• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 9, No 1 (2018)

Evaluation of the Reservoir Yield and Hydropower Potential of the Doma Dam, Nasarawa State, North Central Nigeria

Evaluation of the Reservoir Yield and Hydropower Potential of the Doma Dam, Nasarawa State, North Central Nigeria

Title: Evaluation of the Reservoir Yield and Hydropower Potential of the Doma Dam, Nasarawa State, North Central Nigeria
Bolaji Fatai Sule, Tope Lacroix Adunkpe, Adebayo Wahab Salami

Corresponding email:

Published at : 27 Jan 2018
Volume : IJtech Vol 9, No 1 (2018)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i1.1194

Cite this article as:
Sule, B.F., Adunkpe, T.L., Salami, A.W., 2018. Evaluation of the Reservoir Yield and Hydropower Potential of the Doma Dam, Nasarawa State, North Central Nigeria. International Journal of Technology. Volume 9(1), pp.16-24

Bolaji Fatai Sule Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria
Tope Lacroix Adunkpe Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria
Adebayo Wahab Salami Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria
Email to Corresponding Author

Evaluation of the Reservoir Yield and Hydropower Potential of the Doma Dam, Nasarawa State, North Central Nigeria

Small hydropower has been found to have a positive effect on the quality of life of rural dwellers in numerous ways. It provides a wide range of services, such as improved lighting; energy for small industries, schools, computer and communication service centers, clinics, and entertainment centers; and operations of a range of domestic and light industrial appliances. Nigeria has many dams built for irrigation and water supply, but these may still have the potential for other uses. One such dam is the Doma dam in north central Nigeria. The dam has a live storage of 30 Mm3 and a yearly average inflow of 114 Mm3. This study is a hydrological investigation concerning the possibility of using the dam for power generation. An artificial neural network model, as automated in ALYUDA Forecaster XL, was used to extend the available streamflow record at the dam site. Thereafter, a reservoir yield–capacity analysis was carried out by maximizing the unknown releases subject to storage capacity constraints. The sequent peak algorithm was used to establish the real storage needed to meet the primary demands, including ecological releases and evaporation losses. The results showed that the maximum monthly yield from the reservoir is 6.56 Mm3, while the storage required to satisfy the dam’s primary functions is 12.07 Mm3. This means that there is 16.93 Mm3 of monthly excess stored water, or 6.53 m3/s, which can be used for other purposes, such as electricity generation. Considering 50%, 75%, and 100% usage of the excess stored water with a head of 20 m, the power potentials were found to be 0.51 MW, 0.77 MW, and 1.03 MW, respectively. It is expected that providing 2×500 kW Kaplan turbines to operate for 12 hours a day will deliver between 2.0 and 4.0 GWh of energy yearly to the immediate communities in the Doma local government area.

Dam; Hydropower potential; Primary demand, Reservoir yield, Sequent peak


The objective of this study is to evaluate the reservoir yield and hydropower potential of a multipurpose dam in north central Nigeria to improve power generation in the country through small-scale hydropower plants. It is estimated that only about 10% of rural dwellers and 40% of urban families have access to electricity, and they experience power supply shortages over 60% of the time (Kennedy-Darling et al., 2008; National Bureau of Statistics NBS, 2010). Due to the unstable power supply, many people rely on generators, making Nigeria the largest purchaser of standby electricity generators in the world (Braimoh & Okedeyi, 2010). Currently, Nigeria’s electricity generation capacity is 8,000 MW, while the actual generation is less than 3,000 MW due to an inadequate supply of gas to the power plants (BusinessDay, 2016). This is far short of  the estimated long-term power demand of 25 GW required to sustain economic growth and development (Adejumobi & Adebisi, 2011). The Nigerian National Committee of the World Energy Council has estimated that, for the Nigerian economy to grow at a rate of 10%, the country’s electricity requirement must reach 30,000 MW by 2020 and 78,000 MW by 2030 (BusinessDay, 2016). 

Presently, Nigeria has 16 power-generating plants, out of which, 3 are hydro and 13 are thermal. Nigeria has considerable potential hydro resources, exemplified by the large rivers, small rivers, and streams distributed all over the country (Okoro, 2006). Hydropower currently accounts for about 32% of the total installed commercial electric power capacity of 11,000 MW (Zarma, 2006). For many years, the hydroelectricity supply in Nigeria has come from the Kanji, Jebba, and Shiroro dams, which have capacities of 760 MW, 578.4 MW, and 600 MW, respectively (Sambo et al., 2009). Utilizing the hydropower potentials of the rivers in Nigeria will not only meet the country’s increasing energy demand, but also accelerate the development of these areas in terms of social infrastructures. An acceptable 60% of potential hydropower utilization in Nigeria will increase the power generation to around 12 GW, a figure that will make electric power stable in Nigeria and increase industrial activities in the country (Manohar & Adeyanju, 2009). 

In assessing the hydropower potential of the Kampe (Omi) river dam in Nigeria, Salami et al. (2010) developed an optimization model with the maximization of energy generation as the objective function, while the demand for irrigation, water supply, and ecological releases were considered as constraints. The model was solved with LINGO software for different mean annual inflow exceedance probabilities. Three options by which the hydropower plant could be retrofitted were considered, with the annual hydropower energy obtained for each option at different probabilities of exceedance. In the report, it was recommended that the live storage should be raised to 240 Mm3 by taking 20 Mm3 out of the flood storage space. This would increase the maximum monthly draft and hydropower generation potential of the Kampe multipurpose dam. In addition, Bilewu et al. (2009) assessed the possibility of retrofitting hydropower generation into the Asa water supply dam, Ilorin, Nigeria. The hydropower potential of the dam was evaluated using the sequent peak analysis to determine the storage–yield relationship of the reservoir, thereby ascertaining the available flow for power generation. In forecasting the monthly reservoir inflow, the Thomas–Fierring of first-order Markov model was used, and the synthetic monthly flow series was calculated using observed historical monthly stream flow sequences. The amount of hydropower potential available at the dam was estimated as 2.25 MW. 

The retrofitting of hydropower plants in existing dams, such as the Doma dam, could represent one way of solving local power needs, as water resources are renewable and allow the possibility of producing clean, cheap energy. However, it is essential to objectively evaluate the system potential and identify the best form of operation to avoid the conflicts that may arise when the available resources cannot meet the demands of all the users in a system. For the reasons discussed above, this study has selected the Doma reservoir in Nasarawa state, Nigeria, with the intent of evaluating the reservoir yield and its hydropower potential under its existing uses. The Doma dam is a multipurpose dam constructed off the Ohina River, a tributary of the Mada River in the Lower Benue Basin in north central region of Nigeria. It lies between a latitude of 8°19'42"N and a longitude of 8°18'59"E. The dam is under the jurisdiction of the Lower Benue River Basin Development Authority (LBRBDA). The primary purpose of the dam is to provide water for the irrigation of agricultural crops and the water supply. The dam provides a natural habitat for various aquatic lives, including fishes of many species. The dam was built in 1986, but at the time of this study (2015), it has not been put to full use. The Doma dam has a capacity of 37.5 Mm3 and can irrigate 1,000 ha of land, but only 250 ha of land is presently under irrigation. About 10 Mm3 of water annually is extracted from the dam and treated for the supply to the Doma community. The dam structure is an earth-filled dam with an altitude of 132 m above mean sea level, and it has a foundation at 105 m above sea level. The width at the foundation is 160 m, and at the crest, it is 18 m (Bawala, 2003; Yaro & Ebuga, 2013).

Experimental Methods


2.1. Reservoir Inflows

One of the most important hydrological variables in planning and design for hydropower generation is flow in the river of interest or the inflow to the reservoir where a dam exists. Gupta and Jethoo (2014) revealed that the water inflow in dams may not reach the expected inflow; hence, there is need for proper planning and management of available water. Salami et al. (2014) revealed downward trends exhibited by the runoff and water level in the Benue River sub-basin in Nigeria, which may stem from the effect of climate variability on hydrological variables. The reduction of runoff is an indication of the decrease in water resources in the sub-basin, and it can result in a low reservoir inflow to hydropower dams in the sub-basin. In the planning and management of the reservoir inflow, the record of average monthly inflows at the Doma dam, which is available for only 17 years (1990–2006), was collected. The data were extended to 2025 by modeling the inflow using ALYUDA forecaster XL. ALYUDA Forecaster is a Microsoft Excel forecasting add-in based on artificial neural networks (ANNs). The general concept of ANNs in reservoir inflow forecasting is that such networks can map the relationships between various factors affecting the inflow and the actual inflow. The network performance was evaluated on a test dataset, which was not used in the training process. The ANN model was trained with the first 14 years of inflow data (1990–2003), while the inflow data from the remaining 3 years (2004–2006) were used for the model testing and validation.

2.2. Reservoir Yield

The reservoir storage–yield function defines the minimum active storage capacity required to ensure a given constant release rate for a specified sequence of reservoir inflows. The reservoir yield capacity analysis is carried out to determine the smallest volume of storage required to meet the given demands with a pre specified reliability at the planning stage. Conversely, it can also be used to reassess the water demand that can be satisfied by an existing reservoir. Mass diagrams, sequent peak analyses, and optimization are three methods that can be used to define these functions (Loucks et al., 2005). An optimization model based on linear programming (LP) was used to define the reservoir storage yield function for the Doma reservoir. The LP developed to maximize the reservoir reliable yield Y obtainable from a given active storage capacity is as follows:

Objective function: Maximize Y (1)

The constraint on the balance of mass flow or continuity equation is written for each period t as

where the final reservoir storage volume is denoted as St+1, the initial reservoir storage volume is St, the known inflow is Qt, the unknown yield is Y, and Rt is the release, if any, in period t.

A second set of constraints ensures that the reservoir storage volumes St at the beginning of each period t are no greater than the active reservoir capacity K:

Only the inflow values Qt and reservoir active storage capacity K are known. All other storage, release, and yield variables are unknown. An LP software program called LINGO was used to find the variables’ optimal values for various assumed values of capacity K. 2.3. Water for Power

The water for power variable was determined using the sequent-peak algorithm to estimate the storage needed to meet the primary purposes of the dam, including ecological releases and evaporation losses. The data for the various components of water uses considered in the algorithm are presented in Table 1 (Salami et al., 2017).

This method is expected to give a reasonable idea of the available flow for power generation than the flow duration curve method, which is more suitable for an unregulated flow situation. Sequent-peak analysis is more appropriate for examining the feasibility, including power, at a multipurpose reservoir (Macaringue, 2009). The analysis assumes that the time interval includes the critical period, which is the time over which the flows have reached a minimum, causing the greater drawdown of the reservoir. The other assumption is that the total release over the time interval of analysis does not exceed the total reservoir inflow (Mays & Tung, 1992). To implement the equation, the reservoir is assumed to be initially full, that is, K0 = 0.

Algebraically, the sequent-peak method can be implemented recursively using the following equation:

Kt = Max (0, Kt–1 + Dt – Qt) (4)


: the time period

Kt : the required capacity at the beginning of period t

Qt : the total flow into the reservoir and it includes

: the required releases or demands in period t, and it includes the water supply demand, evaporation from reservoir, irrigation requirement, and ecological releases

Kt–: the storage in the previous period

Let K: Max (Kt) over all t; then, K* is the required active storage capacity of the reservoir. It is the minimum required capacity of the reservoir for a given sequence of inflows to meet a given sequence of demands. Part of the excess storage can be used to generate electricity

2.4. Potential Power

Power generation from water depends on a combination of head and flow. The available head is the difference between the live storage elevation and dead storage elevation. In the case of the Doma dam, this is calculated as 132.0–116.3 = 15.7 m above sea level. From the topography of the site, it is possible to locate a power plant at a point about 5 m lower than the dead storage elevation; the additional head will bring the total head to about 20 m. Based on the net head at which the turbine will operate, it will be a low-head turbine. A Kaplan turbine is appropriate in this case. Typically, the efficiencies achieved for turbines are in the order of 90% (Dandekar & Sharma, 2005; Mohammed & Rasim, 2012). The plant generating efficiency defines the plant’s overall operation effectiveness in converting the energy of the falling water into electricity. It is the product of the turbine efficiency and generator efficiency; an average value of about 80% (Arora, 2014) is adopted in this study. The available power potential P in watts and annual energy E in kilowatt hours are given as presented in Equations 5 and 6, respectively:

P ? ?gQHe (5)

E ? ?gQHe(24?365) (6)

where Q is the discharge (m3/s), H is the net head (m), e is the overall plant efficiency, ? is the density of water (Kg/m3), and g is the acceleration due to gravity (m/s2).

Results and Discussion


3.1. Extension of Flow Record

The performance reports of the ANN model generated and presented in Figure 1 show the relationship between the ANN-forecasted and actual reservoir inflow for the reservoir. Figure 2 shows the scatter plots of the forecasted and actual runoff, while Figure 3 depicts the error deviation of the forecasting. The ANN model generated a positive relationship between the observed and modeled reservoir inflows, with a correlation coefficient (r) value of 0.85 and coefficient of determination (R2) value of 0.71. The comparison between the ANN forecasted and actual reservoir inflow data that were not used in training showed that the forecasts were closer to the observed reservoir inflow, with a maximum error of 2.8%. This showed that the network produced a good fit and can be used for subsequent prediction of reservoir inflow. 

3.2. Yield Function

The storage yield function for the Doma dam is presented in Table 3. The maximum monthly draft that can be withdrawn from the reservoir with a live storage of 30 Mm3 was found to be 6.56 Mm3. The corresponding value of possible total releases for live storages of 25 Mm3 and 35 Mm3 were determined to be about 5.73 Mm3 and 7.40 Mm3, respectively. The extra storage can be taken from the flood storage zone of the reservoir (when there is no tendency for the occurrence of flood) for hydropower generation.

3.3. Storage Requirement

The results of the sequent-peak analysis of storage required at the Doma dam to meet the specified obligations revealed a maximum storage of 12.07 Mm3, while the live storage capacity of the Doma reservoir is 30 Mm3. Considering a 50-year reservoir sedimentation, which is established as 3% of the active storage capacity (Bilewu et al., 2009), in case of changes in land use of the catchment, sediment accumulation in the reservoir will be approximately 1.0 Mm3. The balance of water after deducting all demands (water supply, irrigation, evaporation losses, ecological), including sediment storage, is now 16.93 Mm3, which can be expressed as 6.53 m3/s; this can be available for other possible uses of the extra water, including hydropower potential, at the Doma dam. 3.4. Potential Power

The extra water available for other uses is 6.53 m3/s. The potential power estimates based on 50%, 75%, and 100% use of the extra water for power generation are:

P50%Q = 9.81 × 3.27 × 20 × 0.8 = 512 kW

P75%Q = 9.81 × 4.90 × 20 × 0.8 = 768 kW

P100%Q = 9.81 × 6.53 × 20 × 0.8 = 1025 kW

Therefore, with 50%, 75%, and 100% of the available excess water in storage, between 0.5 MW and 1.0 MW of electricity can be generated. The initial cost of the potential power project is about US$1,750/kW (INFORSE, 2012); multiplied by 500 kW, this gives US$875,000 for a 0.5-MW plant to US$1,750,000 for a 1.0-MW plant. If the plant works for 12 hours a day, it will generate between 2.160 and 4.32 GWh yearly. Presently, in Nigeria, electricity consumers pay 4 cents (N13.00) per kWh. This translates to US$175,500–351,000 annually. Hence, it will be possible to recuperate any investment in this project in 5–7 years. The approach presented in this paper can be used for other reservoirs by following the steps presented in subsections 2.1 to 2.4.


In the hydrological context, this study assessed the technical viability of incorporating a hydropower scheme at the Doma dam. It was ascertained that the hydropower potential of the dam was 0.5–1.0 MW, depending on the percentage of the excess stored water assigned for power. A Kaplan turbine was selected based on the 20-m head and 6.53 m3/s discharge parameters. The total capital cost for the proposed project is estimated to be US$875,000–1,750,000, depending on the turbine capacity selected. The project is expected to deliver 2.16–4.32 GWh of energy per year. Thus, the study has established that the Doma dam has other potential uses beyond irrigation and water supply. It is hoped that the hydropower generated would enhance the quality of life of the people, as it could lead to poverty reduction, job creation, and the establishment of small-scale industries in the community.


The authors would like to thank the management of the Doma dam, Lower Benue River Basin Development Authority, Makurdi, Nigeria, for providing the data used in this study. The authors would also like to thank the Department of Civil Engineering, National Centre for Hydropower Research & Development (NACHRED) and Department of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering, University of Ilorin, for providing technical support.


Adejumobi, I.A., Adebisi, O.I., 2011. Equipment Selection for a Sustainable Small HydropowerScheme. Top Research Group Conference, Lome, Togo

Arora, K.R., 2014. Irrigation, Water Power and Water Resources Engineering.Standard     Publishers Distributors, Delhi, India

Bawala, A., 2003. Decentralized Energy Approach.Cogeneration & Distributed GenerationJournal, Volume 24, pp. 34–50

Bilewu. S.O., Salami, A.W., Sule, B.F.,Adeleke, O.O., Usman, A., 2009. RetrofittingAsa Water Supply Dam for Hydroelectric Power Generation. Technical Report No.6.  (ISBN: 978-978-915-0540). Editedand Published by National Centre for Hydropower Research andDevelopment,(NACHRED) University of Ilorin and Energy Commission of Nigeria. pp. 1–79

Braimoh, D.S., Okedeyi, A.S., 2010. Energy and Power Generation, Transmissionand  Distribution in Lagos State. Available online at http://cefolassaocoed.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=83&Itemid=88&limitstart=4on 15/06/2015

BusinessDay, 2016. Power Supply on Path ofRecord Lows in Africa’s Largest Economy.  BusinessDay Newspapers, August 2, 2016

Dandekar, M.M., Sharma, K.N., 2005. Water Power Engineering. VikasPublishing House PVT LTD, New Delhi, India

Gupta, N.K., Jethoo, A.S., 2014. DecliningTrend of Water Inflow in the Dam of Rajasthan State. International Journal of Technology, Volume 5(1), pp. 14–21

International Network for Sustainable Energy(INFORSE), 2012. Sustainable Energy News No. 75.

Kennedy-Darling, J., Hoyt, N., Murao, K.,Ross, A., 2008. The Energy Crisis ofNigeria: An Overview and Implications for the Future. University of Chicago

Loucks, D.P., Eelco, V.B., Stedinger, J.R.Jozef, P.M., Villars, M.T., 2005. WaterResources Systems Planning and Management. An Introduction to Methods, Modelsand Applications. United Nations Educational Scientific and CulturalOrganization (UNESCO), UNESCO Publishing, Paris

Macaringue, D., 2009. The Potential for Micro-hydro PowerPlants in Mozambique. Literature Review and Project Proposal. University of KwaZulu-Natal,Pietermaritzburg. Availableonline atwww.oalib.com/references/15637448 on 14/08/2014

Manohar, K., Adeyanju, A.A., 2009. HydroPower Energy Resources in Nigeria. Journalof Engineering and Applied Sciences, Volume 4(1), pp. 68–73

Mays, I.W., Tung, Y.K., 1992. Hydrosystems Engineering and Management.McGraw-Hill, New York

Mohammed, T.G., Rasim, A.K., 2012. Hydro Power, Energy Conservation.InTech. DOI: 10.5772/52269

National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), 2010. Annual Abstract of Statistics, 2010. Available online at http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/ on23/12/2014

Okoro, M.C., 2006. Rivers in Nigeria andCorresponding Hydro Potential. In:Proceedings of Conference on National Workshop on Capacity Building in SmallRiver Planning and Design for Isolated Off-Grid Electricity Generation. ChannelView Hotel, Calabar, 14th Nov. 2006, pp. 82–87

Salami, A.W., Sule, B.F., Lawal, K.M., 2010. PotentialHydroelectric Power Development at Kampe (Omi) River Dam, Kogi State, Nigeria. Technical Report No. 3. NationalCentre for Hydropower Research and Development, Energy Commission of Nigeria,pp. 1–130

Salami, A.W., Mohammed, A.A., Abdulmalik,Z.H., Olanlokun, O.K., 2014. Trend Analysis of Hydro-meteorological Variables using the Mann-Kendall TrendTest: Application to the Niger River and the Benue Sub-Basins in Nigeria. International Journal of Technology,Volume 5(2), pp. 100–110

Salami, A.W., Sule, B.F., Adunkpe, T.L.,Ayanshola, A.M., Bilewu, S.O., 2017. Evaluation of the Hydropower GenerationPotential of a Dam using Optimization Techniques: Application toDoma dam, Nassarawa, North Central Nigeria. SlovakJournal of Civil Engineering (SJCE), Volume 25(1), pp. 1–9

Sambo, A.S., Garba, B., Zarma, I.H., Gaji,M.M. 2009. Electricity Generation and thePresent Challenges in the Nigerian Power Sector. Energy Commission ofNigeria, Abuja, Nigeria

Yaro, O.O., Ebuga, E.A., 2013.An Assessment of the Development Potentials of Nasarawa State in Nigeria. International Journal of EnvironmentalScience, Toxicology and Food Technology, Volume 6(1), pp. 1–5 

Zarma, I.H., 2006. Hydropower Resources inNigeria. In: The 2nd Hydro Power for Today Conference, International Centre on Small Hydro Power (IC-SHP), Hangzhou,China. Availableonline at http://www.Unido.Org/Fileadmin/Import/52413_Mr._Ismaila_Haliru_Zarma.Pdf, Accessed on 2nd December 2014