Comparison between Conventional and Azimuthing Podded Propulsion on Maneuvering of a Ferry utilizing Matlab Simulink Program
Corresponding email: andi_haris@yahoo.com
Published at : 29 Jul 2015
Volume : IJtech
Vol 6, No 3 (2015)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v6i3.709
Muhammad, A.H., Hasbullah, M., Djabbar, M.A., Handayani, 2015. Comparison between Conventional and Azimuthing Podded Propulsion on Maneuvering of a Ferry utilizing Matlab Simulink Program. International Journal of Technology. Volume 6(3), pp. 452-461
| Andi Haris Muhammad | Naval Architecture Departement Engineering Faculty Hasanuddin University Campus UNHAS, Tamalanrea 90245, Indonesia |
| Mansyur Hasbullah | Naval Architecture Departement Engineering Faculty Hasanuddin University Campus UNHAS, Tamalanrea 90245, Indonesia |
| Muhammad Alham Djabbar | Naval Architecture Departement Engineering Faculty Hasanuddin University Campus UNHAS, Tamalanrea 90245, Indonesia |
| Handayani | Naval Architecture Departement Engineering Faculty Hasanuddin University Campus UNHAS, Tamalanrea 90245, Indonesia |
The aim of the paper is to describe the influences of conventional and azimuthing podded propulsion on passenger ferry maneuvering, particularly turning circle and zig-zag maneuvers. The MATLAB-simulink program was used to simulate the turning circle and the zig-zag maneuvers. The program was developed based on the mathematical model for ferry maneuvering. The model involved the setting-up of a 4-DOF in a modular of the Mathematical Modelling Group (MMG) of the hull, propellers-rudder or pod system. The simulation includes separating components of the hull equations, propeller-rudder or pod systems as well as the interaction between them. The results indicated that the azimuthing podded propulsion has an advantage for turning circle performance, meanwhile conventional propulsion is beneficial for zig-zag maneuvers. The 1st and 2nd overshoot times of conventional propulsion of the sea trial are higher than the simulation; but the turning cirles of the sea trial are lower.
4-DOF, Ferry, Maneuvering, Podded, Simulation
Ayaz, Turan, O., Vassalos, D., 2005. Maneuvering and Seakeeping Aspects of Pod-driven Ships. Proceedings ImechE, Volume 219 Part M: J. Engineering for the Maritime Environment
Betancourt, M.K., 2003. A Comparison of Ship Maneuvering Characteristics for Rudders and Podded Propulsors. Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California.
Holtrop, J., Mennen, G.G.J., 1982. An Approximate Power Prediction Method. Journal of International Shipbuilding Progress, Volume 29, pp. 166-170
Holtrop, J.,1984. A Statistical Re-analysis of Resistance and Propulsion Data. Journal of International Shipbuilding Progress, Volume 31, pp. 272-276
IMO, 2002. Standards for Ship Maneuverability. Report of the Maritime Safety Committee on its Seventy-Sixth Session-Annex 6 (Resolution MSC.137(76)), London
Insel, M., Helvacioglu, I.H., 1997. Maneuverability Analysis of Double Ended Ferries in Preliminary Design. In: Eleventh Ship Control Systems Symposium, Southampton, UK, 1997, pp.127–141
Kemenhub, 2013. Transportation Statistics 2013, Book 2. Ministry for Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta
Kijima, K., Yasuaki, N., 2003. On the Prediction Method for Ship Maneuvering Characteristics, In: Proceeding of Marsim 2003, Japan
Kobayashi, H., Ishibashi, A., 1993. A Study on the Interaction among the Hull, Propeller and Rudder for the Ship with Twin-propeller Twin-rudder. The Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation, Volume 87, pp. 171-179
Maimun, A., Priyanto, A., Muhammad, A.H., Scully, C.C., Awal, Z.I., 2011. Maneuvering Prediction of Pusher Barge in Deep and Shallow Water. International Journal of Ocean Engineering, Volume 38(11–12), pp. 1277-1356
Maimun, A., Priyanto, A., Rahimuddin, Sian, A.Y., Awal, Z.I., Celement, C.S., Nurcholis, Waqiyuddin, M., 2011. A Mathematical Model on Maneuverability of a LNG Tanker in Vicinity of Bank in Restricted Water. International Journal of Safety Science, Volume 53, pages 34-44
Muhammad, A.H., Maimun, A., Priyanto, A., Yaakob, O., 2008. Effect of Spray-strake on Patrol Vessel Maneuverability. ASME 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Artic Engineering (OMAE 2008), Portugal
Molland, A.F., Turnock, S.R., Hudson, D.A., 2011. Ship Resistance and Propulsion: Practical Estimation of Ship Propulsive Power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Ogawa, A. Kansai, H., 1987. On the Mathematical Model of Maneuvering Motion of Ship. Journal of International Shipbuilding Progress, Volume 25(292), pp. 306-319
Stettler, J.W., Hover, F.S., Triantafyllou, M.S., 2004. Preliminary Results of Testing on the Dynamics of an Azimuthing Podded Propulsor Relating to Vehicle Maneuvering. Naval Engineering and Research Consortium, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Toxopeus, S., Loeff, G., 2002. Maneuvering Aspects of Fast Ships with Pods. In: Proceedings of 3rd International EuroConference on High-Performance Marine Vehicles HIPER'02, Bergen, 14-17 September 2002, pp 392-406
Viviani, M., Bonvino, C.P., Depascale, R., Conti, F., Soave, M., 2003. Identification of Hydrodynamic Coefficient from Standard Maneuveres for a Series of Twin-screw Ships’. Genova, Italy
Yoshimura, Y., 2001. Investigation into the Yaw-checking Ability in Ship Maneuverability Standard. In: Proceeding Prediction of Ship Maneuvering Performance, Tokyo, Japan
Yoshimura, Y., Ning, Ma., 2003. Maneuvering Prediction of Fishing Vessels. In: Proceeding of Marsim 2003, Japan
Yoshimura Y., 2010. Principle of the Effect of Roll Motion on Ship Maneuvering Dynamics. (In Japanese). In: Proceedings of the Conference of Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean. Japan