• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 10, No 4 (2019)

Nanocomposites Comprising Cellulose and Nanomagnetite as Heterogeneous Catalysts for the Synthesis of Biodiesel from Oleic Acid

Nanocomposites Comprising Cellulose and Nanomagnetite as Heterogeneous Catalysts for the Synthesis of Biodiesel from Oleic Acid

Title: Nanocomposites Comprising Cellulose and Nanomagnetite as Heterogeneous Catalysts for the Synthesis of Biodiesel from Oleic Acid
Helmiyati , Yossy Anggraini

Corresponding email:


Cite this article as:
Helmiyati., Anggraini, Y., 2019. Nanocomposites Comprising Cellulose and Nanomagnetite as Heterogeneous Catalysts for the Synthesis of Biodiesel from Oleic Acid. International Journal of Technology. Volume 10(4), pp. 798-807

1,388
Downloads
Helmiyati Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Yossy Anggraini Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract
Nanocomposites Comprising Cellulose and Nanomagnetite as Heterogeneous Catalysts for the Synthesis of Biodiesel from Oleic Acid

A nanocomposite comprising cellulose and nanomagnetite based on rice husk cellulose was used as the catalyst for the formation of methyl esters from oleic acid as an alternative method for biodiesel production. The resulting nanocomposite properties supported by FTIR, XRD, SEM and TEM characterization revealed that nanomagnetite Fe3O4 had impregnated the acetylated nanocellulose. The nanomagnetite Fe3O4 obtained had an average size of 30 nm. The best conversion of oleic acid to methyl esters for the catalytic application of the nanocomposite was 89.21%, which was achieved at a reaction temperature of 60°C, reaction time of 5 hours, catalyst concentration of 1.5 wt.%, and ratio of oleic acid to methanol of 3:1. Kinetic analysis at different temperatures (40, 50, 60 and 70°C) was performed, and a low activation energy of 16.56 kJ/mole was obtained. These results indicate that the biopolymer-based nanocomposite utilizing nanocellulose from rice husks composited with inorganic Fe3O4 nanoparticles has good potential for use as a green biocatalyst, and the proposed reaction can be used as an innovative new method to produce biodiesel in the future.

Catalyst; Cellulose; Magnetite; Methyl esters; Nanocomposite

Introduction

Biodiesel is an alternative fuel that can substitute for petroleum diesel fuel; it is produced through chemical reactions from triglyceride fatty acids that are not derived from petroleum. Compared to fossil fuels, biodiesel is a promising alternative due to its renewable properties, greenhouse gas reduction, biodegradable properties, nontoxicity, sulfur-free gas emissions and environmental friendliness (Veillette et al., 2017). Biodiesel functions in a similar way to petroleum diesel, but produces significantly less air pollution and is safe for the environment (Degife et al., 2015).

One method to produce biodiesel is by the esterification and transesterification reactions of fatty acids. Esterification and transesterification are important organic reactions between fatty acids or triglycerides and low-chain alcohols, which produce esters in the presence of a catalyst. The fatty acids and triglycerides that are used can be derived from vegetable oils or animal fats, such as free fatty acids (El-Nahas et al., 2017). Currently, biodiesel is produced commercially using homogeneous catalysts such as sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide as these strong acids or bases have high catalytic activity and low cost. However, the use of a homogeneous catalyst in the catalytic process of transesterification causes the reaction to become corrosive and will also produce acidic or basic waste from the homogeneous catalyst (Colombo et al., 2017).

Recently, the catalysts used have been replaced with more environmental friendly heterogeneous ones (Caetano et al., 2013; Mendonça et al., 2019). The catalysis process using heterogeneous catalysts is great interest because it has beneficial characteristics such as high selectivity, long catalyst life, easy recovery, repeatability, and temperature stability; the catalyst can also be easily separated from the reaction mixture (Climent et al., 2012; Santos et al., 2015). Among such heterogeneous catalysts, considerable research has been conducted using inorganic substances such as Fe3O4, CaO, Al2O3 and MgO. However, if the inorganic catalyst is not modified, it will have low thermal stability and solubility in water; for example, an unmodified Fe3O4 catalyst is reversible, causing an unstable reaction. Therefore, several studies have focused on developing procedures for nanocomposite synthesis using biopolymers as a support (Sabaqian et al., 2016). Biopolymers such as cellulose have the potential to be used as supporting substances in heterogeneous catalysis (Eyley et al., 2014; Arantes et al., 2017).

Cellulose is one of the most abundant and renewable natural polymers; approximately 1011-1012 tons per year can be obtained from plants and it has been widely studied worldwide in academic and industrial research (Ummartyotin & Manuspiya, 2015). It is a carbohydrate polymer consisting of repeating units of ?-D-glucopyranose, comprising three hydroxyl groups in each of its anhydro-d glucose units, meaning the cellulose molecule has great OH functionality (Lavoine et al., 2012). Cellulose can be converted into nanocellulose, which acts as a sustainable nanomaterial because of its availability, biodegradability and biocompatibility, because the materials produced from nanocellulose can be highly porous. Nanotechnology involving cellulose substrates has become a major focus of research because of the exceptional physical and chemical properties of nanocellulose. It has the potential to be used as an efficient support material because it can form bonds with several functional groups to produce heterogeneous catalysts based on biopolymers (Ummartyotin & Manuspiya, 2015; Jabasingh et al., 2016).

However, the larger the number of OH functional groups, the greater the number of inter-or intramolecular hydrogen bonds, making cellulose less attractive as a catalyst-supporting substance. This can be avoided by modifying the cellulose surface so that the number of active sites will increase and efficiency will be higher (Habibi, 2014; Fatona et al., 2018). Modification of the cellulose surface functionalization can be made by acetylation (Sun et al., 2016) or phosphorylation (Wanrosli et al., 2013), among other processes. Functionalized nanocellulose combined with inorganic nanoparticles can form superior nanocomposites (El-Nahas et al., 2017)

In this study, cellulose is derived from rice husks, which have a large cellulose content (Helmiyati et al., 2017). We converted the cellulose to nanocellulose by mechanical ball milling, whereas previous studies used chemical methods (Nahas et al., 2017), and then acetylated it with anhydrous acetate to functionalize the surface. Subsequently, the acetylated nanocellulose was impregnated with magnetite iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4) to form a nanocomposite. The aim of the study is to evaluate the catalytic efficiency of these cellulose-magnetite nanocomposites as applied to the synthesis of methyl ester biodiesel from oleic acid. The reaction kinetics of the methyl ester synthesis from oleic acid were studied by observing the unreacted oleic acid concentration, and in order to determine the activation energy value the effect of temperature on the reaction was observed.

Conclusion

A cellulose-nanomagnetite Fe3O4 nanocomposites was successfully synthesized, as evidenced by the FTIR, XRD, SEM and TEM characterization, which revealed that nanomagnetite Fe3O4 had impregnated the acetylated nanocellulose as the support material. Nanomagnetite Fe3O4 with an average size of 30 nm in the nanocomposites was obtained. The nanocellulose-Fe3O4 nanocomposites was applied as a catalyst for the synthesis of methyl esters from oleic acid. A molar ratio of methanol to oleic acid of 3:1, catalyst amount of 1.5 wt.%, reaction time of 5 hours and reaction temperature of 60°C were employed as the optimum reaction parameters, with a conversion yield of 89.21%. The type of methyl ester formed as the product of the GC-MS characterization was 9-octadecenoic acid methyl ester, with a relative molecular mass of 296.1 g/mol. In the kinetics study, a low activation energy of 16.56 kJ/mol was obtained. The synthesis of biopolymer cellulose-magnetite nanocomposites using nanocellulose from rice husks with Fe3O4 nanoparticles can therefore be used as an effective catalyst for biodiesel synthesis from fatty acids such as vegetable oil.

References

Arantes, A.C.C., Almeidaa, C.d.G., Dauzacker, L.C.L., Bianchia, M.l., Wood, D.F., Williams, T.G., William J. Orts, W.J., Tonolic, G.H.D., 2017. Renewable Hybrid Nanocatalyst from Magnetite and Cellulose for Treatment of Textile Effluents. Carbohydrate Polymers, Volume 163, pp. 101–107

Caetano, C.S., Caiado, M., Farinha, J., Fonseca, I.M., Ramos, A.M., Vital, J., Castanheiro, J.E., 2013. Esterification of Free Fatty Acids Over Chitosan with Sulfonic Acid Groups. Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 230, pp. 567–572

Cercado, A.P., Ballesteros, F.C., Capareda, S.C., 2018. Biodiesel from Three Microalgae Transesterification Processes using Different Homogenous Catalysts. International Journal of Technology, Volume 9(4), pp. 645–651

Climent, M.J., Corma, A., Iborra, S., 2012. Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalysts for Multicomponent Reactions. RSC Advances, Volume 2(1), pp. 16–58

Colombo, K., Ender, L., Barros. A.A.C., 2017. The Study of Biodiesel Production using CaO as a Heterogeneous Catalytic Reaction. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, Volume 26(2), pp. 341–349

Degife, W., Ashenafi, M., Thiyagarajan, R., Sahu, O., 2015. Extracted Biodiesel as Feed for Internal Combustion Engine. Journal of Mechanical Design and Vibration, Volume 3(1), pp. 1–7

El-Nahas, A.M., Salaheldin, T.A., Zaki, T., El-Maghrabi, H.H., Marie, A.M., Morsy, S.M., Allam, N.K., 2017. Functionalized Cellulose-magnetite Nanocomposite Catalysts for Efficient Biodiesel Production. The Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 322, pp. 67–180

Eyley, S., Thielemans, W., 2014. Surface Modification of Cellulose Nanocrystals. Nanoscale, Volume 6, pp. 7764–7779

Fatona, A., Berry, R.M., Brook, M.A., Moran-Mirabal, J.M., 2018. Versatile Surface Modification of Cellulose Fibers and Cellulose Nanocrystals through Modular Triazinyl Chemistry. Chemistry of Materials, Volume 30(7), pp. 2424?2435

Feyzi, M., Shahbazi, Z., 2016. Preparation, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies of Al–Sr Nanocatalysts for Biodiesel Production. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, Volume 71, pp. 145–155

Habibi, Y., 2014. Key Advances in the Chemical Modification of Nanocelluloses. Chemical Society Reviews, Volume 43(5), pp. 1519–1542

Hebbar, H.R.H., Math, M.C., Yatish, K.V., 2018.  Optimization and Kinetic Study of CaO Nano-particles Catalysed Biodiesel Production from Bombax Ceiba Oil. Energy, Volume 143, pp. 25–38

Helmiyati., Saefumillah, A., Yulianti, W., 2014. Synthesis and Swelling Kinetics of Superabsorbent Rice Straw Cellulose Graft Copolymers.  Asian Journal of Chemistry, Volume 26(21), pp. 7337–7342

Helmiyati., Abbas, G.H., Kurniawan, S., 2017. Superabsorbent Nanocomposite Synthesis of Cellulose from Rice Husk Grafted Poly (Acrylate Acidco-Acrylamide)/Bentonite. In: Journal of Physics, IOP Conference, Materials Science and Engineering, Volume 188(1)

Hidayat, A., Mukti, N.I.F., Handoko, B., Sutrisno, B., 2018. Biodiesel Production from Rice Bran Oil over Modified Natural Zeolite Catalyst. International Journal of Technology, Volume 9(2), pp. 400–411

Jabasingh, S.A., Lalith, D., Prabhub, M.A., Yimam, A., Zewdu, T., 2016. Catalytic Conversion of Sugarcane Bagasse to Cellulosic Ethanol: TiO2 Coupled Nanocellulose as an Effective Hydrolysis Enhancer. Carbohydrate Polymers, Volume 136, pp. 700–709

Lavoine, N., Desloges, I., Dufresne, A., Bras, J., 2012. Microfibrillated Cellulose - Its Barrier Properties and Applications in Cellulosic Materials: A Review. Carbohydrate Polymers, Volume 90(2), pp. 735–764

Mendonça, I.M., Orlando, A.R.L., Paes, O.A.R.L., Maia, J.S., Mayane, P.S., Almeida, R.A., Silva, C.C., Duvoisin, S., de Freitas, F.A., 2019. New Heterogeneous Catalyst for Biodiesel Production from Waste Tucumã Peels (Astrocaryum Aculeatum Meyer):  Parameter Soptimization Study. Renewable Energy, Volume 130, pp. 103–110

Sabaqian, S., Nemati, F., Heravi, M.M., Nahzomi, H.T., 2016. Copper(I) Iodide Supported on Modified Cellulose?based Nano?Magnetite Composite as a Biodegradable Catalyst for the Synthesis of 1,2,3?Triazoles.  Applied Organometallic Chemistry, Volume 31(8), pp. 1–12

Santos, E.M., Teixeira, A.P.C., da Silva, F.G., Cibaka, T.E., M.H., Araujo, M.H., Oliveira, W.X.C., Medeiros, F., Brasil, A.N., de Oliveira, L.S., Lago, R.M., 2015. New Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Esterification of Fatty Acid Produced by Surface Aromatization/Sulfonation of Oilseed Cake. Fuel, Volume 150, pp. 408–414

Sun, S., Zhang, G., Ma, C., 2016. Preparation, Physicochemical Characterization and Application of Acetylated Lotus Rhizome Starches. Carbohydrate Polymers, Volume 135, pp. 10–17

Ummartyotin, S., Manuspiya, H., 2015. A Critical Review on Cellulose: From Fundamental to an Approach on Sensor Technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, Volume 41, pp. 402–412

Veillette, M., Giroir-Fendler, A., Faucheux, N., Heitz, M., 2017. Esterification of Free Fatty Acids with Methanol to Biodiesel using Heterogeneous Catalysts: From Model Acid Oil to Microalgae Lipids. Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 308, pp. 101–109

Wanrosli, W.D., Zainuddin, Z., Ong, P., Rohaizu, R., 2013. Optimization of Cellulose Phosphate Synthesis from Oil Palm Lignocellulosics using Wavelet Neural Networks. Industrial Crops and Products, Volume 50, pp. 611–617

Zarei, S., Niad, M., Raanaei, H., 2017. The Removal of Mercury Ion Pollution by using Fe3O4-Nanocellulose: Synthesis, Characterizations and DFT Studies. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volume 344, pp. 258–273