• Vol 8, No 6 (2017)
  • Industrial Engineering

An Analysis of the Ergonomic Design of the Tactical Commander Console (Tacco) in the Virtual Environment of Medium-Range Twin-Engine Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA)

Billy Muhamad Iqbal, Armand Omar Moeis, Renalda Krissalam


Cite this article as:
Iqbal, B.M., Moeis, A.O., Krissalam, R., 2017. An Analysis of the Ergonomic Design of the Tactical Commander Console (Tacco) in the Virtual Environment of Medium-Range Twin-Engine Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA). International Journal of Technology. Volume 8(6), pp.1097-1107
162
Downloads
Billy Muhamad Iqbal Industrial Engineering Department, Universitas Indonesia
Armand Omar Moeis Industrial Engineering Department, Universitas Indonesia
Renalda Krissalam Industrial Engineering Department, Universitas Indonesia
Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract
image

This study was carried out to examine the ergonomic aspects of the design of the Tactical Commander Console (TACCO) in the virtual environment of medium-range twin-engine ? Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA). The analysis was conducted using Jack 6.0 software. The evaluation method used in this study is the Posture Evaluation Index (PEI) method that integrates the results of analysis from three methods: Lower Back Analysis (LBA), Ovako Working Posture Analysis (OWAS), and Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the actual design of TACCO and to identify the most ergonomic design configuration, which is reviewed according to the distance and tilt angle of the control panel and the height of the chair. The results of this study show that the optimal ergonomic design for TACCO is as follows: panel at a distance of 10 cm, tilt angle of 60?, and a chair height of 29.5 cm.

Ergonomic; PEI; Tactical Commander Console (TACCO); Virtual Environment

References

Batubara, H., Dharmastiti, R., 2017. Redesign of Liquid Aluminum Pouring Tool based on Participatory Ergonomics to Improve Productivity, Workload, and Musculoskeletal Disorders. International Journal of Technology, Volume 8(2), pp. 352–361?

Bridger, R.S., 2003. Introduction to Ergonomics. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group

Caputo, F., Di Gironimo, G., Marzano, A., 2006. Ergonomic Optimization of a Manufacturing System Work Cell in a Virtual Environment. Acta Polytechnica, Volume 46(5), pp. 21–27

Choobineh, A., Hosseini, M., Lahmi, M., Sharifian, S., Hosseini, A.H., 2004. Weaving Posture Analyzing System (WEPAS): Introduction and Validation. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Volume 34, pp. 139–147

Chuan, T.K., Hartono, M., Kumar, N., 2010. Anthropometry of the Singaporean and Indonesian Populations. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Volume 40(6), pp. 757–766

Jung, E.S., Kee, D., 1996. A Man-machine Interface Model with Improved Visibility and Reach Functions. Computers Industrial Engineering, Volume 30(3), pp. 475–486

Kalawsky, R., 1993. The Science of Virtual Reality and Virtual Environments. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company

Rosario, J.L.P., 2014. Photographic Analysis of Human Posture: A Literature Review. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies, Volume 18(1), pp. 56–61

Sanders, S.M., McCormick, E.J., 1993. Human Factor in Engineering and Design. 7th ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill

Savino, M., Mazza, A., Battini, D., 2016. New Easy to Use Postural Assessment Method through Visual Management. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Volume 53, pp. 48–58