Published at : 30 Dec 2018
Volume : IJtech
Vol 9, No 8 (2018)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i8.2757
Mohd Nasrun Mohd Nawi | Disaster Management Institute, School of Technology Management and Logistics, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, 06010, Malaysia |
Che Sobry Abdullah | Disaster Management Institute, School of Technology Management and Logistics, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, 06010, Malaysia |
Nor Azlinda Ramli | Disaster Management Institute, School of Technology Management and Logistics, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, 06010, Malaysia |
Mohd Hanizan Zalazilah | Disaster Management Institute, School of Technology Management and Logistics, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, 06010, Malaysia |
Ahmad Yusni Bahauddin | Disaster Management Institute, School of Technology Management and Logistics, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, 06010, Malaysia |
This study aims
to identify the success factors and challenges of implementing load-bearing masonry
(LBM) technology in the Malaysian construction industry. The success factors
and challenges of implementing LBM technology have been identified in previous
literature. Further, this research has been carried out in which interviews were
conducted to explore the real-life construction situation in Malaysia. The
findings indicate that the success factors for LBM-technology implementation are
organizational readiness, good collaboration, easier to install, skilled labor,
continuous improvement of knowledge, excellent work coordination, improved
efficiency of construction work, and environmentally friendly methods. The
issues faced by construction firms, however, are related to a lack of knowledge,
expertise, and government incentives and promotion as well as a lack of local
demand. Based on these findings, it can be agreed that all the factors gathered
from the previous literature are significantly related to the success factors
and challenges in this study. Further study should be performed to improve the
understanding of success factors and challenges on LBM-technology
implementation.
Construction industry; Industrialised Building System (IBS); Load-bearing masonry (LBM) technology
Load-bearing masonry (LBM) technology is
a simple construction method. There are two LBM construction techniques in
which bricks are joined with mortar and without mortar mix to make a wall and
building structure. Plain masonry, reinforced masonry, and interlocking bricks
are examples of masonry technology structure. It have been manufactured at
factories and then assembled at the construction site with minimal work.
The Construction Industry Development
Board (CIDB) has categorized the interlocking brick system as a part of an
Industrialised Building System (IBS) type that can replace the traditional
method. Implementation of LBM technology is an alternative method to
conventional reinforced frameworks in the completion of construction projects. LBM
technology is an effective method to reduce materials on site, speed up
construction work, cut down costs, and provide safe practices for the
environment (Ramli et al., 2014). The application of LBM technology is not being
rapidly adopted in the Malaysian construction industry even though the
advantages of the technology are evident. According to a study by Ramli et al.,
(2017), only 20% of developers use this technology in their housing projects,
even though this technology can enhance production and improve a firm’s
performance. The construction industry requires a dynamic change to encourage a
new mindset and move forward competitively with the technology industry. This
study explores the success factors and challenges of LBM-technology
implementation. Understanding the success factors of the firms that implement
this technology in their projects can serve as a guide for future adopters of
LBM technology, and identifying the challenges is crucial to overcoming existing
problems and improving LBM technology among industry players. This research has
been conducted in order to identify the success factors and challenges of LBM
technology in Malaysia through a case study.
1.1. Success Factors in the Implementation of
LBM Technology
This section discusses the success
factors of LBM technology based on previous literature. The success factors of
the implementation of LBM technology are as follows:
1.1.1. Organizational readiness
Organizational readiness refers to the
availability of resources needed for the implementation of LBM technology. It
also means that the organization has three key resources: technology, finance,
and staff (Shah Alam, 2009). Organizational readiness plays an important role
and can improve the confidence level of industry players in implementing LBM technology
in construction projects.
1.1.2. Good collaboration among team members
Good collaboration among team members
will solve potential problems related to the sequence and complex interfacing
of the work process (Kamar et al., 2010; Baharuddin et
al., 2015). Effective collaboration and cooperation between all team members in
the technological process and construction work are crucial to ensure the
success of LBM implementation in a project (Ismail et al., 2012).
1.1.3. Easy installation
According to Ramli et al. (2017), organizations
believe that LBM technology is easy to use and install. When a technology such
as LBM is perceived to be simple and easy to use, it is likely to be accepted
by construction laborers.
1.1.4. Skilled labor
Skilled laborers are supported by
quality training and education, especially among workers involved in LBM design
such as brick layers (Ramli et al., 2016a; Thanoon et al., 2003).
1.1.5. Continuous improvement of knowledge
This is important in order to improve
performance and achieve long-term success. The stakeholders should continue to
improve their knowledge and skills in using LBM technology (Ramli et al., 2016a).
1.1.6. Good work coordination
Team members should be involved from the
planning stages by working with the designer to ensure that all members
understand the schematics drawing. They should also have good coordination with
the manufacturing, transportation, and installation processes to ensure the
success of the implementation (Lessing et al., 2005).
1.1.7. Improving the efficiency of construction
work
According to Majid (1997), LBM
technology has the potential to improve the efficiency of construction work
through the elimination of formwork, reduced period of construction’s site activities,
and reduced costs while maintaining high quality. These methods were chosen
because of the simple techniques required in laying bricks with less mortar,
allowing variations of workmanship (Adedeji, 2012).
1.1.8. Environmentally friendly methods
The components
are manufactured in a factory, enabling higher quality control and
environmentally friendly practices compared to on-site construction. Bricks are
manufactured in factories and then assembled at the construction site. Sharath
et al. (2013) stated that the masonry technology produces small-scale
construction, making it self-sustained.
1.2. Challenges for the Implementation of LBM
Technology
In general, challenges and barriers are
defined as components that contribute to ineffective results or the poor
success of a construction project (Baharuddin et al., 2016a). According to
previous studies (Abdullah et al., 2009; Ramli et al., 2016b), there are three
main challenges found regarding LBM technology: a lack of knowledge and
expertise, a lack of promotion and incentive, and a lack of local demand.
1.2.1. Lack of knowledge and expertise
Nowadays, most of the industry’s key
actors are unaware of the existence of LBM technology. This lack of knowledge
and exposure among industry players has led to the low popularity of LBM-technology
use compared to conventional methods. A lack of expertise in LBM technology also
remains, as many in the construction industry are still unfamiliar with this
technology. According to Ramli et al. (2016a), expertise, especially in design,
is crucial for the success of LBM-technology implementation.
1.2.2. Lack of promotion and incentive
Abdullah et al., (2015) discovered that
LBM technology is still not widely used due to a lack of incentives. The
government, through responsible authorization, should increase the incentives
and promotion of LBM implementation. The lack of incentives and promotion is reflected
in a low number of industry players who have adopted the technology (Ramli et
al., 2016b).
1.2.3. Lack of local demand
According to Ramli
et al. (2014), low awareness and a lack of local demand for LBM technology makes
it critically challenging for this technology to penetrate Malaysia. The
small-scale nature of LBM projects demonstrates that this technology is less
popular and less in-demand in Malaysia compared to conventional methods.
LBM technology is
a construction method that is considered to be an effective way to achieve
productivity and make the industry more interactive. To move forward in
construction technology, the Malaysian government has to encourage the use of interlocking-block
systems (LBM technology), which is under the Industrialized Building System
category in construction. LBM technology is an alternative method with benefits
in terms of quality, cost-effectiveness, productivity, and waste reduction.
To accelerate the adoption of LBM technology,
the success factors need to be identified. The challenges of LBM-technology
implementation must also be identified to overcome problems and improve the
adoption of this technology in the future. The results of this case study indicate
eight success factors: organizational resources, good team collaboration,
easier methodologies, skilled labor, continuous improvement of knowledge, good
work coordination, improved construction efficiency, and environmentally friendly
construction methods. The results also point out three main challenges faced by
industry players: a lack of knowledge and expertise, lack of incentives, and a lack
of local demand. Further studies should be done to understand the success
factors and challenges of LBM-technology implementation for the improvement and
benefit of the construction industry.
The authors wish to thank the
Universiti Utara Malaysia for funding this study under Geran Penjanaan
Penyelidikan Skim (SO Code: 13910).
Adedeji, Y.M.D., 2012.
Sustainable Housing Provision: Preference for the Use of Interlocking Masonry in Housing Delivery in Nigeria. Architecture Research, Volume 2(5), pp.81–86
Abdullah, C.S., Zulhumadi, F.,
Othman, A.R., 2009. Load Bearing Masonry Construction System—Its Adoption by
the Construction Industry in Malaysia. Construction Research Journal,
Volume 4, pp. 25–39
Abdullah, C.S., Bahaudin,
A.Y., Mohd Nawi, M.N., Baluch, N.H., Kamaruddeen, A.M., Mohtar, S., Mohamed
Udin, Z., Zulhumadi, F., Abu Bakar, Z., 2015.
Implications of Technology Transfer in the Design and Construction of Load-bearing Masonry Buildings. Jurnal Teknologi, Volume 77 (5), pp. 127–134
Baharuddin, M.N., Bahardin,
N.F., Zaidi, M.A., Yusof, M.R., Lokman, I., 2015. Identification of Critical Factors and Difficulties
for Industrialised Building System (IBS) Formwork in Malaysian Construction
Industry–A Literature Review. In: The 2nd
International Conference on Science and Social Research (CSSR 2015), 5-6
October 2015, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
Baharuddin, M.N.,
Bahardin, N.F., Zaidi, M.A., Lokman, I., Nawi, M.N.M., 2016. A Barriers and
Challenging Criteria of IBS Formwork: A Current Scenario amongs Stakeholder. Revista Tecnica de
la Facultad de Ingenieria Universidad del Zulia, Volume 39(9),
pp.14–21
Ismail, F., Yusuwan, N.M.,
Baharuddin, H.E.A., 2012. Management Factors for Successful IBS Projects
Implementation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 68, pp. 99–107
Kamar, K.A.M., Hamid, Z.A., Alshawi, M., 2010. The Critical Success Factors (CSFs) to the Implementation of Industrialized Building System (IBS) in Malaysia. In: Proceedings: TG57-Special Track, 18th CIB World Building Congress, CIB, Rotterdam
Lessing, J., Stehn, L.,
Ekholm, A., 2005. Industrialised Housing: Definition and Categorization of the
Concept. In: Annual Conference of the International Group for
Lean Construction: 18/07/2005–21/07/2005, pp. 471–480
Majid, S., 1997. Loadbearing Brickwork Methods Offers Advantages. Business
Times, Publication
Date, Volume 13(1), p. 1997
Ramli, N.A., Abdullah, C.S., Nawi, M.N.M., 2014.
Definition and New Directions of IBS Load Bearing
Masonry (LBM) System in Construction Industry. Advances in
Environmental Biology, Volume 8(5), pp.1864–1868
Ramli, N.A., Abdullah, C.S.,
Nawi, M.N.M., 2016a. Factors Influence the Adoption of Load-bearing Masonry System: A Study
on Malaysia Housing Developer Firms. The Social Sciences, Volume 11(31),
pp. 7423–7427
Ramli, N.A., Abdullah, C.S.,
Nawi, M.N.M., Bahaudin,
A.Y., 2016b. Load-bearing Masonry System Adoption and Performance: A Case Study of Construction Company in a Developing Country. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. Volume 1761(1), p. 020091
Ramli, N.A., Abdullah, C.S., Nawi, M.N.M., 2017. Empirical
Study of the Perceived Ease of Use and Relative Advantage on Load-bearing Masonry (LBM) Technology Adoption. In: AIP
Conference Proceedings, Volume 1903(1), p. 030006
Shah Alam, S., 2009. Adoption
of Internet in Malaysian SMEs. Journal
of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Volume 16(2), pp. 240–255
Sharath, M.S.A.I., Vikas, V.V., Kumar, B.S.C., 2013.
Sustainable Construction
using Interlocking Bricks/blocks. International
Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Management, Volume 2, pp. 6–10
Thanoon, W.A., Peng, L.W.,
Kadir, M.R.A., Jaafar, M.S., Salit, M.S., 2003. The Experiences of Malaysia and Other Countries in Industrialised Building System. In: Proceeding of
International Conference on Industrialised Building Systems, September
2003, pp. 10–11
Yin, R.K., 2015. Qualitative
Research from Start to Finish. Guilford Press, New York