• International Journal of Technology (IJTech)
  • Vol 10, No 6 (2019)

Life Cycle Cost Analysis of the Transit Oriented Development Concept in Indonesia

Life Cycle Cost Analysis of the Transit Oriented Development Concept in Indonesia

Title: Life Cycle Cost Analysis of the Transit Oriented Development Concept in Indonesia
Mohammed Berawi, Pradhana Listio Wicaksono, Gunawan , Perdana Miraj, Hamzah Abdul Rahman

Corresponding email:


Cite this article as:
Berawi, M., Wicaksono, P.L., Gunawan., Miraj, P., Rahman, H.A., 2019. Life Cycle Cost Analysis of the Transit-oriented Development Concept in Indonesia. International Journal of Technology. Volume 10(6), pp. 1184-1193

1,009
Downloads
Mohammed Berawi Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.
Pradhana Listio Wicaksono Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.
Gunawan Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.
Perdana Miraj Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.
Hamzah Abdul Rahman Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaya, Malaysia
Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract
Life Cycle Cost Analysis of the Transit Oriented Development Concept in Indonesia

In developing countries like Indonesia, cars are still the main means of transportation. This causes several problems in metropolitan cities, such as the increase in urban population, the volume of vehicles, air pollution, and traffic congestion. The development of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) on LRT is expected to increase public interest in using trains and reducing the numerous problems associated with the use of cars. However, LRT based on TOD development requires a huge financial investment. Therefore, a financial feasibility study is needed to determine the project was feasible or not. The initial and operation-maintenance costs were used as a case study, with the journal review utilized, where the amount needed to develop TOD in other places was analyzed. The methodology used to get the amount of revenue was the dynamic system. From this study, the initial cost of LRT and Property Development obtained were Rp28,291,200,000,000 and Rp23,617,623,459,802, while the Operation and Maintenance costs were Rp19,017,051,414,153 and Rp36,953,818,402,363 respectively. However the new revenue obtained from operating  LRT stations and properties are Rp41,109,405,822,615 and Rp150,524,288,553,165, with an  IRR value of 9.75%. The values below WACC of 11.01% indicate that the project is not financially feasible.

Financial; Internal rate of return; Net present value; Transit-oriented development

Introduction

The population of Indonesia increases yearly, and this has a significant impact on the need for an adequate transportation system, especially in the country’s more populated cities. In developing countries, cars are the main medium of transportation, and this causes several problems, such as urbanization and increases in the number of vehicles, more air pollution, and greater traffic congestion (Berawi et al., 2017).

In Indonesia, the transit-oriented development (TOD) associated with the Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Bekasi (Jabodebek) light rail transit (LRT) line is expected to increase public interest in using trains as a mode of commuting. TOD entails the development of a high-density area by integrating several mixed-use buildings around transit stations, with an emphasis on integration and accessibility. However, the problem associated with this method is that it requires a significant financial investment. Therefore, a financial feasibility study needs to conducted to determine if the project is feasible. This study investigated the financial aspects associated with initial, operational, and maintenance costs, in addition to the revenue obtained from the projects at Bekasi Timur Station, Cibubur Station, Ciracas Station, Jaticempaka Station, and from LRT development.  Hence, the financial feasibility of  the project was analyzed  based on the internal rate of return (IRR) value using the lifecycle cost (LCC) analysis.

The definition of TOD varies, depending on the way it is practiced in the different countries in which it is applied. According to Wey and Chiu (2013), TOD is defined as the integration of a city’s land use and public transportation system, allowing the city’s citizens to achieve their daily needs without having to rely on personal transportation. Its application in the development of Jabodebek LRT affords several benefits. It avoids the occurrence of urban sprawl by controlling population growth (Wey & Chiu, 2013), it reduces the use of personal transportation (Wey & Chiu, 2013), it reduces carbon emissions, which is one of the main causes of air pollution, thereby supporting the sustainability of the surrounding environment (Tiwari et al., 2011), and it supports the financial sustainability of several businesses due to numerous factors, such as improved accessibility because the development is based on surrounding transportation facilities (La Greca et al., 2011), increasing the value of real estate property near a transportation facility so the facility becomes a source of potential income for the government and can be used to cover construction and operational costs (World Resources Institute Ross Centre for Sustainable Cities, 2018).

In the field of economics, LCC analysis is used to evaluate the cost of a project associated with its purchase, own, operation, maintenance, and dispose of an object or process. Thus, LCC is a significant consideration in the decision-making process (Fuller & Stephen, 1996). The LCC analysis is conducted over the duration of the project, from its conceptual, design, development, and operational stages to the disposal stages (Blank & Tarquin, 2011). Factors to be considered in calculating LCC are economic age, interest rate, and inflation; toward that end, the initial cost, operational and maintenance costs, and revenue are the components of the analysis (Berawi et al., 2018a). After identifying the LCC components, IRR and net present value (NPV) are calculated to determine if the project is financially feasible. NPV is the difference between income and expenses, where the two components are discounted to the present value. IRR is a discount rate that produces an NPV equal to zero.

 


Conclusion

By performing an LCC analysis of the development project for the Jabodebek LRT based on TOD, the total of the initial cost is 57 trillion rupiahs. Furthermore, a total of the project’s operational and maintenance costs are 152 trillion rupiahs and its revenue was found to be 562 trillion rupiahs for 40 years. Based on the results of the LCC analysis, IRR of the Jabodebek LRT project based on TOD is 9.75% and a total of NPV is 190 trillion rupiahs.

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by research grants from the Ministry of Research and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia (Kemristekdikti) under grant no NKB-1784/UN2.R3.1/HKP.05.00/2019.

References

Agung Podomoro Land Tbk., 2018. Annual Report 2017. Jakarta: PT. Agung Podomoro Land Tbk

Arcadis, 2018. Cost Construction Handbook Indonesia 2018. Arcadis Indonesia

Bank Indonesia., 2018. Indeks Harga Properti Komersial. Available Online at https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/survei/properti-komersial/Default.aspx

Berawi, M.A., Miraj, P., Berawi, A.R.B., Aghditya, R., 2017. Increasing Added Value for the New City of Walini through Infrastructure Project Development. International Journal of Technology, Volume 8(6), pp. 11411149

Berawi, M.A., Nabila, A., Gunawan., Miraj, P., Rahman, H.A., Berawi, A.R.B., 2018a. Analysis of Life Cycle Cost and Public-private Partnership in the Development of Walini City as Technology Park. International Journal of Technology, Volume 9(7), 14691479

Berawi, M. A., Suwartha, N., Kurnia, K., Gunawan., Miraj, P., Berawi, A.R.B., 2018b. Forecasting the Land Value around Commuter Rail Stations using Hedonic Price Modeling. International Journal of Technology, Volume 9(7), pp. 13291337

Berawi, M.A., Ibrahim, B.A., Gunawan., Miraj, P., 2019. Developing a Conceptual Design of Transit-oriented Development to Improve Urban Land use Planning. Journal of Design and Built Environment, Volume 19(1), pp. 4048

Blank, L., Tarquin, A., 2011. Engineering Economy, 7th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education

Chiara, J., Callender, J., 1983. Time Saver Standards for Building Types, 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill

Colliers International., 2018. Jakarta Property Market Report Q1 2018. Jakarta: Colliers International

Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya, 2007. Pedoman Teknis Pembangunan Bangungan Gedung Negara. Jakarta: Departemen Pemukiman dan Prasaranan Wilayah

Fuller, S.K.P., Stephen, R., 1996. Life Cycle Costing Manual for the Federal Energy Management Program. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology

Guo, Z., Wu, T., Englehardt, J.D., 2013. Review of Cost versus Scale: Water and Wastewater Treatment and Reuse Processes. Water Science and Technology, Volume 69(2), pp. 223224

Ibrahim, B.E., 2018. Pengembangan Konseptual TOD untuk LRT Jabodebek dengan Pendekatan VE. Master’s thesis, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia

Badan Pusat Statistik, 2018. Indeks Kemahalan Konstruksi 2018. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik

La Greca, P., Barbarossa, L., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Martinico, F., 2011. The Density Dilemma. A proposal for Introducing Smart Growth Principles in a Sprawling Settlement within Catania Metropolitan Area. Cities, Volume 28(6), pp. 527535

Litman, T.A., 2011. Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis Techniques, Estimates and Implications, Second Edition. Victoria Transport Policy Institute

Marlina, E., 2008. Panduan Perancangan Bangunan Komersial. Yogyakarta: Andy

Maulanasari, A., Utomo, C., 2015. Analisa Pembiayaan Investasi Properti Perkantoran di Jakarta Selatan. Surabaya, Jurnal Teknik ITS, Volume 4(2), pp.C51-C55

MTR Corporation., 2018. MTR Corporation Annual Report 2018 Connecting Communities. Mass Transit Rapid Corporation Hongkong. Available Online at https://www.mtr.com.hk/archive/corporate/en/investor/annual2018/EMTRAR18.pdf

Neufert, E., Neufert, P., 2000. Architects Data Third Edition. Wiley-Blackwell

Poerbo, H., 1998. Tekno Ekonomi Bangunan Bertingkat Banyak: Dasar-Dasar Studi Kelayakan Proyek Perkantoran, Perhotelan, Rumah Sakit, Apartemen. Jakarta, Djambatan

Setyolelono, D., 2012. Investment Analysis on the Feasibility of Hartono Lifestyle Mall at Solo Baru. Bachelor thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

Strategic Planning Section City of Edmonto., 2009. Park and Ride - City of Edmonton

Tiwari, R., Cervero, R., Schipper, L., 2011. Driving CO2 Reduction by Integrating Transport and Urban Design Strategies. Cities, Volume 28(5), pp. 394405

Wey, W.M., Chiu, Y.H., 2013. Assessing the Walkability of Pedestrian Environment under the Transit-oriented Development. Habitat International, Volume 38, pp. 106118

World Resources Institute Ross Centre for Sustainable Cities., 2018. Available Online at wricitieshub: https://wricitieshub.org/sites/default/files/Module%205%20-%20Financing%20TOD%20Final.slides&notes.pdf

Zhang, M., Xu, T., 2017. Uncovering the Potential for Value Capture from Rail Transit Services. Journal of Urban Planning Development, Volume 143(3), pp. 113