Published at : 29 Apr 2016
Volume : IJtech
Vol 7, No 4 (2016)
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v7i4.2677
Yusuf Latief | Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia Center for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Faculty of Engineering, Kamp |
Mohammed Ali Berawi | Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia Center for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Faculty of Engineering, Kamp |
Ayomi Dita Rarasati | Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia Center for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Faculty of Engineering, Kamp |
Leni Sagita Supriadi | Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia Center for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Faculty of Engineering, Kamp |
Abdur Rohim Boy Berawi | Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia Center for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Faculty of Engineering, Kamp |
Ineswari Syifa Hayuningtiyas | Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia Center for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Faculty of Engineering, Kamp |
The infrastructure of the
transportation system plays an important and strategic part in the development
of a country and serves to support economic progress by enabling the mobility
of citizens and the distribution of goods from one region to another. However,
communities have unequal access to the system and there are gaps in the
regional infrastructure in Indonesia, leading to the requirement for a mapping
of all 33 provincial capitals. In this study, we reviewed provisions for road,
sea, air, and rail travel. The mapping result is expected to determine the
pattern and the prioritization needed for future infrastructure development. A
literature review was performed to establish assessment indicators for the
mapping. The weighting of each indicator was based on a survey of stakeholders
in transportation sectors, which was then analyzed using the Analytical
Hierarchy Process. After weighting was completed, the infrastructure of each
provincial capital was assessed to determine ratings from the highest to the
lowest rank. Jakarta, Medan, Bandung, Surabaya, and Semarang obtained the
highest rankings, while Manokwari, Serang, Mamuju, Ternate, and Palangkaraya
were at the bottom. This result shows that provincial capitals in western
Indonesia had better assessment results than those in the east. Therefore,
improvements to the transportation infrastructure of the latter cities should
be prioritized.
Indonesia; Infrastructure; Provincial capitals; Rank; Transportation