Published at : 30 Dec 2018
Volume : IJtech
Vol 9, No 8 (2018)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i8.2762
Nazirah Mat Russ | Architecture and Environmental Design Department, Centre for Foundation Studies, International Islamic University Malaysia, Office of Campus Director, Kuantan Campus, |
Mahanim Hamid | Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
Kho Mei Ye | Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
Despite
evidence that sustainable construction practice has numerous environmental,
economy and societal benefits, many construction practitioners have failed to
support sustainable construction practice due to perceive higher initial cost
known as “green cost premium” when
compared to traditional construction practice. Hence, the factors of green cost
premium that are commonly cited as a crucial barrier toward sustainable
construction practice must be investigated. Based on the analysis of the
existing literature (e.g.: conference paper, journal article), there are 27
factors, that classified into seven elements, that contribute to the cost
differential. However, few studies have been conducted on green cost premium in
developing countries. Therefore, this study attempts to fill this gap and is
expected to contribute to the discussion on green cost premium to improve
sustainable construction implementation.
Building construction cost; Green cost premium; Sustainable building construction; Sustainable building construction cost
Today, people has become more aware of the negative
impacts of unsustainable economic
growth, rapid development, the industrial revolution, and increased natural
resource consumption (Whang & Kim, 2015; UNDP, 2017). The importance of sustainable
development to protect the environment and to ensure peace and prosperity has
been gaining recognition around the world (UNDP, 2017). The construction industry is one
of the biggest contributors to environmental problems due to improper
construction activities (Afzan, 2016), which lead to increased carbon
emissions, climate change, resource scarcity, and waste generation (Dadhich et al.,
2015). Wu et al. (2014) found
the building sector could help in minimizing the environmental impact if
appropriate construction practice, sustainable materials, and sustainable
technologies were used. Therefore,
sustainable construction has been introduced to mitigate these issues (Afzan,
2016; CIDB, 2016), and it is considered one of the most important factors to
attain sustainable development (Whang & Kim, 2015).
However, even though numerous researches have
highlighted the benefits of sustainable construction practice (Abidin, 2010;
Sundayi et al., 2015; Whang & Kim, 2015; Afzan, 2016; Meron & Meir,
2017), construction practitioners seem to have little interest in adopting sustainable
construction practice (Yahya & Abidin, 2013; Brennan & Cotgrave, 2014; Rostami et al., 2015; Afzan, 2016; Darko et al., 2017). Surveys have indicated this
lack of support is due to the higher initial cost of sustainable building
construction, which is termed “green cost premium” (Ahn et al., 2013; Bahaudin
et al., 2013; Hwang & Ng, 2013; Brennan & Cotgrave, 2014; Shang
& Peng, 2014; Qian et al., 2015; Sundayi et al., 2015; Afzan,
2016; Dodge Data & Analytics, 2016; Dwaikat & Ali, 2016; Mao et al.,
2016; Amiril et al., 2017; Hwang et al., 2017). The following are several
examples explaining the current problem regarding sustainable building
construction and its higher initial cost:
· A study conducted on various
types of sustainable buildings, such as residential, educational, office,
commercial, public buildings, and health facilities, showed that the additional
cost to construct such buildings is up to 12.5% (WorldGBC, 2013) and 5% to 10%
(Hwang et.al, 2017) of the total construction budget.
· To construct sustainable
schools, there were additional construction costs of 2% (Kats, 2014), 2.5% to
2.7% (ILGBC, 2014), and an average of 14.5% (Meron & Meir, 2017), as
compared to traditional school construction.
· Suruhanjaya Tenaga, with a platinum
certificate, and the First Avenue office building, with a gold certificate,
incurred green cost premiums of 6% and 9%, respectively (GBI, 2017).
· Based on a case study
analysis of 10 sustainable office buildings, additional construction cost is
found to be 5% to 8% (Halim, 2012).
· To provide environmentally
sustainable buildings and development, the cost was about 10% to 15% higher
than traditional building construction (Shari & Soerbarto, 2012).
This
paper found that green cost premium is being widely associated with sustainable
construction and is a crucial barrier toward sustainable construction practice
implementation. The objective of this study was achieved, as it identified 27
green cost premium factors classified them into seven elements.
However, some limitations
emerged that will be the basis for further study. First, most of the studies
only identified the factors that contribute to green cost premium but did not
address the interrelationship among the factors nor their significance levels.
Second, the solutions to minimize the green cost premium were suggested without
identifying the root causes. Therefore, future research must analyze the
interaction between green cost premium factors and rank them according to their
significance. Furthermore, future research must identify the root causes of green
cost premium factors, as well as possible strategies to minimize the
sustainable building construction project cost, with the expectation to improve
sustainable construction implementation in Malaysia.
Abidin, N.Z., 2010.
Investigating the Awareness and Application of Sustainable Construction Concept
by Malaysian Developers. Habitat
International, Volume 34(4), pp. 421–426
Afzan, A.Z., 2016. A Model for Implementation of Green
Construction. PhD Dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Shah Alam,
Malaysia
Ahn, Y.H., Pearce, A.R., Wang,
Y., Wang, G., 2013. Drivers and Barriers
of Sustainable Design and Construction: The Perception of Green Building Experience.
International Journal of Sustainable
Building Technology and Urban Development, Volume 4(1), pp. 35–45
Ametepey, O., Aigbavboa, C.,
Ansah, K., 2015. Barriers to Successful Implementation of Sustainable
Construction in the Ghanaian Construction Industry. Procedia Manufacturing, Volume 3, pp. 1682–1689
Amiril, A., Nawawi, A.H.,
Takim, R., Ab-Latif, S.N.F., 2017. The Barriers to Sustainable Railway
Infrastructure Projects in Malaysia. The
Social Sciences, Volume 12(5), pp. 769–775
Arumugam, S., Sumanarathna,
N., Perera, K.K.S., 2015. Transaction Costs of Green Office Building
Construction in Sri Lanka. In: 8th
FARU International Conference, Sri Lanka, pp. 78–91
Bahaudin, A.Y., Elias, E.M.,
Saifudin, A.M., 2013. A Comparison of Green Building Criteria. In: the 3rd International
Building Control Conference (IBCC) 2013, Kuala Lumpur, November 2013, pp. 1–10
Bandy, R., Danckaert, C.,
Fetscher, G., Holmes, B., Gale, M., Mirsky, M., Stewart, S., 2007. Leed in Upstate New York: An Exploration of
Barriers, Resources and Strategies. US Green Building Council (USGBC), New
York, USA
Brennan, M.C., Cotgrave, A.J.,
2014. A Qualitative Inquiry into the Current State of the UK Construction
Industry. Structural Survey, Volume
32(4), pp. 315–330
Construction
Industry Development Board (CIDB), 2003. Industrialized
Building System (IBS) Roadmap 2003-2010. Available Online at http://ibsportal.cidb.gov.my/publication, Accessed on December 15th,
2017
Construction Industry
Development Board (CIDB), 2016. Eleventh
Malaysia Plan: Pursuing Green Growth for Sustainability and Resilience.
Available Online at http://www.cidb.gov.my, Accessed on May 16th,
2018
Construction Research
Institute of Malaysia (CREAM), 2014. Issues
and Challenges in Implementing BIM for SME’s in The Construction Industry.
Available Online at https://www.cream.my/main/index.php/publication/seminar-workshop-materials,
Accessed on October 31st, 2017
Dadhich, P., Genovese, A.,
Kumar, N., Acquaye, A., 2015. Developing Sustainable Supply Chains in the UK
Construction Industry: A Case Study. International
Journal of Production Economics, Volume 164, pp. 271–284
Darko, A., Chenzhuo, Z., Chan,
A. P. C., 2017. Drivers for Green Building: A Review of Empirical Studies. Habitat International, Volume 60, pp.
34–49
Dodge Data & Analytics.,
2016. World Green Building Trends 2016.
Available Online at http://www.construction.com, Accessed on October 17th,
2017
Dwaikat, L.N., Ali, K.N.,
2016. Green Buildings Cost Premium: A Review of Empirical Evidence. Energy and Buildings, Volume 110, pp.
396–403
El-Haram, M.A., Marenjak, S.,
Horner, M.W., 2002. Development of a Generic Framework for Collecting Whole
Life Cost Data for the Building Industry. Journal
of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Volume 8(2), pp. 144–151
Fuller, S., 2016. Life Cycle Cost Analysis. Available Online
at http://www.wbdg.org, Accessed on December 20, 2017
Green Building Index (GBI),
2017. Myth and Truth About GBI.
Available online at http://new.greenbuildingindex.org/faq, Accessed on November
10th, 2017
Halim, M., 2012. Economic Issues on Green Office Buildings in
Malaysia. National Property Information Centre, Valuation and Property
Service Department, Ministry of Finance, Malaysia
Hamid, Z.A., 2016. Mampan to Drive Sustainable Construction in
Malaysia. Available Online at http://www.cream.my/mampan, Accessed on
January 5th, 2018
Houghton, A., Vittori, G., Guenther,
R., 2009. Demystifying First-cost Green Building Premiums in Healthcare. Health Environments Research and Design
Journal, Volume 2(4), pp. 10–45
Huovila, P., Koskela, L.,
1998. Contribution of the Principles of Lean Construction to Meet the
Challenges of Sustainable Development. In:
6th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean
Construction, Guarujá, Brazil
Hussin, J.M., Rahman, I.A.,
Memon, A.H., 2013. The Way Forward in Sustainable Construction: Issues and
Challenges. International Journal of
Advances in Applied Sciences, Volume 2(1), pp. 15–24
Hwang, B.G., Tan, J.S., 2012. Sustainable Project Management for Green
Construction: Challenges, Impacts and Solutions. Available Online at: https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/ 262804796, Accessed on November 7th, 2017
Hwang, B.G., Ng, W.J., 2013.
Project Management Knowledge and Skills for Green Construction: Overcoming
Challenges. International Journal of
Project Management, Volume 31(2), pp. 272–284
Hwang, B.G., Zhu, L., Wang,
Y., Cheong, X., 2017. Green Building Construction Projects in Singapore: Cost
Premiums and Cost Performance. Project
Management Journal, Volume 48(4), pp. 67–79
Kamar, K.A.M., Hamid, Z.A., 2011.
Sustainable Construction and Green Building: The Case of Malaysia. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the
Environment, Volume 167, pp. 15–22
Kats, G., 2014. Israeli Green Buildings: Cost and Financial
Benefits. Available Online at http://www.cap-e.com, Accessed on November 15th,
2017
Latief, Y., Berawi, M.A.,
Basten, V., Budiman, R., Riswanto, 2017. Premium Cost Optimization of Operational
and Maintenance of Green Building in Indonesia using Life Cycle Assessment
Method. AIP Conference Proceedings,
Volume 1855(1), pp. 020007-1-020007-9
Malin, N., 2002. Life-Cycle Assessment for Buildings: Seeking
the Holy Grail. Environmental Building News, Building Green Inc., Volume
11(3)
Mao, C., Xie, F., Hou, L., Wu,
P., Wang, J., Wang, X., 2016. Cost Analysis for Sustainable Off-site Construction
based on a Multiple-case Study in China. Habitat
International, Volume 57, pp. 215–222
Meron, N., Meir, I.A., 2017.
Building Green Schools in Israel. Cost, Economic Benefits and Teacher
Satisfaction. Energy and Buildings,
Volume 154, pp. 12–18
Nurul Zahirah, M.A., Abidin,
N.Z., 2012. Main Elements of Soft Cost in Green Buildings. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering,
Volume 6(12), pp. 3601–3606
Qi, G.Y., Shen, L.Y., Zeng,
S.X., Jorge, O.J., 2010. The Drivers for Contractors ‘Green Innovation: An
Industry Perspective. Journal of Cleaner
Production, Volume 18(14), pp. 1358–1365
Qian, A.Y., Foong, W.K., 2013.
A Cost Management Approach to Sustainable Construction: Maximizing Value via
Cost Engineering Techniques. In: Proceedings
of the SB 13–Realizing Sustainability in the Tropics, Singapore, pp. 235–242
Qian, Q.K., Chan, E.H.W., Khalid,
A.G., 2015. Challenges in Delivering Green Building Projects: Unearthing the
Transaction Costs (TCs). Sustainability,
Volume 7(4), pp. 3615–3636
Rostami, R., Khoshnava, S.M., Rostami,
R., Lamit, H., 2015. Green and Sustainable Policy, Practice and Management in
Construction Sector, A Case Study of Malaysia. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology,
Volume 9(3), pp. 176–188
Royal Institute of British
Architects (RIBA), 2013. RIBA Plan of
Work. Available Online at http://www.architecture.com, Accessed on August
23, 2018
Saleh, M.S., Alalouch, C.,
2015. Towards Sustainable Construction in Oman: Challenges & Opportunities.
Procedia Engineering, Volume 118, pp.
177–184
Shang, G., Pheng, L.S., 2014.
The Last Planner System in China’s Construction Industry — A SWOT Analysis on
Implementation. International Journal of
Project Management, Volume 32, pp. 1260–1272
Shari, Z., Soebarto, V.I.,
2012. Delivering Sustainable Building Strategies in Malaysia: Stakeholders’
Barriers and Aspirations. Alam Cipta,
Volume 5(2), pp. 3–11
Shi, Q., Zuo, J., Huang, R.,
Huang, J., Pullen, S., 2013. Identifying the Critical Factors for Green
Construction – An Empirical Study in China. Habitat
International, Volume 40, pp. 1–8
Sundayi, S., Tramontin, V.,
Loggia, C., 2015. An Investigation into the Cost and Benefits of Green Building
in South Africa. In: World Congress
on Sustainable Technologies (WCST), 14-16 December 2015, London
Tam, C.M., Tam, V.W.Y., Tsui,
W.S., 2004. Green Construction Assessment for Environmental Management in the Construction
Industry of Hong Kong. International
Journal of Project Management, Volume 22(7), pp. 563–571
The Israeli Green Building
Council (ILGBC), 2014. The Cost of Green
Sustainable Construction of School in Israel. The Israel Ministry for
Environmental Protection and the Israel Green Building Council (ILGBC), Tel
Aviv
United Nation Development
Programme (UNDP), 2017. What Are the
Sustainable Development Goals? Available Online at
http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html,
Accessed on August 25th, 2018
Whang, S.W., Kim, S., 2015. Balanced
Sustainable Implementation in the Construction Industry: The Perspective of
Korean Contractors. Energy and Buildings,
Volume 96, pp. 76–85
World Green Building Council
(WorldGBC), 2013. The Business Case for
Green Building—A Review of the Costs and Benefits for Developers, Investors and
Occupants. Available Online at: http://www.worldgbc.org, Accessed on
November 15, 2017
Wu, P., Low, S.P., Xia, B.,
Zuo, J., 2014. Achieving Transparency in Carbon Labelling for Construction
Materials – Lessons from Current Assessment Standards and Carbon Labels. Environmental Science & Policy,
Volume 44, pp. 11–25
Yahya, I., Abidin, N.Z., 2013.
Commitment of Malaysian Contractors for Environmental Management Practices at
Construction Site. International Journal
of Sustainable Human Development, Volume 1(3), pp. 119–127
Zhang, X., Platten, A., Shen,
L., 2011. Green Property Development Practice in China: Costs and Barriers. Building and Environment, Volume 46(11),
pp. 2153–2160