• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 6, No 5 (2015)

The Assessment of Feasibility and Effectiveness of Pedestrian Facilities

Dea Meirina Sari, Nahry , Heddy R. Agah

Corresponding email: dheyaa62@gmail.com

Published at : 30 Dec 2015
Volume : IJtech Vol 6, No 5 (2015)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v6i5.1843

Cite this article as:

Sari, D.M., NahryAgah, H.R., 2015. The Assessment of Feasibility and Effectiveness of Pedestrian Facilities. International Journal of Technology. Volume 6(5), pp. 770-779

Dea Meirina Sari Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Nahry Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Heddy R. Agah Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Email to Corresponding Author


Pedestrians are frequently perceived as one of the sources of traffic congestion due to their illegal occupancy of the roadway. The goal of this study is to examine this issue by investigating the feasibility of pedestrian facilities and the effectiveness of utilizing a pedestrian bridge at a certain congested area: the north-bound traffic in Jalan Lenteng Agung, Jakarta. The feasibility of a facility is represented by an indicator of the Level of Service (LOS), i.e. the space occupied by one pedestrian, and is supported by an assessment from the pedestrian’s point of view, using a questionnaire covering various aspects of the issue. The assessment of its geometric feasibility is also carried out, using the design specifications issued by the Directorate General of Bina Marga (1990) to strengthen the analysis. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of using a pedestrian bridge is represented by the ratio of pedestrian bridge users to the total number of people crossing the street. Data collection related to pedestrian flow is carried out using web cameras. The analysis shows that the LOS of all the segments of the pedestrian facilities ranges from LOS A to LOS C, in which LOS C represents the pedestrian bridge. LOS measures, supported by the geometric feasibility assessment results, signify that the facilities are not yet feasible; the speed of pedestrian flow needs to be increased using geometric improvement and the elimination of all disturbances throughout the facilities. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of using the pedestrian bridge is only 50.26% (meaning it is “quite useful”); the remaining percentage of pedestrians cross the road by navigating through the road traffic. The questionnaire results show that people are indeed aware of the importance of the safety issues related to bridge usage; however, they are reluctant to use it due to the physical barriers. The improvement generated from the analysis may help increase bridge use and its LOS, and eventually reduce the disturbance of vehicle flow.

Crossing bridge, Effectiveness, Feasibility, Level of service, Pedestrian


Alexander, C., 2010. A Pattern Language. Oxford University, Penyunt, New York, USA, pp. 33

Carr, S., 2009. Public Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Colin, H., 2000. Levels of Service for Pedestrian. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Journal, Volume 70(9), pp. 26

Dandan, T., Wei, W., Jian, L.,Yang, B., 2007. Reseach on Methods of Assessing Pedestrian Level of Service for Sidewalk Original. Journal of Transportation System Engineering and Information Technology, Volume 7(5), pp. 74–79

Dwihastati, M., Tjan, D.A., 2006. Study Crossing at Merdeka Street-Bandung. Thesis, Catholic University of Parahyangan, Bandung, Indonesia

Gehl, J., 2011. Life between Buildings. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA, pp. 5

Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 209, 1985. Transportation Research Boards. Washington, D.C., USA

Law of Republic Indonesia Number 22 Year 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation

Lei, K., Yingge, X., Mannering, F.L., 2013. Statistical Analysis of Pedestrian Perception of Sidewalk Level of Service in The Presence of Bicycle. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Volume 53, pp. 10–21

Munawar, A., 2005. The Basics of Transport Engineering. Beta Offset, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

O’Flaherty, C., 1997. Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering. Elsevier, New Delhi, India

Planning Instructions of Sidewalks, 1990. [Performance], The Directorate General of Bina Marga

SNI-03-2443-1991, 1991. About Sidewalks Specifications, [Performance], National Standardization

Sudaryono, 2012. Statistic and Probability. Andi Offset, Tangerang, Indonesia