July 6, 2019
Bell, C., 2009. Ritual
Theory, Ritual Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Berry, T.R., Candis, M.R., 2013. Cultural
Identity and Education: A Critical Race Perspective. Educational Foundations,
Volume 27, 43–64
Creswell, J.W., & Poth,
C.N., 2016. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five
approaches. Sage publications
Della, D.V., 2015. Sacred Space
Unbound, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. Virtual Issue 13
Foster, N., 2014. Architecture Is an Expression of Values, The
European: das Debatten-Magazin. Available Online at
https://www.theeuropean.de/en/norman-foster/9114-the-role-of-architecture-in-todays-society?utm_medium=website&utm_source=archdaily.com
Accessed on July 6, 2019
Franck, K., Lepori, R.B.,
2000. Architecture Inside Out. London: Wiley-Academy
Gudykunst, W.B., Nishida, T.,
2000. The Influence of Culture and Strength of Cultural Identity on Individual
Values in Japan and the United State. Intercultural Communication Studies,
Volume 9(1), pp. 1–18
Gudykunst, W.B., Matsumoto,
Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K.S., Heyman, S., 1996. The Influence of
Cultural Individualism-collectivism, Self Construals, and Individual Values on
Communication Styles across Cultures. Human Communication Research,
Volume 22(4), pp. 510–543
Huppert, F.A., So, T.T.C.,
2013. Flourishing across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for
Defining Well-being. Social Indicators Research, Volume 110(3), pp.
837–861
Henrie, R.L., 1972. The
Perception of Sacred place: The Case of Utah and Other Sacred Places in
Mormondom. Thesis of Master’s,
Department of Geography, Brigham Young University.Provo. Available Online at https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4786
Halafoff, A., Clarke, M.,
2018. Sacred Places and Sustainable Development. Religions, Volume
9(10), pp. 1–12
Jackson, R.H., Henrie, R.,
2009. Perception of Sacred Space. Journal of Cultural Geography, Volume
3(2), pp. 94–107
Jameson, D.A., 2007.
Reconceptualizing Cultural Identity and Its Role in Intercultural Business
Communication. Journal of Business Communication, Volume 44(3), pp. 199–235
Lefebvre, H., 2001. The
Production of Space. Donald Nicholson-Smith, (trans.),
Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publisher Ltd.
Levi, D., Kocher,
S., 2013.
Perception of Sacredness at Heritage Religious Sites. Environment and Behavior. Volume 45(7), pp. 912–930
Lamont, M., Molnár, V., 2002.
The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review Sociology, Volume 28(1), pp. 167–195
Mockbee, S., 2001. His Impact
on Architecture. Available Online at
http://samuelmockbee.net/impact/architecture/?utm_medium=website&utm_source=archdaily.com.
Accessed on July 6, 2019
Ozaki, R., Lewis, J.R., 2006.
Boundaries and the Meaning of Social Space: A Study of Japanese House Plans. Environment
and Planning D: Society and Space, Volume 24(1), pp. 91–104
Panjaitan, T.H., 2017. Hybrid
Traditional Dwellings: Sustainable Systems in the Customary House in Ngada
Regency. International Journal of Technology, Volume 8(5), pp. 841–850
Rasouli, H.A., Kumarasuriyar,
A., 2016, The Social Dimension of Sustainability: Towards Some Definitions and
Analysis. Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications, Volume 4(2), pp. 23–34
Seligman, M., 2011. Flourish.
Toronto: Free Press
Sarwat, A., 2018. Terjemahan Matan Al-Ghayah wa At-Taqib:
Thaharah (English trans., Sacred, Holy, Cleaness). Jakarta: Rumah Fiqih
Publishing
Suwartha, N., Berawi, M.A., Surjandari,
I., Zagloel, T.Y.M., Setiawan, E.A., Atmodiwiryo, P., Yatmo, Y.A., 2018.
Creating a Sustainable Future through the Integration of Management, Design,
and Technology. International Journal of Technology, Volume 9(8), pp.
1518–1522
Vallance, S., Perkins, H.C.,
Dixon, J.E., 2011. What is Social Sustainability? A Clarification of Concepts. Geoforum,
Volume 42(3), pp. 342–348
Yatmo, Y.A., Atmodiwirjo, P.,
Paramita, K.D., 2013. Whose Waste Is It Anyway? Journal of Urban Design, Volume 18(4), pp. 534–552
Yatmo, Y.A., Atmodiwirjo, P.,
2013. Spatial Strategies for Domestic Service Activities in Urban Kampung
Houses. International Journal of Technology, Volume 4(1), pp. 24–33
Yudistira, F., Yatmo, Y.A.,
Atmodiwirjo, P., 2019. From Rigidity to Ephemerality: Architecture as a Socio-spatial
Assemblage of Heterogeneous Components. A|Z ITU
Journal of Faculty of Architecture, Volume 16(3), pp. 115–129