Published at : 16 Dec 2019
Volume : IJtech
Vol 10, No 8 (2019)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i8.3432
Henny Santoso | Management Department, BINUS Business School Doctor of Research in Management, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 10270, Indonesia |
Sri Bramantoro Abdinagoro | Management Department, BINUS Business School Doctor of Research in Management, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 10270, Indonesia |
Muhtosim Arief | Management Department, BINUS Business School Doctor of Research in Management, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 10270, Indonesia |
The so-called “fourth
industrial revolution” that is developing at an exponential pace today is
characterized by several new technologies, such as robotics, artificial
intelligence, and the Internet of Things (IoT). Especially in Indonesia's
telecommunications industry, there is a change in the use of telecommunications
services with a greater need to provide innovative data services. This research
aimed to investigate the relationship among transformational leadership,
innovative work behavior, performance, and digital literacy (as a moderator of
the relationship between innovative work behavior and performance). This
illustrates how innovation in technology can serve as a core element to drive
the competitiveness of a company, especially in high-tech industries. The role
of innovation is becoming increasingly significant and can determine the
survival and growth of a company. This study surveyed 230 managerial-level and
above employees from three telecommunication companies in Indonesia. Structural
equation modeling (SEM) was performed with LISREL to analyze the data in this
quantitative research. The results showed that there was a significant and
positive relationship between transformational leadership and innovative work
behavior, innovative work behavior was also significantly and positively
related to performance, and digital literacy significantly moderated the
relationship between innovative work behavior and performance.
Digital literacy; Innovative work behavior; Strategic management; Transformational leadership; Telecommunication industry
The so-called “fourth
industrial revolution” that is developing at an exponential pace today is
characterized by several new technologies, such as robotics, artificial
intelligence, and the Internet of Things (IoT). Especially
in Indonesia's telecommunications industry, there is a change in the use of
telecommunications services. Data services are very important and have
become the biggest area of growth for telecommunication operators. Based on a
survey conducted by the Indonesian Internet Service Providers Association
(APJII, 2019), internet use in Indonesia reached 54.7% in 2017 (with 143.3
million users) and grew to 56% in 2018 (with 160.6 million users).
Many researchers, such as Suwartha et al. (2017),
have emphasized the importance and significance of innovation in the current era. Innovation and creativity is seen as a determinant of
competitive advantage (Berawi, 2017). Companies
need to show continuous breakthroughs and innovation in order to stay
competitive in industry (Spanuth & Wald, 2017). To produce creativity,
human factors are critical (Chen et al., 2016). In this context, leadership
factors also determine how to promote creativity in employees (Lin & Wong,
2014). Innovative work behavior from employees will produce better performance.
The current version of the industrial revolution is changing the process of
work; many automated processes have been created that have succeeded by using
digital technology. This study specifically examined how digital factors
moderated the relationship between employee performance and innovative work
behavior.
Studies
regarding digital literacy as a moderating variable of the relationship between
innovative work behavior and performance are still relatively rare. Therefore,
the researchers wanted to examine digital literacy as a moderating influence,
which can reinforce the correlation between employee innovative work behavior
and performance. From previous studies, we conceptualized that transformational
leadership correlates with innovative work behavior, and innovative work
behavior correlates with employee performance, with digital literacy moderating
the relationship between the innovative work behavior and the employee
performance. This research model is shown in Figure 1.
Figure
1 Research model
Our study expands the limited research on how
digital literacy can support innovative work behavior to achieve better
performance in the workplace. This extends the literature, especially
innovation theory at an individual level in several ways. Existing literature
has mostly focused on exploring how the behaviors and styles of leaders and their
management skills may affect employee (subordinate) innovative work behavior
(Chang et al., 2015; Jaiswal & Dhar, 2015). The results of this research
suggest the important role of supporting innovative work behavior from
employees in high tech organizations. Transformational leadership also greatly
influences the creativity of team members; it can lead to team member
self-confidence in performing problem-solving. The results of this study were
consistent with the findings from Wang et al. (2014), who examined the
correlation between transformational leadership and employees’ creativity at
work.
In the telecommunication industry represented by the high technology organizations in this study, digital skills are very common and have become part of the daily job. Leaders play an important factor in their use; leaders should update their knowledge especially in the areas of digital skills and knowledge. This research suggests that leaders should update their knowledge so that they can continue to help and inspire their team members in order to solve work-related problems. The results of this study are consistent with the findings of Minh et al. (2016), who examined the relationship between leaders’ technical competence and innovative work behavior.
Abstein, A., Heidenreich, S., Spieth, P., 2014.
Innovative Work Behaviour: The Impact of Comprehensive HR System Perceptions
and the Role of Work-life Conflict. Industry and Innovation, Volume 21,
pp. 91–116
Ahmed, H.M.S., 2010. Hybrid E?learning Acceptance
Model: Learner Perceptions. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative
Education, Volume 8(2), pp. 313–346
APJII, 2019. Laporan
Survei Penetrasi & Profil Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia 2018
(Penetration Survey Report & Indonesian Internet User Behavior Profile
2018)
Avolio, B.J., Bass, B.M. 1995. Individual
Consideration Viewed at Multiple Levels of Analysis: A Multi-level Framework
for Examining the Diffusion of Transformational Leadership. The Leadership
Quarterly, Volume 6(2), pp. 199–218
Avolio, B.J., Bass, B.M., 2004. MLQ—Multifactor
Leadership Questionnaire. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden
Bass, B.M., 1985. Leadership and Performance Beyond
Expectations. New York, NY: Free Press
Berawi, M.A., 2017. Stimulating Innovation and
Creativity: The Way Forward. International Journal of Technology, Volume
8(1), pp. 1–4
Chang, J., Bai, X., Juan, J., 2015. The Influence of
Leadership on Product and Process Innovations in China: The Contingent Role of
Knowledge Acquisition Capability. Industrial Marketing Management,
Volume 50, pp. 18–29
Chen, J., Leung, W.S., Evans, K.P., 2016. Are
Employee-friendly Workplaces Conducive to Innovation? Journal of Corporate
Finance, Volume 40, pp. 61–79
Dorenbosch, L., van Engen, M.L., Verhagen, M., 2005.
On-the-job Innovation: The Impact of Job Design and Human Resource Management
Trough Production Ownership. Creativity and Innovation Management,
Volume 14(2), pp. 129–141
Dörner, N., 2012. Innovative Work Behavior: The Roles of Employee Expectations and
Effects on Job Performance. Doctoral
Thesis, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Hammond, M.M., Neff, N.L., Farr, J.L., Schwall, A.R.,
Zhao, X., 2011. Predictors of Individual-level Innovation at Work: A
Meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,
Volume 5, pp. 90–105
Howell, J., Higgins, C., 1990. Champions of Change:
Identifying, Understanding, and Supporting Champions of Technological Change. Organizational
Dynamics, Volume 19(1), pp. 40–55
Huhtala, H., Parzefall, M.R., 2007. A Review of
Employee Well-being and Innovativeness: An Opportunity for a Mutual Benefit. Creativity
and Innovation Management, Volume 16, pp. 299–307
Jaiswal, N.K., Dhar, R.L., 2015. Transformational
Leadership Innovation Climate, Creative Self-efficacy and Employee Creativity:
A Multilevel Study. International Journal of Hospitality Management,
Volume 51, pp. 30–41
Janssen, O., 2000. Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort-reward
Fairness and Innovative Work Behaviour. Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, Volume 73(3), pp. 287–302
Janssen, O., 2001. Fairness Perceptions as a Moderator
in the Curvilinear Relationships between Job Demands, and Job Performance and
Job Satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, Volume 44, pp.
1039–1050
Janssen, O., 2004. How Fairness Perceptions Make
Innovative Behavior More or Less Stressful. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, Volume 25, pp. 201–215
Jong, J., Hartog, D., 2010. Measuring Innovative Work
Behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, Volume 19(1), pp. 23–36
Kanter, R.M., 1988. When a Thousand Flowers Bloom:
Structural, Collective and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organizations. Research
in Organizational Behavior, Volume 10, pp. 169–211
Katz, D., 1964. The Motivational Basis of
Organizational Behavior. Behavioral Science, Volume 9(2), pp. 131–146
Katz, D., Kahn, R.L., 1978. The Social Psychology
of Organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons
Kleysen, R., Street, C.T., 2001. Toward a Multi-dimensional
Measure of Individual Innovative Behavior Toward a Multi-dimensional Measure of
Individual Innovative Behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Volume
2(3), pp. 284–296
Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C., Hildebrandt, V., Van
Buuren, S., Van Der Beek, A.J., de Vet, H.C.W., 2012. Development of an
Individual Work Performance Questionnaire Development of an Individual Work
Performance Questionnaire. International Journal of Productivity and Performance
Management, Volume 62(1), pp. 6–28
Lin, S.-Y., Wong, C.-K.S., 2014. The Mediating Roles
of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation Between Classroom Learning Environment
and Creativity Among Hospitality Students in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of
Tourism Research, Volume 19(8), pp. 913–931
Martin, A., 2005. DigEuLit – A European Framework for
Digital Literacy: A Progress Report. Journal of E-Literacy, Volume 2,
pp. 130–136
Martin, A., Madigan, D., 2006. Digital Literacies
for Learning. London, UK: Library Association Publishing
Mete, E.S., Sokmen, A., Biyik, Y., 2016. The
Relationship between Organizational Commitment, Organizational Identification,
Person-organization Fit and Job Satisfaction: A Research on IT Employees. International
Review of Management and Business Research, Volume 5, pp. 870–902
Minh, N., Van, Badir, Y.F., Ngoc, N., Afsar, B., 2016.
The Impact of Leaders’ Technical Competence on Employees’ Innovation and
Learning. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Volume 44(C),
pp.44–57
Mohammadyari, S., Singh, H., 2015. Understanding the
Effect of E-learning on Individual Performance: The Role of Digital Literacy. Computers
& Education, Volume 82, pp. 11–25
Ng, W., 2012. Can We Teach Digital Natives Digital
Literacy? Computers & Education, Volume 59(3), pp.1065–1078
Seibert, S.E., Kraimer, M.L., Crant, J.M., 2001, What
Do Proactive People Do? A Longitudinal Model Linking Proactive Personality and
Career Success. Personnel Psychology, Volume 54, pp. 845–874
Spanuth, T., Wald, A., 2017. How to Unleash the
Innovative Work Behavior of Project Staff?? The Role of Affective and
Performance-based Factors. International Journal of Project Management,
Volume 35(7), pp. 1302–1311
Suwartha, N., Ardiyansyah, A., Berawi, M.A.,
Surjandari, I., Zagloel, Y.M., Atmodiwirjo, P., Yatmo, Y.A., 2017. Science,
Technology and Innovation for Sustainable World. International Journal of
Technology, Volume 6, pp. 979–982
Wang, C.J., Tsai, H.T., Tsai, M.T., 2014. Linking
Transformational Leadership and Employee Creativity in the Hospitality
Industry: The Influences of Creative Role Identity, Creative Self-efficacy, and
Job Complexity. Tourism Management, Volume 40, pp. 79–89
West, M.A., 2002. Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant
Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work
Groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, Volume 51(3), pp.
355–387
West, M.A., Farr, J.L., 1990. Innovation and
Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies. in Innovation and Creativity at Work.
West, M.A., Farr, J.L. (eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK
Wiratmadja, I., Govindaraju, R., Handayani, D., 2016.
Innovation and Productivity in Indonesian IT Clusters: The Influence of
External Economies and Joint Action. International Journal of Technology,
Volume 7(6), pp. 1097–1106
Yildiz, B., Uzun, S., Co?kun, S., 2017. Drivers of
Innovative Behaviors: The Moderator Roles of Perceived Organizational Support
and Psychological Empowerment. International Journal of Organizational Leadership,
Volume 6(2017), pp. 341–360
Yim, H.-K. F., Forman, H., Kwa, H., 2013. Factors
Affecting New Product Post-adoption Behavior in a Major US Automotive Supply
Chain: An Examination of Antecedents to Technology Internalization. Journal
of Business & Industrial Marketing, Volume 28(2), pp. 147–159