Published at : 29 Jan 2020
Volume : IJtech
Vol 11, No 1 (2020)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v11i1.2161
Muhammad Imron Rosyidi | Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang, Magelang, 56172, Indonesia |
Eko Muh Widodo | Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang, Magelang, 56172, Indonesia |
Tuessi Ari Purnomo | Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang, Magelang, 56172, Indonesia |
Muji Setiyo | Department of Automotive Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang, Magelang, 56172, Indonesia |
Djoko Wahyu Karmiadji | Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology, Tangerang Selatan, 15314, Indonesia |
The increasing number of transportation on demand (ToD) or online fleets
in Indonesia, as well as the rise in gasoline prices, is a concern for most
online fleet drivers. However, there is an opportunity to convert online fleets
from gasoline to Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) because LPG for vehicles is
available in several big cities in Indonesia at a relatively low price compared
to gasoline RON 90. Therefore, we present a feasibility simulation study for
converting online fleets from gasoline RON 90 to LPG using two scenarios, with
and without annual vehicle tax and inspection costs as scenario 1 and scenario
2, respectively. Simulation results with operational data suggest that investment
is feasible today. The net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR),
and payback period (PP) show promising values. The NPV
was IDR 35.52 and 41.14 million with an IRR of 7% and 8% for scenario 1 and
scenario 2, respectively. The PP was obtained at 14 and 13 months for scenario
1 and scenario 2, respectively. However, this investment
appears to be risky if there is a decrease in daily mileage and an increase in
LPG prices simultaneously
Converting to LPG; Feasibility analysis; Online fleet
In
North America and Europe, the phenomenon of transportation on demand (ToD) or
online fleets as well as car-sharing has been around for a long time, and was
reported more than 70 years ago (Shaheen and Cohen, 2012; Cuevas et al.,
2016). In the past 10
years, car-sharing has spread to five continents. Recently, the phenomenon of
car-sharing has influenced people to delay buying a new car (Hui et al., 2019).
In Indonesia, ToD was pioneered in 2010 by GO-JEK but only began to grow
substantially in 2015. Initially, GO-JEK was present in Jakarta as a motorcycle
transportation service and expanded widely, and then competed with GrabTaxi.
The rivalry between GO-JEK with GrabTaxi intensified when Uber entered the
market in 2014. By 2016, competition among the three companies (GO-JEK,
GrabTaxi, and Uber) was fierce. GrabTaxi changed its name to Grab and compete
with GO-JEK especially
Go-Car, but UBER stopped operating.
The
presence of ToD such as Grab and
Go-Car in urban areas has affected
mobility patterns. The benefits and risks of the presence of ToD have been
discussed in detail from various
perspectives, including economic, social, and policy (Natadjaja and Setyawan, 2016;
For example, Figure 1 shows ToD availability in three cities in Indonesia at midnight, when city buses does not operate.
Figure 1 Online Fleet Availability In Several Cities In
Central Java, Indonesia: (a) Yogyakarta Train Station; (b) Yogyakarta Airport; (c)
Semarang Intersection; and (d) Solo Train Station
In
early 2016, thousands of conventional fleet drivers demonstrated because their
income declined due to the presence of ToD. This incident appeared in all mass
and electronic media in Indonesia. Demonstrators demanded that vehicles used by
Uber, Grab, and Go-Car be tested and inspected by the Department of
Transportation as under the regulations for taxis and other public fleets.
Demonstrators also demanded that ToD be owned by a legal entity or cooperative
to limit the number of the fleet. By the end of 2016, some conventional taxies
that had previously opposed ToD changed their policy. Some now saw online
transportation services as an opportunity, and some joined existing ToD fleets.
Until the beginning of 2018, precise data about the number of online fleets
operating was not available. However, the Ministry of Transportation provided a
quota of 91,953 online fleet units operating in all cities in Indonesia (CNBC Indonesia, 2018).
As a result, due to the huge number of vehicles, since the end of 2016,
GO-JEK and Grab have come under pressure from their drivers because their
incomes have declined by 50%. Therefore, the registration
of new drivers is limited to maintaining supply and demand (Kusuma, 2018).
We validated this data by surveying ToD drivers in Yogyakarta. They experienced
a decrease in income with the increase in vehicles, especially those who worked
as full-time drivers. This phenomenon worsens when the government limits the
supply of subsidized fuel, which is gasoline RON 88 (Premium) sold by the
government for IDR 6,550. ToD drivers must purchase non-subsidized fuel such as
gasoline RON 90 and RON 92 at a higher price. At the time of writing, the price
of gasoline RON 90 was IDR 7,800 and RON 92 was IDR 8,900, 19% and 36% higher
than RON 88, respectively. On the other hand, there is the potential to replace
gasoline with LPG, which has a better environmental impact and lower prices
than gasoline, around IDR 5100 per liter equivalent to premium. In 2018, WLPGA
reported at least 136 types of LPG-fueled vehicles produced as Original
Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) (WLPGA, 2018). However, the
practice of replacing an existing fleet with a new fleet is not easy to
implement (Deendarlianto et al., 2017).
As an alternative, adding LPG converter kits to the existing fleet is a
reasonable solution so that vehicles can operate with LPG.
We chose LPG because it is available at fuel stations in many major
cities in Indonesia (12 in Jakarta and its surroundings, 3 in Surabaya, 3 in
Denpasar, and 1 in Bandung, Semarang, Yogyakarta, and Magelang, respectively).
The cost of converting from conventional fuel to LPG is also lower than to
Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) due to the lower LPG pressure compared to CNG, so
the conversion equipment is cheaper. In addition, LPG has been shown to produce
lower emissions and has a high octane number that can be applied to
high-compression spark-ignition engines to get the best performance. The loss of
power in LPG engines can be increased by various methods to approach gasoline
engine power (Kaleli et al., 2015; Çinar et al., 2016; Suyabodha, 2017).
Based on the description of the problems related to online fleet driver
competition, fuel prices, and the benefits of LPG as an alternative fuel, we
present a techno-economic simulation of the use of LPG for ToD.
The
simulation study showed that investing the conversion of online fleet from
gasoline RON 90 to LPG is feasible today. This program will further assist car
owners if the government provides waivers or exempts owners from taxes and
inspection costs. The government can also promote loans with bank interest
rates below 1% per month or by giving free converter kits to online fleet
owners. Additional analysis showed this investment is resistant to daily
mileage reduction to less than 100 km and LPG price increases to 89% of RON 90
gasoline prices. However, these investments appear to be risky if there is a decrease
in daily mileage and an increase in the price of LPG simultaneously.
This
article is part of research funded by the Ministry of Research Technology and
Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia through the scheme of Penelitian Dasar Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi
(PDUPT). The researchers also thank the Center of Research Development and
Community Services of the Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang for their support.
Arifin, Z.N., Axhausen, K.W.,
2012. Investigating Commute Mode and Route Choice Variabilities in Jakarta using
Multi-day GPS Data. International Journal
of Technology, Volume 3(1), pp. 45–55
Arshad, A., 2012. Net Present
Value is better than Internal Rate of Return. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, Volume
4(8), pp. 211–219
Azzuhri, A.A., Mada, U.G.,
2018. A Creative, Innovative, and Solutive Transportation for Indonesia with
Its Setbacks and How to Tackle Them: A Case Study of the Phenomenal GOJEK. Review of Integrative Business and Economics
Research, Volume 7(1), pp. 59–67
Bank Indonesia, 2018. Indonesian Economic
and Financial Statistics-November 2018. Jakarta
Bank Indonesia, 2019. Data BI
7-Day Repo Rate - Bank Sentral Republik Indonesia. Available online at https://www.bi.go.id/,
Accessed on January 18, 2019
Biscoff, R., Akple, M.,
Turkson, R., Klomegah, W., 2012. Scenario of the Emerging Shift from Gasoline
to LPG Fuelled Cars in Ghana: A Case Study in Ho Municipality, Volta Region. Energy Policy, Volume 44(C), pp. 354–361
Çinar, C., Sahin, S., Can, Ö.,
Uyumaz. A., 2016. A Comparison of Performance and Exhaust Emissions with
Different Valve Lift Profiles Between Gasoline and LPG Fuels in a SI Engine. Applied Thermal Engineering, Volume 107,
pp. 1261–1268
CNBC Indonesia, 2018. Dibatasi 91.953 Taksi Online Unit, Ini Kuota
Setiap Kota (Online Taxis are Limited to 91,953 units, This is the Quota of
Each City). Available Online at https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/, Accessed on
January 10, 2019
Cuevas, V., Estrada, M.,
Salanova, J.M., 2016. Management of On-demand Transport Services in Urban
Contexts. Barcelona Case Study. Transportation
Research Procedia, Volume 13, pp. 155–165
Deendarlianto, Widyaparaga,
A., Sopha, B.M., Budiman, A., Mutohar, I., Setiawan, I.C., Lindasista, A.,
Soemardjito, J., Oka, K., 2017. Scenarios Analysis of Energy Mix for Road Transportation
Sector in Indonesia. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 70, pp. 13–23
European LPG Association, 2013. Autogas in Europe,
The Sustainable Alternative: An LPG Industry Roadmap. Brussels, Belgium: AEGPL
Hui, Y., Wang, Y., Sun, Q., Tang,
L., 2019. The Impact of Car-sharing on the Willingness to Postpone a Car
Purchase: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China. Journal
of Advanced Transportation, Volume 2019, pp. 1–11
Jung, J., Koo, Y., 2018.
Analyzing the Effects of Car Sharing Services on the Reduction of Greenhouse
Gas (GHG) Emissions. Sustainability,
Volume 10(2), pp. 1–17
Kaleli, A., Ceviz, M.A.,
Erenturk, K., 2015. Controlling Spark Timing for Consecutive Cycles to Reduce
the Cyclic Variations of SI Engines. Applied
Thermal Engineering, Volume 87, pp. 624–632
Karamangil, M.I., 2007.
Development of the Auto Gas and LPG-Powered Vehicle Sector in Turkey: A
Statistical Case Study of the Sector for Bursa. Energy Policy, Volume 35(1), pp. 640–649
Kusuma, H., 2018. Pendaftaran Sopir Taksi Online Disetop
karena Penghasilan Menurun (Online Taxi Driver Registration Stopped because
of Declining Income), DetikFinance. Available Online at
https://finance.detik.com/, Accessed on January 10, 2019
Leung, V., 2011. Slow
Diffusion of LPG Vehicles in China-lessons from Shanghai, Guangzhou and Hong
Kong. Energy Policy, Volume 39(6),
pp. 3720–3731
Liu, E., Yue, S.Y., Lee, J.,
1997. A Study on LPG as a Fuel for
Vehicles. Report RP05/96-97, Research and Library Services Division Legislative
Council Secretariat, 4th Floor, Central Government Offices (West
Wing), 11 Ice House Street, Central, Hong Kong
Natadjaja, L., Setyawan,
P.B., 2016. Creating Community through Design: The Case of Go-Jek Online. International Journal of Cultural and
Creative Industries, Volume 4(1), pp. 18–27
Nurhidayah, F., Alkarim, F.,
2017. Domination of Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) in Indonesia: An
Indonesian Case. International Journal of
Business, Economics and Law, Volume 12(3), pp. 11–20
Propane Education and Research Council, 2011a. Converting Vehicles to
Propane Autogas Part 1: Installing Fuel Tanks and Fuel Lines. Washington, D.C.
Propane Education and Research Council, 2011b. Converting Vehicles
to Propane Autogas Part 2: Installing Underhood Components. Washington, D.C.
Raslavi?ius, L., Keršys, A.,
Mockus, S., Keršiene, N., Starevi?ius, M., 2014. Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)
as a Medium-term Option in the Transition to Sustainable Fuels and Transport. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
Volume 32, pp. 513–525
Setiyo, M., Soeparman, S.,
Hamidi, N., Wahyudi, S., 2016. Techno-economic Analysis of Liquid Petroleum Gas
Fueled Vehicles as Public Transportation in Indonesia, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Volume 6, pp.
495–500
Shaheen, S.A., Cohen, A.P.,
2012. Carsharing and Personal Vehicle Services: Worldwide Market Developments
and Emerging Trends. International
Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Volume 7(1), pp. 5–34
Silalahi, S.L.B., Handayani,
P.W., Munajat, Q., 2017. Service Quality Analysis for Online Transportation
Services: Case Study of GO-JEK. Procedia
Computer Science, Volume 124, pp. 487–495
Suyabodha, A., 2017.
Comparison the Rate of Energy Consumption between Gasoline 95 and LPG in Spark
Ignition Engine under Real Driving Conditions. Energy Procedia, Volume 118, pp. 164–171
Wahyuningtyas, S.Y., 2016.
The Online Transportation Network in Indonesia: A Pendulum between the Sharing
Economy and Ex Ante Regulation. Competition
and Regulation in Network Industries, Volume 17(3–4), pp. 260–280
Widodo, E.M., Rosyidi, M.I.,
Purnomo, T.A., Setiyo, M., 2019. Converting Vehicle to LPG/Vigas: A Simple
Calculator to Assess Project Feasibility. Automotive
Experiences, Volume 2(2), pp. 34–40
World LPG Asociation (WLPGA), 2018. Autogas Vehicles
Catalogue 2018. Neuilly-sur-Seine: WLPGA
Žižlavský, O., 2014. Net
Present Value Approach: Method for Economic Assessment of Innovation Projects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,
Volume 156, pp. 506–512