• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 10, No 1 (2019)

Internationalization of Construction Enterprises: An Overview of Motivation

Internationalization of Construction Enterprises: An Overview of Motivation

Title: Internationalization of Construction Enterprises: An Overview of Motivation
Wahyudi Putra Utama, Albert PC Chan, Sesmiwati , Hafiz Zahoor Ahmad Khan, Rao Gan

Corresponding email:

Cite this article as:
Utama, W.P., Chan, A.P., Sesmiwati., Ahmad Khan, H.Z., Gan, R., 2019. Internationalization of Construction Enterprises: An Overview of Motivation. International Journal of Technology. Volume 10(1), pp. 36-46

Wahyudi Putra Utama Department of Quantity Surveying, Universitas Bung Hatta, Jl. Sumatra Ulak Karang, Padang 25133, Indonesia.
Albert PC Chan Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom Kowloon, Hong Kong
Sesmiwati Department of Quantity Surveying, Universitas Bung Hatta, Jl. Sumatra Ulak Karang, Padang 25133, Indonesia.
Hafiz Zahoor Ahmad Khan Department of Construction Engineering and Management, National University of Sciences and Technology, Risalpur Campus, Risalpur, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Rao Gan School of Management Science and Engineering, Central University of Finance and Economics, 39 South College Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
Email to Corresponding Author

Internationalization of Construction Enterprises: An Overview of Motivation

Since the 1970s, researchers have investigated the international expansion of construction enterprises (IECE) from diverse dimensional issues, including the motivation. Different underlying reasons have been identified; however, attempts to reach a consensus of the motivation for IECE have been overlooked. This research solicits and overviews the motivation of construction enterprises with respect to overseas business expansion. It recommends a conceptual framework of the generic motivation for IECE. Nineteen motives are specified and described in a systematic review of the literature on international construction studies. They are then structured into four categories: the source of motivation (internal or external); the pattern (traditional or emerging); the response (proactive or reactive); and the objective (profit, market, resource or opportunity). Further study of this field is equally important by involving the deterrent factors of motivation. Therefore, this paper advocates an investigation of the factors impeding IECE in further related studies.

Conceptual framework, Construction enterprise, Generic motivation, International expansion, Overview


Partly as a result of globalization factors, internationalization has become a global phenomenon for companies. The opportunity for construction companies to obtain projects from cross-national boundary markets has evolved. In terms of the rationale for entering foreign markets, business in the construction industry is not particularly different from other industries, such as manufacturing. Such an initiative can be driven by the same motivation as those found in other industries (Abdul-Aziz, 1994). However, different industries have different business orientations in addressing the needs for information when expanding their markets abroad (Wood & Goolsby, 1987)

Internationalization is a term defined as the expanding process of companies’ business activities through a progressive course of actions to expand their participation in international markets and perform cross-national boundary transactions (Ahmad & Kitchen, 2008; Maqsoom et al., 2014). The term encompasses the attributes of various strategies within a multifaceted and multiple dimensional setting (Buckley & Ghauri, 1999). Different enterprise internationalization studies have resulted in several theories and models, such as the eclectic paradigm (Dunning, 1980) and network theory (Johanson & Mattsson, 1988). 

Much evidence suggests that an international visionary company has several strategic motivation behind its desire to enter foreign markets. Internationalization is believed to increase profitability (Fatemi, 1984); to improve performance (Grant, 1987); to minimize insolvency (Shaked, 1986); and to improve investors’ risk-return opportunities (Logue, 1982). In addition, according to Contractor (2012), the needs for the internationalization of enterprises are also underpinned by eight concepts, namely economies of production; global amortization scope; sourcing of cheaper inputs abroad; accessing foreign knowledge; risk reduction advantages of geographical diversification; tax avoidance opportunities; and gaining international experience.

The existing knowledge in this field has been dominated mostly by the domain of general business and economics. Equally important as with other industries, studies of the motivation for the international expansion of construction enterprises (IECE) help to comprehend how such companies counter the rapid changes in the industry. In the context of the construction industry, several studies have been conducted to examine the internationalization of construction enterprises. For instance, using Dunning’s eclectic paradigm, Seymour (1987) and Cuervo and Pheng (2003) investigated construction firms in the UK and Singapore respectively. Oz (2001) adopted Porter’s Diamond model to examine the internationalization of Turkish companies, while Awil and Abdul-Aziz (2002) studied Malaysia contractors in international markets using stage growth theory. 

Although the investigations have substantially contributed to the promotion of the area of international construction business, very little attention has been devoted to understanding the reasons behind the expansion. To date, there has been no attempt to focus on soliciting and classifying expansion motivation in this context. This paper therefore examines the construction industry with a view to understanding the motivation of construction enterprises for expanding their business away from their domestic market. The paper aims to solicit and overview the motivation of construction enterprises with respect to overseas business expansion. Correspondingly, it intends to recommend a conceptual framework of studies on IECE for further investigation.


This paper set out to identify and propose a conceptual framework for the international expansion motivation of construction enterprises. A literature search was undertaken to establish the expansion of motives related to overseas construction business from peer-reviewed journals and other academic publications. Nineteen motives were identified and categorized. A conceptual framework was developed by clustering motivation into four aspects, namely source, response, pattern and objective. Although the paper is based on a small number of sources, the findings offer an important insight into the realm of international construction knowledge.

Each motive has a different level of importance, which depends on the internal and external environment of company. If it is hypothesized that expansion tends to be motivated by multiple reasons instead of a single motive, then the cumulative effect of each relevant motive constitutes the level of a company’s intention to penetrate foreign markets. However, the fact should be not ignored that every intention has certain negative factors, which may hinder a company from realizing its intentions. Therefore, a further hypothesis is that the level of expansion intention depends on the degree of company motivation for foreign market expansion, but affected by the factors hampering this motivation.

A limitation of the study lies in the fact that it did not take into account the obstacles to international expansion. It is hypothesized that there are various critical hindrance factors which impede strategic decisions. Empirical studies on these factors are limited, especially for developing countries. Further investigation to identify and measure the deterrent factors in the international expansion of construction enterprises is strongly recommended.


The study was funded by The Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia. The authors wish to thank Universitas Bung Hatta, Indonesia and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for their support.


Abdul-Aziz, A.R., 1994. Global Strategies: A Comparison between Japanese and American Construction Firms. Construction Management and Economics, Volume 12(6), pp. 473-484

Abdul-Aziz, A.R., Law, Y.H., 2012. Civil Engineering Consultants from Developing Countries: An Exploration of Malaysian Firms. International Journal of Construction Management, Volume 12(2), pp. 1-21

Abdul-Aziz, A.R., Wong, S.S., 2010. Exploring the Internationalization of Malaysian Contractors: The International Entrepreneurship Dimension. Construction Management and Economics, Volume 28(1), pp. 51-61

Abdul-Aziz, A.R., Nor Azmi, H.A.C., Law, Y.H., Pengiran, D.N., 2012. Internationalization of Construction-related Consultants: Impact of Age and Size. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 139(2), pp.148-155

Ahmad, S.Z., Kitchen, P.J., 2008. International Expansion Strategies of Malaysian Construction Firms: Entry Mode Choice and Motives for Investment. Problems and Perspectives in Management, Volume 6(3), pp. 15-23

Awil, A., Abdul-Aziz, A.R., 2002. International Markets: Malaysian Construction Contractors and the Stage Theory. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, Volume 2(1), pp. 94-106

Bartlett, C.A., Beamish, P.W., 2018. Transnational Management: Text, Readings, and Cases in Cross-Border Management.  Cambridge University Press

Buckley, P.J., Ghauri, P.N., 1999. The Internationalization of the Firm. Cengage Learning EMEA

Cattaneo, O., Engman, M., Saez, S., Stern, R. (Eds.), 2010. International Trade in Services: New Trends and Opportunities for Developing Countries. The World Bank

Chen, C., Orr, R., 2009. Chinese Contractors in Africa: Home Government Support, Coordination Mechanisms, and Market Entry Strategies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Volume 135(11), pp. 1201-1210

Contractor, F.J., 2012. Why do Multinational Firms Exist? A Theory Note about the Effect of Multinational Expansion on Performance and Recent Methodological Critiques. Global Strategy Journal, Volume 2(4), pp. 318-331

Crosthwaite, D., 1998. The Internationalization of British Construction Companies 1990-96: An Empirical Analysis. Construction Management and Economics, Volume 16(4), pp. 389-395

Cuervo, J.C., Pheng, L.S., 2003. Ownership Advantages/Disadvantages of Singapore Transnational Construction Corporations. Construction Management & Economics, Volume 21(1), pp. 81-94

Czinkota, M.R., Rokainen, I.A., 2007. International Marketing. Ohio: Thomson, South Western

Dunning, J.H., 1980. Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Test. Journal of International Business Studies, Volume 11(1), pp. 9-31

Dunning, J.H., 2014. The Globalization of Business (Routledge Revivals): The Challenge of the 1990s. London, Routledge

Elo, S., Kyngäs, H., 2008. The Qualitative Content Analysis Process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, Volume 62(1), pp. 107-115

Fatemi, A.M., 1984. Shareholder Benefits from Corporate International Diversification. Journal of Finance, Volume 39(5), pp. 1325-1344

Fellows, R.F., Liu, A.M., 2008. Research Methods for Construction. 3rd ed. Chichester, Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Giritli, H., Sozen, Z., Flanagan, R., Lansley, P., 1990. International Contracting: A Turkish Perspective. Construction Management and Economics, Volume 8(4), pp. 415-430

Glass, G.V., 1976. Primary, Secondary, and Meta-analysis of Research. Educational Researcher, Volume 5(10), pp. 3-8

Goswami, S., Sarkar, M., 2014. Achieving Sustainable Growth - The Biggest Challenge. Global Journal for Research Analysis, Volume 3(4), pp. 28-29

Grant, R.M., 1987. Multinationality and Performance among British Manufacturing Companies. Journal of International Business Studies, Volume 18(3), pp. 79-89

Griffin, R., 2010. Diversify, Diversify: Why Spreading the Risk is Key to Global Investment. Available Online at http://www.independent.co.uk/money/spend-save/diversify-diversify-why-spreading-the-risk-is-key-to-global-investment-2034116.html, Accessed on March 20, 2016

Gunhan, S., 2003. Foreign Market Entry Decision Model for Construction Companies. Doctoral Dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, US

Gunhan, S., Arditi, D., 2005. International Expansion Decision for Construction Companies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Volume 131(8), pp. 928-937

Han, S.H., Kim, D.Y., Kim, H., 2007. Predicting Profit Performance for Selecting Candidate International Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Volume 133(6), pp. 425-436

Isa, C.M., Adnan, H., Endut, I.R., Basrah, N., 2006. Malaysian Contractors? Opinions towards International Market Expansion. In: Proceedings of the International Conference in the Built Environment in the 21st Century (ICiBE 2006), pp. 287-297

Jarkas, A.M., Mubarak, S.A., Kadri, C.Y., 2014. Critical Factors Determining Bid/No Bid Decisions of Contractors in Qatar. Journal of Management in EngineeringVolume 30(4), pp. 05014007-1- 05014007-11

Johanson, J., Mattson, L.G., 1988. Internationalization in Industrial Systems - A Network Approach. Strategies in Global Competition, London: Croom Helm, pp. 287-314

Joshi, R.M., 2009. International Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Logue, D.E., 1982. An Experiment in International Diversification. Journal of Portfolio Management, Volume 9(1), pp. 22-27

Maqsoom, A., Charoenngam, C., Masood, R., Awais, M., 2014. Foreign Market Entry Considerations of Emerging Economy Firms: An Example of Pakistani Contractors. Procedia Engineering, Volume 77, pp. 222-228

Menzies, J.L., Orr, S.C., 2014. Internationalization to China: A Model for Australian Architectural, Engineering and Construction Firms. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, Volume 10(3), pp. 201-221

Mutti, C.D.N., Flanagan, R., 2008. International Construction and Brazilian Contractors’ Operations. Construction Information Quarterly, Volume 10(1), pp. 19-24

Neo, R.B., 1976. International Construction Contracting — A Critical Investigation into Certain Aspects of Financing, Capital Planning and Cash Flow Effects. Epping: Gower

Ofori, G., 2000. Globalization and Construction Industry Development: Research Opportunities. Construction Management & Economics, Volume 18(3), pp. 257-262

Ofori, G., 2003. Frameworks for Analysing International Construction. Construction Management and Economics, Volume 21(4), pp. 379-391

Oz, O., 2001. Sources of Competitive Advantage of Turkish Construction Companies in International Markets. Construction Management & Economics, Volume 19(2), pp. 135-144

Pandya, A.M., Rao, N.V., 1998. Diversification and Firm Performance: An Empirical Evaluation. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, Volume 11(2), pp. 67-81

Pheng, L.S., Hongbin, J., 2004. Estimation of International Construction Performance: Analysis at the Country Level. Construction Management & Economics, Volume 22(3), pp. 277-289

Quak, S.K., 1989. Cover Story: Seeking Niches in the International Construction Market. Construction Markets Digest, CIDB Singapore, pp. 2-11

Seymour, H., 1987. The Multinational Construction Industry, Routledge; First Edition edition

Shaked, I., 1986. Are Multinational Corporations Safer?. Journal of International Business Studies, Volume 17(1), pp. 83-106

Teo, E., Chan, S., Tan, P., 2007. Empirical Investigation into Factors Affecting Exporting Construction Services in SMEs in Singapore. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Volume 133(8), pp. 582-591

Utama, W.P., Chan, A.P., Gao, R., Zahoor, H., 2018. Making International Expansion Decision for Construction Enterprises with Multiple Criteria: A Literature Review Approach. International Journal of Construction Management, Volume 18(3), pp. 221-231

Wing, C.K., 1997. The Ranking of Construction Management Journals. Construction Management and Economics, Volume 15(4), pp. 387-398

Wood V.R., Goolsby J.R., 1987. Foreign Market Information Preferences of Established US Exporters. International Marketing Review, Volume 4(4), pp. 43-52