• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 6, No 4 (2015)

An Analysis of Cognitive-based Design of Yogurt Product Packaging

An Analysis of Cognitive-based Design of Yogurt Product Packaging

Title: An Analysis of Cognitive-based Design of Yogurt Product Packaging
Amalia Suzianti, Stephanie Rengkung, Boy Nurtjahyo, Harun Al Rasyid

Corresponding email:

Published at : 27 Oct 2015
Volume : IJtech Vol 6, No 4 (2015)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v6i4.1105

Cite this article as:

Suzianti, A., Rengkung, S., Nurtjahyo, B., Rasyid, H.A., 2015. An Analysis of Cognitive-based Design of Yogurt Product Packaging. International Journal of Technology. Volume 6(4), pp. 659-669

Amalia Suzianti Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Stephanie Rengkung Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Boy Nurtjahyo Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Harun Al Rasyid Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Email to Corresponding Author

An Analysis of Cognitive-based Design of Yogurt Product Packaging

Product packaging is not only used as a product container, but also used as a means of marketing by companies, particularly by those involved in consumer goods. Yogurt products are predicted to experience expansion in the Indonesian market. In this study, the authors analyzed the implementation of cognitive-based design in developing yogurt product packaging to increase consumers’ willingness to buy the product. This study was divided into two phases: initial research and primary research. Initial research pursued six levels of color scheme and font factors and then narrowed down the results into the two best options that would later be combined with the primary research that analysed the shape factors. Research methods used in the initial study were the Eye-Tracking method and the ‘Retrospective-Think-Aloud’ (RTA) method. Preliminary results showed that ‘Fineliner’ and ‘Bodoni’ font type along with ‘Analogue’ and ‘Tetradic’ color schemes are judged to be the best combination and thus, these results would be combined in the main study with the shape factor. Conjoint Analysis methods were used in the main study. The main results of the research study showed a preference from Indonesian consumers for yogurt product packaging with the ‘Fineline’ font type with its rounded shape and an ‘Analogue’ color scheme.

Ergonomics, Product Packaging, Market Research, Eye Tracker, Retrospective Think Aloud, Conjoint Analysis, Dairy Product


Altaffer, P., Smith, G?W., 2012. Interesting Development in Indonesia. Nutraceuticalsworld

Auttarapong, D., 2012. Package Design Expert System based on Relation between Packaging and Perception of Customer. Procedia Engineering, Volume 32, pp. 307?314

Becker, L., Van Rompay, T.J., Schifferstein, H.N., Galetzka, M., 2011. Tough Package, Strong Taste: The Influence of Packaging Design on Taste Impressions and Product Evaluations. Food Quality and Preference, Volume 22(1), pp.17?23

Calver, G., 2004. What is Packaging Design? Rotovision

Chind, K., Sahachaisaeree, N., 2012. Purchasers’ Perception on Packaging Formal Design: A Comparative Case Study on Luxury Goods Merchandizing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 42, pp. 436?442

Cyr, D., Head, M., Larios, H., 2010. Colour Appeal in Website Design within and Across Cultures: A Multi?Method Evaluation. International Journal of Human?Computer Studies, Volume 68(1), pp.1?21

DeMaio, T.J., Rothgeb, J., Hess, J., 1998. Improving Survey Quality through Pretesting. In: Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, Volume 3, pp. 50?58

Estiri, M., Hasangholi, T., Yazdani, H., Nejad, H.J., Rayej, H., 2010. Food Products Consumer Behaviors: The Role of Packaging Elements. Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 10, pp. 535?543

Guan, Z., Lee, S., Cuddihy, E., Ramey, J., 2006. The Validity of the Stimulated Retrospective Think-Aloud Method as Measured by Eye Tracking. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1253?1262. ACM

Huber, J., 1987. Conjoint Analysis: How We Got Here and Where We Are. In: Proceedings of the Sawtooth Conference on Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis and Computer Interviewing, M. Metegrano (ed.) Ketchum: ID: Sawtooth Software, pp. 2?6

Kuvykaite, R., Dovaliene, A., Navickiene, L., 2009. Impact of Package Elements on Consumer’s Purchase Decision. Economics & Management, Volume 14(1), pp. 441?447

Market Indicator Report, 2010. Packaged Food Sales in Indonesia. International Markets Bureau. Canada

Najib, M., Kiminami, A., Yagi, H., 2011. Competitiveness of Indonesian Small and Medium Food Processing Industry: Does the Location Matter? International Journal of Business and Management, Volume 6(9), pp. 57

Park, J., Woods, E., DeLong, M., 2010. Quantification of Aesthetic Viewing using Eye-Tracking Technology: The Influence of Previous Training in Apparel Design. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye?Tracking Research & Applications, pp. 153?155

Park, T., Weliwita, A., 1999. Competitive Behavior in the US Food Retailing Industry. In: Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/ Revue Canadienne D'agroeconomie, Volume 47(1), pp. 45?55

Pieters, R., Warlop, L., 1999. Visual Attention during Brand Choice: The Impact of Time Pressure and Task Motivation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Volume 16(1), pp. 1?16

Plumhoff, J.E., Schirillo, J.A., 2009. Mondrian, Eye Movements, and the Oblique Effect. Perception, Volume 38(5), pp. 719

Rebollar, R., Lidón, I., Serrano, A., Martín, J., Fernández, M.J., 2012. Influence of Chewing Gum Packaging Design on Consumer Expectation and Willingness to Buy. An Analysis of Functional, Sensory and Experience Attributes. Food Quality and Preference, Volume 24(1), pp. 162?170

Reimann, M., Zaichkowsky, J., Neuhaus, C., Bender, T., Weber, B., 2010. Aesthetic Package Design: A Behavioral, Neural, and Psychological Investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, Volume 20(4), pp. 431?441

Ritnamkam, S., Sahachaisaeree, N., 2012. Package Design Determining Young Purchasers ‘Buying Decision: A Cosmetic Packaging Case Study on Gender Distinction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 38, pp. 373?379

Silayoi, P., Speece, M., 2004. Packaging and Purchase Decisions: An Exploratory Study on the Impact of Involvement Level and Time Pressure. British Food Journal, Volume 106(8), pp. 607?628

Tobii Technology AB, 2008. Eye Tracking as a Tool in Package and Shelf Testing. Available at: http://www.acuity-ets.com/downloads/package_and_shelf_testing.pdf

Wang, R.W.Y., Chou, M.C., 2010. Differentiation in the Arched Surface of Packaging: Its Influence on the Fundability. Displays, Volume 32(1), pp. 24-34

Westerman, S.J.; Sutherland, E. J.; Gardner, P. H.; Baig, N.; Critchley, C.; Hickey, C.; Zervos, Z., 2013. The Design of Consumer Packaging: Effects of Manipulations of Shape, Orientation, and Alignment of Graphical Forms on Consumers’ Assessments. In: Food Quality and Preference, 27(1), pp. 8?17