• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 4, No 3 (2013)

Intelligent Transport Systems-Technological, Economic, System Performance and Market Views

Intelligent Transport Systems-Technological, Economic, System Performance and Market Views

Title: Intelligent Transport Systems-Technological, Economic, System Performance and Market Views
Pekka Leviäkangas

Corresponding email:

Published at : 17 Jan 2014
Volume : IJtech Vol 4, No 3 (2013)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v4i3.133

Cite this article as:
Leviäkangas, P., 2013. Intelligent Transport Systems-Technological, Economic, System Performance and Market Views. International Journal of Technology. Volume 4(3), pp. 288-298

Pekka Leviäkangas Department of Industrial Engineering & Management, Faculty of Technology University of Oulu, PO Box 4610, FIN-90014, Finland
Email to Corresponding Author

Intelligent Transport Systems-Technological, Economic, System Performance and Market Views

This paper introduces a holistic view to intelligent transport systems (ITS) by providing four different perspectives: the technological, economic, system performance and market views. These perspectives are essential for a thorough understanding of ITS systems, which extend beyond traditional transportation engineering. ITS require management tools related to systems engineering (i.e. architectures); unique features are related to transport economics, and they differ from traditional transport engineering solutions. ITS technologies can improve transport system performance in numerous ways; furthermore, ITS is an important business segment for many technology companies and an industry by its own right. Different types of expertise and management are required for this meta-system, which is comparable to the entire transport system in terms of organisational objectives.

Benefits; Impacts, Management, System architecture; ITS, Transport


BCC Research, 2010. Intelligent Transport Systems Review. Available at http://www.bccresearch.com/report/2010-Intelligent-transportation-systems-trn001d.html, accessed in January 2012.

Crawley, E., de Weck, O., Eppinger, S., Magee, C., Moses, J., Seering, W., Schindall, J., Wallace, D., Whitney, D., 2004. The Influence of Architecture in Engineering Systems, Engineering Systems Monograph, p. 2, MIT.

Gleave, S.D., 2009. Evaluation of the Common Transport Policy (CTP) of the EU from 2000 to 2008 and Analysis of the Evolution and Structure of the European Transport Sector in the Context of the long-term Development of the CTP. D3—Final Report, August 2009.

Hautala, R., Leviäkangas, P., Mäkinen, P., 2003. Meriliikenteen Telematiikka-arkkitehtuuri. Esiselvitys [Maritime telematics architecture. Pre-study], Publications of Finnish Maritime Administration. In Finnish, English abstract.


ITS Denmark, 2012. 13 måder ITS kan reducere traengsel, forberede miljoet og redde menneskeliv [13 measures that can reduce congestion, improve environment and save lives]. In Danish only.

Kristensen, J.N.P., 2011. Why ITS needs PCP, P3ITS Webinar, ERTICO, 26 May 2011.

Kulmala, R., Schirokoff, A., 2009. Tieliikenteen hallinta 2015 [Road traffic management 2015], Finnish Road Administration Reports 42/2009, Helsinki. In Finnish only, English abstract.

Leviäkangas, P., 2011. Building Value in ITS Services by Analysing Information Service Supply Chains and Value Attributes. International Journal of Intelligent Transport Systems Research. Volume 9(2), pp. 47-54.

Leviäkangas, P., Haajanen, J., Alaruikka, A-M., 2007. Information Service Architecture for International Multi-modal Logistic Corridor. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transport

Systems, Volume 8(4), pp.

Leviäkangas, P., Hautala, R., 2009. Benefits and Value of Meteorological Information Services—the Case of the Finnish Meteorological Institute, Meteorological Applications, Volume 16, pp. 369-379, Royal Meteorological Society.

Leviäkangas, P., 2011. ITS in a Changing Climate—a Savior Tool or Another Vulnerable System? In: Proceedings of the 18th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems 16-20 Oct 2011, Orlando.

Leviäkangas, P., Lähesmaa, J., 1999. Profitability Comparison between ITS Investments and Traditional Investments in Infrastructure, Ministry of Transport and Communications Finland. Reports and memoranda B 24/99, Helsinki.

Leviäkangas, P., Lähesmaa, J., 2002. Profitability Evaluation of Intelligent Transport System Investments. ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, Volume 128(3), pp.

Leviäkangas, P., Lähesmaa, J., Oinas, J., Appel, K., Ruoti, K., 2000. Kansallinen liikennetelematiikan arkkitehtuuri-yhteenvetoraportti [The Finnish National System Architecture for Transport Telematics. Summary], The Ministry of Transport and Communications Finland. Reports and Memoranda B 1/2000. In Finnish, English abstract.

Natvig, M., Westerheim, H., Moseng, T.K., Vennesland, A., 2009. ARKTRANS—The Multimodal ITS Framework Architecture, Version 6, SINTEF Report A12001.

Sallman, D., Flanigan, E., Jeannotte, K., Hedden, C., Morallos, D., 2012. Operations Benefit/Cost Analysis Desk Reference, FHWA-HOP-12-028, Federal Highway Administration.

The Ministry of Transport and Communications Finland, 2013. The National Strategy Update for ITS—Draft, Unpublished results.

U.S. Department of Transportation and Caltrans, 2009. Systems Engineering Guidebook for Intelligent Transportation Systems.

Van Horne, J.C., Wachovwicz, J.M., 2001. Fundamentals of Financial Management, 11th edition, Prentice Hall.

Williams, B., 2008. Intelligent Transport System Standards, Archtech House Inc.

Yokota, T., Weiland, R.J., 2004. ITS System Architectures for Developing Countries, Technical Note 5, The World Bank.

Zulkarnain, Leviäkangas, P., 2012. The Size, Structure and Characteristics of Finland’s ITS Industry. Technology & Investment, Volume 3(3), pp. 158-167, Scientific Research